"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote in message
...

Moderate conservatives? You mean the ones who only *listen* to Rush,
Sean, O'Reilly & Beck and nod their heads in approval, instead of
rushing out to kill doctors, blow up clinics, and make idiotic comments
about judge nominees?



Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal
thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk
about shallow, narrow minds.

I know that both of you are smarter than that. Both of you should
throw away your talking point notes and start speaking for yourselves,
using your own brains.

Eisboch




"Moderate" conservative. snerk


Like I suggested , .... oh, never mind. Your too programmed.

Eisboch

Ok, ok. "You're"

BTW ....

You crack me up. A while back ... year or so ago ... when we could discuss
things more rationally,
you identified me as a "moderate" conservative with whom you didn't have a
major problem with in terms of political viewpoints.

But now, according to you and your puppy, I am a bible thumping, far right,
knuckle dragging Neanderthal, a relic from the dark ages.

What happened? I haven't changed a bit.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote in message
...

Moderate conservatives? You mean the ones who only *listen* to
Rush, Sean, O'Reilly & Beck and nod their heads in approval,
instead of rushing out to kill doctors, blow up clinics, and make
idiotic comments about judge nominees?



Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal
thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk
about shallow, narrow minds.

I know that both of you are smarter than that. Both of you should
throw away your talking point notes and start speaking for
yourselves, using your own brains.

Eisboch




"Moderate" conservative. snerk


Like I suggested , .... oh, never mind. Your too programmed.

Eisboch

Ok, ok. "You're"

BTW ....

You crack me up. A while back ... year or so ago ... when we could
discuss things more rationally,
you identified me as a "moderate" conservative with whom you didn't have
a major problem with in terms of political viewpoints.

But now, according to you and your puppy, I am a bible thumping, far
right, knuckle dragging Neanderthal, a relic from the dark ages.

What happened? I haven't changed a bit.

Eisboch


Your party has. I didn't say you were a bible-thumping, far-right,
whatever. But that is what is controlling your party. What I am
snickering at now are you attempts to move away from what your party has
become by describing yourself as a "moderate" conservative. According to
your party, you a a RINO, something they want to be rid of...

It's not you...it's your party.

You might be happier with the Libertarians, although they seem to be
going through another crazy period.

Ain't politics fun?


My mother, a lifelong Republican from Boston, would have never tolerated
what her grand old GOP has become. She was a very minor political
functionary in our home county, and would have raised holy hell at local
meetings if that GOP had descended into today's GOP.

"HK" wrote in message
...

Eisboch wrote:


You crack me up. A while back ... year or so ago ... when we could
discuss things more rationally,
you identified me as a "moderate" conservative with whom you didn't have
a major problem with in terms of political viewpoints.

But now, according to you and your puppy, I am a bible thumping, far
right, knuckle dragging Neanderthal, a relic from the dark ages.

What happened? I haven't changed a bit.

Eisboch


Your party has. I didn't say you were a bible-thumping, far-right,
whatever. But that is what is controlling your party. What I am snickering
at now are you attempts to move away from what your party has become by
describing yourself as a "moderate" conservative. According to your party,
you a a RINO, something they want to be rid of...

It's not you...it's your party.


Repeating my comment in another post, it's not "my" party. I am not a
Republican.
I am not a Democrat. I think for myself. My viewpoints may not always be
correct or well thought out, but I don't automatically subscribe to any
political party's agenda.

I am of a conservative bent and believe in many of the Republican
philosophies but often also embrace Democratic and yes, even some "liberal"
ideas.

You purebred liberals are having a field day right now because you have
conveniently lumped all Republicans into one category. Yes, it's fun, but
it's not truthful. That has been the point I've tried to make several
times. There are more liberals making noise about Rush than most of us
with more conservative viewpoints. I understand the purpose. It's just
not honest.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...

