|
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Jun 3, 11:40*am, jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:34:33 -0400, jim78 wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. *I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons.. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Would you please learn to punctuate properly. Your work is unreadable. A pig would have no trouble reading Harry's post. *A silly **** may.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And you sure ARE a pig. What a freakin' low life. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Jun 3, 11:16*am, HK wrote:
jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. *I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes.. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey, Don, Harry misspelled a word!!! Remember now, you and Harry think that people who misspell are "idiots". |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Jun 3, 10:56*am, HK wrote:
jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:49:44 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:18:58 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: GC Boater wrote: It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats.- Hide quoted text - Penis substitutes? *Would that explain the Hatteras and the Zimerman- like lobster boat? He said the same thing about people who owned handguns. I said that people who owned handguns were more likely to take their own lives. *Do you fit that description? Two points: 1. *I was not discussing you or even talking to you, I was discussing the person who stated those who owned handguns were using them due to them having a very small penis. * You might have said, it, but I never heard you say it, Harry said it everyday, till the day he purchased a handgun. 2. *I don't own a handgun, never have. *I have no problem if handguns have increased regulations or completely banned. * I really don't have a problem if we leave the law the way it is. * *I completely agree that in most cases handguns are used against the handgun owner (by a criminal who takes the gun away from them), or they use the gun to kill themselves. *Based upon Harry's behavior, and I would think the odds are he will eventually use his handgun to harm himself, or he will go postal at the local mall, but I don't think banning guns will result in criminals or mentally unstable individuals turning in their handguns. It will just make selling them very profitable for organized crime. Lefties aren't the ones who go postal. *We realize we can't control everything arounds us, unlike righties. Good for you that you're not among the paranoid nuts, at least on this subject. I'm so honored to be the object of desire of rec.boats' ****heads like Reggie, Loogie, floridajim, *et cetera.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No one here "desires" you. I, for one, wish you'd take your lying, fat, nasty, vulgar, low life ass somewhere else. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
|
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 06:01:28 -0500, Richard Casady
wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:49:44 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: I completely agree that in most cases handguns are used against the handgun owner (by a criminal who takes the gun away from them), or they use the gun to kill themselves Utter bull****. In most cases handguns are never used in anger. 99% of them. Your 'most cases' falls in the 1 %. A guy once pulled a knife on me and demanded money. I pulled a .45 and told him to run. He did. Had he tried to ' use it against me' I would have shot him several times. Back in the bin. Casady You're much better off listening to Krause. He never bull****s. He went to Yale, you know. Reggie may have been talking about handgun deaths, not the handguns themselves. -- John H "The problem with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money." --Margaret Thatcher |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:52:13 -0500, Richard Casady wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:36:36 -0700, jps wrote: I said that people who owned handguns were more likely to take their own lives. Do you fit that description? Tens of millions of handgun owners, a few thousand suicides. Many people are math challenged. Are you? Casady I don't care how many are owned. It's how they're used. A large percentage of use is against the owner or immediate family. Bull****. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:36:29 -0500, Richard Casady wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:38:25 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:14:36 -0400, "Doral 36" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:49:44 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." . Lefties aren't the ones who go postal. We realize we can't control everything arounds us, unlike righties. I think you are delusional if you don't think there are just as many nut cases who profess to be on the right of left. Mental illness has no restrictions. Nutcases and postal are two different things. Righties go postal. May I point you to Wichita? The man who killed JFK, Lee Oswald, was far enough left to move to the USSR. He came back and killed the Prez. Within a day a right wing nut, Jack Ruby, killed him. Scum come in all flavors. The nuts have been working on the why of it ever since. Casady Richard, most of the violence we've seen in this country for the last 100 years comes from the right. Oswald and Ruby were driven by far more than politics. Just keeping making this **** up, moron. Donnie aside, no one here is dumb enough to believe it. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
|
H.L. Mencken Debunked
My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman.- Hide quoted text - Hey Krausie, how 'bout posting a pic of your Zimerman-like and your Hatteras, eh? |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
