Nice try Tom
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..

Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.

It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike

No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.

Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike

Nice try Tom
 

On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...

Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.

It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike

No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.

Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike

It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.

Nice try Tom
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...

Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.

It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike

No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.

Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike

It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.

You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for 8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike

Nice try Tom
 

On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...

Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.

It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike

No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.

Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike

It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.

You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for 8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike

Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's
# on a monthly basis.

Nice try Tom
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:998035p93g23qr6fffc4sinp35cj046k67@4ax. com...

Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.

It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike

No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.

Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike

It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.

You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at
this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for 8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike

Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's
# on a monthly basis.

No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of
political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be for
a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some arbitrary
time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been purely caused
by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house for the past 6
months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike

Nice try Tom
 

On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:41:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:998035p93g23qr6fffc4sinp35cj046k67@4ax .com...

Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.

It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike

No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.

Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike

It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.

You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at
this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for 8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike

Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's
# on a monthly basis.

No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of
political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be for
a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some arbitrary
time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been purely caused
by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house for the past 6
months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike

Tom doesn't post a single item that doesn't have a link. What the
diff between cut and paste and a pointer?

Your partisan bent is what...

Nice try Tom
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:41:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:ioc035dr1m5rf46jrt7edoteov0abjgp1g@4ax. com...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:998035p93g23qr6fffc4sinp35cj046k67@4a x.com...

Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide
the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.

It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike

No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.

Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike

It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.

You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at
this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for
8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike

Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's
# on a monthly basis.

No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of
political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be
for
a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some arbitrary
time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been purely
caused
by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house for the past 6
months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike

Tom doesn't post a single item that doesn't have a link. What the
diff between cut and paste and a pointer?

Your partisan bent is what...

There ya go... you spin to deflect. The *point* here is that harry has been
posting *exponentially* more political garbage than Tom. Can you not agree
with that?? I don't care who is cut-n-pasting or posting links. Personally,
I'd prefer the latter anyway. A cut and paste is an *attempt* to force feed
your message, a link doesn't have to be clicked. The point is that harry has
turned this place into a political garbage dump... no one else. Anyone else
that's doing it is just having fun with harry... pure and simple.

--Mike

Nice try Tom
 

On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:22:27 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:41:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:ioc035dr1m5rf46jrt7edoteov0abjgp1g@4ax .com...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:998035p93g23qr6fffc4sinp35cj046k67@4 ax.com...

Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide
the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.

It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike

No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.

Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike

It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.

You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at
this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for
8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike

Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's
# on a monthly basis.

No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of
political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be
for
a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some arbitrary
time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been purely
caused
by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house for the past 6
months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike

Tom doesn't post a single item that doesn't have a link. What the
diff between cut and paste and a pointer?

Your partisan bent is what...

There ya go... you spin to deflect. The *point* here is that harry has been
posting *exponentially* more political garbage than Tom. Can you not agree
with that?? I don't care who is cut-n-pasting or posting links. Personally,
I'd prefer the latter anyway. A cut and paste is an *attempt* to force feed
your message, a link doesn't have to be clicked. The point is that harry has
turned this place into a political garbage dump... no one else. Anyone else
that's doing it is just having fun with harry... pure and simple.

--Mike

You're not forced to read or click so they're the same.

Again, I didn't say who *posted* more, I was pointing out that Tom has
eclipsed Harry in *initiating* political threads.

That's all I said.

Nice try Tom
 

"mgg" wrote in message
...

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:998035p93g23qr6fffc4sinp35cj046k67@4ax .com...

Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide
the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.

It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike

No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.

Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike

It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.

You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at
this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for
8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike

Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's
# on a monthly basis.

No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of
political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be
for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some
arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been
purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house
for the past 6 months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike


Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years.

Nice try Tom
 

On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:24:53 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years.

How can you mistake half the congressional Democrats for liberals is a
testament to your powers of perception.

Have a look at the Blue Dogs. They're your kinda Dem.

Nice try Tom
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:24:53 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years.

How can you mistake half the congressional Democrats for liberals is a
testament to your powers of perception.

