wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:35:10 -0400, H the K
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:57:36 -0400, H the K
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:34:24 -0400, H the K
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:08:46 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:18:04 -0500, penned
the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

refer to previous post for previously posted
3. E.g., "The induction problem forever haunts us. How many
instances of a class must be observed before one can be really sure?
Having experience two uncoordinated woman-drivers, am I justified in
making a generalization about woman-drivers? (For too many man, a
sampling of two seems to justify such a generalization. Women, of
course, never make this sort of error.)" James L. Christian,
Philosophy (HBJ College, 1998).

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
The short answer is far simpler: There are no Republican family values.
Solipsism suits you, you little nym-shifter you.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Better to be solipsistically exuberant than bogged down by the hypocrisy
of Republican "family values." I think Daedalus said that before taking
off from Crete. Maybe not.
Not. It was Leo Gorcey


I remember Leo and the rest of the boys from the 25-cent Saturday
matinees...George W. Bush took his place as the king of the malaprop.

Actually, I'm not quite that old. I remember watching the Bowery Boys
on saturday afternoon network television when I was a kid. To be
honest, and I mean no offense, your "solipsisticaly exuberant" phrase
brought Slip Mahoney to mind.



Well, of course, although I didn't have old Slip in mind, or, for that
matter, Daedalus.

wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:27:57 -0700, jps wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:17:32 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:57:36 -0400, H the K
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:34:24 -0400, H the K
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:08:46 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:18:04 -0500, penned
the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

refer to previous post for previously posted
3. E.g., "The induction problem forever haunts us. How many
instances of a class must be observed before one can be really sure?
Having experience two uncoordinated woman-drivers, am I justified in
making a generalization about woman-drivers? (For too many man, a
sampling of two seems to justify such a generalization. Women, of
course, never make this sort of error.)" James L. Christian,
Philosophy (HBJ College, 1998).

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
The short answer is far simpler: There are no Republican family values.
Solipsism suits you, you little nym-shifter you.



Better to be solipsistically exuberant than bogged down by the hypocrisy
of Republican "family values." I think Daedalus said that before taking
off from Crete. Maybe not.
Not. It was Leo Gorcey
Jesus Christ, take it to a men's room stall you two.

Spoken like an experienced politician.



We've gotten used to the mindless gutter badinage that's typically
tossed out by the righties here. Being accused of practicing solipsism,
well...that's at least a step higher on the ladder.

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:17:32 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:57:36 -0400, H the K
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:34:24 -0400, H the K
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:08:46 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:18:04 -0500, penned
the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

refer to previous post for previously posted
3. E.g., "The induction problem forever haunts us. How many
instances of a class must be observed before one can be really sure?
Having experience two uncoordinated woman-drivers, am I justified in
making a generalization about woman-drivers? (For too many man, a
sampling of two seems to justify such a generalization. Women, of
course, never make this sort of error.)" James L. Christian,
Philosophy (HBJ College, 1998).

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

The short answer is far simpler: There are no Republican family values.

Solipsism suits you, you little nym-shifter you.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access



Better to be solipsistically exuberant than bogged down by the hypocrisy
of Republican "family values." I think Daedalus said that before taking
off from Crete. Maybe not.

Not. It was Leo Gorcey

Another bite on an obvious troll.
--

John H

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:17:48 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:34:24 -0400, H the K
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:08:46 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:18:04 -0500, penned
the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

refer to previous post for previously posted

3. E.g., "The induction problem forever haunts us. How many
instances of a class must be observed before one can be really sure?
Having experience two uncoordinated woman-drivers, am I justified in
making a generalization about woman-drivers? (For too many man, a
sampling of two seems to justify such a generalization. Women, of
course, never make this sort of error.)" James L. Christian,
Philosophy (HBJ College, 1998).

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access


The short answer is far simpler: There are no Republican family values.

Solipsism suits you, you little nym-shifter you.

A bite on an obvious troll.
--

John H

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:22:20 -0400, H the K
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:27:57 -0700, jps wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:17:32 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:57:36 -0400, H the K
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:34:24 -0400, H the K
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:08:46 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:18:04 -0500, penned
the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

refer to previous post for previously posted
3. E.g., "The induction problem forever haunts us. How many
instances of a class must be observed before one can be really sure?
Having experience two uncoordinated woman-drivers, am I justified in
making a generalization about woman-drivers? (For too many man, a
sampling of two seems to justify such a generalization. Women, of
course, never make this sort of error.)" James L. Christian,
Philosophy (HBJ College, 1998).

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
The short answer is far simpler: There are no Republican family values.
Solipsism suits you, you little nym-shifter you.



Better to be solipsistically exuberant than bogged down by the hypocrisy
of Republican "family values." I think Daedalus said that before taking
off from Crete. Maybe not.
Not. It was Leo Gorcey
Jesus Christ, take it to a men's room stall you two.