wrote in message ... On Jun 2, 8:47 pm, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. It worked for a while but they lost touch and started coasting. When you look back at some of the barges they were selling in the 70s it's a wonder they lasted as long as they did. When we had the gas lines and the big three started trying to make a gas saving vehicle, the Honda Civic came into play. Then GM tried with the Vega, Ford the Pinto, Chrysler with the K car. BUT, out of those crappy vehicles came the technology and research to make some decent fuel efficient cars. I can only hope it'll be the same this time around. During that time, the U.S. was bailing them out, too, just like now. ----------------------------------------- The only "bailout" I remember was a loan to Chrysler which was paid back in full and ahead of schedule. Where there others? Eisboch |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Jun 2, 8:47 pm, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. It worked for a while but they lost touch and started coasting. When you look back at some of the barges they were selling in the 70s it's a wonder they lasted as long as they did. When we had the gas lines and the big three started trying to make a gas saving vehicle, the Honda Civic came into play. Then GM tried with the Vega, Ford the Pinto, Chrysler with the K car. BUT, out of those crappy vehicles came the technology and research to make some decent fuel efficient cars. I can only hope it'll be the same this time around. During that time, the U.S. was bailing them out, too, just like now. ----------------------------------------- The only "bailout" I remember was a loan to Chrysler which was paid back in full and ahead of schedule. Where there others? Eisboch ummm... "were" there others? |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
Eisboch wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Jun 2, 8:47 pm, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. It worked for a while but they lost touch and started coasting. When you look back at some of the barges they were selling in the 70s it's a wonder they lasted as long as they did. When we had the gas lines and the big three started trying to make a gas saving vehicle, the Honda Civic came into play. Then GM tried with the Vega, Ford the Pinto, Chrysler with the K car. BUT, out of those crappy vehicles came the technology and research to make some decent fuel efficient cars. I can only hope it'll be the same this time around. During that time, the U.S. was bailing them out, too, just like now. ----------------------------------------- The only "bailout" I remember was a loan to Chrysler which was paid back in full and ahead of schedule. Where there others? Eisboch ummm... "were" there others? There have been other U.S. government bailouts of corporations and financial institutions...Lockheed, Penn Central, the S&L bailouts, and others. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
"HK" wrote in message m... Eisboch wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Jun 2, 8:47 pm, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. It worked for a while but they lost touch and started coasting. When you look back at some of the barges they were selling in the 70s it's a wonder they lasted as long as they did. When we had the gas lines and the big three started trying to make a gas saving vehicle, the Honda Civic came into play. Then GM tried with the Vega, Ford the Pinto, Chrysler with the K car. BUT, out of those crappy vehicles came the technology and research to make some decent fuel efficient cars. I can only hope it'll be the same this time around. During that time, the U.S. was bailing them out, too, just like now. ----------------------------------------- The only "bailout" I remember was a loan to Chrysler which was paid back in full and ahead of schedule. Where there others? Eisboch ummm... "were" there others? There have been other U.S. government bailouts of corporations and financial institutions...Lockheed, Penn Central, the S&L bailouts, and others. Please pay attention. The subject was US auto industry bailouts. Eisboch |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message m... Eisboch wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Jun 2, 8:47 pm, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. It worked for a while but they lost touch and started coasting. When you look back at some of the barges they were selling in the 70s it's a wonder they lasted as long as they did. When we had the gas lines and the big three started trying to make a gas saving vehicle, the Honda Civic came into play. Then GM tried with the Vega, Ford the Pinto, Chrysler with the K car. BUT, out of those crappy vehicles came the technology and research to make some decent fuel efficient cars. I can only hope it'll be the same this time around. During that time, the U.S. was bailing them out, too, just like now. ----------------------------------------- The only "bailout" I remember was a loan to Chrysler which was paid back in full and ahead of schedule. Where there others? Eisboch ummm... "were" there others? There have been other U.S. government bailouts of corporations and financial institutions...Lockheed, Penn Central, the S&L bailouts, and others. Please pay attention. The subject was US auto industry bailouts. Eisboch Sorry...I saw your question...I only skim the occasional Loogy dropping. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:47:49 -0400, D K
wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:36:29 -0500, Richard Casady wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:38:25 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:14:36 -0400, "Doral 36" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:49:44 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." . Lefties aren't the ones who go postal. We realize we can't control everything arounds us, unlike righties. I think you are delusional if you don't think there are just as many nut cases who profess to be on the right of left. Mental illness has no restrictions. Nutcases and postal are two different things. Righties go postal. May I point you to Wichita? The man who killed JFK, Lee Oswald, was far enough left to move to the USSR. He came back and killed the Prez. Within a day a right wing nut, Jack Ruby, killed him. Scum come in all flavors. The nuts have been working on the why of it ever since. Casady Richard, most of the violence we've seen in this country for the last 100 years comes from the right. Oswald and Ruby were driven by far more than politics. Just keeping making this **** up, moron. Donnie aside, no one here is dumb enough to believe it. Oh, that's an excellent argument filled with rich historical fact and subtle nuance. Thanks for digging so deep into your intellectual resources for the thoughtful response. Silly ****ing ****. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:43:25 -0400, D K
wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:52:13 -0500, Richard Casady wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:36:36 -0700, jps wrote: I said that people who owned handguns were more likely to take their own lives. Do you fit that description? Tens of millions of handgun owners, a few thousand suicides. Many people are math challenged. Are you? Casady I don't care how many are owned. It's how they're used. A large percentage of use is against the owner or immediate family. Bull****. Another brilliant rebuttal by the rec.boats.**** |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K
wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****. Do you want to compare sizes? Value? HP? Bilge pumps? Every newsgroup you frequent includes a long history of your conflicts. Food, barbeque, fast food, what have you. Every single newsgroup. You really should up your sessions to 5 a week. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Jun 3, 9:04*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... wrote in message .... On Jun 2, 8:47 pm, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. It worked for a while but they lost touch and started coasting. When you look back at some of the barges they were selling in the 70s it's a wonder they lasted as long as they did. When we had the gas lines and the big three started trying to make a gas saving vehicle, the Honda Civic came into play. Then GM tried with the Vega, Ford the Pinto, Chrysler with the K car. BUT, out of those crappy vehicles came the technology and research to make some decent fuel efficient cars. I can only hope it'll be the same this time around. During that time, the U.S. was bailing them out, too, just like now. ----------------------------------------- The only "bailout" I remember was a loan to Chrysler which was paid back in full and ahead of schedule. * Where there others? Eisboch ummm... *"were" there others?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yes, but not as publicized, because in those days, Carter's bailout of Chrysler was massive. But at the same time the government was dribbling money (in loans again) to the other two that added up substantially. The bailouts of today are designed as loans also. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****. What is a 'boat silly ****'. Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****? These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of Donnie and Harry, I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even converse with this guy. -- John H "The problem with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money." --Margaret Thatcher |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
"John H" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****. What is a 'boat silly ****'. Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****? These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of Donnie and Harry, I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even converse with this guy. -- John H ...and yet you feel compelled to respond to him! Why is that Johnny..are you strangely excited by the so called..gay talk'? |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
"jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:47:49 -0400, D K wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:36:29 -0500, Richard Casady wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:38:25 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:14:36 -0400, "Doral 36" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:49:44 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." . Lefties aren't the ones who go postal. We realize we can't control everything arounds us, unlike righties. I think you are delusional if you don't think there are just as many nut cases who profess to be on the right of left. Mental illness has no restrictions. Nutcases and postal are two different things. Righties go postal. May I point you to Wichita? The man who killed JFK, Lee Oswald, was far enough left to move to the USSR. He came back and killed the Prez. Within a day a right wing nut, Jack Ruby, killed him. Scum come in all flavors. The nuts have been working on the why of it ever since. Casady Richard, most of the violence we've seen in this country for the last 100 years comes from the right. Oswald and Ruby were driven by far more than politics. Just keeping making this **** up, moron. Donnie aside, no one here is dumb enough to believe it. Oh, that's an excellent argument filled with rich historical fact and subtle nuance. Thanks for digging so deep into your intellectual resources for the thoughtful response. Silly ****ing ****. Kruger spends too much time lurking in dark, skanky holes waiting for young girls to pass so he can harass them. . |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
A large percentage of use is against the owner or immediate family. Could you furnish any facts, information, cites, or studies to back that up? I thought not. Steve |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:39 -0300, "Don White"
wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****. What is a 'boat silly ****'. Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****? These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of Donnie and Harry, I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even converse with this guy. -- John H ..and yet you feel compelled to respond to him! Why is that Johnny..are you strangely excited by the so called..gay talk'? Having nothing more than drivel to offer, he attacks my grammar. Johnny's excited by having at Librals, just like I'm excited by having at idiots. I have him plonked, not worth the time. Silly old ****. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Jun 4, 9:26*am, "Don White" wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:47:49 -0400, D K wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:36:29 -0500, Richard Casady wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:38:25 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:14:36 -0400, "Doral 36" wrote: "jps" wrote in message news:i93d25518ckivlq4jsrs8ndhhehcuq7huh@4ax. com... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:49:44 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." . Lefties aren't the ones who go postal. *We realize we can't control everything arounds us, unlike righties. I think you are delusional if you don't think there are just as many nut cases who profess to be on the right of left. Mental illness has no restrictions. Nutcases and postal are two different things. Righties go postal. May I point you to Wichita? The man who killed JFK, Lee Oswald, was far enough left to move to the USSR. He came back and killed the Prez. *Within a day a right wing nut, Jack Ruby, killed him. Scum come in all flavors. The nuts have been working on the why of it ever since. Casady Richard, most of the violence we've seen in this country for the last 100 years *comes from the right. Oswald and Ruby were driven by far more than politics. Just keeping making this **** up, moron. *Donnie aside, no one here is dumb enough to believe it. Oh, that's an excellent argument filled with rich *historical fact and subtle nuance. *Thanks for digging so deep into your intellectual resources for the thoughtful response. Silly ****ing ****. Kruger spends too much time lurking in dark, skanky holes waiting for young girls to pass so he can harass them. .- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Any proof of that, liar? |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
jps wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:39 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****. What is a 'boat silly ****'. Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****? These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of Donnie and Harry, I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even converse with this guy. -- John H ..and yet you feel compelled to respond to him! Why is that Johnny..are you strangely excited by the so called..gay talk'? Having nothing more than drivel to offer, he attacks my grammar. Johnny's excited by having at Librals, just like I'm excited by having at idiots. I have him plonked, not worth the time. Silly old ****. Which is really funny, since both Herring and his wife have been sucking at the taxpayers' teat for their jobs and benefits most of their lives and, as everyone knows, "guv'mint" is a "libral" concept. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:33:57 -0400, HK wrote:
jps wrote: On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:39 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****. What is a 'boat silly ****'. Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****? These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of Donnie and Harry, I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even converse with this guy. -- John H ..and yet you feel compelled to respond to him! Why is that Johnny..are you strangely excited by the so called..gay talk'? Having nothing more than drivel to offer, he attacks my grammar. Johnny's excited by having at Librals, just like I'm excited by having at idiots. I have him plonked, not worth the time. Silly old ****. Which is really funny, since both Herring and his wife have been sucking at the taxpayers' teat for their jobs and benefits most of their lives and, as everyone knows, "guv'mint" is a "libral" concept. Did he earn a pension? Is it too much to hope for that it'll get taken away like what happens in the "free market?" |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
jps wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:33:57 -0400, HK wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:39 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****. What is a 'boat silly ****'. Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****? These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of Donnie and Harry, I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even converse with this guy. -- John H ..and yet you feel compelled to respond to him! Why is that Johnny..are you strangely excited by the so called..gay talk'? Having nothing more than drivel to offer, he attacks my grammar. Johnny's excited by having at Librals, just like I'm excited by having at idiots. I have him plonked, not worth the time. Silly old ****. Which is really funny, since both Herring and his wife have been sucking at the taxpayers' teat for their jobs and benefits most of their lives and, as everyone knows, "guv'mint" is a "libral" concept. Did he earn a pension? Is it too much to hope for that it'll get taken away like what happens in the "free market?" Federal pensions...both safe. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Jun 4, 12:33*pm, HK wrote:
jps wrote: On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:39 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. *I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. *Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. *And, I have a boat silly ****. What is a 'boat silly ****'. Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****? These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of Donnie and Harry, I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even converse with this guy. -- John H ..and yet you feel compelled to respond to him! Why is that Johnny..are you strangely excited by the so called..gay talk'? Having nothing more than drivel to offer, he attacks my grammar. Johnny's excited by having at Librals, just like I'm excited by having at idiots. *I have him plonked, not worth the time. Silly old ****. Which is really funny, since both Herring and his wife have been sucking at the taxpayers' teat for their jobs and benefits most of their lives and, as everyone knows, "guv'mint" is a "libral" concept.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I know you have nothing but disdain for anyone who's served to keep your sorry fat ass safe, but John has earned his way by doing just that. If I recall correctly, his wife still works and it's with a private entity. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:46:14 -0400, HK wrote:
