Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For Vic: Fuel efficient boat
From what I can determine, once a boat is on plane, it is primarily
the weight that determines fuel efficiency so a lighter weight boat should give much better fuel economy. BUT, as I have found with my Tolman which is very light for her size, a lightweight boat is easily pushed around by a wave due to less momentum. So, although you might consider a boat made from new lightweight composites, would it be as seaworthy as a heavier one? This is actually a practical consideration for me if I build a Tolman Jumbo with slightly gretaer deadrise than the design. More deadrise will make her pound less but will the lightweight make her less seaworthy than similar heavier boats? |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For Vic: Fuel efficient boat
On Jun 29, 2:28*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
From what I can determine, once a boat is on plane, it is primarily the weight that determines fuel efficiency so a lighter weight boat should give much better fuel economy. BUT, as I have found with my Tolman which is very light for her size, a lightweight boat is easily pushed around by a wave due to less momentum. *So, although you might consider a boat made from new lightweight composites, would it be as seaworthy as a heavier one? This is actually a practical consideration for me if I build a Tolman Jumbo with slightly gretaer deadrise than the design. *More deadrise will make her pound less but will the lightweight make her less seaworthy than similar heavier boats? At one time I thought HK new something about boat design but he gives me no reason to think he does. |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For Vic: Fuel efficient boat
On Jun 29, 2:31*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Jun 29, 2:28*pm, Frogwatch wrote: From what I can determine, once a boat is on plane, it is primarily the weight that determines fuel efficiency so a lighter weight boat should give much better fuel economy. BUT, as I have found with my Tolman which is very light for her size, a lightweight boat is easily pushed around by a wave due to less momentum. *So, although you might consider a boat made from new lightweight composites, would it be as seaworthy as a heavier one? This is actually a practical consideration for me if I build a Tolman Jumbo with slightly gretaer deadrise than the design. *More deadrise will make her pound less but will the lightweight make her less seaworthy than similar heavier boats? At one time I thought HK new something about boat design but he gives me no reason to think he does. He has stuck his foot in his mouth enough times to prove he knows nothing about design or building. Most of the time he doesn't even know he is saying something that makes that point so clear.. He don't know, what he don't know.. makes for funny **** sometimes... |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For Vic: Fuel efficient boat
Frogwatch wrote:
On Jun 29, 2:28 pm, Frogwatch wrote: From what I can determine, once a boat is on plane, it is primarily the weight that determines fuel efficiency so a lighter weight boat should give much better fuel economy. BUT, as I have found with my Tolman which is very light for her size, a lightweight boat is easily pushed around by a wave due to less momentum. So, although you might consider a boat made from new lightweight composites, would it be as seaworthy as a heavier one? This is actually a practical consideration for me if I build a Tolman Jumbo with slightly gretaer deadrise than the design. More deadrise will make her pound less but will the lightweight make her less seaworthy than similar heavier boats? At one time I thought HK new something about boat design but he gives me no reason to think he does. Because I laugh at your "ideas"? Well...it's hard to take you and your boating ideas seriously, froggy. |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For Vic: Fuel efficient boat
JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Jun 29, 2:31 pm, Frogwatch wrote: On Jun 29, 2:28 pm, Frogwatch wrote: From what I can determine, once a boat is on plane, it is primarily the weight that determines fuel efficiency so a lighter weight boat should give much better fuel economy. BUT, as I have found with my Tolman which is very light for her size, a lightweight boat is easily pushed around by a wave due to less momentum. So, although you might consider a boat made from new lightweight composites, would it be as seaworthy as a heavier one? This is actually a practical consideration for me if I build a Tolman Jumbo with slightly gretaer deadrise than the design. More deadrise will make her pound less but will the lightweight make her less seaworthy than similar heavier boats? At one time I thought HK new something about boat design but he gives me no reason to think he does. He has stuck his foot in his mouth enough times to prove he knows nothing about design or building. Most of the time he doesn't even know he is saying something that makes that point so clear.. He don't know, what he don't know.. makes for funny **** sometimes... I've seen photos of your rowboats. You're a funny guy. Most of what you've "built" is barely suitable for a voyage across a swimming pool. And those stained seams! |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For Vic: Fuel efficient boat