Have a look at the Blue Dogs. They're your kinda Dem.

They are voting the Pelosi / Reid line.

Nice try Tom
 

On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:25:43 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:24:53 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years.

How can you mistake half the congressional Democrats for liberals is a
testament to your powers of perception.

Have a look at the Blue Dogs. They're your kinda Dem.

They are voting the Pelosi / Reid line.

"Liberals" would be clamoring for a single payer, public option so
there would be competition for health care insurance.

You'll find very few congress members even considering the single
payer option.

They're not liberals, as you'd like to believe.

Nice try Tom
 

On Jun 11, 12:28*am, jps wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:22:27 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:41:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
news:ioc035dr1m5rf46jrt7edoteov0abjgp1g@4ax .com...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
news:998035p93g23qr6fffc4sinp35cj046k67@4 ax.com...

Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide
the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.

It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike

No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.

Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike

It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.

You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at
this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for
8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike

Oh, okay. *I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along..

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's
# on a monthly basis.

No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of
political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be
for
a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some arbitrary
time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been purely
caused
by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house for the past 6
months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike

Tom doesn't post a single item that doesn't have a link. *What the
diff between cut and paste and a pointer?

Your partisan bent is what...

There ya go... you spin to deflect. The *point* here is that harry has been
posting *exponentially* more political garbage than Tom. Can you not agree
with that?? I don't care who is cut-n-pasting or posting links. Personally,
I'd prefer the latter anyway. A cut and paste is an *attempt* to force feed
your message, a link doesn't have to be clicked. The point is that harry has
turned this place into a political garbage dump... no one else. Anyone else
that's doing it is just having fun with harry... pure and simple.

--Mike

You're not forced to read or click so they're the same.

Again, I didn't say who *posted* more, I was pointing out that Tom has
eclipsed Harry in *initiating* political threads.

That's all I said.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh yeah, that must be what "is", is. I really think you guys are proud
of being dishonest little cowards, amazing..

Nice try Tom
 

On Jun 11, 1:24*am, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message

...







"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
news:998035p93g23qr6fffc4sinp35cj046k67@4ax .com...

Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide
the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.

It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike

No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.

Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike

It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.

You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at
this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for
8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike

Oh, okay. *I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's
# on a monthly basis.

No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of
political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be
for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some
arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been
purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house
for the past 6 months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike

Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yeah, remember Pelosi's big deal about "first thing we will take care
of will be gas prices"? Geeze, within a year 4 dollar gas puts the
world in a recession, now it's happening again while the dems spend
their time deflecting legal actions against criminals like Dodd,
Pelosi, Jefferson, Murtha, Obama, Feinstein... The list of criminals
being protected by the congress is endless..

Nice try Tom
 

Calif Bill wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message
...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide
the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.
It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike
No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.
Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike
It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.
You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at
this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for
8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike
Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's
# on a monthly basis.
No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of
political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be
for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some
arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been
purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house
for the past 6 months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike


Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years.




Nope. If the "liberals" had been in charge, we'd already be out of Iraq,
we'd have single-payer health care, Cheney would be under indictment, a
hate crimes bill would have been passed, gay marriage would be legal in
all 50 states, and the rich would be paying taxes on all income, as is
their privilege.

You really don't know anyting about politics, Bilious.



--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Nice try Tom
 

On Jun 11, 2:32*am, jps wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:25:43 -0700, "Calif Bill"





wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:24:53 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years.

How can you mistake half the congressional Democrats for liberals is a
testament to your powers of perception.

Have a look at the Blue Dogs. *They're your kinda Dem.

They are voting the Pelosi / Reid line.

"Liberals" would be clamoring for a single payer, public option so
there would be competition for health care insurance.

You'll find very few congress members even considering the single
payer option.

They're not liberals, as you'd like to believe.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

They're voting the Pelosi / Reid line, period.... And getting paid
well for it.