jps wrote: On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:33:57 -0400, HK wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:39 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****. What is a 'boat silly ****'. Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****? These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of Donnie and Harry, I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even converse with this guy. -- John H ..and yet you feel compelled to respond to him! Why is that Johnny..are you strangely excited by the so called..gay talk'? Having nothing more than drivel to offer, he attacks my grammar. Johnny's excited by having at Librals, just like I'm excited by having at idiots. I have him plonked, not worth the time. Silly old ****. Which is really funny, since both Herring and his wife have been sucking at the taxpayers' teat for their jobs and benefits most of their lives and, as everyone knows, "guv'mint" is a "libral" concept. Did he earn a pension? Is it too much to hope for that it'll get taken away like what happens in the "free market?" Federal pensions...both safe. Why should the government be obligated to protect pensions when the "free market" isn't? Shouldn't government operate just like the free market? Why should an old cocksucker who hates goverment be protected by same? |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
HK wrote:
jps wrote: On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:39 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****. What is a 'boat silly ****'. Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****? These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of Donnie and Harry, I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even converse with this guy. -- John H ..and yet you feel compelled to respond to him! Why is that Johnny..are you strangely excited by the so called..gay talk'? Having nothing more than drivel to offer, he attacks my grammar. Johnny's excited by having at Librals, just like I'm excited by having at idiots. I have him plonked, not worth the time. Silly old ****. Which is really funny, since both Herring and his wife have been sucking at the taxpayers' teat for their jobs and benefits most of their lives and, as everyone knows, "guv'mint" is a "libral" concept. You might say that Harry Krause has been and is sucking on America's teat. His landlady might be too. Although she may be contributing something of value. Who knows. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Jun 4, 1:26*pm, jps wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:46:14 -0400, HK wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:33:57 -0400, HK wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:39 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message om... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. *I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. *Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. *And, I have a boat silly ****. What is a 'boat silly ****'. Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****? These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of Donnie and Harry, I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even converse with this guy. -- John H ..and yet you feel compelled to respond to him! Why is that Johnny..are you strangely excited by the so called..gay talk'? Having nothing more than drivel to offer, he attacks my grammar. Johnny's excited by having at Librals, just like I'm excited by having at idiots. *I have him plonked, not worth the time. Silly old ****. Which is really funny, since both Herring and his wife have been sucking at the taxpayers' teat for their jobs and benefits most of their lives and, as everyone knows, "guv'mint" is a "libral" concept. Did he earn a pension? *Is it too much to hope for that it'll get taken away like what happens in the "free market?" Federal pensions...both safe. Why should the government be obligated to protect pensions when the "free market" isn't? *Shouldn't government operate just like the free market? Why should an old cocksucker who hates goverment be protected by same?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Damn you're as much of a vulgar low life as slammer. Educated and intelligent people can get a point across without all of that. You and Harry can't. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****. Do you want to compare sizes? Value? HP? Bilge pumps? Every newsgroup you frequent includes a long history of your conflicts. Food, barbeque, fast food, what have you. Every single newsgroup. You really should up your sessions to 5 a week. So you lied when you said you were looking for a boat? You are more like WAFA with every keystroke, Sherlock. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
Don White wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:47:49 -0400, D K wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:36:29 -0500, Richard Casady wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:38:25 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:14:36 -0400, "Doral 36" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:49:44 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." . Lefties aren't the ones who go postal. We realize we can't control everything arounds us, unlike righties. I think you are delusional if you don't think there are just as many nut cases who profess to be on the right of left. Mental illness has no restrictions. Nutcases and postal are two different things. Righties go postal. May I point you to Wichita? The man who killed JFK, Lee Oswald, was far enough left to move to the USSR. He came back and killed the Prez. Within a day a right wing nut, Jack Ruby, killed him. Scum come in all flavors. The nuts have been working on the why of it ever since. Casady Richard, most of the violence we've seen in this country for the last 100 years comes from the right. Oswald and Ruby were driven by far more than politics. Just keeping making this **** up, moron. Donnie aside, no one here is dumb enough to believe it. Oh, that's an excellent argument filled with rich historical fact and subtle nuance. Thanks for digging so deep into your intellectual resources for the thoughtful response. Silly ****ing ****. Kruger spends too much time lurking in dark, skanky holes waiting for young girls to pass so he can harass them. . Really, dummy? What did you base that "fact" on? |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
jps wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:39 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****. What is a 'boat silly ****'. Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****? These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of Donnie and Harry, I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even converse with this guy. -- John H ..and yet you feel compelled to respond to him! Why is that Johnny..are you strangely excited by the so called..gay talk'? Having nothing more than drivel to offer, he attacks my grammar. Johnny's excited by having at Librals, just like I'm excited by having at idiots. I have him plonked, not worth the time. Silly old ****. "Having at"? |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:09:43 -0400, D K
wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:39 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****. What is a 'boat silly ****'. Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****? These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of Donnie and Harry, I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even converse with this guy. -- John H ..and yet you feel compelled to respond to him! Why is that Johnny..are you strangely excited by the so called..gay talk'? Having nothing more than drivel to offer, he attacks my grammar. Johnny's excited by having at Librals, just like I'm excited by having at idiots. I have him plonked, not worth the time. Silly old ****. "Having at"? Down to critiquing expressions? Not much below you is there? You gotta have a strong stomach to be a **** hauler. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:07:06 -0400, D K
wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****. Do you want to compare sizes? Value? HP? Bilge pumps? Every newsgroup you frequent includes a long history of your conflicts. Food, barbeque, fast food, what have you. Every single newsgroup. You really should up your sessions to 5 a week. So you lied when you said you were looking for a boat? You are more like WAFA with every keystroke, Sherlock. Dickless, people who are interested in boats are always looking for boats. If something showed up in my price range right now I'd be interested. I'm holding out for what I've set my sights on but I remain open to alternatives. Are you one of those stick-up-the-ass blindered "conservatives" who can only think of one boat at a time? I take that back, we know you're a stick-up-the-ass "conservative," the only part I'm missing is if you're only interested in one boat at a time. |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
jps wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:09:43 -0400, D K wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:39 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****. What is a 'boat silly ****'. Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****? These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of Donnie and Harry, I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even converse with this guy. -- John H ..and yet you feel compelled to respond to him! Why is that Johnny..are you strangely excited by the so called..gay talk'? Having nothing more than drivel to offer, he attacks my grammar. Johnny's excited by having at Librals, just like I'm excited by having at idiots. I have him plonked, not worth the time. Silly old ****. "Having at"? Down to critiquing expressions? Not much below you is there? You gotta have a strong stomach to be a **** hauler. What does "Not much below you is there?" mean? I am not familiar with that expression. Does it refer to his silly ****? -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
jps wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:07:06 -0400, D K wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****. Do you want to compare sizes? Value? HP? Bilge pumps? Every newsgroup you frequent includes a long history of your conflicts. Food, barbeque, fast food, what have you. Every single newsgroup. You really should up your sessions to 5 a week. So you lied when you said you were looking for a boat? You are more like WAFA with every keystroke, Sherlock. Dickless, people who are interested in boats are always looking for boats. If something showed up in my price range right now I'd be interested. I'm holding out for what I've set my sights on but I remain open to alternatives. Are you one of those stick-up-the-ass blindered "conservatives" who can only think of one boat at a time? I take that back, we know you're a stick-up-the-ass "conservative," the only part I'm missing is if you're only interested in one boat at a time. Are you from the US? I keep learning new expression from reading your posts. What the heck does blindered mean? Or was this a misspelling of "blundered" ? When you say "stick-up-the-ass" do you mean up his poop chute or his humorous ****? It almost sounds like you are have a random generator putting words together to form something that resembles a sentence. -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects |
H.L. Mencken Debunked
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:56:45 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:09:43 -0400, D K wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:39 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious! What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****. What is a 'boat silly ****'. Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'? Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****? These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of Donnie and Harry, I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even converse with this guy. -- John H ..and yet you feel compelled to respond to him! Why is that Johnny..are you strangely excited by the so called..gay talk'? Having nothing more than drivel to offer, he attacks my grammar. Johnny's excited by having at Librals, just like I'm excited by having at idiots. I have him plonked, not worth the time. Silly old ****. "Having at"? Down to critiquing expressions? Not much below you is there? You gotta have a strong stomach to be a **** hauler. What does "Not much below you is there?" mean? I am not familiar with that expression. Does it refer to his silly ****? As they say, "as you see fit." |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com