|
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
HK wrote:
D.Duck wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Jun 12, 1:54 pm, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 12:31 pm, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Jim22208 wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:50:03 -0400, jim 1 wrote: Don't try it H. You might hurt your brain. Plonk you, ****. floridajim tries *soooo* hard to be noticed. I don't know why; he's just another knuckledragger who shot the only wad he had in the navy while helping us lose the war against vietnam. Harry, your boy is having some trouble. Tell him that you can't block a poster by saying plonk. You must also say abra ka dabra before and after saying "plonk". Well I tried it, so now lets see if you can get by my plonk You mispelled abracadabra. So did jps, he thought it was a four letter word starting with a C and ending with a T. :-) Well, if you read my sig, you will notice that I find spelling errors as enhancements to my posts True. Your statement had character and beauty, and was not flawed at it's core. Carry on! ======================= Why can't some of the others have fun here like you guys? 8) What could be more fun on usenet than watching the right-wing knuckledraggers...drag their knuckles? :) I mean, really, I go through the entire week, doing my thing to make bucks, talking on the phone, going to a meeting or two, arguing with my contacts at clients, seeing people at the local stores or post office, and I never ever come into contact with lowlifes like justhate, herring, floridajim, loogy, jackoff, et cetera. Don't forgot "planning your annual Seafood Tent Party". -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
On Jun 12, 12:54*pm, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 12:31 pm, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Jim22208 wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:50:03 -0400, jim 1 wrote: Don't try it H. You might hurt your brain. Plonk you, ****. floridajim tries *soooo* hard to be noticed. I don't know why; he's just another knuckledragger who shot the only wad he had in the navy while helping us lose the war against vietnam. Harry, your boy is having some trouble. Tell him that you can't block a poster by saying plonk. You must also say abra ka dabra before and after saying "plonk". Well I tried it, so now lets see if you can get by my plonk You mispelled abracadabra. So did jps, he thought it was a four letter word starting with a C and ending with a T. *:-) Well, if you read my sig, you will notice that I find spelling errors as enhancements to my posts -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects In my posts it 's an accepte3d way of life. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
jps wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:34:37 -0400, HK wrote: JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jun 12, 8:56 am, Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. Ding, ding, ding,... We have a winner.. Planned Parenthood got caught on tape hiding rapist identities for men as old as 34 ****ing 14 year old girls and nothing is being done about it. It all goes back to accountability, if she can't vote yet, she doesn't matter to the Democrats at all... So...how old are you, anyway? Simps. It's the "Conservatives" who seem to be regularly caught in acts indicative of sexual repression and deviancy. Cite? No?, OK. As expected. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
HK wrote:
jps wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:34:37 -0400, HK wrote: JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jun 12, 8:56 am, Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. Ding, ding, ding,... We have a winner.. Planned Parenthood got caught on tape hiding rapist identities for men as old as 34 ****ing 14 year old girls and nothing is being done about it. It all goes back to accountability, if she can't vote yet, she doesn't matter to the Democrats at all... So...how old are you, anyway? Simps. It's the "Conservatives" who seem to be regularly caught in acts indicative of sexual repression and deviancy. I sorta figured justhate was discussing his personal family life, though he's older than 34... It's not just the "deviancy" of the cons...even the ones I at one time thought were "bright" are turning out to be...less bright. This morning, for example, Eisboch thought it not possible for me to review a YouTube video he referenced in the time I allocated for it, which I suppose means he doesn't know how YouTube works. For reasons that have nothing to do with me, my internet connection apparently is about 10 times faster than his. That means I can "get" a YouTube video much faster than he can, and skim right through it without it breaking up or pixelating. Bull****. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
HK wrote:
jps wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:28:51 -0400, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. So, Bristol Palin's former beau is a lefty, eh? I'm glad you're back to being Jackoff again, Jack Goff. Suits you. Thank God he's not a liberal. He's one of those jackoffs who is trying to sell the latest "con" lie - that the holocaust museum killer wasn't one of his boys, philosophically. Bull****. Got a cite, liar? |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
D.Duck wrote:
"HK" wrote in message m... D.Duck wrote: "HK" wrote in message How about a screen shot of your Speakeasy DL/UL results? You're not aware that certain cable provides are selling pretty high speed internet connections to households, even speeds much higher than what I have? I posted speakeasy and other speedtest site results here more than once. Ask one of the googlegroupslookupassholes like Reggie or Loogy to spit 'em up. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. Sorry, I guess I missed them. They were never posted. He's a narcissistic liar and an asshole. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
HK wrote:
D.Duck wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... D.Duck wrote: "HK" wrote in message How about a screen shot of your Speakeasy DL/UL results? You're not aware that certain cable provides are selling pretty high speed internet connections to households, even speeds much higher than what I have? I posted speakeasy and other speedtest site results here more than once. Ask one of the googlegroupslookupassholes like Reggie or Loogy to spit 'em up. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. Sorry, I guess I missed them. Well, I just ran a speakeasy test, and since it is mid-morning, my DL speed is down to about 15,000+ kbps down and about 9,000 kbps up. For me to get my "best" DL speeds, I have to try very late at night or very early in the AM. The speeds shown here are typical for mid-day...usually 15,000-20,000 kbps. Again, this is nothing unusual. If I wanted to pay more, I could close to triple that at mid-day. More bull****. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
Jack wrote:
On Jun 12, 12:30 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Jim22208 wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:50:03 -0400, jim 1 wrote: Don't try it H. You might hurt your brain. Plonk you, ****. floridajim tries *soooo* hard to be noticed. I don't know why; he's just another knuckledragger who shot the only wad he had in the navy while helping us lose the war against vietnam. Harry, your boy is having some trouble. Tell him that you can't block a poster by saying plonk. You must also say abra ka dabra before and after saying "plonk". abra ka dabra.... PLONK ............................ abra ka dabra -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects jps has written that he's really smart, but have you noticed when someone puts forth an opposing viewpoint that he can't counter, he "plonks" them? He just sticks his head in the sand and ignores any thought that his mind can't comprehend, and that seems to be quite a lot. Also, consider this: "The use of profanity has been described as an attempt by a lazy and ignorant mind to express itself forcefully. Others have called profanity the refuge of the witless. People who have such a poor command of the language that they are unable to express themselves effectively often rely on profanity to impress and shock others." "And one more thing to consider—the words we choose to use reveal the kind of person we are. A person who is willing to use coarse, base, and offensive words, in public or in private, is a person whose character should be seriously questioned." This guy nailed jps. Yep. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
