Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "H the K" wrote in message m... You also need to run a records check and insist upon a urine test. I wouldn't waste the time or money. Eisboch Sure...go ahead...hire someone with a criminal record who also abuses drugs. :) I've never done that. One thing nice about a small, privately held business is that you can hire who you want and, if necessary, fire who you want without going through an act of congress to do so. In my experience, I've either directly hired or at least approved the hiring of probably about 200 people between two companies. Of those, only 3 had to be terminated later. One was a perpetual trouble maker on the shop floor who constantly caused problems with others. One was caught seriously fudging expense reports and bragging about it to others in the company. The third was a thief. That's not a bad track record. Eisboch Actually, if you don't run tests and check backgrounds, you simply don't know if you've hired a druggie or a thief, do you? -- A wise Latina makes better decisions than a dumb elephant. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|