|
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:06:25 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: Are you from the US? I keep learning new expression from reading your posts. What the heck does blindered mean? Or was this a misspelling of "blundered" ? When you say "stick-up-the-ass" do you mean up his poop chute or his humorous ****? It almost sounds like you are have a random generator putting words together to form something that resembles a sentence. Blinders, as in the other end of a horse's ass. I could have used blinkered. Would that've helped? Maybe check your OED. In the silly ****'s case, it'd be a giant log up his arse that's somehow affected synapses firing. Maybe he's stopped up. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
jps wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:06:25 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Are you from the US? I keep learning new expression from reading your posts. What the heck does blindered mean? Or was this a misspelling of "blundered" ? When you say "stick-up-the-ass" do you mean up his poop chute or his humorous ****? It almost sounds like you are have a random generator putting words together to form something that resembles a sentence. Blinders, as in the other end of a horse's ass. I could have used blinkered. Would that've helped? Maybe check your OED. In the silly ****'s case, it'd be a giant log up his arse that's somehow affected synapses firing. Maybe he's stopped up. A query from Reggie is best handled by not responding, or responding by telling him to eat **** and die. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
"D K" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:47:49 -0400, D K wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:36:29 -0500, Richard Casady wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:38:25 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:14:36 -0400, "Doral 36" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:49:44 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." . Lefties aren't the ones who go postal. We realize we can't control everything arounds us, unlike righties. I think you are delusional if you don't think there are just as many nut cases who profess to be on the right of left. Mental illness has no restrictions. Nutcases and postal are two different things. Righties go postal. May I point you to Wichita? The man who killed JFK, Lee Oswald, was far enough left to move to the USSR. He came back and killed the Prez. Within a day a right wing nut, Jack Ruby, killed him. Scum come in all flavors. The nuts have been working on the why of it ever since. Casady Richard, most of the violence we've seen in this country for the last 100 years comes from the right. Oswald and Ruby were driven by far more than politics. Just keeping making this **** up, moron. Donnie aside, no one here is dumb enough to believe it. Oh, that's an excellent argument filled with rich historical fact and subtle nuance. Thanks for digging so deep into your intellectual resources for the thoughtful response. Silly ****ing ****. Kruger spends too much time lurking in dark, skanky holes waiting for young girls to pass so he can harass them. . Really, dummy? What did you base that "fact" on? ooops...somebody forgot to flush the toilet. Ah..... there we go! |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
HK wrote:
jps wrote: On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:06:25 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Are you from the US? I keep learning new expression from reading your posts. What the heck does blindered mean? Or was this a misspelling of "blundered" ? When you say "stick-up-the-ass" do you mean up his poop chute or his humorous ****? It almost sounds like you are have a random generator putting words together to form something that resembles a sentence. Blinders, as in the other end of a horse's ass. I could have used blinkered. Would that've helped? Maybe check your OED. In the silly ****'s case, it'd be a giant log up his arse that's somehow affected synapses firing. Maybe he's stopped up. A query from Reggie is best handled by not responding, or responding by telling him to eat **** and die. jps, You better listen to Harry or he might turn on you. So remember, it is ignore me, like Harry does, which means respond to my post by 3rd party, or tell me to eat **** and die. Snap too, you pussy. -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:30:54 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:06:25 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Are you from the US? I keep learning new expression from reading your posts. What the heck does blindered mean? Or was this a misspelling of "blundered" ? When you say "stick-up-the-ass" do you mean up his poop chute or his humorous ****? It almost sounds like you are have a random generator putting words together to form something that resembles a sentence. Blinders, as in the other end of a horse's ass. I could have used blinkered. Would that've helped? Maybe check your OED. In the silly ****'s case, it'd be a giant log up his arse that's somehow affected synapses firing. Maybe he's stopped up. A query from Reggie is best handled by not responding, or responding by telling him to eat **** and die. jps, You better listen to Harry or he might turn on you. So remember, it is ignore me, like Harry does, which means respond to my post by 3rd party, or tell me to eat **** and die. Snap too, you pussy. Eat **** and die. Consider this a favor. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
jps wrote:
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:30:54 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:06:25 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Are you from the US? I keep learning new expression from reading your posts. What the heck does blindered mean? Or was this a misspelling of "blundered" ? When you say "stick-up-the-ass" do you mean up his poop chute or his humorous ****? It almost sounds like you are have a random generator putting words together to form something that resembles a sentence. Blinders, as in the other end of a horse's ass. I could have used blinkered. Would that've helped? Maybe check your OED. In the silly ****'s case, it'd be a giant log up his arse that's somehow affected synapses firing. Maybe he's stopped up. A query from Reggie is best handled by not responding, or responding by telling him to eat **** and die. jps, You better listen to Harry or he might turn on you. So remember, it is ignore me, like Harry does, which means respond to my post by 3rd party, or tell me to eat **** and die. Snap too, you pussy. Eat **** and die. Consider this a favor. I knew you would fall in line. Good job -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 07:11:46 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: jps wrote: On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:30:54 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:06:25 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Are you from the US? I keep learning new expression from reading your posts. What the heck does blindered mean? Or was this a misspelling of "blundered" ? When you say "stick-up-the-ass" do you mean up his poop chute or his humorous ****? It almost sounds like you are have a random generator putting words together to form something that resembles a sentence. Blinders, as in the other end of a horse's ass. I could have used blinkered. Would that've helped? Maybe check your OED. In the silly ****'s case, it'd be a giant log up his arse that's somehow affected synapses firing. Maybe he's stopped up. A query from Reggie is best handled by not responding, or responding by telling him to eat **** and die. jps, You better listen to Harry or he might turn on you. So remember, it is ignore me, like Harry does, which means respond to my post by 3rd party, or tell me to eat **** and die. Snap too, you pussy. Eat **** and die. Consider this a favor. I knew you would fall in line. Good job LOL. -- John H "The problem with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money." --Margaret Thatcher |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Jun 4, 8:31*pm, jps wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:09:43 -0400, D K wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:39 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. *I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. *Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. *And, I have a boat silly ****. What is a 'boat silly ****'. Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****? These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of Donnie and Harry, I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even converse with this guy. -- John H ..and yet you feel compelled to respond to him! Why is that Johnny..are you strangely excited by the so called..gay talk'? Having nothing more than drivel to offer, he attacks my grammar. Johnny's excited by having at Librals, just like I'm excited by having at idiots. *I have him plonked, not worth the time. Silly old ****. "Having at"? Down to critiquing expressions? *Not much below you is there? You gotta have a strong stomach to be a **** hauler.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That's what your buddies Harry and Don do! |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:45:16 -0400, John H
wrote: Utter bull****. In most cases handguns are never used in anger. 99% of them. Your 'most cases' falls in the 1 %. A guy once pulled a knife on me and demanded money. I pulled a .45 and told him to run. He did. Had he tried to ' use it against me' I would have shot him several times. Back in the bin. Casady You're much better off listening to Krause. He never bull****s. He went to Yale, you know. Reggie may have been talking about h My use resulted in no shots fired, so it wasn't even reported, Nothing in the statistics. There are estimates that guns are used to chase off trouble more than a million times a year, without anyone bothering to report it. Many successful crimes are also unreported, so it is hard to get at the truth, even without an ax to grind. Casady |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
Richard Casady wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:45:16 -0400, John H wrote: Utter bull****. In most cases handguns are never used in anger. 99% of them. Your 'most cases' falls in the 1 %. A guy once pulled a knife on me and demanded money. I pulled a .45 and told him to run. He did. Had he tried to ' use it against me' I would have shot him several times. Back in the bin. Casady You're much better off listening to Krause. He never bull****s. He went to Yale, you know. Reggie may have been talking about h My use resulted in no shots fired, so it wasn't even reported, Nothing in the statistics. There are estimates that guns are used to chase off trouble more than a million times a year, without anyone bothering to report it. Many successful crimes are also unreported, so it is hard to get at the truth, even without an ax to grind. Casady It pays to have a full-sized, steel handgun, so if you don't have to shoot the felon wannabe, you can always smack him over the head. My Sig P226 X5 weighs about 48 ounces sans ammo, and would work well as a blackjack. Not very concealable, though. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
|
H.L. Mencken Debunked
HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:45:16 -0400, John H wrote: Utter bull****. In most cases handguns are never used in anger. 99% of them. Your 'most cases' falls in the 1 %. A guy once pulled a knife on me and demanded money. I pulled a .45 and told him to run. He did. Had he tried to ' use it against me' I would have shot him several times. Back in the bin. Casady You're much better off listening to Krause. He never bull****s. He went to Yale, you know. Reggie may have been talking about h My use resulted in no shots fired, so it wasn't even reported, Nothing in the statistics. There are estimates that guns are used to chase off trouble more than a million times a year, without anyone bothering to report it. Many successful crimes are also unreported, so it is hard to get at the truth, even without an ax to grind. Casady It pays to have a full-sized, steel handgun, so if you don't have to shoot the felon wannabe, you can always smack him over the head. My Sig P226 X5 weighs about 48 ounces sans ammo, and would work well as a blackjack. Not very concealable, though. That's about three pounds. You probably need two hands to pick it up. And I doubt you'd be brave enough, to get within arms length of a threat, to smack him with your pistola. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
Richard Casady wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 06:28:53 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Then GM tried with the Vega, There were five thousand with four valves per cylinder, DOHC. Only Lotus and Jensen-Healy offered that. My brother had a Jensen.. Called it the road oiler. Bought it in 72 and it rusted while he spent years on a flattop. Then he got home, we stripped it down to the frame, more or less, and chased the rust. He has probably put an thousand miles on it since. Casady Ahhhh...British sports cars. My introduction to them came in junior high. One of my buds was one of three sons of a fairly wealthy lawyer. His two older brothers were given Austin-Healeys for their 16th birthdays, and we got to wash them and sit in them and drive them around the circular driveway when we were about 13. When my friend turned 16, his dad bought him a new Jag XK150. I fell in love with that car. We even took it up to Lime Rock once and ran the track on a non race day. Great fun. After I finished my junior year in college, I got a summer job at a newspaper and used my practically non-existent salary to buy a pretty MG-A. I loved that car, but it was completely unreliable in every aspect possible. But I loved driving it when it would start! Then I bought a new TR4-IRS, and that became my favorite sports car. It wasn't as pretty as the MG, but it was rock solid reliable. It was followed by a Lotus Cortina, which was an English Ford with an engine "worked on" by Lotus. Well, that should have done it for me, because it, too, was a P.O.S. While in Florida, I bought an unrestored, original and near-perfect Jag XK150-S with, incredibly, just under 9,000 original miles. I drove it a little on dry, windless days, but mostly it lived in a good solid garage, under a soft bedsheet. It stayed in Florida when we moved to Maryland. A friend took care of the car for me in between my visits. Sold the car last year with 11,000 miles on it. The new owner had to supply his own battery. I really liked the car, and still think the XK150 and the original XKE's that followed were the high point of British sports car design. I never like the Lotuses much. There's a firm in England remanufacturing XKE's, and from what I have read they do a fabulous job. They have original, cleaned up E-types, but what really interests me are the fully modernized, remanufactured XKE's. Oh...the buddy...he cracked up the XK150 and the next week, his dad bought him a new "E" type. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
Richard Casady wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:45:16 -0400, John H wrote: Utter bull****. In most cases handguns are never used in anger. 99% of them. Your 'most cases' falls in the 1 %. A guy once pulled a knife on me and demanded money. I pulled a .45 and told him to run. He did. Had he tried to ' use it against me' I would have shot him several times. Back in the bin. Casady You're much better off listening to Krause. He never bull****s. He went to Yale, you know. Reggie may have been talking about h My use resulted in no shots fired, so it wasn't even reported, Nothing in the statistics. There are estimates that guns are used to chase off trouble more than a million times a year, without anyone bothering to report it. Many successful crimes are also unreported, so it is hard to get at the truth, even without an ax to grind. Casady Well you are probably correct that it is very difficult to get reliable gun statistics, but according to the CDC and bureau of Justice Statistics: "Suicides typically make up 56.5% of all gun deaths according to the Bureau Of Justice Statistics. In fact, drugs and suicides account for more than 2 out of every 3 gun deaths in the USA. " According to the CDC for the 6 yr period from 1/1/2000 to 12/31/2006 there were 209,773 deaths by handguns. As I said, I have no problems if the laws remain the same or if they change, but I have never felt that I needed a handgun for protection.. I go downtown without any fear, including some of the cities with high crime rates, Atlanta, Washington DC, Miami, NYC, and have never been threatened. I personally think it is because I don't look like an easy target, others might say it is because I look like the kind of person who would go postal if threated. But, based upon the way I use my cell phone (it normally stays in my car) , if and when I needed a handgun, it would not be close by. From the estimates I have read, the estimates that guns are used to prevent crime are between 400,000 and 2.5 million. The problem is all of these statistics are very dubious, because of what one defines as crime prevention. Does it include when someone pulls out a gun due to road rage? I really can't figure out what I am doing to have lived all of my life, and never had anyone try to rob me or threaten my life, but if I could figure it out, I need to bottle it and sell it. -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote: On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 06:28:53 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Then GM tried with the Vega, There