On Sat, 16 May 2009 15:48:57 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

Now I won't say I'm cheap

I will.

On May 16, 6:29*pm, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 15:48:57 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

Now I won't say I'm cheap

I will.

Well, maybe i should have titled my post as "Economical Satisfaction"

?;^)

On Sat, 16 May 2009 16:51:04 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On May 16, 6:29*pm, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 15:48:57 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

Now I won't say I'm cheap

I will.

Well, maybe i should have titled my post as "Economical Satisfaction"

?;^)

No - you had it right the first time.

On May 16, 8:18*pm, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 16:51:04 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On May 16, 6:29*pm, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 15:48:57 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

Now I won't say I'm cheap

I will.

Well, maybe i should have titled my post as "Economical Satisfaction"

?;^)

No - you had it right the first time.

LOL!

You win!

On Sat, 16 May 2009 18:34:26 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On May 16, 8:18*pm, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 16:51:04 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On May 16, 6:29*pm, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 15:48:57 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

Now I won't say I'm cheap

I will.

Well, maybe i should have titled my post as "Economical Satisfaction"

?;^)

No - you had it right the first time.

LOL!

You win!

Your buddy with the pawn shop - he have any Olympus OM lenses in
decent shape?

I want to do some experiments and used lenses are the way to go - I
can take 'em apart and not lose a whole lot of money. :)

And no - that's not being cheap - that's being practical.

Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 18:34:26 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On May 16, 8:18 pm, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 16:51:04 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On May 16, 6:29 pm, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 15:48:57 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
Now I won't say I'm cheap
I will.
Well, maybe i should have titled my post as "Economical Satisfaction"
?;^)
No - you had it right the first time.
LOL!

You win!

Your buddy with the pawn shop - he have any Olympus OM lenses in
decent shape?

I want to do some experiments and used lenses are the way to go - I
can take 'em apart and not lose a whole lot of money. :)

And no - that's not being cheap - that's being practical.


A picket fence by any other name is...a picket fence.

On May 16, 8:42*pm, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 18:34:26 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On May 16, 8:18*pm, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 16:51:04 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On May 16, 6:29*pm, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 15:48:57 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

Now I won't say I'm cheap

I will.

Well, maybe i should have titled my post as "Economical Satisfaction"

?;^)

No - you had it right the first time.

LOL!

You win!

Your buddy with the pawn shop - he have any Olympus OM lenses in
decent shape?

I want to do some experiments and used lenses are the way to go - I
can take 'em apart and not lose a whole lot of money. *:)

And no - that's not being cheap - that's being practical.

Hey Sorry I didn't understand you the first time (whats new!)

I'll ask him tomorrow,Tom. I don't know if it was an Olympus or not,
but he had an SLR outfit he was going to run on ebay, but pulled it
because there was moisture (or so he thought) in the lenses.

Do you specifically need Olympus, or can you use others like Minolta
or Yashica? 50mm on up?

On Tue, 19 May 2009 20:57:14 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On May 16, 8:42*pm, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 18:34:26 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On May 16, 8:18*pm, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 16:51:04 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On May 16, 6:29*pm, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 15:48:57 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

Now I won't say I'm cheap

I will.

Well, maybe i should have titled my post as "Economical Satisfaction"

?;^)

No - you had it right the first time.

LOL!

You win!

Your buddy with the pawn shop - he have any Olympus OM lenses in
decent shape?

I want to do some experiments and used lenses are the way to go - I
can take 'em apart and not lose a whole lot of money. *:)

And no - that's not being cheap - that's being practical.

Hey Sorry I didn't understand you the first time (whats new!)

I'll ask him tomorrow,Tom. I don't know if it was an Olympus or not,
but he had an SLR outfit he was going to run on ebay, but pulled it
because there was moisture (or so he thought) in the lenses.

Do you specifically need Olympus, or can you use others like Minolta
or Yashica? 50mm on up?

I need older Oly OM lenses - I'm making a camera mount for my 12 inch
Celestron telescope to do some astrophotography. I'd buy one, but I'd
rather use my film cameras than the digital cameras for this project.

A couple of 50mm lenses would be fine. I can't find any up around
these parts. If he doesn't have any, no problem - I'll try eBay
altough I'll probably pay through the nose for them.

On May 16, 8:34*pm, Tim wrote:
On May 16, 8:18*pm, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:



On Sat, 16 May 2009 16:51:04 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On May 16, 6:29*pm, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 15:48:57 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

Now I won't say I'm cheap

I will.

Well, maybe i should have titled my post as "Economical Satisfaction"

?;^)

No - you had it right the first time.

LOL!

You win!

Hey! this Compaq FS 7600 is great! It sure beats the old HP that I
was using, even if this Compaq is "Bigger'n a Buick" a lot better
resolution.

Ah! I'm finally stepping into the big times!

Tim wrote:
On May 16, 8:34 pm, Tim wrote:
On May 16, 8:18 pm, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:



On Sat, 16 May 2009 16:51:04 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On May 16, 6:29 pm, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 15:48:57 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
Now I won't say I'm cheap
I will.
Well, maybe i should have titled my post as "Economical Satisfaction"
?;^)
No - you had it right the first time.
LOL!

You win!

Hey! this Compaq FS 7600 is great! It sure beats the old HP that I
was using, even if this Compaq is "Bigger'n a Buick" a lot better
resolution.

Ah! I'm finally stepping into the big times!


Wow...once they see a 17" monitor, how can we keep them down on the farm?

:)