BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Lefties dont need no stinkin laws (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/107465-lefties-dont-need-no-stinkin-laws.html)

Frogwatch[_2_] June 30th 09 06:26 PM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. What ever happened to
rule of law? If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.

HK June 30th 09 06:33 PM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. What ever happened to
rule of law? If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.



Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?


Frogwatch[_2_] June 30th 09 06:48 PM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
On Jun 30, 1:33*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. *The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. *Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. *This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. *What ever happened to
rule of law? *If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.


Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?


Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.

Loogypicker[_2_] June 30th 09 07:18 PM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
On Jun 30, 1:48*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Jun 30, 1:33*pm, HK wrote:





Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. *The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. *Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. *This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. *What ever happened to
rule of law? *If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.


Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?


Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. *He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


You got it! He has shown he's not capable of original thought, that's
why he can only cut and paste, insult and tell lies.

jps June 30th 09 07:27 PM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Jun 30, 1:33*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. *The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. *Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. *This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. *What ever happened to
rule of law? *If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.


Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?


Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.


That supposes what you've written contains reason. Big leap.

Frogwatch[_2_] June 30th 09 07:57 PM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
On Jun 30, 2:28*pm, Gene wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:26:36 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. *


You keep posting "Obama, Chavez and Castro" as if they are the only
folks taking this position. I've really looked for any country, ANY
country that supports Honduras, but I can't find one.

Last time I asked this question, I got crickets..... so, I'll ask
again:

Does ANY country support Honduras in this?
--

Forté Agent 5.00 Build 1171

"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by
the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do.
So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor.
Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover." * - Unknown

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepagehttp://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm


Why would any reasonable person not support following their
constitution?

jps June 30th 09 08:20 PM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:57:22 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Jun 30, 2:28*pm, Gene wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:26:36 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. *


You keep posting "Obama, Chavez and Castro" as if they are the only
folks taking this position. I've really looked for any country, ANY
country that supports Honduras, but I can't find one.

Last time I asked this question, I got crickets..... so, I'll ask
again:

Does ANY country support Honduras in this?


Why would any reasonable person not support following their
constitution?


Does any question get answered by another question?

Not usually and not in this case.

HK June 30th 09 08:43 PM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
Frogwatch wrote:
On Jun 30, 1:33 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. What ever happened to
rule of law? If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.

Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?


Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.



Froggy, your "political posts" read as if the person making them were
eating desert mushrooms. Why would you expect me to take your
"reasoning" seriously?

HK June 30th 09 08:49 PM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Jun 30, 1:33 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. What ever happened to
rule of law? If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.
Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?

Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.


That supposes what you've written contains reason. Big leap.


An impossible leap, which is why I don't do what he wants.

HK June 30th 09 08:50 PM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
Gene wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:26:36 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power.


You keep posting "Obama, Chavez and Castro" as if they are the only
folks taking this position. I've really looked for any country, ANY
country that supports Honduras, but I can't find one.

Last time I asked this question, I got crickets..... so, I'll ask
again:

Does ANY country support Honduras in this?


Neoconville.

jps June 30th 09 09:13 PM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:50:14 -0400, HK wrote:

Gene wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:26:36 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power.


You keep posting "Obama, Chavez and Castro" as if they are the only
folks taking this position. I've really looked for any country, ANY
country that supports Honduras, but I can't find one.

Last time I asked this question, I got crickets..... so, I'll ask
again:

Does ANY country support Honduras in this?


Neoconville.


That's not a country, it's a small town in nowhere, USA.

Frogwatch[_2_] June 30th 09 09:22 PM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
On Jun 30, 4:13*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:50:14 -0400, HK wrote:
Gene wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:26:36 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:


Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. *


You keep posting "Obama, Chavez and Castro" as if they are the only
folks taking this position. I've really looked for any country, ANY
country that supports Honduras, but I can't find one.


Last time I asked this question, I got crickets..... so, I'll ask
again:


Does ANY country support Honduras in this?


Neoconville.


That's not a country, it's a small town in nowhere, USA.


Right and wrong is not defined by consensus. The fact is that they
followed the rule of law as defined by their constitution. It was not
a coup. If you do not approve of following a constitution, why should
I follow one either?

HK June 30th 09 09:29 PM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
Frogwatch wrote:
On Jun 30, 4:13 pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:50:14 -0400, HK wrote:
Gene wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:26:36 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power.
You keep posting "Obama, Chavez and Castro" as if they are the only
folks taking this position. I've really looked for any country, ANY
country that supports Honduras, but I can't find one.
Last time I asked this question, I got crickets..... so, I'll ask
again:
Does ANY country support Honduras in this?
Neoconville.

That's not a country, it's a small town in nowhere, USA.


Right and wrong is not defined by consensus. The fact is that they
followed the rule of law as defined by their constitution. It was not
a coup. If you do not approve of following a constitution, why should
I follow one either?