HK wrote:
D.Duck wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Jun 12, 1:54 pm, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 12:31 pm, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Jim22208 wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:50:03 -0400, jim 1 wrote: Don't try it H. You might hurt your brain. Plonk you, ****. floridajim tries *soooo* hard to be noticed. I don't know why; he's just another knuckledragger who shot the only wad he had in the navy while helping us lose the war against vietnam. Harry, your boy is having some trouble. Tell him that you can't block a poster by saying plonk. You must also say abra ka dabra before and after saying "plonk". Well I tried it, so now lets see if you can get by my plonk You mispelled abracadabra. So did jps, he thought it was a four letter word starting with a C and ending with a T. :-) Well, if you read my sig, you will notice that I find spelling errors as enhancements to my posts True. Your statement had character and beauty, and was not flawed at it's core. Carry on! ======================= Why can't some of the others have fun here like you guys? 8) What could be more fun on usenet than watching the right-wing knuckledraggers...drag their knuckles? :) I mean, really, I go through the entire week, doing my thing to make bucks, talking on the phone, going to a meeting or two, arguing with my contacts at clients, seeing people at the local stores or post office, and I never ever come into contact with lowlifes like justhate, herring, floridajim, loogy, jackoff, et cetera. It's...entertainment. For boating talk, I go elsewhere. You know, where there are actual boaters. Half the righties who pollute here either don't have boats or have no real interest in boats. Your interest in boats ends after you look at it through Karen's window and crawl back under your desk to chew on your fingernails. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
On Jun 12, 7:50*pm, DK wrote:
HK wrote: D.Duck wrote: "Jack" wrote in message .... On Jun 12, 1:54 pm, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 12:31 pm, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Jim22208 wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:50:03 -0400, jim 1 wrote: Don't try it H. You might hurt your brain. Plonk you, ****. floridajim tries *soooo* hard to be noticed. I don't know why; he's just another knuckledragger who shot the only wad he had in the navy while helping us lose the war against vietnam. Harry, your boy is having some trouble. Tell him that you can't block a poster by saying plonk. You must also say abra ka dabra before and after saying "plonk". Well I tried it, so now lets see if you can get by my plonk You mispelled abracadabra. So did jps, he thought it was a four letter word starting with a C and ending with a T. :-) Well, if you read my sig, you will notice that I find spelling errors as enhancements to my posts True. *Your statement had character and beauty, and was not flawed at it's core. Carry on! ======================= Why can't some of the others have fun here like you guys? *8) What could be more fun on usenet than watching the right-wing knuckledraggers...drag their knuckles? :) I mean, really, I go through the entire week, doing my thing to make bucks, talking on the phone, going to a meeting or two, arguing with my contacts at clients, seeing people at the local stores or post office, and I never ever come into contact with lowlifes like justhate, herring, floridajim, loogy, jackoff, et cetera. It's...entertainment. For boating talk, I go elsewhere. You know, where there are actual boaters. Half the righties who pollute here either don't have boats or have no real interest in boats. Your interest in boats ends after you look at it through Karen's window and crawl back under your desk to chew on your fingernails.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - snerk |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
On Jun 12, 12:41*pm, Jack wrote:
On Jun 12, 12:30*pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Jim22208 wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:50:03 -0400, jim 1 wrote: Don't try it H. You might hurt your brain. Plonk you, ****. floridajim tries *soooo* hard to be noticed. I don't know why; he's just another knuckledragger who shot the only wad he had in the navy while helping us lose the war against vietnam. Harry, your boy is having some trouble. Tell him that you can't block a poster by saying plonk. You must also say abra ka dabra before and after saying "plonk". abra ka dabra.... * *PLONK ............................ * abra ka dabra -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects jps has written that he's really smart, but have you noticed when someone puts forth an opposing viewpoint that he can't counter, he "plonks" them? *He just sticks his head in the sand and ignores any thought that his mind can't comprehend, and that seems to be quite a lot. Also, consider this: "The use of profanity has been described as an attempt by a lazy and ignorant mind to express itself forcefully. Others have called profanity the refuge of the witless. *People who have such a poor command of the language that they are unable to express themselves effectively often rely on profanity to impress and shock others." "And one more thing to consider—the words we choose to use reveal the kind of person we are. *A person who is willing to use coarse, base, and offensive words, in public or in private, is a person whose character should be seriously questioned." This guy nailed jps. Stanley Schachter and Jerome Singer developed the Two Factor Theory of Emotion. In essence, the theory developed the following structu (1) In the event that an individual has no causal explanation for an arousal state, he or she will label arousal in terms of available cognitions. (2) In the event that an individual has appropriate explanation for arousal, alternative cognitive labeling will be unlikely. (3) Under identical “cognitive circumstances”, an individual will only respond with emotional experience to the degree that he or she is physiologically excited. Basically, the psychological value of cursing and/or coarse language depends upon the force of the 'shock' which it is capable of giving. The occasion of profanity in general is a situation in which there is a high degree of emotion, usually aggressive, accompanied by a certain feeling of helplessness. Additionally, the Two Factor theory allows for differing levels of cursing/oath/coarse language as a measure of both intelligence and creativity. For example, a single oath/curse when surprised is relatively meaningless in context - as in being surprised by a loud noise or event. However, when it is used routinely in response to reasoned and/or normal discourse, it is an indicator of base intelligence and creativity. For example, a riposte of "Plonk you, ****" shows a base lack of creativity thus a low level of intelligence in addition to being rather passive. Conversly, a riposte of "You loose-toothed croup-breathed nightcrawler reeking of bathtub gin and the genetic stink of human desperation ****" shows a high level of creativity and is much more aggressive carrying much more meaning. So, while your original supposition was sound and correct, it also needed some additional clarification. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