Eisboch wrote:


You crack me up. A while back ... year or so ago ... when we could
discuss things more rationally,
you identified me as a "moderate" conservative with whom you didn't
have a major problem with in terms of political viewpoints.

But now, according to you and your puppy, I am a bible thumping, far
right, knuckle dragging Neanderthal, a relic from the dark ages.

What happened? I haven't changed a bit.

Eisboch


Your party has. I didn't say you were a bible-thumping, far-right,
whatever. But that is what is controlling your party. What I am
snickering at now are you attempts to move away from what your party
has become by describing yourself as a "moderate" conservative.
According to your party, you a a RINO, something they want to be rid
of...

It's not you...it's your party.


Repeating my comment in another post, it's not "my" party. I am not a
Republican.
I am not a Democrat. I think for myself. My viewpoints may not
always be correct or well thought out, but I don't automatically
subscribe to any political party's agenda.

I am of a conservative bent and believe in many of the Republican
philosophies but often also embrace Democratic and yes, even some
"liberal" ideas.

You purebred liberals are having a field day right now because you have
conveniently lumped all Republicans into one category. Yes, it's fun,
but it's not truthful. That has been the point I've tried to make
several times. There are more liberals making noise about Rush than
most of us with more conservative viewpoints. I understand the
purpose. It's just not honest.

Eisboch

You are either "with him or against him". According to Harry, the world
is black and white, there is no gray

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 08:19:15 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"I'm not a Republican" is a matra being repeated across the country by
tens of millions who don't want to associate with a party of losers.

When it comes to voting, they're Republicans.

Eisboch wrote:

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote in message
...

Moderate conservatives? You mean the ones who only *listen* to
Rush, Sean, O'Reilly & Beck and nod their heads in approval,
instead of rushing out to kill doctors, blow up clinics, and make
idiotic comments about judge nominees?



Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal
thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk
about shallow, narrow minds.

I know that both of you are smarter than that. Both of you should
throw away your talking point notes and start speaking for
yourselves, using your own brains.

Eisboch




"Moderate" conservative. snerk


Like I suggested , .... oh, never mind. Your too programmed.

Eisboch

Ok, ok. "You're"

BTW ....

You crack me up. A while back ... year or so ago ... when we could
discuss things more rationally,
you identified me as a "moderate" conservative with whom you didn't have
a major problem with in terms of political viewpoints.

But now, according to you and your puppy, I am a bible thumping, far
right, knuckle dragging Neanderthal, a relic from the dark ages.

What happened? I haven't changed a bit.

Eisboch

According to Harry, you were a Righteous Rightie, while those more
liberal than you, were RepubliNazi's.

Don't try to understand Don, JPS or Harry, it is impossible.

Have you figures out what Flat Shiny Object you need to visit for an
examination?

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in
message ...

Don't try to understand Don, JPS or Harry, it is impossible.

Have you figures out what Flat Shiny Object you need to visit for an
examination?



Yes. He's very familiar with the image.

Eisboch

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote in message
...

Moderate conservatives? You mean the ones who only *listen* to Rush,
Sean, O'Reilly & Beck and nod their heads in approval, instead of
rushing out to kill doctors, blow up clinics, and make idiotic
comments about judge nominees?



Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal
thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk
about shallow, narrow minds.

I know that both of you are smarter than that. Both of you should
throw away your talking point notes and start speaking for yourselves,
using your own brains.

Eisboch




"Moderate" conservative. snerk


Like I suggested , .... oh, never mind. Your too programmed.

Eisboch

Ok, ok. "You're"

BTW ....

You crack me up. A while back ... year or so ago ... when we could
discuss things more rationally,
you identified me as a "moderate" conservative with whom you didn't have a
major problem with in terms of political viewpoints.

But now, according to you and your puppy, I am a bible thumping, far
right, knuckle dragging Neanderthal, a relic from the dark ages.

What happened? I haven't changed a bit.

Eisboch

Got Religion? . . . :)