Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Firing Inspector General Walpin without the requisite explanation or
notice might be considered an impeachable offense. After all, Obama sponsored legislation that required such but instead he was fired with an hiours notice without explanation simply because he found $80 million if fraud by Obama's fav thang, "AmeriCorps" where an Obama buddy was taking taxpayer money. Do you think the Dems will investigate this? Do you believe in the Easter Bunny? Obama's buddy had his hand in the public trough but The One could not allow an investigation. Remember, only little people pay taxes or have to pay penalties, Democrats do not. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:05:56 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: Firing Inspector General Walpin without the requisite explanation or notice might be considered an impeachable offense. After all, Obama sponsored legislation that required such but instead he was fired with an hiours notice without explanation simply because he found $80 million if fraud by Obama's fav thang, "AmeriCorps" where an Obama buddy was taking taxpayer money. Do you think the Dems will investigate this? Do you believe in the Easter Bunny? Obama's buddy had his hand in the public trough but The One could not allow an investigation. Remember, only little people pay taxes or have to pay penalties, Democrats do not. Sucker! You're gonna get taxed more than anyone. We're singling you out. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 24, 9:21*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:05:56 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Firing Inspector General Walpin without the requisite explanation or notice might be considered an impeachable offense. *After all, Obama sponsored legislation that required such but instead he was fired with an hiours notice without explanation simply because he found $80 million if fraud by Obama's fav thang, "AmeriCorps" where an Obama buddy was taking taxpayer money. Do you think the Dems will investigate this? *Do you believe in the Easter Bunny? *Obama's buddy had his hand in the public trough but The One could not allow an investigation. Remember, only little people pay taxes or have to pay penalties, Democrats do not. Sucker! *You're gonna get taxed more than anyone. * We're singling you out. Yup, they admit it, only little people pay taxes. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... On Jun 24, 9:21 pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:05:56 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Firing Inspector General Walpin without the requisite explanation or notice might be considered an impeachable offense. After all, Obama sponsored legislation that required such but instead he was fired with an hiours notice without explanation simply because he found $80 million if fraud by Obama's fav thang, "AmeriCorps" where an Obama buddy was taking taxpayer money. Do you think the Dems will investigate this? Do you believe in the Easter Bunny? Obama's buddy had his hand in the public trough but The One could not allow an investigation. Remember, only little people pay taxes or have to pay penalties, Democrats do not. Sucker! You're gonna get taxed more than anyone. We're singling you out. Yup, they admit it, only little people pay taxes. reply: You forgot to mention that "people of color" don't have to pay, either. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:43:41 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... On Jun 24, 9:21 pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:05:56 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Firing Inspector General Walpin without the requisite explanation or notice might be considered an impeachable offense. After all, Obama sponsored legislation that required such but instead he was fired with an hiours notice without explanation simply because he found $80 million if fraud by Obama's fav thang, "AmeriCorps" where an Obama buddy was taking taxpayer money. Do you think the Dems will investigate this? Do you believe in the Easter Bunny? Obama's buddy had his hand in the public trough but The One could not allow an investigation. Remember, only little people pay taxes or have to pay penalties, Democrats do not. Sucker! You're gonna get taxed more than anyone. We're singling you out. Yup, they admit it, only little people pay taxes. reply: You forgot to mention that "people of color" don't have to pay, either. Proof of Utah. You belong in the sticks, it suits you. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jps wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:43:41 -0600, "SteveB" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... On Jun 24, 9:21 pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:05:56 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Firing Inspector General Walpin without the requisite explanation or notice might be considered an impeachable offense. After all, Obama sponsored legislation that required such but instead he was fired with an hiours notice without explanation simply because he found $80 million if fraud by Obama's fav thang, "AmeriCorps" where an Obama buddy was taking taxpayer money. Do you think the Dems will investigate this? Do you believe in the Easter Bunny? Obama's buddy had his hand in the public trough but The One could not allow an investigation. Remember, only little people pay taxes or have to pay penalties, Democrats do not. Sucker! You're gonna get taxed more than anyone. We're singling you out. Yup, they admit it, only little people pay taxes. reply: You forgot to mention that "people of color" don't have to pay, either. Proof of Utah. You belong in the sticks, it suits you. "People of color" don't have to pay taxes? Where do these idiot righties learn this crap, at their mama's breast? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
No offense intended | ASA | |||
No Offense, Mooron.... | ASA |