"H the K" wrote in message
m...
Eisboch wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
m...

Eisboch wrote:

"H the K" wrote in message
m...

Eisboch wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:15:36 -0400, Just wait a frekin' minute!
wrote:


Like I said the professor is just another racist thug, this time
hopefully gets his ass handed to him.
So what if he is racist? Blacks can't be racist? I'd point out,
the
only reason Gates became a topic of conversation is because he is
black.
White men, mouthing off to cops, get arrested daily. It doesn't
make for
a national topic of conversation, but that's not racism, is it?
Do the arrested white men immediately claim racial profiling and
threaten to sue?
That's what made this a "racist" issue .... until some people woke
up.

Eisboch
Right...there's no racist profiling of blacks. Right. And Sarah Palin
is a rocket scientist.


Now, there's a "stupidity" statement if I ever heard one. Nobody ever
said there is no racist profiling of blacks. The question was did it
occur in this particular incident. Seems the facts say no.

Eisboch
"Seems"?

Based on what?

Police reports?

About the last thing anyone should believe is a report police prepare
commenting on the behavior of their fellow officers. It's not until they
are caught with their hands in the cookie jar that the higher ups in
police departments take any action, usually. There have been a few
exceptions, but...there's no shortage of corruption in many police
departments, and that corruption includes financial shenanigans,
doctoring evidence, withholding evidence, colluding with prosecutors,
brutality, framing innocent people, et cetera. Think otherwise? Just
look up "police corruption." The number of cases is endless.

When the police report on their own conduct, be very very skeptical.


You are so cute when you get frustrated.

Eisboch


Frustrated? With you? With the professor? With the Cambridge cops? You
have to be kidding.

Are you devolving into another sanctimonious, self-righteous right-winger?

It's a lousy path to follow.

Or are you in denial about police corruption...now that would be funny.
And so typically right wing.



I have never claimed anything other than the fact that in this particular
case, there was another side to the story and, as the facts have emerged, it
appears maybe was right.

You are the one extending that basic comment to now mean that I am another
sanctimonious, self-righteous righ-winger and in denial about police
corruption.

True to form Harry. You never change.
Your really are a form of predictable entertainment.

Eisboch