were five thousand with four valves per cylinder, DOHC. Only Lotus and Jensen-Healy offered that. My brother had a Jensen.. Called it the road oiler. Bought it in 72 and it rusted while he spent years on a flattop. Then he got home, we stripped it down to the frame, more or less, and chased the rust. He has probably put an thousand miles on it since. Casady Ahhhh...British sports cars. My introduction to them came in junior high. One of my buds was one of three sons of a fairly wealthy lawyer. His two older brothers were given Austin-Healeys for their 16th birthdays, and we got to wash them and sit in them and drive them around the circular driveway when we were about 13. When my friend turned 16, his dad bought him a new Jag XK150. I fell in love with that car. We even took it up to Lime Rock once and ran the track on a non race day. Great fun. After I finished my junior year in college, I got a summer job at a newspaper and used my practically non-existent salary to buy a pretty MG-A. I loved that car, but it was completely unreliable in every aspect possible. But I loved driving it when it would start! Then I bought a new TR4-IRS, and that became my favorite sports car. It wasn't as pretty as the MG, but it was rock solid reliable. It was followed by a Lotus Cortina, which was an English Ford with an engine "worked on" by Lotus. Well, that should have done it for me, because it, too, was a P.O.S. While in Florida, I bought an unrestored, original and near-perfect Jag XK150-S with, incredibly, just under 9,000 original miles. I drove it a little on dry, windless days, but mostly it lived in a good solid garage, under a soft bedsheet. It stayed in Florida when we moved to Maryland. A friend took care of the car for me in between my visits. Sold the car last year with 11,000 miles on it. The new owner had to supply his own battery. I really liked the car, and still think the XK150 and the original XKE's that followed were the high point of British sports car design. I never like the Lotuses much. There's a firm in England remanufacturing XKE's, and from what I have read they do a fabulous job. They have original, cleaned up E-types, but what really interests me are the fully modernized, remanufactured XKE's. Oh...the buddy...he cracked up the XK150 and the next week, his dad bought him a new "E" type. You sure are a glutton for punishment. You would think you would have learned something after purchasing your first British motorcar Who said slow learners couldn't graduate from a third rate Kansas school. Probably the bottom of your class but who cares. You made it. Congratulations. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Jun 5, 9:31*am, HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote: On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 06:28:53 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Then GM tried with the Vega, There were five thousand with four valves per cylinder, DOHC. Only Lotus and Jensen-Healy offered that. My brother had a Jensen.. Called it the road oiler. Bought it in 72 and it rusted while he spent years on a flattop. Then he got home, we stripped it down to the frame, more or less, and chased the rust. He has probably put an thousand miles on it since. Casady Ahhhh...British sports cars. My introduction to them came in junior high. One of my buds was one of three sons of a fairly wealthy lawyer. His two older brothers were given Austin-Healeys for their 16th birthdays, and we got to wash them and sit in them and drive them around the circular driveway when we were about 13. When my friend turned 16, his dad bought him a new Jag XK150. I fell in love with that car. We even took it up to Lime Rock once and ran the track on a non race day. Great fun. After I finished my junior year in college, I got a summer job at a newspaper and used my practically non-existent salary to buy a pretty MG-A. I loved that car, but it was completely unreliable in every aspect possible. But I loved driving it when it would start! *Then I bought a new TR4-IRS, and that became my favorite sports car. It wasn't as pretty as the MG, but it was rock solid reliable. It was followed by a Lotus Cortina, which was an English Ford with an engine "worked on" by Lotus. Well, that should have done it for me, because it, too, was a P.O.S. While in Florida, I bought an unrestored, original and near-perfect Jag XK150-S with, incredibly, just under 9,000 original miles. I drove it a little on dry, windless days, but mostly it lived in a good solid garage, under a soft bedsheet. *It stayed in Florida when we moved to Maryland. A friend took care of the car for me in between my visits. Sold the car last year with 11,000 miles on it. The new owner had to supply his own battery. I really liked the car, and still think the XK150 and the original XKE's that followed were the high point of British sports car design. I never like the Lotuses much. There's a firm in England remanufacturing XKE's, and from what I have read they do a fabulous job. They have original, cleaned up E-types, but what really interests me are the fully modernized, remanufactured XKE's. Oh...the buddy...he cracked up the XK150 and the next week, his dad bought him a new "E" type. Ah......WAFA bull**** at it's finest. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:35:27 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: Richard Casady wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:45:16 -0400, John H wrote: Utter bull****. In most cases handguns are never used in anger. 99% of them. Your 'most cases' falls in the 1 %. A guy once pulled a knife on me and demanded money. I pulled a .45 and told him to run. He did. Had he tried to ' use it against me' I would have shot him several times. Back in the bin. Casady You're much better off listening to Krause. He never bull****s. He went to Yale, you know. Reggie may have been talking about h My use resulted in no shots fired, so it wasn't even reported, Nothing in the statistics. There are estimates that guns are used to chase off trouble more than a million times a year, without anyone bothering to report it. Many successful crimes are also unreported, so it is hard to get at the truth, even without an ax to grind. Casady Well you are probably correct that it is very difficult to get reliable gun statistics, but according to the CDC and bureau of Justice Statistics: "Suicides typically make up 56.5% of all gun deaths according to the Bureau Of Justice Statistics. In fact, drugs and suicides account for more than 2 out of every 3 gun deaths in the USA. " According to the CDC for the 6 yr period from 1/1/2000 to 12/31/2006 there were 209,773 deaths by handguns. As I said, I have no problems if the laws remain the same or if they change, but I have never felt that I needed a handgun for protection.. I go downtown without any fear, including some of the cities with high crime rates, Atlanta, Washington DC, Miami, NYC, and have never been threatened. I personally think it is because I don't look like an easy target, others might say it is because I look like the kind of person who would go postal if threated. But, based upon the way I use my cell phone (it normally stays in my car) , if and when I needed a handgun, it would not be close by. From the estimates I have read, the estimates that guns are used to prevent crime are between 400,000 and 2.5 million. The problem is all of these statistics are very dubious, because of what one defines as crime prevention. Does it include when someone pulls out a gun due to road rage? I really can't figure out what I am doing to have lived all of my life, and never had anyone try to rob me or threaten my life, but if I could figure it out, I need to bottle it and sell it. It helps to look like the meanest, ugliest SOB in the valley. -- John H "The problem with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money." --Margaret Thatcher |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
John H wrote:
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:35:27 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Richard Casady wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:45:16 -0400, John H wrote: Utter bull****. In most cases handguns are never used in anger. 99% of them. Your 'most cases' falls in the 1 %. A guy once pulled a knife on me and demanded money. I pulled a .45 and told him to run. He did. Had he tried to ' use it against me' I would have shot him several times. Back in the bin. Casady You're much better off listening to Krause. He never bull****s. He went to Yale, you know. Reggie may have been talking about h My use resulted in no shots fired, so it wasn't even reported, Nothing in the statistics. There are estimates that guns are used to chase off trouble more than a million times a year, without anyone bothering to report it. Many successful crimes are also unreported, so it is hard to get at the truth, even without an ax to grind. Casady Well you are probably correct that it is very difficult to get reliable gun statistics, but according to the CDC and bureau of Justice Statistics: "Suicides typically make up 56.5% of all gun deaths according to the Bureau Of Justice Statistics. In fact, drugs and suicides account for more than 2 out of every 3 gun deaths in the USA. " According to the CDC for the 6 yr period from 1/1/2000 to 12/31/2006 there were 209,773 deaths by handguns. As I said, I have no problems if the laws remain the same or if they change, but I have never felt that I needed a handgun for protection.. I go downtown without any fear, including some of the cities with high crime rates, Atlanta, Washington DC, Miami, NYC, and have never been threatened. I personally think it is because I don't look like an easy target, others might say it is because I look like the kind of person who would go postal if threated. But, based upon the way I use my cell phone (it normally stays in my car) , if and when I needed a handgun, it would not be close by. From the estimates I have read, the estimates that guns are used to prevent crime are between 400,000 and 2.5 million. The problem is all of these statistics are very dubious, because of what one defines as crime prevention. Does it include when someone pulls out a gun due to road rage? I really can't figure out what I am doing to have lived all of my life, and never had anyone try to rob me or threaten my life, but if I could figure it out, I need to bottle it and sell it. It helps to look like the meanest, ugliest SOB in the valley. -- John H "The problem with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money." --Margaret Thatcher I don't know if it is because I am the meanest, the ugliest or both, but I NEVER have any problems. -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:35:27 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: I personally think it is because I don't look like an easy target, others might say it is because I look like the kind of person who would go postal if threated So many jokes - so little time. :) |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:30:15 -0400, John H
