http://js.polls.yahoo.com/quiz/quizi...?poll_id=46067

NOTE: After you vote, you will see a second page that shows the running
total and what the opinions are.

On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:52:40 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

http://js.polls.yahoo.com/quiz/quizi...?poll_id=46067

NOTE: After you vote, you will see a second page that shows the running
total and what the opinions are.

internet pols are bogus. Don't come close to representing valid cross
section of public.

Might as well put the pol on Fox News' website.

jps wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:52:40 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

http://js.polls.yahoo.com/quiz/quizi...?poll_id=46067

NOTE: After you vote, you will see a second page that shows the running
total and what the opinions are.

internet pols are bogus. Don't come close to representing valid cross
section of public.

Might as well put the pol on Fox News' website.

Didn't you get the note about the dangers of offering up facts to
simpletons like Lu?


--
Whatever moral rules you have proposed, abide by them as they were laws,
and as if you would be guilty of impiety by violating any of them,
*unless* you are a conservative Republican office holder or minister. If
that is your position in life, then anything goes.

"H the K" wrote in message
m...
jps wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:52:40 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

http://js.polls.yahoo.com/quiz/quizi...?poll_id=46067

NOTE: After you vote, you will see a second page that shows the running
total and what the opinions are.

internet pols are bogus. Don't come close to representing valid cross
section of public.

Might as well put the pol on Fox News' website.

Didn't you get the note about the dangers of offering up facts to
simpletons like Lu?


--
Whatever moral rules you have proposed, abide by them as they were laws,
and as if you would be guilty of impiety by violating any of them,
*unless* you are a conservative Republican office holder or minister. If
that is your position in life, then anything goes.


WAFA

On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:44:21 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:


"H the K" wrote in message
om...
jps wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:52:40 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

http://js.polls.yahoo.com/quiz/quizi...?poll_id=46067

NOTE: After you vote, you will see a second page that shows the running
total and what the opinions are.

internet pols are bogus. Don't come close to representing valid cross
section of public.

Might as well put the pol on Fox News' website.

Didn't you get the note about the dangers of offering up facts to
simpletons like Lu?


--
Whatever moral rules you have proposed, abide by them as they were laws,
and as if you would be guilty of impiety by violating any of them,
*unless* you are a conservative Republican office holder or minister. If
that is your position in life, then anything goes.


WAFA

Brilliant retort, my man! Brilliant!

jps wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:44:21 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

"H the K" wrote in message
m...
jps wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:52:40 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

http://js.polls.yahoo.com/quiz/quizi...?poll_id=46067

NOTE: After you vote, you will see a second page that shows the running
total and what the opinions are.
internet pols are bogus. Don't come close to representing valid cross
section of public.

Might as well put the pol on Fox News' website.
Didn't you get the note about the dangers of offering up facts to
simpletons like Lu?


--
Whatever moral rules you have proposed, abide by them as they were laws,
and as if you would be guilty of impiety by violating any of them,
*unless* you are a conservative Republican office holder or minister. If
that is your position in life, then anything goes.

WAFA

Brilliant retort, my man! Brilliant!

Yeah, it is ALMOST as good as "What a silly ****".

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

jps wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:44:21 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

"H the K" wrote in message
m...
jps wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:52:40 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

http://js.polls.yahoo.com/quiz/quizi...?poll_id=46067

NOTE: After you vote, you will see a second page that shows the running
total and what the opinions are.
internet pols are bogus. Don't come close to representing valid cross
section of public.

Might as well put the pol on Fox News' website.
Didn't you get the note about the dangers of offering up facts to
simpletons like Lu?


--
Whatever moral rules you have proposed, abide by them as they were laws,
and as if you would be guilty of impiety by violating any of them,
*unless* you are a conservative Republican office holder or minister. If
that is your position in life, then anything goes.

WAFA

Brilliant retort, my man! Brilliant!


Don't encourage him; he's just post another sixth-grader joke he
overhead in the copshop locker room.


--
Whatever moral rules you have proposed, abide by them as they were laws,
and as if you would be guilty of impiety by violating any of them,
*unless* you are a conservative Republican office holder or minister. If
that is your position in life, then anything goes.

jps wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:44:21 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

"H the K" wrote in message
m...
jps wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:52:40 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

http://js.polls.yahoo.com/quiz/quizi...?poll_id=46067

NOTE: After you vote, you will see a second page that shows the running
total and what the opinions are.
internet pols are bogus. Don't come close to representing valid cross
section of public.

Might as well put the pol on Fox News' website.
Didn't you get the note about the dangers of offering up facts to
simpletons like Lu?


--
Whatever moral rules you have proposed, abide by them as they were laws,
and as if you would be guilty of impiety by violating any of them,
*unless* you are a conservative Republican office holder or minister. If
that is your position in life, then anything goes.

WAFA

Brilliant retort, my man! Brilliant!

Yes. Simple yet elegant.