Trade War!! With Canada?
 

And just think - the "adults" are in charge.

I think I'd rather have the kids.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051404241.html

When the histories are written, the Obama Administration will be known
as "The Unintended Consequences Admininstration".

And none of those consequences are going to be good.

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
And just think - the "adults" are in charge.

I think I'd rather have the kids.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051404241.html

When the histories are written, the Obama Administration will be known
as "The Unintended Consequences Admininstration".

That is if the current administration doesn't issue a book burning order.

And none of those consequences are going to be good.

Well! at least his heart is in the right place. Isn't it? I think he
should hire Mitt Romney to help him out with business and financial
matters.

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
And just think - the "adults" are in charge.

I think I'd rather have the kids.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051404241.html

When the histories are written, the Obama Administration will be known
as "The Unintended Consequences Admininstration".

And none of those consequences are going to be good.

My favorite part was about the steel company outside of Pittsburgh
laying off 80% of its employees as a consequence of its customers
complying with the buy American provision in the Stimulus bill.

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

"jim7856" wrote in message
...
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
And just think - the "adults" are in charge.

I think I'd rather have the kids.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051404241.html

When the histories are written, the Obama Administration will be known
as "The Unintended Consequences Admininstration".

That is if the current administration doesn't issue a book burning order.

And none of those consequences are going to be good.

Well! at least his heart is in the right place. Isn't it? I think he
should hire Mitt Romney to help him out with business and financial
matters.



Was just watching Congressman Ron Paul being interviewed on Morning Joe.

Scarborough read a document written by Paul back in 2003 in which he
accurately and precisely predicted the current economic condition, including
the housing bubble burst, the activities of government sponsored mortgages
for non-qualified buyers, the phony blaming of capitalism as the "problem"
and on and on. Again, this was in 2003.

He said he recognized the potential as far back as 1971 when we went
de-linked the dollar from gold. He blames big government, phony
"oversight" that supports pork barrel programs and winks and nods by members
of Congress.

But, disturbingly, he is now very concerned that the US dollar is going to
collapse due to debt and trade deficits.
He doesn't paint a very optimistic picture. He says that if we continue on
our current path, trying to spend our way out of this problem that the
dollar *will* collapse and the ramifications for all of us will make the
current economic problems look minor in comparison.

He advocates a complete and total dismantling of government, eliminating all
"Department of ......." whatever, other than those identified as necessary
in the US Constitution.

People thought he was a nut-case when he was running for President. They
aren't laughing now.

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

Eisboch wrote:

"jim7856" wrote in message
...
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
And just think - the "adults" are in charge.

I think I'd rather have the kids.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051404241.html


When the histories are written, the Obama Administration will be known
as "The Unintended Consequences Admininstration".

That is if the current administration doesn't issue a book burning order.

And none of those consequences are going to be good.

Well! at least his heart is in the right place. Isn't it? I think he
should hire Mitt Romney to help him out with business and financial
matters.



Was just watching Congressman Ron Paul being interviewed on Morning Joe.

Scarborough read a document written by Paul back in 2003 in which he
accurately and precisely predicted the current economic condition,
including the housing bubble burst, the activities of government
sponsored mortgages for non-qualified buyers, the phony blaming of
capitalism as the "problem" and on and on. Again, this was in 2003.

He said he recognized the potential as far back as 1971 when we went
de-linked the dollar from gold. He blames big government, phony
"oversight" that supports pork barrel programs and winks and nods by
members of Congress.

But, disturbingly, he is now very concerned that the US dollar is going
to collapse due to debt and trade deficits.
He doesn't paint a very optimistic picture. He says that if we
continue on our current path, trying to spend our way out of this
problem that the dollar *will* collapse and the ramifications for all of
us will make the current economic problems look minor in comparison.

He advocates a complete and total dismantling of government, eliminating
all "Department of ......." whatever, other than those identified as
necessary in the US Constitution.

People thought he was a nut-case when he was running for President.
They aren't laughing now.


"He advocates a complete and total dismantling of government,
eliminating all "Department of ......." "whatever"


Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Ron Paul's a fascinating fella, but...he's a nut case.