On Jun 29, 4:07*pm, HK wrote:
JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jun 29, 2:31 pm, Frogwatch wrote: On Jun 29, 2:28 pm, Frogwatch wrote: From what I can determine, once a boat is on plane, it is primarily the weight that determines fuel efficiency so a lighter weight boat should give much better fuel economy. BUT, as I have found with my Tolman which is very light for her size, a lightweight boat is easily pushed around by a wave due to less momentum. *So, although you might consider a boat made from new lightweight composites, would it be as seaworthy as a heavier one? This is actually a practical consideration for me if I build a Tolman Jumbo with slightly gretaer deadrise than the design. *More deadrise will make her pound less but will the lightweight make her less seaworthy than similar heavier boats? At one time I thought HK new something about boat design but he gives me no reason to think he does. He has stuck his foot in his mouth enough times to prove he knows nothing about design or building. Most of the time he doesn't even know he is saying something that makes that point so clear.. He don't know, what he don't know.. makes for funny **** sometimes... I've seen photos of your rowboats. You're a funny guy. Most of what you've "built" is barely suitable for a voyage across a swimming pool. And those stained seams!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - LOL, as if you know what you are talking about... snerk You couldn't build a sand pile in a sandbox.. |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For Vic: Fuel efficient boat
JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Jun 29, 4:07 pm, HK wrote: JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jun 29, 2:31 pm, Frogwatch wrote: On Jun 29, 2:28 pm, Frogwatch wrote: From what I can determine, once a boat is on plane, it is primarily the weight that determines fuel efficiency so a lighter weight boat should give much better fuel economy. BUT, as I have found with my Tolman which is very light for her size, a lightweight boat is easily pushed around by a wave due to less momentum. So, although you might consider a boat made from new lightweight composites, would it be as seaworthy as a heavier one? This is actually a practical consideration for me if I build a Tolman Jumbo with slightly gretaer deadrise than the design. More deadrise will make her pound less but will the lightweight make her less seaworthy than similar heavier boats? At one time I thought HK new something about boat design but he gives me no reason to think he does. He has stuck his foot in his mouth enough times to prove he knows nothing about design or building. Most of the time he doesn't even know he is saying something that makes that point so clear.. He don't know, what he don't know.. makes for funny **** sometimes... I've seen photos of your rowboats. You're a funny guy. Most of what you've "built" is barely suitable for a voyage across a swimming pool. And those stained seams!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - LOL, as if you know what you are talking about... snerk You couldn't build a sand pile in a sandbox.. Any idiot can build a dingy dinghy. You're proof of that. |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For Vic: Fuel efficient boat
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:26:48 -0400, HK wrote:
JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jun 29, 4:07 pm, HK wrote: JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jun 29, 2:31 pm, Frogwatch wrote: On Jun 29, 2:28 pm, Frogwatch wrote: From what I can determine, once a boat is on plane, it is primarily the weight that determines fuel efficiency so a lighter weight boat should give much better fuel economy. BUT, as I have found with my Tolman which is very light for her size, a lightweight boat is easily pushed around by a wave due to less momentum. So, although you might consider a boat made from new lightweight composites, would it be as seaworthy as a heavier one? This is actually a practical consideration for me if I build a Tolman Jumbo with slightly gretaer deadrise than the design. More deadrise will make her pound less but will the lightweight make her less seaworthy than similar heavier boats? At one time I thought HK new something about boat design but he gives me no reason to think he does. He has stuck his foot in his mouth enough times to prove he knows nothing about design or building. Most of the time he doesn't even know he is saying something that makes that point so clear.. He don't know, what he don't know.. makes for funny **** sometimes... I've seen photos of your rowboats. You're a funny guy. Most of what you've "built" is barely suitable for a voyage across a swimming pool. And those stained seams!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - LOL, as if you know what you are talking about... snerk You couldn't build a sand pile in a sandbox.. Any idiot can build a dingy dinghy. You're proof of that. Special idiots can buld special dinghies. He's proof of that too. |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For Vic: Fuel efficient boat
jps wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:26:48 -0400, HK wrote: JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jun 29, 4:07 pm, HK wrote: JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jun 29, 2:31 pm, Frogwatch wrote: On Jun 29, 2:28 pm, Frogwatch wrote: From what I can determine, once a boat is on plane, it is primarily the weight that determines fuel efficiency so a lighter weight boat should give much better fuel economy. BUT, as I have found with my Tolman which is very light for her size, a lightweight boat is easily pushed around by a wave due to less momentum. So, although you might consider a boat made from new lightweight composites, would it be as seaworthy as a heavier one? This is actually a practical consideration for me if I build a Tolman Jumbo with slightly gretaer deadrise than the design. More deadrise will make her pound less but will the lightweight make her less seaworthy than similar heavier boats? At one time I thought HK new something about boat design but he gives me no reason to think he does. He has stuck his foot in his mouth enough times to prove he knows nothing about design or building. Most of the time he doesn't even know he is saying something that makes that point so clear.. He don't know, what he don't know.. makes for funny **** sometimes... I've seen photos of your rowboats. You're a funny guy. Most of what you've "built" is barely suitable for a voyage across a swimming pool. And those stained seams!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - LOL, as if you know what you are talking about... snerk You couldn't build a sand pile in a sandbox.. Any idiot can build a dingy dinghy. You're proof of that. Special idiots can buld special dinghies. He's proof of that too. Well, he quit the boat-building biz. Did you ever see the paint job he put on his own rowboat? It was...well, it looked as if he launched the boat and then painted a bootstripe on it freehand to mark the waterline, and then slapped on the cheapest gray housepaint he could find on the interior. Sloppy, sloppy, sloppy. Back in the good old days, my father's shop would turn out a few plywood workboats to order in the winter. That kept his workmen busy. I got to help a little and I got to sand and paint. I was maybe nine or ten. If I painted as poorly as justhate did, my father would have tossed me off the dock. |
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For Vic: Fuel efficient boat
On Jun 29, 4:47*pm, HK wrote:
jps wrote: On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:26:48 -0400, HK wrote: JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jun 29, 4:07 pm, HK wrote: JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jun 29, 2:31 pm, Frogwatch wrote: On Jun 29, 2:28 pm, Frogwatch wrote: From what I can determine, once a boat is on plane, it is primarily the weight that determines fuel efficiency so a lighter weight boat should give much better fuel economy. BUT, as I have found with my Tolman which is very light for her size, a lightweight boat is easily pushed around by a wave due to less momentum. *So, although you might consider a boat made from new lightweight composites, would it be as seaworthy as a heavier one? This is actually a practical consideration for me if I build a Tolman Jumbo with slightly gretaer deadrise than the design. *More deadrise will make her pound less but will the lightweight make her less seaworthy than similar heavier boats? At one time I thought HK new something about boat design but he gives me no reason to think he does. He has stuck his foot in his mouth enough times to prove he knows nothing about design or building. Most of the time he doesn't even know he is saying something that makes that point so clear.. He don't know, what he don't know.. makes for funny **** sometimes... I've seen photos of your rowboats. You're a funny guy. Most of what you've "built" is barely suitable for a voyage across a swimming pool. And those stained seams!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - LOL, as if you know what you are talking about... *snerk You couldn't build a sand pile in a sandbox.. Any idiot can build a dingy dinghy. You're proof of that. Special idiots can buld special dinghies. *He's proof of that too. Well, he quit the boat-building biz. Did you ever see the paint job he put on his own rowboat? It was...well, it looked as if he launched the boat and then painted a bootstripe on it freehand to mark the waterline, and then slapped on the cheapest gray housepaint he could find on the interior. Sloppy, sloppy, sloppy. Back in the good old days, my father's shop would turn out a few plywood workboats to order in the winter. That kept his workmen busy. I got to help a little and I got to sand and paint. I was maybe nine or ten. If I painted as poorly as justhate did, my father would have tossed me off the dock.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Pffffttt... Nobody here believes you. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
For Vic: Fuel efficient boat | General | |||
Nothing like lean, mean and efficient... | General | |||
Could flapping sails be more efficient? | ASA | |||
Hey, jps- here's one that's stout, fuel efficient, and affordable! | General | |||
Most fuel efficient... | General |