H the K wrote:
jps wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:18:25 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Aug 7, 6:12 pm, Jim wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
We have found these pictures of vicious angry right wing mobs
attacking Obamacare supporters. One wonders how the Obamacare people
found the courage to stand up to these desperate thugs. If the right
wing continues to employ such terror tactics, Obama will have to call
out the National Guard to restore order.
http://thedanashow.wordpress.com/200.../meet-the-mob/
Anyone notice what I see? These guys are well into their Medicare
days.
What is it they are protesting?

The government won't be taking control over their Medicare, I promise.
And if any of them are driven by ideological principles, I'm sure they
could refuse Medicare and Social Security.

I think part of the plan is for people to not think closely that there
might be no one protesting that has no health insurance, and those who
do have government controlled health care without realizing it.

Good Republican protesters, protesting what?
jps has revealed the esence of Obamacare, we just shoot those people
with walkers, that'll save money. However, since jps has revealed the
true desire of lefties, to shoot anybody that disagrees with them, can
you blame the people for arming themselves? With this revelation from
jps, would you really expect htis to have a happy ending?

Yes, the more protesters killed by violent means the better. It's
time the left wing threatened violence against the ball-less assholes
who call themselves patriots.


Heheh...in the mid 1970's, probably 1975, I was a consultant to one of
the large international construction unions and went to its big
convention. About 5000 delegates. Anyway, the president was conducting
the meeting according to Roberts when a small group of protesters
"demanded" the floor. The president told them they'd have to proceed
according to Roberts, which he said probably wouldn't work because most
of the delegates would vote down any such motion, even if it were ruled
in order. But he did say the protesters could have the floor for a
half-hour after the upcoming lunch break.

That wasn't good enough. The protesters continued to disrupt the
meeting. The president asked them twice to stop. They didn't. The
president nodded to the sergeant-at-arms and the protesters were removed
forcibly from the hall by some of the biggest guys I have ever seen.

Works for me.

That's a nice way to treat your fellow union brothers and sisters. All
they wanted was to be heard and because the union bosses didn't want
them heard the union bosses had them forcibly removed. This speaks
volumes about how the unions operate and how they treat dissent of the
leadership's views.

The unions are no better than Castro and Chavez.