On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:54:47 -0400, Zombie of Woodstock
wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 07:29:31 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal
thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk about
shallow, narrow minds.

Psst - there's a name for guys like Jon and Harry.

big·ot – noun - a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing
creed, belief, or opinion.

MIRROR PLEASE! I must have missed your single pleasant utterance
about our current CIC.

You've done nothing but post carping bull****.

I know that both of you are smarter than that.

There's your first mistake.

Not very funny.

Both of you should throw away your talking point notes and
start speaking for yourselves, using your own brains.

Here's another word for you.

prej·u·diced – noun - an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed
beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason - any preconceived
opinion or feeling, either favorable or unfavorable - unreasonable
feelings, opinions, or attitudes, esp. of a hostile nature, regarding
a racial, religious, or national group.

You've done much to earn it. Narrow defines your politics best of
all.

When you think about it - it's pretty much "hate speech".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech

Funny how all this works huh?

Not at all funny. Look at who's leading the "conservative" movement.

Now that's funny.

jps wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:54:47 -0400, Zombie of Woodstock
wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 07:29:31 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal
thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk about
shallow, narrow minds.
Psst - there's a name for guys like Jon and Harry.

big·ot – noun - a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing
creed, belief, or opinion.

MIRROR PLEASE! I must have missed your single pleasant utterance
about our current CIC.

You've done nothing but post carping bull****.

I know that both of you are smarter than that.
There's your first mistake.

Not very funny.

Both of you should throw away your talking point notes and
start speaking for yourselves, using your own brains.
Here's another word for you.

prej·u·diced – noun - an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed
beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason - any preconceived
opinion or feeling, either favorable or unfavorable - unreasonable
feelings, opinions, or attitudes, esp. of a hostile nature, regarding
a racial, religious, or national group.

You've done much to earn it. Narrow defines your politics best of
all.

When you think about it - it's pretty much "hate speech".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech

Funny how all this works huh?

Not at all funny. Look at who's leading the "conservative" movement.

Now that's funny.


Watch it there...if you press SW Tom too closely, or question his
choices, he'll have a hissy fit and then never ever never ever talk to
you here again.

On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 16:01:55 -0400, HK wrote:

jps wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:54:47 -0400, Zombie of Woodstock
wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 07:29:31 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal
thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk about
shallow, narrow minds.
Psst - there's a name for guys like Jon and Harry.

big·ot – noun - a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing
creed, belief, or opinion.

MIRROR PLEASE! I must have missed your single pleasant utterance
about our current CIC.

You've done nothing but post carping bull****.

I know that both of you are smarter than that.
There's your first mistake.

Not very funny.

Both of you should throw away your talking point notes and
start speaking for yourselves, using your own brains.
Here's another word for you.

prej·u·diced – noun - an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed
beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason - any preconceived
opinion or feeling, either favorable or unfavorable - unreasonable
feelings, opinions, or attitudes, esp. of a hostile nature, regarding
a racial, religious, or national group.

You've done much to earn it. Narrow defines your politics best of
all.

When you think about it - it's pretty much "hate speech".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech

Funny how all this works huh?

Not at all funny. Look at who's leading the "conservative" movement.

Now that's funny.


Watch it there...if you press SW Tom too closely, or question his
choices, he'll have a hissy fit and then never ever never ever talk to
you here again.

I believe I've already earned my way onto his **** list.

jps wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 16:01:55 -0400, HK wrote:

jps wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:54:47 -0400, Zombie of Woodstock
wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 07:29:31 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal
thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk about
shallow, narrow minds.
Psst - there's a name for guys like Jon and Harry.

big·ot – noun - a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing
creed, belief, or opinion.
MIRROR PLEASE! I must have missed your single pleasant utterance
about our current CIC.

You've done nothing but post carping bull****.

I know that both of you are smarter than that.
There's your first mistake.
Not very funny.

Both of you should throw away your talking point notes and
start speaking for yourselves, using your own brains.
Here's another word for you.

prej·u·diced – noun - an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed
beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason - any preconceived
opinion or feeling, either favorable or unfavorable - unreasonable
feelings, opinions, or attitudes, esp. of a hostile nature, regarding
a racial, religious, or national group.
You've done much to earn it. Narrow defines your politics best of
all.

When you think about it - it's pretty much "hate speech".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech

Funny how all this works huh?
Not at all funny. Look at who's leading the "conservative" movement.

Now that's funny.

Watch it there...if you press SW Tom too closely, or question his
choices, he'll have a hissy fit and then never ever never ever talk to
you here again.

I believe I've already earned my way onto his **** list.


Only yesterday he claimed the model Husqie garden tractor I have doesn't
exist, as in Husqvarna never made such a model. So I posted a photo of
it, along with the manufacturer's spec's. He's sooooooo easy.

Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...



I can't stand that Air America and MSNBC is paying him any mind.

I had to turn it off. Listening to him makes me ill and it's a
tremendous waste of time and energy. It's time to ignore him so we
can focus on what needs to be accomplished.


That's about the most intelligent statement you have made in a long
time.
Most moderate conservatives have know that for years. It's
encouraging to
see some of you liberals catching up.

Eisboch



Moderate conservatives? You mean the ones who only *listen* to Rush,
Sean, O'Reilly & Beck and nod their heads in approval, instead of
rushing out to kill doctors, blow up clinics, and make idiotic
comments about judge nominees?


Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal
thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk
about shallow, narrow minds.

I know that both of you are smarter than that. Both of you should
throw away your talking point notes and start speaking for
yourselves, using your own brains.

Eisboch



"Moderate" conservative. snerk


Like I suggested , .... oh, never mind. Your too programmed.

Eisboch

That is correct!

HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:54:47 -0400, Zombie of Woodstock
wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 07:29:31 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal
thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk
about shallow, narrow minds.
Psst - there's a name for guys like Jon and Harry.

big·ot – noun - a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing
creed, belief, or opinion.

MIRROR PLEASE! I must have missed your single pleasant utterance
about our current CIC.

You've done nothing but post carping bull****.

I know that both of you are smarter than that.
There's your first mistake.

Not very funny.

Both of you should throw away your talking point notes and start
speaking for yourselves, using your own brains.
Here's another word for you.

prej·u·diced – noun - an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed
beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason - any preconceived
opinion or feeling, either favorable or unfavorable - unreasonable
feelings, opinions, or attitudes, esp. of a hostile nature, regarding
a racial, religious, or national group.

You've done much to earn it. Narrow defines your politics best of
all.

When you think about it - it's pretty much "hate speech".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech

Funny how all this works huh?

Not at all funny. Look at who's leading the "conservative" movement.

Now that's funny.


Watch it there...if you press SW Tom too closely, or question his
choices, he'll have a hissy fit and then never ever never ever talk to
you here again.

That's *your* MO, asshole.

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...



I can't stand that Air America and MSNBC is paying him any mind.

I had to turn it off. Listening to him makes me ill and it's a
tremendous waste of time and energy. It's time to ignore him so we
can focus on what needs to be accomplished.


That's about the most intelligent statement you have made in a long
time.
Most moderate conservatives have know that for years. It's encouraging
to
see some of you liberals catching up.

Eisboch



Moderate conservatives? You mean the ones who only *listen* to Rush,
Sean, O'Reilly & Beck and nod their heads in approval, instead of rushing
out to kill doctors, blow up clinics, and make idiotic comments about
judge nominees?


Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal
thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk about
shallow, narrow minds.

I know that both of you are smarter than that. Both of you should throw
away your talking point notes and start speaking for yourselves, using
your own brains.

Eisboch



I have pretty much figured that Harry is not that smart, or is on the verge
of commitment. jps is so far to the left, he thinks all that are only a
little to the left are far right extremists.

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote in message
...

Moderate conservatives? You mean the ones who only *listen* to Rush,
Sean, O'Reilly & Beck and nod their heads in approval, instead of
rushing out to kill doctors, blow up clinics, and make idiotic
comments about judge nominees?



Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal
thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk
about shallow, narrow minds.

I know that both of you are smarter than that. Both of you should
throw away your talking point notes and start speaking for yourselves,
using your own brains.

Eisboch




"Moderate" conservative. snerk


Like I suggested , .... oh, never mind. Your too programmed.

Eisboch

Ok, ok. "You're"

BTW ....

You crack me up. A while back ... year or so ago ... when we could
discuss things more rationally,
you identified me as a "moderate" conservative with whom you didn't have a
major problem with in terms of political viewpoints.

But now, according to you and your puppy, I am a bible thumping, far
right, knuckle dragging Neanderthal, a relic from the dark ages.

What happened? I haven't changed a bit.

Eisboch

Got Religion? . . . :)

On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 17:55:56 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Eisboch" wrote in message
m...

"HK" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...



I can't stand that Air America and MSNBC is paying him any mind.

I had to turn it off. Listening to him makes me ill and it's a
tremendous waste of time and energy. It's time to ignore him so we
can focus on what needs to be accomplished.


That's about the most intelligent statement you have made in a long
time.
Most moderate conservatives have know that for years. It's encouraging
to
see some of you liberals catching up.

Eisboch



Moderate conservatives? You mean the ones who only *listen* to Rush,
Sean, O'Reilly & Beck and nod their heads in approval, instead of rushing
out to kill doctors, blow up clinics, and make idiotic comments about
judge nominees?


Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal
thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk about
shallow, narrow minds.

I know that both of you are smarter than that. Both of you should throw
away your talking point notes and start speaking for yourselves, using
your own brains.

Eisboch



I have pretty much figured that Harry is not that smart, or is on the verge
of commitment. jps is so far to the left, he thinks all that are only a
little to the left are far right extremists.


I know you claim to be a D but I don't expect you've gone to any
precinct meeting recently. You haven't a clue what left is anymore.

jps wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 17:55:56 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
"HK" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...



I can't stand that Air America and MSNBC is paying him any mind.

I had to turn it off. Listening to him makes me ill and it's a
tremendous waste of time and energy. It's time to ignore him so we
can focus on what needs to be accomplished.

That's about the most intelligent statement you have made in a long
time.
Most moderate conservatives have know that for years. It's encouraging
to
see some of you liberals catching up.

Eisboch


Moderate conservatives? You mean the ones who only *listen* to Rush,
Sean, O'Reilly & Beck and nod their heads in approval, instead of rushing
out to kill doctors, blow up clinics, and make idiotic comments about
judge nominees?

Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal
thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk about
shallow, narrow minds.

I know that both of you are smarter than that. Both of you should throw
away your talking point notes and start speaking for yourselves, using
your own brains.

Eisboch


I have pretty much figured that Harry is not that smart, or is on the verge
of commitment. jps is so far to the left, he thinks all that are only a
little to the left are far right extremists.


I know you claim to be a D but I don't expect you've gone to any
precinct meeting recently. You haven't a clue what left is anymore.

As James Carville sez:

The Republicans got spanked in 2008, and they're going to keep
getting spanked.

The explanation is simple:

• They've destroyed the myth of conservative competence.
• They're corrupt.
• They've lost the culture war.

Add to that the incredible amount of infighting going on between the
dimwitted ultra-religious Republicans, the neocon Republicans, the
so-called RINO's, et cetera, plus the stable of lackluster, doctrinaire
idiots who are already fighting for the nomination, and 2012 is shaping
up as a year of more pain for the old GOP.

Delicious.