"DK" wrote in message ... HK wrote: This morning, for example, Eisboch thought it not possible for me to review a YouTube video he referenced in the time I allocated for it, which I suppose means he doesn't know how YouTube works. For reasons that have nothing to do with me, my internet connection apparently is about 10 times faster than his. That means I can "get" a YouTube video much faster than he can, and skim right through it without it breaking up or pixelating. Bull****. It is bull****. Regardless of his super-duper cable download speeds, the fact is that YouTube streams the video files, allowing us mere mortals with normal Internet speeds to enjoy the presentation. The performance section of the "Tribute" involves at least half of the time to watch the video in real time. So Super Harry was able to watch a mere segment of a 7 plus minute long performance, then jump back to rec.boats and declare his authoritative opinion of it's quality compared to the original performance. What a guy. Professionals in the field hold Monaco in very high opinion in terms of his interpretation and ability to emulate the Jimmy Smith style of B3 organ playing. Some say Monaco has to hold back. I don't think Harry knows who Monaco or Smith is, let alone his ability to compare their capabilities. Eisboch |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
Eisboch wrote:
"DK" wrote in message ... HK wrote: This morning, for example, Eisboch thought it not possible for me to review a YouTube video he referenced in the time I allocated for it, which I suppose means he doesn't know how YouTube works. For reasons that have nothing to do with me, my internet connection apparently is about 10 times faster than his. That means I can "get" a YouTube video much faster than he can, and skim right through it without it breaking up or pixelating. Bull****. It is bull****. Regardless of his super-duper cable download speeds, the fact is that YouTube streams the video files, allowing us mere mortals with normal Internet speeds to enjoy the presentation. The performance section of the "Tribute" involves at least half of the time to watch the video in real time. So Super Harry was able to watch a mere segment of a 7 plus minute long performance, then jump back to rec.boats and declare his authoritative opinion of it's quality compared to the original performance. What a guy. Professionals in the field hold Monaco in very high opinion in terms of his interpretation and ability to emulate the Jimmy Smith style of B3 organ playing. Some say Monaco has to hold back. I don't think Harry knows who Monaco or Smith is, let alone his ability to compare their capabilities. Eisboch Nice try. The reality is, I downloaded the video from youtube, watched about 30 seconds of the schmaltzy beginning, then fast-fowarded to the middle and then the end. I probably watched two minutes in total, enough to determine the guy was damned good, but not Jimmy Smith. Just an imitator. Let's put it into simpler terms. Jimmy Smith played as Jimmy Smith; Monaco played as an imitator of Smith. Wynton Marsalis has a CD out in which he imitates many famous jazz trumpeters. I saw him interviewed about that CD many years ago. He was imitating the earlier great trumpeters (Armstrong, Miles Davis, and a couple of others), but as good as he is, he said he could never equal any of them playing their style, because each of their styles was unique, just as when he is playing *his* style, he is incomparable. Well, I'm sure your hero Monaco is terrific when he's playing in his style, but when he is playing in Smith's style, he's not Smith...he's just imitating him. You righties are quite the trip...if someone intrudes onto what you feel is your turf, you all go bat****. That's true of you, and to a much greater degree, of Tom. Entertaining, but predictable. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
On Jun 12, 8:23*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"DK" wrote in message ... HK wrote: This morning, for example, Eisboch thought it not possible for me to review a YouTube video he referenced in the time I allocated for it, which I suppose means he doesn't know how YouTube works. For reasons that have nothing to do with me, my internet connection apparently is about 10 times faster than his. That means I can "get" a YouTube video much faster than he can, and skim right through it without it breaking up or pixelating. Bull****. It is bull****. * Regardless of his super-duper cable download speeds, the fact is that YouTube streams the video files, allowing us mere mortals with normal Internet speeds to enjoy the presentation. The performance section of the "Tribute" involves at least half of the time to watch the video in real time. *So Super Harry was able to watch a mere segment of a 7 plus minute long performance, then jump back to rec.boats and declare his authoritative opinion of it's quality compared to the original performance. What a guy. Professionals in the field hold Monaco in very high opinion in terms of his interpretation and ability to emulate the Jimmy Smith style of B3 organ playing. *Some say Monaco has to hold back. I don't think Harry knows who Monaco or Smith is, let alone his ability to compare their capabilities. Eisboch Yeah, we figured that out hours ago while Harry was dancing...;) |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
"HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "DK" wrote in message ... HK wrote: This morning, for example, Eisboch thought it not possible for me to review a YouTube video he referenced in the time I allocated for it, which I suppose means he doesn't know how YouTube works. For reasons that have nothing to do with me, my internet connection apparently is about 10 times faster than his. That means I can "get" a YouTube video much faster than he can, and skim right through it without it breaking up or pixelating. Bull****. It is bull****. Regardless of his super-duper cable download speeds, the fact is that YouTube streams the video files, allowing us mere mortals with normal Internet speeds to enjoy the presentation. The performance section of the "Tribute" involves at least half of the time to watch the video in real time. So Super Harry was able to watch a mere segment of a 7 plus minute long performance, then jump back to rec.boats and declare his authoritative opinion of it's quality compared to the original performance. What a guy. Professionals in the field hold Monaco in very high opinion in terms of his interpretation and ability to emulate the Jimmy Smith style of B3 organ playing. Some say Monaco has to hold back. I don't think Harry knows who Monaco or Smith is, let alone his ability to compare their capabilities. Eisboch Nice try. The reality is, I downloaded the video from youtube, watched about 30 seconds of the schmaltzy beginning, then fast-fowarded to the middle and then the end. I probably watched two minutes in total, enough to determine the guy was damned good, but not Jimmy Smith. Just an imitator. Let's put it into simpler terms. Jimmy Smith played as Jimmy Smith; Monaco played as an imitator of Smith. Wynton Marsalis has a CD out in which he imitates many famous jazz trumpeters. I saw him interviewed about that CD many years ago. He was imitating the earlier great trumpeters (Armstrong, Miles Davis, and a couple of others), but as good as he is, he said he could never equal any of them playing their style, because each of their styles was unique, just as when he is playing *his* style, he is incomparable. Well, I'm sure your hero Monaco is terrific when he's playing in his style, but when he is playing in Smith's style, he's not Smith...he's just imitating him. You righties are quite the trip...if someone intrudes onto what you feel is your turf, you all go bat****. That's true of you, and to a much greater degree, of Tom. Entertaining, but predictable. "Us righties" ? What the hell does the playing style or competence of a B3 Hammond player have to do with politics? Sorry Harry. I'll pit my knowledge of the Hammond B3, the artists who perform on a Hammond B3 and their relative competence against your knowledge any day. Go ahead. Make my day. Eisboch |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "DK" wrote