wrote: It helps to look like the meanest, ugliest SOB in the valley. It's even better to be the meanest, ugliest SOB in the valley. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:35:27 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: I personally think it is because I don't look like an easy target, others might say it is because I look like the kind of person who would go postal if threated So many jokes - so little time. :) Feel free to save this for future reference when you have the time. -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 07:11:46 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: jps wrote: On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:30:54 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:06:25 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Are you from the US? I keep learning new expression from reading your posts. What the heck does blindered mean? Or was this a misspelling of "blundered" ? When you say "stick-up-the-ass" do you mean up his poop chute or his humorous ****? It almost sounds like you are have a random generator putting words together to form something that resembles a sentence. Blinders, as in the other end of a horse's ass. I could have used blinkered. Would that've helped? Maybe check your OED. In the silly ****'s case, it'd be a giant log up his arse that's somehow affected synapses firing. Maybe he's stopped up. A query from Reggie is best handled by not responding, or responding by telling him to eat **** and die. jps, You better listen to Harry or he might turn on you. So remember, it is ignore me, like Harry does, which means respond to my post by 3rd party, or tell me to eat **** and die. Snap too, you pussy. Eat **** and die. Consider this a favor. I knew you would fall in line. Good job You asked me to say it. I did it for you. Like I said, consider it a favor, no compensation necessary. It was my pleasure. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
jps wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:07:06 -0400, D K wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****. Do you want to compare sizes? Value? HP? Bilge pumps? Every newsgroup you frequent includes a long history of your conflicts. Food, barbeque, fast food, what have you. Every single newsgroup. You really should up your sessions to 5 a week. So you lied when you said you were looking for a boat? You are more like WAFA with every keystroke, Sherlock. Dickless, people who are interested in boats are always looking for boats. If something showed up in my price range right now I'd be interested. I'm holding out for what I've set my sights on but I remain open to alternatives. Are you one of those stick-up-the-ass blindered "conservatives" who can only think of one boat at a time? I take that back, we know you're a stick-up-the-ass "conservative," the only part I'm missing is if you're only interested in one boat at a time. So the short ,and mature, version is - you don't have a boat and you are looking at them. Why are you compelled to lie and be an asshole? Did you get beat up in school, you pathetic *******? |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
jps wrote: On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:07:06 -0400, D K wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****. Do you want to compare sizes? Value? HP? Bilge pumps? Every newsgroup you frequent includes a long history of your conflicts. Food, barbeque, fast food, what have you. Every single newsgroup. You really should up your sessions to 5 a week. So you lied when you said you were looking for a boat? You are more like WAFA with every keystroke, Sherlock. Dickless, people who are interested in boats are always looking for boats. If something showed up in my price range right now I'd be interested. I'm holding out for what I've set my sights on but I remain open to alternatives. Are you one of those stick-up-the-ass blindered "conservatives" who can only think of one boat at a time? I take that back, we know you're a stick-up-the-ass "conservative," the only part I'm missing is if you're only interested in one boat at a time. Are you from the US? I keep learning new expression from reading your posts. What the heck does blindered mean? Or was this a misspelling of "blundered" ? When you say "stick-up-the-ass" do you mean up his poop chute or his humorous ****? It almost sounds like you are have a random generator putting words together to form something that resembles a sentence. Now *that* is funny! |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
John H wrote:
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 07:11:46 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: jps wrote: On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:30:54 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:06:25 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Are you from the US? I keep learning new expression from reading your posts. What the heck does blindered mean? Or was this a misspelling of "blundered" ? When you say "stick-up-the-ass" do you mean up his poop chute or his humorous ****? It almost sounds like you are have a random generator putting words together to form something that resembles a sentence. Blinders, as in the other end of a horse's ass. I could have used blinkered. Would that've helped? Maybe check your OED. In the silly ****'s case, it'd be a giant log up his arse that's somehow affected synapses firing. Maybe he's stopped up. A query from Reggie is best handled by not responding, or responding by telling him to eat **** and die. jps, You better listen to Harry or he might turn on you. So remember, it is ignore me, like Harry does, which means respond to my post by 3rd party, or tell me to eat **** and die. Snap too, you pussy. Eat **** and die. Consider this a favor. I knew you would fall in line. Good job LOL. -- John H "The problem with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money." --Margaret Thatcher He's an official member now. The nail-biting begins... |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:34:09 -0400, D K