We'll pull out of mess *Bush* put us into...despite the
knuckle-dragging, obstructionist Republicans.

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

"HK" wrote in message
m...

We'll pull out of mess *Bush* put us into...despite the knuckle-dragging,
obstructionist Republicans.


"Blinded by the light" comes to mind.
Our situation involves much more than just Bush. He didn't help, but he
didn't create.
If you can ever get over that fact, you may begin to get a view of a much
bigger picture. I don't expect any revelations in the near term, however.

It's big government and corrupt politicians sitting on both sides of the
isle. And it's been going on for many, many years. Now it's blowing up.



Eisboch

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

On May 15, 7:04*am, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"jim7856" wrote in message
...
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
And just think - the "adults" are in charge.

I think I'd rather have the kids.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/05/14/AR200....

When the histories are written, the Obama Administration will be known
as "The Unintended Consequences Admininstration".

That is if the current administration doesn't issue a book burning order.

And none of those consequences are going to be good.

Well! at least his heart is in the right place. Isn't it? I think he
should hire Mitt Romney to help him out with business and financial
matters.

Was just watching Congressman Ron Paul being interviewed on Morning Joe..

Scarborough read a document written by Paul back in 2003 in which he
accurately and precisely predicted the current economic condition,
including the housing bubble burst, the activities of government
sponsored mortgages for non-qualified buyers, the phony blaming of
capitalism as the "problem" and on and on. * *Again, this was in 2003.

He said he recognized the potential as far back as 1971 *when we went
de-linked the dollar from gold. * He blames big government, phony
"oversight" that supports pork barrel programs and winks and nods by
members of Congress.

But, disturbingly, he is now very concerned that the US dollar is going
to collapse due to debt and trade deficits.
He doesn't paint a very optimistic picture. * He says that if we
continue on our current path, trying to spend our way out of this
problem that the dollar *will* collapse and the ramifications for all of
us will make the current economic problems look minor in comparison.

He advocates a complete and total dismantling of government, eliminating
all "Department of ......." * whatever, other than those identified as
necessary in the US Constitution.

People thought he was a nut-case when he was running for President. *
They aren't laughing now.

"He advocates a complete and total dismantling of government,
eliminating all "Department of ......." * "whatever"

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Ron Paul's a fascinating fella, but...he's a nut case.

We'll pull out of mess *Bush* put us into...despite the
knuckle-dragging, obstructionist Republicans.

Herr Krause. It's becoming more evident that those who you brand as
"nut cases" are probably genius. These thoughts are bolstered after
hearing you laugh as they wheel you down the halls of the asylum.

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

On Fri, 15 May 2009 08:19:51 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

It's big government and corrupt politicians sitting on both sides of the
isle. And it's been going on for many, many years. Now it's blowing up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diFbYd6kutw

The great bit is at about :40 into the video.

And just because I can

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJHKtLnT0Ak

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

On May 15, 7:04*am, HK wrote:


We'll pull out of mess *Bush* put us into...despite the
knuckle-dragging, obstructionist Republicans.


Herr Krause. Even though you are, there's no need to sound disparate.

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

On May 15, 8:04*am, HK wrote:

We'll pull out of mess *Bush* put us into...

Wow, the great Yale scholar wordsmith wrote THIS??!!!!
It's barely English.

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

On May 15, 8:39*am, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 08:19:51 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

It's big government and corrupt politicians sitting on both sides of the
isle. *And it's been going on for many, many years. *Now it's blowing up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diFbYd6kutw

The great bit is at about :40 into the video.

And just because I can

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJHKtLnT0Ak

There are crooks on both sides of the fence. I agree that on my side,
Murtha is about as bad as they come!

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

On Fri, 15 May 2009 05:46:24 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On May 15, 8:39*am, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 08:19:51 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

It's big government and corrupt politicians sitting on both sides of the
isle. *And it's been going on for many, many years. *Now it's blowing up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diFbYd6kutw

The great bit is at about :40 into the video.

And just because I can

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJHKtLnT0Ak

There are crooks on both sides of the fence. I agree that on my side,
Murtha is about as bad as they come!

There's always going to be a certain amount of pork barrell spending
and the Republicans are just as guilty as any other politician from
the Democrats.

