Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...

Eisboch wrote:


You crack me up. A while back ... year or so ago ... when we could
discuss things more rationally,
you identified me as a "moderate" conservative with whom you didn't
have a major problem with in terms of political viewpoints.

But now, according to you and your puppy, I am a bible thumping, far
right, knuckle dragging Neanderthal, a relic from the dark ages.

What happened? I haven't changed a bit.

Eisboch


Your party has. I didn't say you were a bible-thumping, far-right,
whatever. But that is what is controlling your party. What I am
snickering at now are you attempts to move away from what your party
has become by describing yourself as a "moderate" conservative.
According to your party, you a a RINO, something they want to be rid
of...

It's not you...it's your party.


Repeating my comment in another post, it's not "my" party. I am not a
Republican.
I am not a Democrat. I think for myself. My viewpoints may not
always be correct or well thought out, but I don't automatically
subscribe to any political party's agenda.

I am of a conservative bent and believe in many of the Republican
philosophies but often also embrace Democratic and yes, even some
"liberal" ideas.

You purebred liberals are having a field day right now because you have
conveniently lumped all Republicans into one category. Yes, it's fun,
but it's not truthful. That has been the point I've tried to make
several times. There are more liberals making noise about Rush than
most of us with more conservative viewpoints. I understand the
purpose. It's just not honest.

Eisboch

You are either "with him or against him". According to Harry, the world
is black and white, there is no gray

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects