"Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was
concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations
that we don’t want to have too many of."

Don't Google it - just guess.

It will amaze you.

Eugenics as policy - unbelievable.

Captain Zombie of Woodstock wrote:
"Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was
concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations
that we don’t want to have too many of."

Don't Google it - just guess.

It will amaze you.

Eugenics as policy - unbelievable.



Indeed, those of us who favored the Roe v. Wade decision thought the
right-wing troglodytes would take advantage of the greater availability
of abortion, and produce fewer baby knuckledraggers. Alas, our good
intentions were not enough.

Keep on trying, Tom. Your bait smells as bad as your buddy, ShortHate.

Captain Zombie of Woodstock wrote:
"Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was
concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations
that we don’t want to have too many of."

Don't Google it - just guess.

It will amaze you.

Eugenics as policy - unbelievable.

I was thinking Billary...

On Jul 9, 8:31*am, Captain Zombie of Woodstock
wrote:
"Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was
concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations
that we don’t want to have too many of."

Don't Google it - just guess.

It will amaze you.

Eugenics as policy - unbelievable.

Well, I remember something of that statement, and I'm not really sure
who but I think it was from someone on the Supreme Court, but not for
certain.