Nice try Tom
 

HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message
...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not
hide the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.
It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike
No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.
Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda
than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike
It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.
You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest
at this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political
postings for 8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike
Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's
# on a monthly basis.
No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the
king of political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought),
and will be for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is
historically, not some arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then
our economic mess has been purely caused by the liberals... after
all, they've had the white house for the past 6 months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike


Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years.



Nope. If the "liberals" had been in charge, we'd already be out of Iraq,
we'd have single-payer health care, Cheney would be under indictment, a
hate crimes bill would have been passed, gay marriage would be legal in
all 50 states, and the rich would be paying taxes on all income, as is
their privilege.

You really don't know anyting about politics, Bilious.



So the liberals have taken over but they haven't taken charge yet. That
sums up what you are saying. Well. We're waiting. I see the messiah
declaring this and that, but he's only making a bigger mess out of
everything.
What do you know about politics, Krause?

Nice try Tom
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:25:43 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:24:53 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years.

How can you mistake half the congressional Democrats for liberals is a
testament to your powers of perception.

Have a look at the Blue Dogs. They're your kinda Dem.

They are voting the Pelosi / Reid line.

"Liberals" would be clamoring for a single payer, public option so
there would be competition for health care insurance.

You'll find very few congress members even considering the single
payer option.

They're not liberals, as you'd like to believe.

Yup, on the way to the dermatologist this morning, heard the report of Obama
pitching his $1.3 Trillion program for the uninsured. That seems extremely
expensive. Actually grossly, extremely overpriced plan. Cost me $1700 a
month on HIPPA for 2 of us. That is about 29k a year per uninsured.
Cheaper to buy a Kaiser or Blue Cross plan for them. Kids can get a plan
for about $1200 a year. Which Dem is getting the contract?

Nice try Tom
 

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Calif Bill wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message
...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide
the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.
It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike
No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.
Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda
than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike
It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.
You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at
this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings
for 8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike
Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's
# on a monthly basis.
No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king
of political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will
be for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some
arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been
purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house
for the past 6 months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike


Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years.


Nope. If the "liberals" had been in charge, we'd already be out of Iraq,
we'd have single-payer health care, Cheney would be under indictment, a
hate crimes bill would have been passed, gay marriage would be legal in
all 50 states, and the rich would be paying taxes on all income, as is
their privilege.

You really don't know anyting about politics, Bilious.



--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Seems as if you know very little about politics. The Liberal arm of
politics has had control of Congress for 2 years. They are not in control
yet? Seems as if they are incompetent in more ways than you can count.

Nice try Tom
 

On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:00:09 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
om...
Calif Bill wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message
...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide
the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.
It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike
No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.
Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda
than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike
It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.
You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at
this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings
for 8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike
Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's
# on a monthly basis.
No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king
of political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will
be for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some
arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been
purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house
for the past 6 months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike


Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years.


Nope. If the "liberals" had been in charge, we'd already be out of Iraq,
we'd have single-payer health care, Cheney would be under indictment, a
hate crimes bill would have been passed, gay marriage would be legal in
all 50 states, and the rich would be paying taxes on all income, as is
their privilege.

You really don't know anyting about politics, Bilious.



--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Seems as if you know very little about politics. The Liberal arm of
politics has had control of Congress for 2 years. They are not in control
yet? Seems as if they are incompetent in more ways than you can count.


More pseudo-conservative bullpucky.

Bill, when are you just going to throw in the towel and admit you're a
Republican?

Nice try Tom
 

Calif Bill wrote:


Actually I am the majority group now. Independents. Sucks to be a minority
party jps?


Yeah? Who is the last independent candidate for national office you
voted for?


--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Nice try Tom
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:00:09 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
news:4O6dnXFB8Z35Qa3XnZ2dnUVZ_tSdnZ2d@earthlink. com...
Calif Bill wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message
...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not
hide
the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.
It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike
No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.
Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda
than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike
It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.
You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest
at
this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings
for 8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike
Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds
Harry's
# on a monthly basis.
No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the
king
of political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and
will
be for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some
arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has
been
purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white
house
for the past 6 months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike


Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years.


