GC Boater wrote:
On May 30, 9:37 am, HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2009 08:54:22 -0700 (PDT), GC Boater
wrote:
We certainly would not want anyone to think that we were making light
of their mental abberations or their body contours.
It only matters how fat a poster is, if he brags about barefoot skiing
or running up ratlines. I can wish people would give it rest, but it
won't happen.
Casady
If you want to make a contribution towards your goal, don't interact
with "GC Boater." That particular p.o.s. has been in my bozo bin since
his second or third post.

Oh Krausie, Old Boy, how could that be? You recently replied directly
to one of my posts. A little slip, eh?

That can happen when you are a habitual liar.

That can happen when you are a habitual liar.


Krausie a liar?

GC Boater wrote:
That can happen when you are a habitual liar.


Krausie a liar?

Are you new here?

On May 31, 6:38*pm, D K wrote:
GC Boater wrote:
That can happen when you are a habitual liar.

Krausie a liar?

Are you new here?

Shocking, I tell you. Absolutely shocking to think that Harry Krause
would stoop to lie. Surely, you must be mistaken.

On Sun, 31 May 2009 19:38:26 -0700 (PDT), GC Boater
wrote:

On May 31, 6:38*pm, D K wrote:
GC Boater wrote:
That can happen when you are a habitual liar.

Krausie a liar?

Are you new here?

Shocking, I tell you. Absolutely shocking to think that Harry Krause
would stoop to lie. Surely, you must be mistaken.

Many of us can ladle out any ammount of falsehood without lying. Bad
memory and no way to check will do it. He is, however, a lying sack of
****, as near as I can tell. Many lie about their names. Never felt
the need. If I was going to use a handle it would have to be ' Sleeps
With Kitties ' since ' Dances With Wolves ' is taken.

Casady

GC Boater wrote:
On May 31, 6:38 pm, D K wrote:
GC Boater wrote:
That can happen when you are a habitual liar.
Krausie a liar?
Are you new here?

Shocking, I tell you. Absolutely shocking to think that Harry Krause
would stoop to lie. Surely, you must be mistaken.

Nope.