|
Nice try Tom
"jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message . .. Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today. It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it? --Mike No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom. Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than your buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh. --Mike |
Nice try Tom
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:
"jps" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today. It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it? --Mike No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom. Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than your buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh. --Mike It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political posts. |
Nice try Tom
"jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message . .. On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message m... Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today. It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it? --Mike No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom. Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than your buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh. --Mike It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political posts. You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at this point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for 8 or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted. --Mike --Mike |
Nice try Tom
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:
"jps" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message om... Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today. It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it? --Mike No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom. Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than your buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh. --Mike It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political posts. You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at this point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for 8 or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted. --Mike --Mike Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along. How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's # on a monthly basis. |
Nice try Tom
"jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message . .. On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message m... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message news:998035p93g23qr6fffc4sinp35cj046k67@4ax. com... Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today. It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it? --Mike No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom. Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than your buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh. --Mike It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political posts. You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at this point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for 8 or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted. --Mike --Mike Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along. How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's # on a monthly basis. No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house for the past 6 months... Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade. --Mike |
Nice try Tom
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:41:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:
"jps" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message om... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message news:998035p93g23qr6fffc4sinp35cj046k67@4ax .com... Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today. It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it? --Mike No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom. Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than your buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh. --Mike It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political posts. You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at this point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for 8 or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted. --Mike --Mike Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along. How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's # on a monthly basis. No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house for the past 6 months... Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade. --Mike Tom doesn't post a single item that doesn't have a link. What the diff between cut and paste and a pointer? Your partisan bent is what... |
Nice try Tom
"jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:41:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message . .. On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message m... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message news:ioc035dr1m5rf46jrt7edoteov0abjgp1g@4ax. com... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message news:998035p93g23qr6fffc4sinp35cj046k67@4a x.com... Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today. It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it? --Mike No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom. Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than your buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh. --Mike It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political posts. You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at this point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for 8 or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted. --Mike --Mike Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along. How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's # on a monthly basis. No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house for the past 6 months... Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade. --Mike Tom doesn't post a single item that doesn't have a link. What the diff between cut and paste and a pointer? Your partisan bent is what... There ya go... you spin to deflect. The *point* here is that harry has been posting *exponentially* more political garbage than Tom. Can you not agree with that?? I don't care who is cut-n-pasting or posting links. Personally, I'd prefer the latter anyway. A cut and paste is an *attempt* to force feed your message, a link doesn't have to be clicked. The point is that harry has turned this place into a political garbage dump... no one else. Anyone else that's doing it is just having fun with harry... pure and simple. --Mike |
Nice try Tom
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:22:27 -0700, "mgg" wrote:
"jps" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:41:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message om... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message news:ioc035dr1m5rf46jrt7edoteov0abjgp1g@4ax .com... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message news:998035p93g23qr6fffc4sinp35cj046k67@4 ax.com... Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today. It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it? --Mike No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom. Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than your buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh. --Mike It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political posts. You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at this point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for 8 or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted. --Mike --Mike Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along. How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's # on a monthly basis. No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house for the past 6 months... Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade. --Mike Tom doesn't post a single item that doesn't have a link. What the diff between cut and paste and a pointer? Your partisan bent is what... There ya go... you spin to deflect. The *point* here is that harry has been posting *exponentially* more political garbage than Tom. Can you not agree with that?? I don't care who is cut-n-pasting or posting links. Personally, I'd prefer the latter anyway. A cut and paste is an *attempt* to force feed your message, a link doesn't have to be clicked. The point is that harry has turned this place into a political garbage dump... no one else. Anyone else that's doing it is just having fun with harry... pure and simple. --Mike You're not forced to read or click so they're the same. Again, I didn't say who *posted* more, I was pointing out that Tom has eclipsed Harry in *initiating* political threads. That's all I said. |
Nice try Tom
"mgg" wrote in message ... "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message om... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message news:998035p93g23qr6fffc4sinp35cj046k67@4ax .com... Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today. It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it? --Mike No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom. Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than your buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh. --Mike It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political posts. You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at this point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for 8 or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted. --Mike --Mike Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along. How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's # on a monthly basis. No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house for the past 6 months... Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade. --Mike Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years. |
Nice try Tom
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:24:53 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote: Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years. How can you mistake half the congressional Democrats for liberals is a testament to your powers of perception. Have a look at the Blue Dogs. They're your kinda Dem. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com