Nope. If the "liberals" had been in charge, we'd already be out of Iraq,
we'd have single-payer health care, Cheney would be under indictment, a
hate crimes bill would have been passed, gay marriage would be legal in
all 50 states, and the rich would be paying taxes on all income, as is
their privilege.

You really don't know anyting about politics, Bilious.



--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Seems as if you know very little about politics. The Liberal arm of
politics has had control of Congress for 2 years. They are not in control
yet? Seems as if they are incompetent in more ways than you can count.


More pseudo-conservative bullpucky.

Bill, when are you just going to throw in the towel and admit you're a
Republican?

Actually I am the majority group now. Independents. Sucks to be a minority
party jps?

Nice try Tom
 

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Calif Bill wrote:


Actually I am the majority group now. Independents. Sucks to be a
minority party jps?

Yeah? Who is the last independent candidate for national office you voted
for?


--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Last election I voted Libertarian. We know who you would have voted for if
you could vote.

Nice try Tom
 

On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:13:18 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:00:09 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
news:4O6dnXFB8Z35Qa3XnZ2dnUVZ_tSdnZ2d@earthlink .com...
Calif Bill wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message
...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not
hide
the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.
It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike
No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.
Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda
than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike
It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.
You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest
at
this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings
for 8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike
Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds
Harry's
# on a monthly basis.
No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the
king
of political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and
will
be for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some
arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has
been
purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white
house
for the past 6 months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike


Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years.


Nope. If the "liberals" had been in charge, we'd already be out of Iraq,
we'd have single-payer health care, Cheney would be under indictment, a
hate crimes bill would have been passed, gay marriage would be legal in
all 50 states, and the rich would be paying taxes on all income, as is
their privilege.

You really don't know anyting about politics, Bilious.



--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Seems as if you know very little about politics. The Liberal arm of
politics has had control of Congress for 2 years. They are not in control
yet? Seems as if they are incompetent in more ways than you can count.


More pseudo-conservative bullpucky.

Bill, when are you just going to throw in the towel and admit you're a
Republican?

Actually I am the majority group now. Independents. Sucks to be a minority
party jps?

Hey, we're all independent Bill. Those of us with a brain at least.
I've voted for Republican candidates.

Trouble is Bill, you're in the minority because Dems and the majority
of Independents lean left.

You lean right.

Nice try Tom
 

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Calif Bill wrote:


Actually I am the majority group now. Independents. Sucks to be a
minority party jps?

Yeah? Who is the last independent candidate for national office you voted
for?


--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Last election I voted Libertarian. We know who you would have voted for
if you could vote.


The problem with hairy is that he doesn't think when he votes... he simply
pulls the "D" lever. That's a wonderful way to choose a candidate.

--Mike

Nice try Tom
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:13:18 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:00:09 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
news:4O6dnXFB8Z35Qa3XnZ2dnUVZ_tSdnZ2d@earthlin k.com...
Calif Bill wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message
...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not
hide
the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.
It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike
No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.
Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at
propaganda
than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike
It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating
political
posts.
You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a
contest
at
this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political
postings
for 8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike
Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds
Harry's
# on a monthly basis.
No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the
king
of political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and
will
be for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not
some
arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has
been
purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white
house
for the past 6 months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike


Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2
years.


Nope. If the "liberals" had been in charge, we'd already be out of
Iraq,
we'd have single-payer health care, Cheney would be under indictment,
a
hate crimes bill would have been passed, gay marriage would be legal
in
all 50 states, and the rich would be paying taxes on all income, as is
their privilege.

You really don't know anyting about politics, Bilious.



--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by
a
gang of moral nihilists.

Seems as if you know very little about politics. The Liberal arm of
politics has had control of Congress for 2 years. They are not in
control
yet? Seems as if they are incompetent in more ways than you can count.


More pseudo-conservative bullpucky.

Bill, when are you just going to throw in the towel and admit you're a
Republican?

Actually I am the majority group now. Independents. Sucks to be a
minority
party jps?

Hey, we're all independent Bill. Those of us with a brain at least.
I've voted for Republican candidates.

