Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
jps jps is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,720
Default Marital Bliss

On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
. net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been ****ed away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing in it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.


And how much have we spent in Bosnia?


Too much!


You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.
  #32   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2009
Posts: 826
Default Marital Bliss


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini@4ax. com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
.net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been ****ed
away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing in
it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?


Too much!


You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.


Billions. And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with the
Bosnian war? If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?


  #33   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
jps jps is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,720
Default Marital Bliss

On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:32:32 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini@4ax .com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
t.net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been ****ed
away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing in
it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?

Too much!


You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.


Billions. And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with the
Bosnian war? If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?


I'm sorry, what did we destroy? I thought most of the destruction was
done by the locals.
  #34   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2009
Posts: 826
Default Marital Bliss


"jps" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:32:32 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:seg7559af7mck6nvddgq4o9nhb4u0n82cp@4ax. com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini@4a x.com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
nt.net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed
them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've
spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been ****ed
away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any
standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing
in
it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq
funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and
bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars
wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far
piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?

Too much!

You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.


Billions. And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with the
Bosnian war? If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?


I'm sorry, what did we destroy? I thought most of the destruction was
done by the locals.


Oops. I was under the impression that around the clock bombing destroyed
stuff on the ground. Thanks for enlightening me.


  #35   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
jps jps is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,720
Default Marital Bliss

On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:19:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:32:32 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:seg7559af7mck6nvddgq4o9nhb4u0n82cp@4ax .com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini@4 ax.com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
ant.net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed
them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've
spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been ****ed
away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any
standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing
in
it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq
funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and
bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars
wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far
piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?

Too much!

You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.

Billions. And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with the
Bosnian war? If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?


I'm sorry, what did we destroy? I thought most of the destruction was
done by the locals.


Oops. I was under the impression that around the clock bombing destroyed
stuff on the ground. Thanks for enlightening me.


I guess it depends on how many times the clock went around, right?


  #36   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2009
Posts: 826
Default Marital Bliss


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:19:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:32:32 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:rdl9559n4p1nm3utolrqun06470mm1m1t4@4ax. com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:seg7559af7mck6nvddgq4o9nhb4u0n82cp@4a x.com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini@ 4ax.com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
iant.net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the
spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed
them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've
spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been
****ed
away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any
standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing
in
it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq
funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and
bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars
wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far
piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?

Too much!

You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.

Billions. And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with
the
Bosnian war? If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?

I'm sorry, what did we destroy? I thought most of the destruction was
done by the locals.


Oops. I was under the impression that around the clock bombing destroyed
stuff on the ground. Thanks for enlightening me.


I guess it depends on how many times the clock went around, right?


Wrong. Only takes one bomb to damage lots of stuff on the ground.


  #37   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
jps jps is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,720
Default Marital Bliss

On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 22:45:04 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:19:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:32:32 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:rdl9559n4p1nm3utolrqun06470mm1m1t4@4ax .com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:seg7559af7mck6nvddgq4o9nhb4u0n82cp@4 ax.com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini @4ax.com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
liant.net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the
spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed
them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've
spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been
****ed
away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any
standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing
in
it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq
funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and
bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars
wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far
piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?

Too much!

You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.

Billions. And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with
the
Bosnian war? If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?

I'm sorry, what did we destroy? I thought most of the destruction was
done by the locals.

Oops. I was under the impression that around the clock bombing destroyed
stuff on the ground. Thanks for enlightening me.


I guess it depends on how many times the clock went around, right?


Wrong. Only takes one bomb to damage lots of stuff on the ground.


Vs. years of little bullets and mortars going 'round.

So, how much did it cost us to bomb? No idea, right?