in message ... HK wrote: This morning, for example, Eisboch thought it not possible for me to review a YouTube video he referenced in the time I allocated for it, which I suppose means he doesn't know how YouTube works. For reasons that have nothing to do with me, my internet connection apparently is about 10 times faster than his. That means I can "get" a YouTube video much faster than he can, and skim right through it without it breaking up or pixelating. Bull****. It is bull****. Regardless of his super-duper cable download speeds, the fact is that YouTube streams the video files, allowing us mere mortals with normal Internet speeds to enjoy the presentation. The performance section of the "Tribute" involves at least half of the time to watch the video in real time. So Super Harry was able to watch a mere segment of a 7 plus minute long performance, then jump back to rec.boats and declare his authoritative opinion of it's quality compared to the original performance. What a guy. Professionals in the field hold Monaco in very high opinion in terms of his interpretation and ability to emulate the Jimmy Smith style of B3 organ playing. Some say Monaco has to hold back. I don't think Harry knows who Monaco or Smith is, let alone his ability to compare their capabilities. Eisboch Nice try. The reality is, I downloaded the video from youtube, watched about 30 seconds of the schmaltzy beginning, then fast-fowarded to the middle and then the end. I probably watched two minutes in total, enough to determine the guy was damned good, but not Jimmy Smith. Just an imitator. Let's put it into simpler terms. Jimmy Smith played as Jimmy Smith; Monaco played as an imitator of Smith. Wynton Marsalis has a CD out in which he imitates many famous jazz trumpeters. I saw him interviewed about that CD many years ago. He was imitating the earlier great trumpeters (Armstrong, Miles Davis, and a couple of others), but as good as he is, he said he could never equal any of them playing their style, because each of their styles was unique, just as when he is playing *his* style, he is incomparable. Well, I'm sure your hero Monaco is terrific when he's playing in his style, but when he is playing in Smith's style, he's not Smith...he's just imitating him. You righties are quite the trip...if someone intrudes onto what you feel is your turf, you all go bat****. That's true of you, and to a much greater degree, of Tom. Entertaining, but predictable. "Us righties" ? What the hell does the playing style or competence of a B3 Hammond player have to do with politics? Sorry Harry. I'll pit my knowledge of the Hammond B3, the artists who perform on a Hammond B3 and their relative competence against your knowledge any day. Go ahead. Make my day. Eisboch I never said I was an expert on the Hammond B3 or its players. But if I had my druthers, I'd rather listen to Jimmy Smith playing Jimmy Smith than some imitator playing Jimmy Smith. The comment about politics had nothing to do with politics, per se. Didn't you get that? "If someone intrudes on what you feel is your turf, you go bat****." As you did. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
Jack wrote:
On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. Snerk Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), when she allowed her daughter Bristol to be raped and impregnated by the daughter's boy friend, and then let him move into their house? Wanna bet Palin's 14-year-old daughter will also be knocked up before the next presidential election? After all, the Palins don't believe in birth control. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
On Jun 12, 8:16*pm, HK wrote:
Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-.... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. *He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. *I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. *Snerk *Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), when she allowed her daughter Bristol to be raped and impregnated by the daughter's boy friend, and then let him move into their house? Wanna bet Palin's 14-year-old daughter will also be knocked up before the next presidential election? After all, the Palins don't believe in birth control. Herr Krause. Why must you pang over girls you can't have? Tendencies of pedophilia? |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
On Jun 12, 9:16*pm, HK wrote:
Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-.... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. *He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. *I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. *Snerk *Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), "Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that)" That's another hk lie. Palin did NOT say that, as much as Matt Lauer tried to imply that. "But Palin declined Letterman’s offer to appear on his show, saying “it would be wise to keep Willow away from” him. On TODAY Friday, Lauer asked the governor if she had been implying that Willow would not be safe around the late-night comedian. “Take it however you want to take it,” Palin replied. “It was a comment that came from the heart.” “Hey, it's not in bad taste,” the governor added. “Maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow has had enough of these kinds of antics, and maybe she would want to react in a way that would take him off guard.” Heh... maybe Palin meant that Willow would just kick Letterman in the nuts. That's what liberal trash like him deserves. In any case, she did NOT say what old weird tried to lie that she did. No surprise there. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
Jack wrote:
On Jun 12, 9:16 pm, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. Snerk Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), "Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that)" That's another hk lie. Palin did NOT say that, as much as Matt Lauer tried to imply that. "But Palin declined Letterman’s offer to appear on his show, saying “it would be wise to keep Willow away from” him. On TODAY Friday, Lauer asked the governor if she had been implying that Willow would not be safe around the late-night comedian. “Take it however you want to take it,” Palin replied. “It was a comment that came from the heart.” “Hey, it's not in bad taste,” the governor added. “Maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow has had enough of these kinds of antics, and maybe she would want to react in a way that would take him off guard.” Heh... maybe Palin meant that Willow would just kick Letterman in the nuts. That's what liberal trash like him deserves. In any case, she did NOT say what old weird tried to lie that she did. No surprise there. It's just been another week of Sarah Palin playing the victim. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
On Jun 12, 10:49*pm, HK wrote:
Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 9:16 pm, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-.... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. *He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. *I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. *Snerk *Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), "Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that)" That's another hk lie. *Palin did NOT say that, as much as Matt Lauer tried to imply that. "But Palin declined Letterman’s offer to appear on his show, saying “it would be wise to keep Willow away from” him. On TODAY Friday, Lauer asked the governor if she had been implying that Willow would not be safe around the late-night comedian. “Take it however you want to take it,” Palin replied. “It was a comment that came from the heart.” “Hey, it's not in bad taste,” the governor added. “Maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow has had enough of these kinds of antics, and maybe she would want to react in a way that would take him off guard.” Heh... maybe Palin meant that Willow would just kick Letterman in the nuts. *That's what liberal trash like him deserves. *In any case, she did NOT say what old weird tried to lie that she did. *No surprise there. It's just been another week of Sarah Palin playing the victim. And another day of old weird harold lies. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