Spoken like an experienced politician.



We've gotten used to the mindless gutter badinage that's typically
tossed out by the righties here. Being accused of practicing solipsism,
well...that's at least a step higher on the ladder.


It's the odd person that actually adopts solipsism as a viable
philosophy. But not far removed from solipsism, though, is the
insulating quality of the internet. Persons can trash each other face
to face in the newsgroups without fear of the social consequence. It's
a behavior that most would find unconscionable, or at the least
regrettable, in public. The behavior here is akin to road rage, where
drivers are insulated from each other by the personal universe of
their vehicle.

I've had some good, liberal friends over the years with whom I've had
some rather passionate political discussions. I generally haven't
agreed with the basic tenets of their respective political
philosophies; but, I've recognized that, for the most part, they were
(and are) decent persons.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:06:30 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:22:20 -0400, H the K
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:27:57 -0700, jps wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:17:32 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:57:36 -0400, H the K
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:34:24 -0400, H the K
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:08:46 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:18:04 -0500, penned
the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

refer to previous post for previously posted
3. E.g., "The induction problem forever haunts us. How many
instances of a class must be observed before one can be really sure?
Having experience two uncoordinated woman-drivers, am I justified in
making a generalization about woman-drivers? (For too many man, a
sampling of two seems to justify such a generalization. Women, of
course, never make this sort of error.)" James L. Christian,
Philosophy (HBJ College, 1998).

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
The short answer is far simpler: There are no Republican family values.
Solipsism suits you, you little nym-shifter you.



Better to be solipsistically exuberant than bogged down by the hypocrisy
of Republican "family values." I think Daedalus said that before taking
off from Crete. Maybe not.
Not. It was Leo Gorcey
Jesus Christ, take it to a men's room stall you two.

Spoken like an experienced politician.



We've gotten used to the mindless gutter badinage that's typically
tossed out by the righties here. Being accused of practicing solipsism,
well...that's at least a step higher on the ladder.


It's the odd person that actually adopts solipsism as a viable
philosophy. But not far removed from solipsism, though, is the
insulating quality of the internet. Persons can trash each other face
to face in the newsgroups without fear of the social consequence. It's
a behavior that most would find unconscionable, or at the least
regrettable, in public. The behavior here is akin to road rage, where
drivers are insulated from each other by the personal universe of
their vehicle.

I've had some good, liberal friends over the years with whom I've had
some rather passionate political discussions. I generally haven't
agreed with the basic tenets of their respective political
philosophies; but, I've recognized that, for the most part, they were
(and are) decent persons.

There are a few decent liberals right here in the group. You happen to
be responding to the exception. Once he starts calling you names and
you see the light for what it is, you may be able to stop biting at
his obvious trolls.

--

John H

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:32:06 -0400, Just John Again
wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:06:30 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:22:20 -0400, H the K
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:27:57 -0700, jps wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:17:32 -0500, wrote:

snipped for brevity.

We've gotten used to the mindless gutter badinage that's typically
tossed out by the righties here. Being accused of practicing solipsism,
well...that's at least a step higher on the ladder.


It's the odd person that actually adopts solipsism as a viable
philosophy. But not far removed from solipsism, though, is the
insulating quality of the internet. Persons can trash each other face
to face in the newsgroups without fear of the social consequence. It's
a behavior that most would find unconscionable, or at the least
regrettable, in public. The behavior here is akin to road rage, where
drivers are insulated from each other by the personal universe of
their vehicle.

I've had some good, liberal friends over the years with whom I've had
some rather passionate political discussions. I generally haven't
agreed with the basic tenets of their respective political
philosophies; but, I've recognized that, for the most part, they were
(and are) decent persons.

There are a few decent liberals right here in the group. You happen to
be responding to the exception. Once he starts calling you names and
you see the light for what it is, you may be able to stop biting at
his obvious trolls.

The poster is free to comport himself however he or she wants. My
personal imperative is to try to comport myself in accordance with my
respect for common courtesy.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:06:30 -0500, wrote:



It's the odd person that actually adopts solipsism as a viable
philosophy.

Even odder to hear it mentioned outside ivory towers, or for anyone to
take it seriously as a philosophical construct outside of a classroom.
I'll go with a lit prof's intent when she accused me of solipsism.
"You're bullheaded." I took her chastisement to heart.

--Vic

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:54:21 -0500, wrote:

My
personal imperative is to try to comport myself in accordance with my
respect for common courtesy.

I hope it spreads.
--

John H

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:57:05 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:



My! Aren't we feeling sesquipedalian! Your entire response was
illogical gibberish.
(Argument By Prestigious Jargon and Argument By Bafflement)


Golly gee willkers, you have me on the sesquipedalian indictment. I
forgot my audience. I suppose I'll just have to counter with an
indictment of resorting to the esoteric tu quoque.

Regards

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access