But Murtha sets the standard - it's absoutely stunning what he's been
able to do at the expense of the taxpayer.

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

On May 15, 8:58*am, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 05:46:24 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 15, 8:39*am, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 08:19:51 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

It's big government and corrupt politicians sitting on both sides of the
isle. *And it's been going on for many, many years. *Now it's blowing up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diFbYd6kutw

The great bit is at about :40 into the video.

And just because I can

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJHKtLnT0Ak

There are crooks on both sides of the fence. I agree that on my side,
Murtha is about as bad as they come!

There's always going to be a certain amount of pork barrell spending
and the Republicans are just as guilty as any other politician from
the Democrats.

But Murtha sets the standard - it's absoutely stunning what he's been
able to do at the expense of the taxpayer.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And the money is STILL piling in for his airport!

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

"Wizard of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
And just think - the "adults" are in charge.

I think I'd rather have the kids.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051404241.html

When the histories are written, the Obama Administration will be known
as "The Unintended Consequences Admininstration".

And none of those consequences are going to be good.

Typical...the real enemy in the trade deficit is in Asia, but we'll end up
fighting among ourselves.
Maybe things will calm down when the Chinese take us over.

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

Don White wrote:
"Wizard of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
And just think - the "adults" are in charge.

I think I'd rather have the kids.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051404241.html

When the histories are written, the Obama Administration will be known
as "The Unintended Consequences Admininstration".

And none of those consequences are going to be good.

Typical...the real enemy in the trade deficit is in Asia, but we'll end up
fighting among ourselves.
Maybe things will calm down when the Chinese take us over.



Hey! I like Chinese food!

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

"HK" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Wizard of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
And just think - the "adults" are in charge.

I think I'd rather have the kids.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051404241.html

When the histories are written, the Obama Administration will be known
as "The Unintended Consequences Admininstration".

And none of those consequences are going to be good.

Typical...the real enemy in the trade deficit is in Asia, but we'll end
up fighting among ourselves.
Maybe things will calm down when the Chinese take us over.

Hey! I like Chinese food!

Guess we'd all better like it.
It'll be noodles & rice day in & day out .

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Wizard of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
And just think - the "adults" are in charge.

I think I'd rather have the kids.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051404241.html

When the histories are written, the Obama Administration will be known
as "The Unintended Consequences Admininstration".

And none of those consequences are going to be good.
Typical...the real enemy in the trade deficit is in Asia, but we'll end
up fighting among ourselves.
Maybe things will calm down when the Chinese take us over.
Hey! I like Chinese food!

Guess we'd all better like it.
It'll be noodles & rice day in & day out .



Well, if we actually ate decent Chinese food, and not the sugary crap
sold at many restaurants, we'd all be healthier. A lot less beef, some
chicken and fish, but mostly veggies.

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Eisboch wrote:

"jim7856" wrote in message
...
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
And just think - the "adults" are in charge.

I think I'd rather have the kids.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051404241.html

When the histories are written, the Obama Administration will be known
as "The Unintended Consequences Admininstration".

That is if the current administration doesn't issue a book burning
order.

And none of those consequences are going to be good.

Well! at least his heart is in the right place. Isn't it? I think he
should hire Mitt Romney to help him out with business and financial
matters.



Was just watching Congressman Ron Paul being interviewed on Morning Joe.

Scarborough read a document written by Paul back in 2003 in which he
accurately and precisely predicted the current economic condition,
including the housing bubble burst, the activities of government
sponsored mortgages for non-qualified buyers, the phony blaming of
capitalism as the "problem" and on and on. Again, this was in 2003.

He said he recognized the potential as far back as 1971 when we went
de-linked the dollar from gold. He blames big government, phony
"oversight" that supports pork barrel programs and winks and nods by
members of Congress.

But, disturbingly, he is now very concerned that the US dollar is going
to collapse due to debt and trade deficits.
He doesn't paint a very optimistic picture. He says that if we continue
on our current path, trying to spend our way out of this problem that the
dollar *will* collapse and the ramifications for all of us will make the
current economic problems look minor in comparison.