wrote: John H wrote: On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 07:11:46 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: jps wrote: On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:30:54 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:06:25 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Are you from the US? I keep learning new expression from reading your posts. What the heck does blindered mean? Or was this a misspelling of "blundered" ? When you say "stick-up-the-ass" do you mean up his poop chute or his humorous ****? It almost sounds like you are have a random generator putting words together to form something that resembles a sentence. Blinders, as in the other end of a horse's ass. I could have used blinkered. Would that've helped? Maybe check your OED. In the silly ****'s case, it'd be a giant log up his arse that's somehow affected synapses firing. Maybe he's stopped up. A query from Reggie is best handled by not responding, or responding by telling him to eat **** and die. jps, You better listen to Harry or he might turn on you. So remember, it is ignore me, like Harry does, which means respond to my post by 3rd party, or tell me to eat **** and die. Snap too, you pussy. Eat **** and die. Consider this a favor. I knew you would fall in line. Good job LOL. -- John H "The problem with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money." --Margaret Thatcher He's an official member now. The nail-biting begins... And you preceded my promotion by having achieved official ****dom. The Queen of rec.boats ****s. Congrats! |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:29:08 -0400, D K
wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:07:06 -0400, D K wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****. Do you want to compare sizes? Value? HP? Bilge pumps? Every newsgroup you frequent includes a long history of your conflicts. Food, barbeque, fast food, what have you. Every single newsgroup. You really should up your sessions to 5 a week. So you lied when you said you were looking for a boat? You are more like WAFA with every keystroke, Sherlock. Dickless, people who are interested in boats are always looking for boats. If something showed up in my price range right now I'd be interested. I'm holding out for what I've set my sights on but I remain open to alternatives. Are you one of those stick-up-the-ass blindered "conservatives" who can only think of one boat at a time? I take that back, we know you're a stick-up-the-ass "conservative," the only part I'm missing is if you're only interested in one boat at a time. So the short ,and mature, version is - you don't have a boat and you are looking at them. Why are you compelled to lie and be an asshole? Did you get beat up in school, you pathetic *******? I have two parents you silly ****, both of whom were involved in producing me. WTF produced you? I see you like to steal other folks' themes. Thinly veiled version of my supposition that your father kicked the **** out of you. Apparently he left enough of your cortex intact to minimally function, like a silly ****. You like being chased around like you chase Don? |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
"jps" wrote in message ... I have two parents you silly ****, both of whom were involved in producing me. WTF produced you? I see you like to steal other folks' themes. Thinly veiled version of my supposition that your father kicked the **** out of you. Apparently he left enough of your cortex intact to minimally function, like a silly ****. You like being chased around like you chase Don? Ditzy Dan still chasing my butt? He'd need three or four enimas before he'd be able to even get near me! |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
Don White wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ... I have two parents you silly ****, both of whom were involved in producing me. WTF produced you? I see you like to steal other folks' themes. Thinly veiled version of my supposition that your father kicked the **** out of you. Apparently he left enough of your cortex intact to minimally function, like a silly ****. You like being chased around like you chase Don? Ditzy Dan still chasing my butt? He'd need three or four enimas before he'd be able to even get near me! Looks like ol' JPS is giving DickheadDan a taste of his own medicine. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Jun 6, 8:56*am, HK wrote:
Don White wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . I have two parents you silly ****, both of whom were involved in producing me. *WTF produced you? I see you like to steal other folks' themes. *Thinly veiled version of my supposition that your father kicked the **** out of you. Apparently he left enough of your cortex intact to minimally function, like a silly ****. You like being chased around like you chase Don? Ditzy Dan still chasing my butt? He'd need three or four enimas before he'd be able to even get near me! Looks like ol' JPS is giving DickheadDan a taste of his own medicine.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So you like JPS's vulgar childish bull****, huh? Figures. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
"HK" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... I have two parents you silly ****, both of whom were involved in producing me. WTF produced you? I see you like to steal other folks' themes. Thinly veiled version of my supposition that your father kicked the **** out of you. Apparently he left enough of your cortex intact to minimally function, like a silly ****. You like being chased around like you chase Don? Ditzy Dan still chasing my butt? He'd need three or four enimas before he'd be able to even get near me! Looks like ol' JPS is giving DickheadDan a taste of his own medicine. Doubt JPS could be as nasty or obnoxious as Dingy Dan... but a good slap upside Krugers' head might smarten him up |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... I have two parents you silly ****, both of whom were involved in producing me. WTF produced you? I see you like to steal other folks' themes. Thinly veiled version of my supposition that your father kicked the **** out of you. Apparently he left enough of your cortex intact to minimally function, like a silly ****. You like being chased around like you chase Don? Ditzy Dan still chasing my butt? He'd need three or four enimas before he'd be able to even get near me! Looks like ol' JPS is giving DickheadDan a taste of his own medicine. Doubt JPS could be as nasty or obnoxious as Dingy Dan... but a good slap upside Krugers' head might smarten him up More likely, create a hollow sound... |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Jun 6, 8:56*am, HK wrote:
Don White wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . I have two parents you silly ****, both of whom were involved in producing me. *WTF produced you? I see you like to steal other folks' themes. *Thinly veiled version of my supposition that your father kicked the **** out of you. Apparently he left enough of your cortex intact to minimally function, like a silly ****. You like being chased around like you chase Don? Ditzy Dan still chasing my butt? He'd need three or four enimas before he'd be able to even get near me! Looks like ol' JPS is giving DickheadDan a taste of his own medicine.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Show me ONE INSTANCE where DK has called anybody a "****".. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Jun 6, 1:09*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "jps" wrote in message . .. I have two parents you silly ****, both of whom were involved in producing me. *WTF produced you? I see you like to steal other folks' themes. *Thinly veiled version of my supposition that your father kicked the **** out of you. Apparently he left enough of your cortex intact to minimally function, like a silly ****. You like being chased around like you chase Don? Ditzy Dan still chasing my butt? He'd need three or four enimas before he'd be able to even get near me! Looks like ol' JPS is giving DickheadDan a taste of his own medicine. Doubt JPS could be as nasty or obnoxious as Dingy Dan... but a good slap upside Krugers' head might smarten him up- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So you approve of people calling others "****s"? No wonder your son turned out like he did. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
jps wrote:
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:29:08 -0400, D K wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:07:06 -0400, D K wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****. Do you want to compare sizes? Value? HP? Bilge pumps? Every newsgroup you frequent includes a long history of your conflicts. Food, barbeque, fast food, what have you. Every single newsgroup. You really should up your sessions to 5 a week. So you lied when you said you were looking for a boat? You are more like WAFA with every keystroke, Sherlock. Dickless, people who are interested in boats are always looking for boats. If something showed up in my price range right now I'd be interested. I'm holding out for what I've set my sights on but I remain open to alternatives. Are you one of those stick-up-the-ass blindered "conservatives" who can only think of one boat at a time? I take that back, we know you're a stick-up-the-ass "conservative," the only part I'm missing is if you're only interested in one boat at a time. So the short ,and mature, version is - you don't have a boat and you are looking at them. Why are you compelled to lie and be an asshole? Did you get beat up in school, you pathetic *******? I have two parents you silly ****, both of whom were involved in producing me. WTF produced you? I see you like to steal other folks' themes. Thinly veiled version of my supposition that your father kicked the **** out of you. Apparently he left enough of your cortex intact to minimally function, like a silly ****. You like being chased around like you chase Don? OK, so you don't own a boat. Admit it and skip the bull**** and name-calling. It's too obvious - to everyone. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
Don White wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ... I have two parents you silly ****, both of whom were involved in producing me. WTF produced you? I see you like to steal other folks' themes. Thinly veiled version of my supposition that your father kicked the **** out of you. Apparently he left enough of your cortex intact to minimally function, like a silly ****. You like being chased around like you chase Don? Ditzy Dan still chasing my butt? He'd need three or four enimas before he'd be able to even get near me! What the hell does that mean? I know you're dumb but this is off the charts! |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... I have two parents you silly ****, both of whom were involved in producing me. WTF produced you? I see you like to steal other folks' themes. Thinly veiled version of my supposition that your father kicked the **** out of you. Apparently he left enough of your cortex intact to minimally function, like a silly ****. You like being chased around like you chase Don? Ditzy Dan still chasing my butt? He'd need three or four enimas before he'd be able to even get near me! Looks like ol' JPS is giving DickheadDan a taste of his own medicine. Doubt JPS could be as nasty or obnoxious as Dingy Dan... but a good slap upside Krugers' head might smarten him up I doubt you can read. It's all here - you hero, jps, is a vulgar POS. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
|
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 20:30:24 -0400, D K
wrote: Don White wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... I have two parents you silly ****, both of whom were involved in producing me. WTF produced you? I see you like to steal other folks' themes. Thinly veiled version of my supposition that your father kicked the **** out of you. Apparently he left enough of your cortex intact to minimally function, like a silly ****. You like being chased around like you chase Don? Ditzy Dan still chasing my butt? He'd need three or four enimas before he'd be able to even get near me! Looks like ol' JPS is giving DickheadDan a taste of his own medicine. Doubt JPS could be as nasty or obnoxious as Dingy Dan... but a good slap upside Krugers' head might smarten him up I doubt you can read. It's all here - you hero, jps, is a vulgar POS. And who are you a hero to? **** haulers of America? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com