"HK" wrote in message m... Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 9:16 pm, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. Snerk Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), "Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that)" That's another hk lie. Palin did NOT say that, as much as Matt Lauer tried to imply that. "But Palin declined Letterman’s offer to appear on his show, saying “it would be wise to keep Willow away from” him. On TODAY Friday, Lauer asked the governor if she had been implying that Willow would not be safe around the late-night comedian. “Take it however you want to take it,” Palin replied. “It was a comment that came from the heart.” “Hey, it's not in bad taste,” the governor added. “Maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow has had enough of these kinds of antics, and maybe she would want to react in a way that would take him off guard.” Heh... maybe Palin meant that Willow would just kick Letterman in the nuts. That's what liberal trash like him deserves. In any case, she did NOT say what old weird tried to lie that she did. No surprise there. It's just been another week of Sarah Palin playing the victim. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. Should be a week which starts the transfer of a large part of Letterman's wealth to Willow. Was completely out of line, slanderous. What would you have said if it one of Obama's children had been substituted. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
On Jun 12, 9:49*pm, HK wrote:
Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 9:16 pm, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-.... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. *He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. *I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. *Snerk *Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), "Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that)" That's another hk lie. *Palin did NOT say that, as much as Matt Lauer tried to imply that. "But Palin declined Letterman’s offer to appear on his show, saying “it would be wise to keep Willow away from” him. On TODAY Friday, Lauer asked the governor if she had been implying that Willow would not be safe around the late-night comedian. “Take it however you want to take it,” Palin replied. “It was a comment that came from the heart.” “Hey, it's not in bad taste,” the governor added. “Maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow has had enough of these kinds of antics, and maybe she would want to react in a way that would take him off guard.” Heh... maybe Palin meant that Willow would just kick Letterman in the nuts. *That's what liberal trash like him deserves. *In any case, she did NOT say what old weird tried to lie that she did. *No surprise there. It's just been another week of Sarah Palin playing the victim. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. Herr Krause. Playing the *victim?* or being "victimized?" |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
Calif Bill wrote:
"HK" wrote in message m... Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 9:16 pm, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. Snerk Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), "Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that)" That's another hk lie. Palin did NOT say that, as much as Matt Lauer tried to imply that. "But Palin declined Letterman’s offer to appear on his show, saying “it would be wise to keep Willow away from” him. On TODAY Friday, Lauer asked the governor if she had been implying that Willow would not be safe around the late-night comedian. “Take it however you want to take it,” Palin replied. “It was a comment that came from the heart.” “Hey, it's not in bad taste,” the governor added. “Maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow has had enough of these kinds of antics, and maybe she would want to react in a way that would take him off guard.” Heh... maybe Palin meant that Willow would just kick Letterman in the nuts. That's what liberal trash like him deserves. In any case, she did NOT say what old weird tried to lie that she did. No surprise there. It's just been another week of Sarah Palin playing the victim. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. Should be a week which starts the transfer of a large part of Letterman's wealth to Willow. Was completely out of line, slanderous. What would you have said if it one of Obama's children had been substituted. Can't do that. It would be racist. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:37:49 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote: "HK" wrote in message om... Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 9:16 pm, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. Snerk Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), "Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that)" That's another hk lie. Palin did NOT say that, as much as Matt Lauer tried to imply that. "But Palin declined Letterman’s offer to appear on his show, saying “it would be wise to keep Willow away from” him. On TODAY Friday, Lauer asked the governor if she had been implying that Willow would not be safe around the late-night comedian. “Take it however you want to take it,” Palin replied. “It was a comment that came from the heart.” “Hey, it's not in bad taste,” the governor added. “Maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow has had enough of these kinds of antics, and maybe she would want to react in a way that would take him off guard.” Heh... maybe Palin meant that Willow would just kick Letterman in the nuts. That's what liberal trash like him deserves. In any case, she did NOT say what old weird tried to lie that she did. No surprise there. It's just been another week of Sarah Palin playing the victim. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. Should be a week which starts the transfer of a large part of Letterman's wealth to Willow. Was completely out of line, slanderous. What would you have said if it one of Obama's children had been substituted. The Palin's are the ones parading their kids in public. The Obamas don't grant access to their kids, at home or otherwise. If you really want to protect your kids, taking them on political jaunts probably isn't a good idea. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
On Jun 13, 5:14*am, jps wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:37:49 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "HK" wrote in message om... Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 9:16 pm, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. *He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. *I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. *Snerk *Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), "Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that)" That's another hk lie. *Palin did NOT say that, as much as Matt Lauer tried to imply that. "But Palin declined Letterman’s offer to appear on his show, saying “it would be wise to keep Willow away from” him. On TODAY Friday, Lauer asked the governor if she had been implying that Willow would not be safe around the late-night comedian. “Take it however you want to take it,” Palin replied. “It was a comment that came from the heart.” “Hey, it's not in bad taste,” the governor added. “Maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow has had enough of these kinds of antics, and maybe she would want to react in a way that would take him off guard.” Heh... maybe Palin meant that Willow would just kick Letterman in the nuts. *That's what liberal trash like him deserves. *In any case, she did NOT say what old weird tried to lie that she did. *No surprise there. It's just been another week of Sarah Palin playing the victim. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. Should be a week which starts the transfer of a large part of Letterman's wealth to Willow. *Was completely out of line, slanderous. *What would you have said if it one of Obama's children had been substituted. The Palin's are the ones parading their kids in public. *The Obamas don't grant access to their kids, at home or otherwise. If you really want to protect your kids, taking them on political jaunts probably isn't a good idea. Remember last week's Middle East and Europe trip the Obamas took, *with* their children? Idiot. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
