H.L. Mencken Debunked
 

On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:06:25 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:


Are you from the US? I keep learning new expression from reading your
posts. What the heck does blindered mean? Or was this a misspelling
of "blundered" ? When you say "stick-up-the-ass" do you mean up his
poop chute or his humorous ****? It almost sounds like you are have a
random generator putting words together to form something that resembles
a sentence.

Blinders, as in the other end of a horse's ass. I could have used
blinkered. Would that've helped?

Maybe check your OED.

In the silly ****'s case, it'd be a giant log up his arse that's
somehow affected synapses firing. Maybe he's stopped up.

H.L. Mencken Debunked
 

jps wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:06:25 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:


Are you from the US? I keep learning new expression from reading your
posts. What the heck does blindered mean? Or was this a misspelling
of "blundered" ? When you say "stick-up-the-ass" do you mean up his
poop chute or his humorous ****? It almost sounds like you are have a
random generator putting words together to form something that resembles
a sentence.

Blinders, as in the other end of a horse's ass. I could have used
blinkered. Would that've helped?

Maybe check your OED.

In the silly ****'s case, it'd be a giant log up his arse that's
somehow affected synapses firing. Maybe he's stopped up.


A query from Reggie is best handled by not responding, or responding by
telling him to eat **** and die.

H.L. Mencken Debunked
 

"D K" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:47:49 -0400, D K
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:36:29 -0500, Richard Casady
wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:38:25 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:14:36 -0400, "Doral 36"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:49:44 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III,
Esq."
.
Lefties aren't the ones who go postal. We realize we can't
control
everything arounds us, unlike righties.
I think you are delusional if you don't think there are just as
many nut
cases who profess to be on the right of left.

Mental illness has no restrictions.
Nutcases and postal are two different things.

Righties go postal.

May I point you to Wichita?
The man who killed JFK, Lee Oswald, was far enough left to move to
the
USSR. He came back and killed the Prez. Within a day a right wing
nut, Jack Ruby, killed him. Scum come in all flavors. The nuts have
been working on the why of it ever since.

Casady
Richard, most of the violence we've seen in this country for the last
100 years comes from the right.

Oswald and Ruby were driven by far more than politics.
Just keeping making this **** up, moron. Donnie aside, no one here is
dumb enough to believe it.
Oh, that's an excellent argument filled with rich historical fact and
subtle nuance. Thanks for digging so deep into your intellectual
resources for the thoughtful response.

Silly ****ing ****.


Kruger spends too much time lurking in dark, skanky holes waiting for
young girls to pass so he can harass them. .

Really, dummy? What did you base that "fact" on?

ooops...somebody forgot to flush the toilet. Ah..... there we go!

H.L. Mencken Debunked
 

HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:06:25 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:


Are you from the US? I keep learning new expression from reading
your posts. What the heck does blindered mean? Or was this a
misspelling of "blundered" ? When you say "stick-up-the-ass" do you
mean up his poop chute or his humorous ****? It almost sounds like
you are have a random generator putting words together to form
something that resembles a sentence.

Blinders, as in the other end of a horse's ass. I could have used
blinkered. Would that've helped?

Maybe check your OED.

In the silly ****'s case, it'd be a giant log up his arse that's
somehow affected synapses firing. Maybe he's stopped up.


A query from Reggie is best handled by not responding, or responding by
telling him to eat **** and die.

jps,
You better listen to Harry or he might turn on you. So remember, it is
ignore me, like Harry does, which means respond to my post by 3rd party,
or tell me to eat **** and die. Snap too, you pussy.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

H.L. Mencken Debunked
 

On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:30:54 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:06:25 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:


Are you from the US? I keep learning new expression from reading
your posts. What the heck does blindered mean? Or was this a
misspelling of "blundered" ? When you say "stick-up-the-ass" do you
mean up his poop chute or his humorous ****? It almost sounds like
you are have a random generator putting words together to form
something that resembles a sentence.

Blinders, as in the other end of a horse's ass. I could have used
blinkered. Would that've helped?

Maybe check your OED.

In the silly ****'s case, it'd be a giant log up his arse that's
somehow affected synapses firing. Maybe he's stopped up.


A query from Reggie is best handled by not responding, or responding by
telling him to eat **** and die.

jps,
You better listen to Harry or he might turn on you. So remember, it is
ignore me, like Harry does, which means respond to my post by 3rd party,
or tell me to eat **** and die. Snap too, you pussy.

Eat **** and die. Consider this a favor.

H.L. Mencken Debunked
 

jps wrote:
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:30:54 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:06:25 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:


Are you from the US? I keep learning new expression from reading
your posts. What the heck does blindered mean? Or was this a
misspelling of "blundered" ? When you say "stick-up-the-ass" do you
mean up his poop chute or his humorous ****? It almost sounds like
you are have a random generator putting words together to form
something that resembles a sentence.
Blinders, as in the other end of a horse's ass. I could have used
blinkered. Would that've helped?

Maybe check your OED.