Froggy, consumer-product-inventor-wannabe and expert on Honduran
constitution, eh?

What a laugh.

jps June 30th 09 09:30 PM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:22:41 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Jun 30, 4:13*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:50:14 -0400, HK wrote:
Gene wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:26:36 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:


Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. *


You keep posting "Obama, Chavez and Castro" as if they are the only
folks taking this position. I've really looked for any country, ANY
country that supports Honduras, but I can't find one.


Last time I asked this question, I got crickets..... so, I'll ask
again:


Does ANY country support Honduras in this?


Neoconville.


That's not a country, it's a small town in nowhere, USA.


Right and wrong is not defined by consensus. The fact is that they
followed the rule of law as defined by their constitution. It was not
a coup. If you do not approve of following a constitution, why should
I follow one either?


Okay, by your logic, we should've kicked Bush out of the country when
his party interceded in the lawful recounting of votes in Florida.

Frogwatch[_2_] June 30th 09 09:32 PM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
On Jun 30, 4:30*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:22:41 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch



wrote:
On Jun 30, 4:13*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:50:14 -0400, HK wrote:
Gene wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:26:36 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:


Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. *


You keep posting "Obama, Chavez and Castro" as if they are the only
folks taking this position. I've really looked for any country, ANY
country that supports Honduras, but I can't find one.


Last time I asked this question, I got crickets..... so, I'll ask
again:


Does ANY country support Honduras in this?


Neoconville.


That's not a country, it's a small town in nowhere, USA.


Right and wrong is not defined by consensus. *The fact is that they
followed the rule of law as defined by their constitution. *It was not
a coup. *If you do not approve of following a constitution, why should
I follow one either?


Okay, by your logic, we should've kicked Bush out of the country when
his party interceded in the lawful recounting of votes in Florida.


If you'd had a legal basis for doing so, Yes.

BAR[_2_] June 30th 09 11:59 PM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
Gene wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:26:36 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power.


You keep posting "Obama, Chavez and Castro" as if they are the only
folks taking this position. I've really looked for any country, ANY
country that supports Honduras, but I can't find one.

Last time I asked this question, I got crickets..... so, I'll ask
again:

Does ANY country support Honduras in this?


The Honduran people support their own actions in this! That counts more
than any external support due to the fact that it is their country.


HK July 1st 09 12:03 AM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
BAR wrote:
Gene wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:26:36 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power.


You keep posting "Obama, Chavez and Castro" as if they are the only
folks taking this position. I've really looked for any country, ANY
country that supports Honduras, but I can't find one.

Last time I asked this question, I got crickets..... so, I'll ask
again:

Does ANY country support Honduras in this?


The Honduran people support their own actions in this! That counts more
than any external support due to the fact that it is their country.



You've polled Hondurans?

Frogwatch July 1st 09 04:03 AM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
On Jun 30, 7:03*pm, HK wrote:
BAR wrote:
Gene wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:26:36 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:


Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. *


You keep posting "Obama, Chavez and Castro" as if they are the only
folks taking this position. I've really looked for any country, ANY
country that supports Honduras, but I can't find one.


Last time I asked this question, I got crickets..... so, I'll ask
again:


Does ANY country support Honduras in this?


The Honduran people support their own actions in this! That counts more
than any external support due to the fact that it is their country.


You've polled Hondurans?


Unlike lefties who are incapable of thought, I have read about the
Honduran Supreme Court and read the pertinent parts of their
constitution. They acted legally, responsibly and as directed by
their constitution. Obama wants them to act against their
constitution as does the OAS which is as silly as the UN. So, Yes,
Obama, Castro and Chavez fit together very well.

D K[_15_] July 3rd 09 02:06 AM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
Frogwatch wrote:
On Jun 30, 1:33 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. What ever happened to
rule of law? If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.

Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?


Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.


And lie...

JustWaitAFrekinMinute! July 3rd 09 02:37 AM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
On Jun 30, 2:27*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch





wrote:
On Jun 30, 1:33*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. *The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. *Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. *This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. *What ever happened to
rule of law? *If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.


Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?


Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. *He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.


That supposes what you've written contains reason. *Big leap.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Yeah, those pesky facts keep getting in the way...

Frogwatch July 3rd 09 03:44 AM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
On Jul 2, 9:37*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:
On Jun 30, 2:27*pm, jps wrote:



On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch


wrote:
On Jun 30, 1:33*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. *The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. *Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. *This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. *What ever happened to
rule of law? *If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.


Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?


Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. *He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.


That supposes what you've written contains reason. *Big leap.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Yeah, those pesky facts keep getting in the way...


OK, DK, prove I lied then. I stand by my assertions that their
supreme court acted legally and in accord with their constitution. If
you cannot show I lied, then man up and admit you are wrong.

jps July 3rd 09 04:20 AM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 19:44:41 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Jul 2, 9:37*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:
On Jun 30, 2:27*pm, jps wrote:



On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch


wrote:
On Jun 30, 1:33*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. *The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. *Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. *This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. *What ever happened to
rule of law? *If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.


Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?


Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. *He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.


That supposes what you've written contains reason. *Big leap.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Yeah, those pesky facts keep getting in the way...


OK, DK, prove I lied then. I stand by my assertions that their
supreme court acted legally and in accord with their constitution. If
you cannot show I lied, then man up and admit you are wrong.


You didn't lie. However, your understand remains stilted.

Frogwatch July 3rd 09 04:58 AM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
On Jul 2, 11:20*pm, jps wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 19:44:41 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch



wrote:
On Jul 2, 9:37*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:
On Jun 30, 2:27*pm, jps wrote:


On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch


wrote:
On Jun 30, 1:33*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. *The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. *Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. *This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. *What ever happened to
rule of law? *If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.


Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?


Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. *He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.


That supposes what you've written contains reason. *Big leap.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Yeah, those pesky facts keep getting in the way...


OK, DK, prove I lied then. *I stand by my assertions that their
supreme court acted legally and in accord with their constitution. *If
you cannot show I lied, then man up and admit you are wrong.


You didn't lie. *However, your understand remains stilted.


"stilted", meaning: "THat Damned Frogwatch is right again"

jps July 3rd 09 06:37 AM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 20:58:27 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Jul 2, 11:20*pm, jps wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 19:44:41 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch



wrote:
On Jul 2, 9:37*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:
On Jun 30, 2:27*pm, jps wrote:


On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch


wrote:
On Jun 30, 1:33*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. *The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. *Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. *This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. *What ever happened to
rule of law? *If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.


Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?


Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. *He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.


That supposes what you've written contains reason. *Big leap.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Yeah, those pesky facts keep getting in the way...


OK, DK, prove I lied then. *I stand by my assertions that their
supreme court acted legally and in accord with their constitution. *If
you cannot show I lied, then man up and admit you are wrong.


You didn't lie. *However, your understand remains stilted.


"stilted", meaning: "THat Damned Frogwatch is right again"


You may be right about some things, none of them have to do with
politics.

John...same as yesterday. July 3rd 09 01:50 PM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 19:44:41 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Jul 2, 9:37*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:
On Jun 30, 2:27*pm, jps wrote:



On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch


wrote:
On Jun 30, 1:33*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. *The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. *Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. *This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. *What ever happened to
rule of law? *If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.


Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?


Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. *He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.


That supposes what you've written contains reason. *Big leap.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Yeah, those pesky facts keep getting in the way...


OK, DK, prove I lied then. I stand by my assertions that their
supreme court acted legally and in accord with their constitution. If
you cannot show I lied, then man up and admit you are wrong.


Froggie, DK wasn't accusing you of lieing. He was simply adding
another item to your list of Harry's skills.

Your statement regarding Honduras was right on.
--
John H

"If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until its free!"
--Anonymous

John...same as yesterday. July 3rd 09 01:51 PM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 20:58:27 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Jul 2, 11:20*pm, jps wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 19:44:41 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch



wrote:
On Jul 2, 9:37*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:
On Jun 30, 2:27*pm, jps wrote:


On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch


wrote:
On Jun 30, 1:33*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. *The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. *Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. *This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. *What ever happened to
rule of law? *If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.


Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?


Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. *He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.


That supposes what you've written contains reason. *Big leap.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Yeah, those pesky facts keep getting in the way...


OK, DK, prove I lied then. *I stand by my assertions that their
supreme court acted legally and in accord with their constitution. *If
you cannot show I lied, then man up and admit you are wrong.


You didn't lie. *However, your understand remains stilted.


"stilted", meaning: "THat Damned Frogwatch is right again"


Exactly.
--
John H

"If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until its free!"
--Anonymous

D K[_15_] July 4th 09 01:37 AM

Lefties dont need no stinkin laws
 
John...same as yesterday. wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 19:44:41 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Jul 2, 9:37 pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:
On Jun 30, 2:27 pm, jps wrote:



On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:
On Jun 30, 1:33 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a
referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term,
he had imported ballots from Chavez. The army which is charged by
their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe
keeping. Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots.
Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a
referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing
the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after
a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and
unconstitutional. This was not a coup but was legal and in accord
with their constitution.
Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and
his illegal actions and put him back in power. What ever happened to
rule of law? If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these
people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them
by ANY means.
Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means
anything to him.
Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras?
Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. He is simply not
capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut
and paste.
That supposes what you've written contains reason. Big leap.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Yeah, those pesky facts keep getting in the way...

OK, DK, prove I lied then. I stand by my assertions that their
supreme court acted legally and in accord with their constitution. If
you cannot show I lied, then man up and admit you are wrong.


Froggie, DK wasn't accusing you of lieing. He was simply adding
another item to your list of Harry's skills.

Your statement regarding Honduras was right on.
--
John H


Bingo!


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com