Trouble is Bill, you're in the minority because Dems and the majority
of Independents lean left.

You lean right.

Nope, middle of the road. Like the majority of America. You are so far to
the left, any thing moderate looks far right.

Nice try Tom
 

On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:48:08 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:13:18 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:00:09 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
news:4O6dnXFB8Z35Qa3XnZ2dnUVZ_tSdnZ2d@earthli nk.com...
Calif Bill wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message
...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not
hide
the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.
It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike
No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.
Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at
propaganda
than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike
It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating
political
posts.
You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a
contest
at
this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political
postings
for 8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike
Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds
Harry's
# on a monthly basis.
No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the
king
of political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and
will
be for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not
some
arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has
been
purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white
house
for the past 6 months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike


Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2
years.


Nope. If the "liberals" had been in charge, we'd already be out of
Iraq,
we'd have single-payer health care, Cheney would be under indictment,
a
hate crimes bill would have been passed, gay marriage would be legal
in
all 50 states, and the rich would be paying taxes on all income, as is
their privilege.

You really don't know anyting about politics, Bilious.



--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by
a
gang of moral nihilists.

Seems as if you know very little about politics. The Liberal arm of
politics has had control of Congress for 2 years. They are not in
control
yet? Seems as if they are incompetent in more ways than you can count.


More pseudo-conservative bullpucky.

Bill, when are you just going to throw in the towel and admit you're a
Republican?

Actually I am the majority group now. Independents. Sucks to be a
minority
party jps?

Hey, we're all independent Bill. Those of us with a brain at least.
I've voted for Republican candidates.

Trouble is Bill, you're in the minority because Dems and the majority
of Independents lean left.

You lean right.

Nope, middle of the road. Like the majority of America. You are so far to
the left, any thing moderate looks far right.

It's among the wonders of the earth that you consider yourself a
Democrat.

You really should rethink that and have the courage to go join your
real breathren in the party of the nearly dead white men.

They'd have you in a minute and probably give you a gold watch for
retiring from life with them.

Nice try Tom
 

HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:


Actually I am the majority group now. Independents. Sucks to be a
minority party jps?

Yeah? Who is the last independent candidate for national office you
voted for?


Four years of College (English major) wasted on a moron. He's talking
about voters not candidates.

Nice try Tom
 

mgg wrote:
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...
"HK" wrote in message
m...
Calif Bill wrote:

Actually I am the majority group now. Independents. Sucks to be a
minority party jps?
Yeah? Who is the last independent candidate for national office you voted
for?


--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.
Last election I voted Libertarian. We know who you would have voted for
if you could vote.


The problem with hairy is that he doesn't think when he votes... he simply
pulls the "D" lever. That's a wonderful way to choose a candidate.

--Mike



He's been programed by his labor union trainers to do that. They do all
of his thinking for him.

Nice try Tom
 

Calif Bill wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
m...
Calif Bill wrote:

Actually I am the majority group now. Independents. Sucks to be a
minority party jps?
Yeah? Who is the last independent candidate for national office you voted
for?


--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Last election I voted Libertarian. We know who you would have voted for if
you could vote.



Loonitarian, eh? Figures.


--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Nice try Tom
 

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Calif Bill wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
m...
Calif Bill wrote:

Actually I am the majority group now. Independents. Sucks to be a
minority party jps?
Yeah? Who is the last independent candidate for national office you
voted for?


--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Last election I voted Libertarian. We know who you would have voted for
if you could vote.

Loonitarian, eh? Figures.


--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Both the other candidates were bad. I did vote for Obama in the primary.
Buyers remorse. Hillary could not screw up worse than what is happening.

Nice try Tom
 

On Jun 12, 5:12*am, HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
om...
Calif Bill wrote:

Actually I am the majority group now. *Independents. *Sucks to be a
minority party jps?
Yeah? Who is the last independent candidate for national office you voted
for?

--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Last election I voted Libertarian. *We know who you would have voted for if
you could vote.

Loonitarian, eh? Figures.

--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Your droll comments Herr Krause, are predictably void of content.