jps wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 00:46:56 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...



I can't stand that Air America and MSNBC is paying him any mind.

I had to turn it off. Listening to him makes me ill and it's a
tremendous waste of time and energy. It's time to ignore him so we
can focus on what needs to be accomplished.

That's about the most intelligent statement you have made in a long time.
Most moderate conservatives have know that for years. It's encouraging to
see some of you liberals catching up.

Eisboch

By your standards. I don't live by your standards.

But, it should make you consider that you're way the hell to the
right and need a little adjustment.

You really need an examination in a shiny object, hopefully flat.

You embarrass me and most other moderate and liberals, when I read your
average post you seem like a man on the verge of of walking to the
nearest McDonald's with an AK 47. This post seems like you just
ingested some really bad drugs. I am sure in your drug induced state,
you knew exactly what flat, shiny, object Eisboch should visit for an
examination, but you were not able to group your words together in a
coherent manner, so that anyone use would know what you were talking
about.

I now understand why you like to limit your normal posts to "you silly
little ****" and "you ****ing asshole" type comments. I almost hate to
say it, but you should probably limited yourself to them.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

jps wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 00:46:56 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


I can't stand that Air America and MSNBC is paying him any mind.

I had to turn it off. Listening to him makes me ill and it's a
tremendous waste of time and energy. It's time to ignore him so we
can focus on what needs to be accomplished.



That's about the most intelligent statement you have made in a long
time.
Most moderate conservatives have know that for years. It's encouraging
to
see some of you liberals catching up.

Eisboch



By your standards. I don't live by your standards.

But, it should make you consider that you're way the hell to the
right and need a little adjustment.



I am "way the hell to the right" because I don't subscribe to Rush's
ranting (or even listen to him)?
You are in another dimension pal.

My point is that liberals seem to make a bigger deal and listen to him more
than moderate conservatives. Try again.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:

jps wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 00:46:56 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


I can't stand that Air America and MSNBC is paying him any mind.

I had to turn it off. Listening to him makes me ill and it's a
tremendous waste of time and energy. It's time to ignore him so we
can focus on what needs to be accomplished.



That's about the most intelligent statement you have made in a long
time.
Most moderate conservatives have know that for years. It's
encouraging to
see some of you liberals catching up.

Eisboch



By your standards. I don't live by your standards.

But, it should make you consider that you're way the hell to the
right and need a little adjustment.



I am "way the hell to the right" because I don't subscribe to Rush's
ranting (or even listen to him)?
You are in another dimension pal.

My point is that liberals seem to make a bigger deal and listen to him
more than moderate conservatives. Try again.

Eisboch




"Moderate conservatives."

The new oxymoron.

On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 07:08:35 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


jps wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 00:46:56 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


I can't stand that Air America and MSNBC is paying him any mind.

I had to turn it off. Listening to him makes me ill and it's a
tremendous waste of time and energy. It's time to ignore him so we
can focus on what needs to be accomplished.



That's about the most intelligent statement you have made in a long
time.
Most moderate conservatives have know that for years. It's encouraging
to
see some of you liberals catching up.

Eisboch



By your standards. I don't live by your standards.

But, it should make you consider that you're way the hell to the
right and need a little adjustment.



I am "way the hell to the right" because I don't subscribe to Rush's
ranting (or even listen to him)?
You are in another dimension pal.

My point is that liberals seem to make a bigger deal and listen to him more
than moderate conservatives. Try again.

Eisboch

I don't care whether you listen to Rush. However, he is driving the
"conservative" message. The conservative dialogue involves fringe
players and has beens from the past like Newt.

The right's lunacy is a tool used to attract attention from the left
and keep the agenda on partisanship rather than solutions.

The leaders of your movement are a bunch of second-rate hacks and the
dems aren't much better but we've got real problems to solve and all
the Rs can do is shoot arrows.

****ing ridiculous. If this were 2003, we'd be accusing conservatives
of providing aid and comfort to the enemy and guilty of sedition.

All your buddy Tom can do is carp. Where's the constructive criticism
of a real "worthy opponent?"

Missing in action.

On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 06:21:47 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

I now understand why you like to limit your normal posts to "you silly
little ****" and "you ****ing asshole" type comments. I almost hate to
say it, but you should probably limited yourself to them.

Are you holding yourself out as an example of what you preach?

You add so little value and expect so much. Sorry Ruggie, no sale.