On Aug 2, 9:37*pm, Guru of Woodstock wrote:
If man evolved from monkeys and apes, why do we still have monkeys and
apes?

because we needed republicans?

wf3h wrote:
On Aug 2, 9:37 pm, Guru of Woodstock wrote:
If man evolved from monkeys and apes, why do we still have monkeys and
apes?

because we needed republicans?

I thought most modern-day Republicans were parented by jackals.
Live and learn.

On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 04:26:13 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 2, 9:37*pm, Guru of Woodstock wrote:
If man evolved from monkeys and apes, why do we still have monkeys and
apes?

because we needed republicans?

Glad to see you got into the spirit of the question. :)

Things have been too serious around here lately. :)

wf3h wrote:
On Aug 2, 9:37 pm, Guru of Woodstock wrote:
If man evolved from monkeys and apes, why do we still have monkeys and
apes?

because we needed republicans?

LOL, Very good

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 08:04:07 -0400, Just Regigie
wrote:

wf3h wrote:
On Aug 2, 9:37 pm, Guru of Woodstock wrote:
If man evolved from monkeys and apes, why do we still have monkeys and
apes?

because we needed republicans?

LOL, Very good

It was.

Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 08:04:07 -0400, Just Regigie
wrote:

wf3h wrote:
On Aug 2, 9:37 pm, Guru of Woodstock wrote:
If man evolved from monkeys and apes, why do we still have monkeys and
apes?
because we needed republicans?
LOL, Very good

It was.

It is nice to see a post with some wit.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects