Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:55:11 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote: On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:33:06 -0500, Vic Smith penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:08:29 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote: | |On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:55:37 -0500, Vic Smith penned the following |well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: | | ||Sounds like a drug song to me, but since it's you ...... | |In 1969, what *wasn't* a drug song? | |Okie from Muskogee of course. |Merle Haggard - my second favorite voice. | |--Vic Oh, puleeeeeeze..... http://tinyurl.com/l5utv6 Don't matter. It's what the audience took from it. I was in the audience. And the words fit me well. You surely haven't forgotten the Silent Majority? Or Muskrat Love? --Vic |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:24:57 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote: (About Okie from Muskogee and Merle being a False Prophet) | |Don't matter. It's what the audience took from it. |I was in the audience. And the words fit me well. |You surely haven't forgotten the Silent Majority? |Or Muskrat Love? | |--Vic That same logic has made a lot of satisfied owners of the Brooklyn Bridge..... Just because one is a square sure doesn't mean he's a sucker. Never was into drugs, never burned a draft card, and never bought a bridge either. I was a member of the Silent Majority. And pure blue collar. Nothing to do with logic. Just was. That was then, this is now. I'll concede one thing. That song Muskrat Love turned my stomach. Muskrats having sex? OMG!!! --Vic |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:24:57 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote: (About Okie from Muskogee and Merle being a False Prophet) | |Don't matter. It's what the audience took from it. |I was in the audience. And the words fit me well. |You surely haven't forgotten the Silent Majority? |Or Muskrat Love? | |--Vic That same logic has made a lot of satisfied owners of the Brooklyn Bridge..... Just because one is a square sure doesn't mean he's a sucker. Never was into drugs, never burned a draft card, and never bought a bridge either. I was a member of the Silent Majority. And pure blue collar. Nothing to do with logic. Just was. That was then, this is now. I'll concede one thing. That song Muskrat Love turned my stomach. Muskrats having sex? OMG!!! --Vic Where do you think baby muskrats come from? The stork? :) |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:26:30 -0400, HK wrote:
Where do you think baby muskrats come from? The stork? :) I don't want to know. --Vic |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:50:28 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote: ROFL .... the Silent Majority ....was neither..... This says otherwise, and conforms closely to my memory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_majority Oh sure, most of the silent majority expressed their views. But not on the streets. Left it to the cops to bust heads. I'll never forget something Ed Zieben, a WWII vet I worked with a few miles from the Dem convention riots, said at the height of it. We were hot, sweating, heat treating bull workers at IH, producing the heavy machinery of America. And damn proud of it. No time to smoke dope or throw **** at cops. Pretty much like the Okies in Muskogee, except we lived in Chicago. We finished a push into a furnace, and Ed ran a rag across his brow, then looked at me and said...well actually yelled: "One 500 pounder will scatter them ****ing hippies to hell." Though I had no problem with the cops swinging their sticks, I did view that as a mite extreme. Things are more vocal now, from all sides. We need more silence. Majorly. --Vic |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:50:29 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote: On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:50:28 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote: ROFL .... the Silent Majority ....was neither..... This says otherwise, and conforms closely to my memory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_majority Oh sure, most of the silent majority expressed their views. But not on the streets. Left it to the cops to bust heads. I'll never forget something Ed Zieben, a WWII vet I worked with a few miles from the Dem convention riots, said at the height of it. We were hot, sweating, heat treating bull workers at IH, producing the heavy machinery of America. And damn proud of it. No time to smoke dope or throw **** at cops. Pretty much like the Okies in Muskogee, except we lived in Chicago. We finished a push into a furnace, and Ed ran a rag across his brow, then looked at me and said...well actually yelled: "One 500 pounder will scatter them ****ing hippies to hell." Though I had no problem with the cops swinging their sticks, I did view that as a mite extreme. Things are more vocal now, from all sides. We need more silence. Majorly. --Vic Those hippies were trying to stop a war that eventually took 50,000 American lives. What did we get for it? History isn't on your side. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:31:51 -0700, jps wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:50:29 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:50:28 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote: ROFL .... the Silent Majority ....was neither..... This says otherwise, and conforms closely to my memory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_majority Oh sure, most of the silent majority expressed their views. But not on the streets. Left it to the cops to bust heads. I'll never forget something Ed Zieben, a WWII vet I worked with a few miles from the Dem convention riots, said at the height of it. We were hot, sweating, heat treating bull workers at IH, producing the heavy machinery of America. And damn proud of it. No time to smoke dope or throw **** at cops. Pretty much like the Okies in Muskogee, except we lived in Chicago. We finished a push into a furnace, and Ed ran a rag across his brow, then looked at me and said...well actually yelled: "One 500 pounder will scatter them ****ing hippies to hell." Though I had no problem with the cops swinging their sticks, I did view that as a mite extreme. Things are more vocal now, from all sides. We need more silence. Majorly. --Vic Those hippies were trying to stop a war that eventually took 50,000 American lives. What did we get for it? History isn't on your side. Too bad the history is gone and I'm still here. --Vic |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:42:20 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote: On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:31:51 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:50:29 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:50:28 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote: ROFL .... the Silent Majority ....was neither..... This says otherwise, and conforms closely to my memory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_majority Oh sure, most of the silent majority expressed their views. But not on the streets. Left it to the cops to bust heads. I'll never forget something Ed Zieben, a WWII vet I worked with a few miles from the Dem convention riots, said at the height of it. We were hot, sweating, heat treating bull workers at IH, producing the heavy machinery of America. And damn proud of it. No time to smoke dope or throw **** at cops. Pretty much like the Okies in Muskogee, except we lived in Chicago. We finished a push into a furnace, and Ed ran a rag across his brow, then looked at me and said...well actually yelled: "One 500 pounder will scatter them ****ing hippies to hell." Though I had no problem with the cops swinging their sticks, I did view that as a mite extreme. Things are more vocal now, from all sides. We need more silence. Majorly. --Vic Those hippies were trying to stop a war that eventually took 50,000 American lives. What did we get for it? History isn't on your side. Too bad the history is gone and I'm still here. --Vic If it hadn't have been for those hippies, it may have cost us another 50,000 Americans. You and I may have been among them. I'd rather be here. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:56:47 -0700, jps wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:42:20 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:31:51 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:50:29 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:50:28 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote: ROFL .... the Silent Majority ....was neither..... This says otherwise, and conforms closely to my memory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_majority Oh sure, most of the silent majority expressed their views. But not on the streets. Left it to the cops to bust heads. I'll never forget something Ed Zieben, a WWII vet I worked with a few miles from the Dem convention riots, said at the height of it. We were hot, sweating, heat treating bull workers at IH, producing the heavy machinery of America. And damn proud of it. No time to smoke dope or throw **** at cops. Pretty much like the Okies in Muskogee, except we lived in Chicago. We finished a push into a furnace, and Ed ran a rag across his brow, then looked at me and said...well actually yelled: "One 500 pounder will scatter them ****ing hippies to hell." Though I had no problem with the cops swinging their sticks, I did view that as a mite extreme. Things are more vocal now, from all sides. We need more silence. Majorly. --Vic Those hippies were trying to stop a war that eventually took 50,000 American lives. What did we get for it? History isn't on your side. Too bad the history is gone and I'm still here. --Vic If it hadn't have been for those hippies, it may have cost us another 50,000 Americans. You and I may have been among them. I'd rather be here. Ever see or read about time travel where tinkering with the past affects the future? I'm sure you have. Though you qualified what you said with "mays" it still reminds me of that logical imperative. Maybe if the hippies would have enlisted and fought, the war would have been won, with fewer casualties, Pol Pot wouldn't have had his killing fields in Cambodia, the Soviets would have succumbed ten years earlier, and a cure for cancer would have been discovered. Maybe not. Impossible to say. Maybe if we hadn't fought at all, the commies would have been encouraged to successfully foment revolution on a wider scale and at an ultimately higher cost to us. It was a different world then. Commies were our mortal enemies. Maybe it all worked out just right - that's my view. History only records the results of the paths we chose. In any case, I did not welcome the hippies' proselytizing. But it was their right. And it was the cops' right to whack their heads when they got out of line. The hippies got us Richard Nixon and 6 more years of Viet Nam. Anyway, here we are. --Vic |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jps" wrote in message ... On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:42:20 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:31:51 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:50:29 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:50:28 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote: ROFL .... the Silent Majority ....was neither..... This says otherwise, and conforms closely to my memory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_majority Oh sure, most of the silent majority expressed their views. But not on the streets. Left it to the cops to bust heads. I'll never forget something Ed Zieben, a WWII vet I worked with a few miles from the Dem convention riots, said at the height of it. We were hot, sweating, heat treating bull workers at IH, producing the heavy machinery of America. And damn proud of it. No time to smoke dope or throw **** at cops. Pretty much like the Okies in Muskogee, except we lived in Chicago. We finished a push into a furnace, and Ed ran a rag across his brow, then looked at me and said...well actually yelled: "One 500 pounder will scatter them ****ing hippies to hell." Though I had no problem with the cops swinging their sticks, I did view that as a mite extreme. Things are more vocal now, from all sides. We need more silence. Majorly. --Vic Those hippies were trying to stop a war that eventually took 50,000 American lives. What did we get for it? History isn't on your side. Too bad the history is gone and I'm still here. --Vic If it hadn't have been for those hippies, it may have cost us another 50,000 Americans. You and I may have been among them. I'd rather be here. And maybe if they said fight the war and get r done, we could have won the war, just not the battles. Friend of mine is Cambodian. Tina said yesterday, that in her life in Cambodia, she went through 3 wars. And she was born in 1966. Only one involved Americans. Maybe she would not have seen 2 more wars. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Transom Troubles | General | |||
Transom Troubles | General | |||
More on trailer troubles - much cussin' - NSFW | General | |||
Troubles with shorepower | Cruising | |||
5.7 L Thunderbolt troubles | General |