Jack wrote:
On Jun 13, 5:14 am, jps wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:37:49 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 9:16 pm, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. Snerk Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), "Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that)" That's another hk lie. Palin did NOT say that, as much as Matt Lauer tried to imply that. "But Palin declined Letterman’s offer to appear on his show, saying “it would be wise to keep Willow away from” him. On TODAY Friday, Lauer asked the governor if she had been implying that Willow would not be safe around the late-night comedian. “Take it however you want to take it,” Palin replied. “It was a comment that came from the heart.” “Hey, it's not in bad taste,” the governor added. “Maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow has had enough of these kinds of antics, and maybe she would want to react in a way that would take him off guard.” Heh... maybe Palin meant that Willow would just kick Letterman in the nuts. That's what liberal trash like him deserves. In any case, she did NOT say what old weird tried to lie that she did. No surprise there. It's just been another week of Sarah Palin playing the victim. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. Should be a week which starts the transfer of a large part of Letterman's wealth to Willow. Was completely out of line, slanderous. What would you have said if it one of Obama's children had been substituted. The Palin's are the ones parading their kids in public. The Obamas don't grant access to their kids, at home or otherwise. If you really want to protect your kids, taking them on political jaunts probably isn't a good idea. Remember last week's Middle East and Europe trip the Obamas took, *with* their children? Idiot. First of all, the Obamas traveled separately...and Mrs. Obama and the kids had for the most part different schedules. The kids had no political appearances. Palin is always parading her children around at political events. During the campaign, she had her knocked-up daughter with her and trotted her out on every occasion, and even had the boyfriend who raped her living at her house...and if memory serves, he was part of the campaign entourage, too. My bet stands...that Ferntree Palin or whatever the 14 year old daughter's name is...will be pregnant before the 2012 elections. The Palins...sounds like a TV family sitcom for deviant adults. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
On Jun 13, 8:26*am, HK wrote:
Jack wrote: On Jun 13, 5:14 am, jps wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:37:49 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "HK" wrote in message news:PMKdnSJ9t4Eijq7XnZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@earthlink .com... Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 9:16 pm, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. *He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. *I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. *Snerk *Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), "Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that)" That's another hk lie. *Palin did NOT say that, as much as Matt Lauer tried to imply that. "But Palin declined Letterman’s offer to appear on his show, saying “it would be wise to keep Willow away from” him. On TODAY Friday, Lauer asked the governor if she had been implying that Willow would not be safe around the late-night comedian. “Take it however you want to take it,” Palin replied. “It was a comment that came from the heart.” “Hey, it's not in bad taste,” the governor added. “Maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow has had enough of these kinds of antics, and maybe she would want to react in a way that would take him off guard.” Heh... maybe Palin meant that Willow would just kick Letterman in the nuts. *That's what liberal trash like him deserves. *In any case, she did NOT say what old weird tried to lie that she did. *No surprise there. It's just been another week of Sarah Palin playing the victim. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. Should be a week which starts the transfer of a large part of Letterman's wealth to Willow. *Was completely out of line, slanderous. *What would you have said if it one of Obama's children had been substituted. The Palin's are the ones parading their kids in public. *The Obamas don't grant access to their kids, at home or otherwise. If you really want to protect your kids, taking them on political jaunts probably isn't a good idea. Remember last week's Middle East and Europe trip the Obamas took, *with* their children? Idiot. First of all, the Obamas traveled separately...and Mrs. Obama and the kids had for the most part different schedules. The kids had no political appearances. Palin took her 14 year old daughter to a baseball game. Liberal gasbag Letterman attacked her with very inappropriate sexual remarks. No amount of spin can deflect from that fact. And you're in a dream world if you think that o didn't use his family on the campaign trail, and continues to take them on political trips. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
Jack wrote:
On Jun 13, 8:26 am, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 13, 5:14 am, jps wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:37:49 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 9:16 pm, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. Snerk Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), "Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that)" That's another hk lie. Palin did NOT say that, as much as Matt Lauer tried to imply that. "But Palin declined Letterman’s offer to appear on his show, saying “it would be wise to keep Willow away from” him. On TODAY Friday, Lauer asked the governor if she had been implying that Willow would not be safe around the late-night comedian. “Take it however you want to take it,” Palin replied. “It was a comment that came from the heart.” “Hey, it's not in bad taste,” the governor added. “Maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow has had enough of these kinds of antics, and maybe she would want to react in a way that would take him off guard.” Heh... maybe Palin meant that Willow would just kick Letterman in the nuts. That's what liberal trash like him deserves. In any case, she did NOT say what old weird tried to lie that she did. No surprise there. It's just been another week of Sarah Palin playing the victim. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. Should be a week which starts the transfer of a large part of Letterman's wealth to Willow. Was completely out of line, slanderous. What would you have said if it one of Obama's children had been substituted. The Palin's are the ones parading their kids in public. The Obamas don't grant access to their kids, at home or otherwise. If you really want to protect your kids, taking them on political jaunts probably isn't a good idea. Remember last week's Middle East and Europe trip the Obamas took, *with* their children? Idiot. First of all, the Obamas traveled separately...and Mrs. Obama and the kids had for the most part different schedules. The kids had no political appearances. Palin took her 14 year old daughter to a baseball game. Liberal gasbag Letterman attacked her with very inappropriate sexual remarks. No amount of spin can deflect from that fact. And you're in a dream world if you think that o didn't use his family on the campaign trail, and continues to take them on political trips. Did the first lady and the rug rats fly commercial or did we have to pay for two planes, with double the fuel and who knows how many more secret service agents. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