In the silly ****'s case, it'd be a giant log up his arse that's
somehow affected synapses firing. Maybe he's stopped up.

A query from Reggie is best handled by not responding, or responding by
telling him to eat **** and die.
jps,
You better listen to Harry or he might turn on you. So remember, it is
ignore me, like Harry does, which means respond to my post by 3rd party,
or tell me to eat **** and die. Snap too, you pussy.

Eat **** and die. Consider this a favor.

I knew you would fall in line. Good job

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

H.L. Mencken Debunked
 

On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 07:11:46 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:30:54 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:06:25 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:


Are you from the US? I keep learning new expression from reading
your posts. What the heck does blindered mean? Or was this a
misspelling of "blundered" ? When you say "stick-up-the-ass" do you
mean up his poop chute or his humorous ****? It almost sounds like
you are have a random generator putting words together to form
something that resembles a sentence.
Blinders, as in the other end of a horse's ass. I could have used
blinkered. Would that've helped?

Maybe check your OED.

In the silly ****'s case, it'd be a giant log up his arse that's
somehow affected synapses firing. Maybe he's stopped up.

A query from Reggie is best handled by not responding, or responding by
telling him to eat **** and die.
jps,
You better listen to Harry or he might turn on you. So remember, it is
ignore me, like Harry does, which means respond to my post by 3rd party,
or tell me to eat **** and die. Snap too, you pussy.

Eat **** and die. Consider this a favor.

I knew you would fall in line. Good job

LOL.
--
John H

"The problem with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money." --Margaret Thatcher

H.L. Mencken Debunked
 

On Jun 4, 8:31*pm, jps wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:09:43 -0400, D K
wrote:





jps wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:39 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K
wrote:

HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote:

wrote:
On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:
Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating
the
taste of the American public."
GM has proven him wrong.
--Vic
Does it really have to do with taste?
Just depends on how you define taste.
As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles."
What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview
on TV.
Seemed like a reasonable guy.
So I looked him up on Wiki and found this:
"When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in
2001
one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was
going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is
estimated at $6.9 million."
And this:
"He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one
reason
for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in
Washington
that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted,
rather
than what customers wanted."
That is what I mean by "taste."
Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools.
Gonna save GM with 500 hp car.
Gonna give the customers what they want.
Sorry, close your ears. *I have to say this.
LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!!
I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!!
--Vic
It's been time for decades to wean american males off their
overpowered
penis substitutes in cars and boats.
Like lobster boats?
Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis
substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary.
That you have any purpose is imaginary.

The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership
of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that
looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons.

My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and
that
service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable
like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman.

Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. *Delicious!
What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty
assholes. *And, I have a boat silly ****.
What is a 'boat silly ****'.

Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'?

Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'?

Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****?

These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of
Donnie and Harry,

I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even
converse with this guy.
--
John H

..and yet you feel compelled to respond to him!
Why is that Johnny..are you strangely excited by the so called..gay talk'?

Having nothing more than drivel to offer, he attacks my grammar.

Johnny's excited by having at Librals, just like I'm excited by having
at idiots. *I have him plonked, not worth the time.

Silly old ****.

"Having at"?

Down to critiquing expressions? *Not much below you is there?

You gotta have a strong stomach to be a **** hauler.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That's what your buddies Harry and Don do!

H.L. Mencken Debunked
 

On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:45:16 -0400, John H
wrote:

Utter bull****. In most cases handguns are never used in anger. 99% of
them. Your 'most cases' falls in the 1 %. A guy once pulled a knife on
me and demanded money. I pulled a .45 and told him to run. He did.
Had he tried to ' use it against me' I would have shot him several
times. Back in the bin.

Casady

You're much better off listening to Krause. He never bull****s. He
went to Yale, you know.

Reggie may have been talking about h

My use resulted in no shots fired, so it wasn't even reported, Nothing
in the statistics. There are estimates that guns are used to chase off
trouble more than a million times a year, without anyone bothering to
report it. Many successful crimes are also unreported, so it is hard
to get at the truth, even without an ax to grind.

Casady

H.L. Mencken Debunked
 

Richard Casady wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:45:16 -0400, John H
wrote:

Utter bull****. In most cases handguns are never used in anger. 99% of
them. Your 'most cases' falls in the 1 %. A guy once pulled a knife on
me and demanded money. I pulled a .45 and told him to run. He did.
Had he tried to ' use it against me' I would have shot him several
times. Back in the bin.

Casady
You're much better off listening to Krause. He never bull****s. He
went to Yale, you know.

Reggie may have been talking about h

My use resulted in no shots fired, so it wasn't even reported, Nothing
in the statistics. There are estimates that guns are used to chase off
trouble more than a million times a year, without anyone bothering to
report it. Many successful crimes are also unreported, so it is hard
to get at the truth, even without an ax to grind.

Casady


It pays to have a full-sized, steel handgun, so if you don't have to
shoot the felon wannabe, you can always smack him over the head. My Sig
P226 X5 weighs about 48 ounces sans ammo, and would work well as a
blackjack. Not very concealable, though.