Your point is still unmade Hans Christian.
  #38   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default Marital Bliss

On Jul 10, 12:54*am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 22:45:04 -0700, "Calif Bill"



wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:19:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:32:32 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:rdl9559n4p1nm3utolrqun06470mm1m1t4@4ax .com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:seg7559af7mck6nvddgq4o9nhb4u0n82cp@4 ax.com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini @4ax.com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
liant.net...


"Calif Bill" wrote in message
news:PradnR4xDNIfbNHXnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2 ...


That sounds more like the current Democrats. *All the
spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. *you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. *So is a joint effort. *Clinton bombed
them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.


You keep harping about Bosnia. *Can you tell us how much we've
spent
in Bosnia?


I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been
****ed
away
in Iraq.


Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any
standard.


Bosnia may be an even more evil war. *There was absolutely nothing
in
it
for
us. *Was a European problem if at all. *How much of that Iraq
funding
was
pork? *Percentage wise? *25%? 30%?


What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and
bombs?


It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars
wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.


Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. *A far
piece
from $3 trillion. *And the pork part did not go to the war.


And how much have we spent in Bosnia?


Too much!


You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.


My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.


Billions. *And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with
the
Bosnian war? *If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?


I'm sorry, what did we destroy? *I thought most of the destruction was
done by the locals.


Oops. *I was under the impression that around the clock bombing destroyed
stuff on the ground. *Thanks for enlightening me.


I guess it depends on how many times the clock went around, right?


Wrong. *Only takes one bomb to damage lots of stuff on the ground.


Vs. years of little bullets and mortars going 'round.

So, how much did it cost us to bomb? *No idea, right?

Your point is still unmade Hans Christian.


I didn't know Bill was a yacht maker?
http://www.hanschristianyachts.com/
  #39   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
jps jps is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,720
Default Marital Bliss

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:10:12 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Jul 10, 12:54*am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 22:45:04 -0700, "Calif Bill"



wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:19:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:32:32 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:rdl9559n4p1nm3utolrqun06470mm1m1t4@4ax .com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:seg7559af7mck6nvddgq4o9nhb4u0n82cp@4 ax.com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini @4ax.com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
liant.net...


"Calif Bill" wrote in message
news:PradnR4xDNIfbNHXnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2 ...


That sounds more like the current Democrats. *All the
spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. *you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. *So is a joint effort. *Clinton bombed
them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.


You keep harping about Bosnia. *Can you tell us how much we've
spent
in Bosnia?


I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been
****ed
away
in Iraq.


Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any
standard.


Bosnia may be an even more evil war. *There was absolutely nothing
in
it
for
us. *Was a European problem if at all. *How much of that Iraq
funding
was
pork? *Percentage wise? *25%? 30%?


What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and
bombs?


It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars
wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.


Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. *A far
piece
from $3 trillion. *And the pork part did not go to the war.


And how much have we spent in Bosnia?


Too much!


You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.


My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.


Billions. *And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with
the
Bosnian war? *If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?


I'm sorry, what did we destroy? *I thought most of the destruction was
done by the locals.


Oops. *I was under the impression that around the clock bombing destroyed
stuff on the ground. *Thanks for enlightening me.


I guess it depends on how many times the clock went around, right?


Wrong. *Only takes one bomb to damage lots of stuff on the ground.


Vs. years of little bullets and mortars going 'round.

So, how much did it cost us to bomb? *No idea, right?

Your point is still unmade Hans Christian.


I didn't know Bill was a yacht maker?
http://www.hanschristianyachts.com/


Wrong Hans Christian.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ignore-ance is bliss! John H.[_4_] General 2 May 14th 08 01:31 AM
laptop+wireless+pda+vnc=bliss Duncan Heenan Electronics 5 February 12th 05 04:54 PM
Bliss-Stick Super RAD 180 Playak General 0 December 16th 04 09:58 AM
Comparison: Wavesport Super EZ and Necky Bliss Wilko Whitewater 2 August 6th 03 02:44 AM
Comparison: Necky Bliss vs. Wavesport Super EZ KAYAKFAN General 0 July 22nd 03 04:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017