On Jun 13, 8:46*am, jim 001 wrote:
Jack wrote: On Jun 13, 8:26 am, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 13, 5:14 am, jps wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:37:49 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "HK" wrote in message news:PMKdnSJ9t4Eijq7XnZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@earthli nk.com... Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 9:16 pm, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. *He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. *I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. *Snerk *Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), "Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that)" That's another hk lie. *Palin did NOT say that, as much as Matt Lauer tried to imply that. "But Palin declined Letterman’s offer to appear on his show, saying “it would be wise to keep Willow away from” him. On TODAY Friday, Lauer asked the governor if she had been implying that Willow would not be safe around the late-night comedian. “Take it however you want to take it,” Palin replied. “It was a comment that came from the heart.” “Hey, it's not in bad taste,” the governor added. “Maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow has had enough of these kinds of antics, and maybe she would want to react in a way that would take him off guard.” Heh... maybe Palin meant that Willow would just kick Letterman in the nuts. *That's what liberal trash like him deserves. *In any case, she did NOT say what old weird tried to lie that she did. *No surprise there. It's just been another week of Sarah Palin playing the victim. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. Should be a week which starts the transfer of a large part of Letterman's wealth to Willow. *Was completely out of line, slanderous. *What would you have said if it one of Obama's children had been substituted. The Palin's are the ones parading their kids in public. *The Obamas don't grant access to their kids, at home or otherwise. If you really want to protect your kids, taking them on political jaunts probably isn't a good idea. Remember last week's Middle East and Europe trip the Obamas took, *with* their children? Idiot. First of all, the Obamas traveled separately...and Mrs. Obama and the kids had for the most part different schedules. The kids had no political appearances. Palin took her 14 year old daughter to a baseball game. *Liberal gasbag Letterman attacked her with very inappropriate sexual remarks. No amount of spin can deflect from that fact. And you're in a dream world if you think that o didn't use his family on the campaign trail, and continues to take them on political trips. Did the first lady and the rug rats fly commercial or did we have to pay for two planes, with double the fuel and who knows how many more secret service agents. Jim, you know that the potus and FL and family's travel plans are top secret and classified. Only the Secret Service and old weird know how they travel. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
Jack wrote:
On Jun 13, 8:26 am, HK wrote: First of all, the Obamas traveled separately...and Mrs. Obama and the kids had for the most part different schedules. The kids had no political appearances. Palin took her 14 year old daughter to a baseball game. Liberal gasbag Letterman attacked her with very inappropriate sexual remarks. No amount of spin can deflect from that fact. Yeah, Sarah, Pinecone and Rudy Guiliani. Non-political appearance. As for the "feelings" of the Palin family, well, truthfully, I don't give a ****. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
On Jun 13, 9:24*am, HK wrote:
Jack wrote: On Jun 13, 8:26 am, HK wrote: First of all, the Obamas traveled separately...and Mrs. Obama and the kids had for the most part different schedules. The kids had no political appearances. Palin took her 14 year old daughter to a baseball game. *Liberal gasbag Letterman attacked her with very inappropriate sexual remarks. No amount of spin can deflect from that fact. Yeah, Sarah, Pinecone and Rudy Guiliani. Non-political appearance. Now you're getting it! A baseball game is not a political event, and no one "appears" when they attend one. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:26:06 -0400, HK wrote:
Jack wrote: On Jun 13, 5:14 am, jps wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:37:49 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 9:16 pm, HK wrote: Jack wrote: On Jun 12, 8:44 am, TopBassDog wrote: ....and quit writing jokes for David Letterman: http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/200...vid-letterman-... before you both end up on the streets. Letterman is a liar. He knew exactly which daughter was with Palin on her trip to NY, but he went ahead with the comments anyway. I see now why the lefty wingnuts want to make sure young girls can get an abortion... they need that to be able to cover their tracks when they commit rape on young girls. Snerk Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that), "Why would Sarah Palin be worried about Dave Letterman raping her daughter (yes, she said that)" That's another hk lie. Palin did NOT say that, as much as Matt Lauer tried to imply that. "But Palin declined Letterman’s offer to appear on his show, saying “it would be wise to keep Willow away from” him. On TODAY Friday, Lauer asked the governor if she had been implying that Willow would not be safe around the late-night comedian. “Take it however you want to take it,” Palin replied. “It was a comment that came from the heart.” “Hey, it's not in bad taste,” the governor added. “Maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow has had enough of these kinds of antics, and maybe she would want to react in a way that would take him off guard.” Heh... maybe Palin meant that Willow would just kick Letterman in the nuts. That's what liberal trash like him deserves. In any case, she did NOT say what old weird tried to lie that she did. No surprise there. It's just been another week of Sarah Palin playing the victim. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. Should be a week which starts the transfer of a large part of Letterman's wealth to Willow. Was completely out of line, slanderous. What would you have said if it one of Obama's children had been substituted. The Palin's are the ones parading their kids in public. The Obamas don't grant access to their kids, at home or otherwise. If you really want to protect your kids, taking them on political jaunts probably isn't a good idea. Remember last week's Middle East and Europe trip the Obamas took, *with* their children? Idiot. First of all, the Obamas traveled separately...and Mrs. Obama and the kids had for the most part different schedules. The kids had no political appearances. Palin is always parading her children around at political events. During the campaign, she had her knocked-up daughter with her and trotted her out on every occasion, and even had the boyfriend who raped her living at her house...and if memory serves, he was part of the campaign entourage, too. My bet stands...that Ferntree Palin or whatever the 14 year old daughter's name is...will be pregnant before the 2012 elections. The Palins...sounds like a TV family sitcom for deviant adults. Jack Off hasn't a clue what he's talking about, as usual. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 09:24:14 -0400, HK wrote:
Jack wrote: On Jun 13, 8:26 am, HK wrote: First of all, the Obamas traveled separately...and Mrs. Obama and the kids had for the most part different schedules. The kids had no political appearances. Palin took her 14 year old daughter to a baseball game. Liberal gasbag Letterman attacked her with very inappropriate sexual remarks. No amount of spin can deflect from that fact. Yeah, Sarah, Pinecone and Rudy Guiliani. Non-political appearance. As for the "feelings" of the Palin family, well, truthfully, I don't give a ****. They've ginned this up into a ratings bonanza for Letterman. And, made themselves look even whinier than they were when claiming Obama palled around with terrorists. Hayseed hicks. Appealing to the ignorant 20%. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
On Jun 13, 9:24*am, HK wrote:
Jack wrote: On Jun 13, 8:26 am, HK wrote: First of all, the Obamas traveled separately...and Mrs. Obama and the kids had for the most part different schedules. The kids had no political appearances. Palin took her 14 year old daughter to a baseball game. *Liberal gasbag Letterman attacked her with very inappropriate sexual remarks. No amount of spin can deflect from that fact. Yeah, Sarah, Pinecone and Rudy Guiliani. Non-political appearance. As for the "feelings" of the Palin family, well, truthfully, I don't give a ****. Gee what an amazing humanitarian. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
Eisboch wrote:
"DK" wrote in message ... HK wrote: This morning, for example, Eisboch thought it not possible for me to review a YouTube video he referenced in the time I allocated for it, which I suppose means he doesn't know how YouTube works. For reasons that have nothing to do with me, my internet connection apparently is about 10 times faster than his. That means I can "get" a YouTube video much faster than he can, and skim right through it without it breaking up or pixelating. Bull****. It is bull****. Regardless of his super-duper cable download speeds, the fact is that YouTube streams the video files, allowing us mere mortals with normal Internet speeds to enjoy the presentation. The performance section of the "Tribute" involves at least half of the time to watch the video in real time. So Super Harry was able to watch a mere segment of a 7 plus minute long performance, then jump back to rec.boats and declare his authoritative opinion of it's quality compared to the original performance. What a guy. Professionals in the field hold Monaco in very high opinion in terms of his interpretation and ability to emulate the Jimmy Smith style of B3 organ playing. Some say Monaco has to hold back. I don't think Harry knows who Monaco or Smith is, let alone his ability to compare their capabilities. Eisboch He will Google it and debate you. What else does he have to do all day? |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "DK" wrote in message ... HK wrote: This morning, for example, Eisboch thought it not possible for me to review a YouTube video he referenced in the time I allocated for it, which I suppose means he doesn't know how YouTube works. For reasons that have nothing to do with me, my internet connection apparently is about 10 times faster than his. That means I can "get" a YouTube video much faster than he can, and skim right through it without it breaking up or pixelating. Bull****. It is bull****. Regardless of his super-duper cable download speeds, the fact is that YouTube streams the video files, allowing us mere mortals with normal Internet speeds to enjoy the presentation. The performance section of the "Tribute" involves at least half of the time to watch the video in real time. So Super Harry was able to watch a mere segment of a 7 plus minute long performance, then jump back to rec.boats and declare his authoritative opinion of it's quality compared to the original performance. What a guy. Professionals in the field hold Monaco in very high opinion in terms of his interpretation and ability to emulate the Jimmy Smith style of B3 organ playing. Some say Monaco has to hold back. I don't think Harry knows who Monaco or Smith is, let alone his ability to compare their capabilities. Eisboch Nice try. The reality is, I downloaded the video from youtube, watched about 30 seconds of the schmaltzy beginning, then fast-fowarded to the middle and then the end. I probably watched two minutes in total, enough to determine the guy was damned good, but not Jimmy Smith. Just an imitator. Let's put it into simpler terms. Jimmy Smith played as Jimmy Smith; Monaco played as an imitator of Smith. Wynton Marsalis has a CD out in which he imitates many famous jazz trumpeters. I saw him interviewed about that CD many years ago. He was imitating the earlier great trumpeters (Armstrong, Miles Davis, and a couple of others), but as good as he is, he said he could never equal any of them playing their style, because each of their styles was unique, just as when he is playing *his* style, he is incomparable. Well, I'm sure your hero Monaco is terrific when he's playing in his style, but when he is playing in Smith's style, he's not Smith...he's just imitating him. You righties are quite the trip...if someone intrudes onto what you feel is your turf, you all go bat****. That's true of you, and to a much greater degree, of Tom. Entertaining, but predictable. "Us righties" ? What the hell does the playing style or competence of a B3 Hammond player have to do with politics? Sorry Harry. I'll pit my knowledge of the Hammond B3, the artists who perform on a Hammond B3 and their relative competence against your knowledge any day. Go ahead. Make my day. Eisboch Yup. He pretends to killfile anyone who he can't debate. By his own admission, he has a large "killfile". |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
Looks like the old boy gave in. Maybe he finally realised that the
insulting joke he made at the Governor and her families expense, actually wasn't all that funny. http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...lLdqgD98REJ880 Of course, Herr Krause will always believe that Letterman is the true victim in this case. |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
"TopBassDog" wrote in message ... Looks like the old boy gave in. Maybe he finally realised that the insulting joke he made at the Governor and her families expense, actually wasn't all that funny. http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...lLdqgD98REJ880 Of course, Herr Krause will always believe that Letterman is the true victim in this case. It was a joke... nothing more. These guys that tell jokes for a living, are used to hits and misses. This one missed... no big deal. He got more laughs from his on-air apology. It was a win-win for Letterman, and I aint no big Letterman fan. I *am* a Palin fan however, if for no reason other than that hairy hates her. Hell, I registered Republican for the first time in my life after reading hairy's dribble for the last few years. I figured if he's what the Dems are all about, I want nothing to do with them. He's a hell of a cheerleader for the party!! *Us* Repubs should pray he keeps it up! g --Mike |
Herr Krause. Seek a new occupation...
"mgg" wrote in message ... "TopBassDog" wrote in message ... Looks like the old boy gave in. Maybe he finally realised that the insulting joke he made at the Governor and her families expense, actually wasn't all that funny. http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...lLdqgD98REJ880 Of course, Herr Krause will always believe that Letterman is the true victim in this case. It was a joke... nothing more. These guys that tell jokes for a living, are used to hits and misses. This one missed... no big deal. He got more laughs from his on-air apology. It was a win-win for Letterman, and I aint no big Letterman fan. I *am* a Palin fan however, if for no reason other than that hairy hates her. Hell, I registered Republican for the first time in my life after reading hairy's dribble for the last few years. I figured if he's what the Dems are all about, I want nothing to do with them. He's a hell of a cheerleader for the party!! *Us* Repubs should pray he keeps it up! g --Mike Was a joke in his mind and his writers mind(s). Was not a joke. Was not funny, and even if it was about the 18 year old, was not appropriate. Would be interesting to hear A-rods take on it. Insulted him also. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com