He advocates a complete and total dismantling of government, eliminating
all "Department of ......." whatever, other than those identified as
necessary in the US Constitution.

People thought he was a nut-case when he was running for President. They
aren't laughing now.


"He advocates a complete and total dismantling of government, eliminating
all "Department of ......." "whatever"


Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Ron Paul's a fascinating fella, but...he's a nut case.

We'll pull out of mess *Bush* put us into...despite the knuckle-dragging,
obstructionist Republicans.

Kewl... it took you less than an hour to blame something on Bush. Get over
it, you won, and things have gone from bad to worse. You can't blame it on
GWB forever.

Do you do anything other than post here. With the timestamps of yours posts,
I don't think so. Get a life... putz.

--Mike

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

On Fri, 15 May 2009 21:04:33 -0700, "Mike" wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
om...
Eisboch wrote:

"jim7856" wrote in message
...
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
And just think - the "adults" are in charge.

I think I'd rather have the kids.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051404241.html

When the histories are written, the Obama Administration will be known
as "The Unintended Consequences Admininstration".

That is if the current administration doesn't issue a book burning
order.

And none of those consequences are going to be good.

Well! at least his heart is in the right place. Isn't it? I think he
should hire Mitt Romney to help him out with business and financial
matters.



Was just watching Congressman Ron Paul being interviewed on Morning Joe.

Scarborough read a document written by Paul back in 2003 in which he
accurately and precisely predicted the current economic condition,
including the housing bubble burst, the activities of government
sponsored mortgages for non-qualified buyers, the phony blaming of
capitalism as the "problem" and on and on. Again, this was in 2003.

He said he recognized the potential as far back as 1971 when we went
de-linked the dollar from gold. He blames big government, phony
"oversight" that supports pork barrel programs and winks and nods by
members of Congress.

But, disturbingly, he is now very concerned that the US dollar is going
to collapse due to debt and trade deficits.
He doesn't paint a very optimistic picture. He says that if we continue
on our current path, trying to spend our way out of this problem that the
dollar *will* collapse and the ramifications for all of us will make the
current economic problems look minor in comparison.

He advocates a complete and total dismantling of government, eliminating
all "Department of ......." whatever, other than those identified as
necessary in the US Constitution.

People thought he was a nut-case when he was running for President. They
aren't laughing now.


"He advocates a complete and total dismantling of government, eliminating
all "Department of ......." "whatever"


Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Ron Paul's a fascinating fella, but...he's a nut case.

We'll pull out of mess *Bush* put us into...despite the knuckle-dragging,
obstructionist Republicans.

Kewl... it took you less than an hour to blame something on Bush. Get over
it, you won, and things have gone from bad to worse. You can't blame it on
GWB forever.

Do you do anything other than post here. With the timestamps of yours posts,
I don't think so. Get a life... putz.

--Mike

Bad to worse?

We had to live through 8 years of a failed turd of an administration
going bad to worse. We now find that Cheney was trying to coerce
testimony out of prisoners to establish a link between Iraq and al
Qaeda using torture before they'd established the bogus legal basis
for torture.

The same torture technique used by Japanese our soldiers in WWII,
several of which we hanged post conviction.

This is why the convenient timing of the Pelosi red herring.

Republicans will now live with the taste of **** in their mouths for
the next 8 years, probably more.

It's gonna take a long time to get the taste of **** out of our mouths
from Bush/Cheney.

You may as well get used to it. We're gonna be blaming every ****ing
thing on idiot Bush the same way they blamed Clinton for everything.

Enjoy.

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

jps wrote:

Republicans will now live with the taste of **** in their mouths for
the next 8 years, probably more.


True statement. What is happening is crap. You apparently like the taste.

Johnson

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

"Wizard of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
And just think - the "adults" are in charge.

I think I'd rather have the kids.

Isn't that the truth.

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"Wizard of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
And just think - the "adults" are in charge.

I think I'd rather have the kids.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051404241.html

When the histories are written, the Obama Administration will be known
as "The Unintended Consequences Admininstration".

And none of those consequences are going to be good.

Typical...the real enemy in the trade deficit is in Asia, but we'll end up
fighting among ourselves.
Maybe things will calm down when the Chinese take us over.

Chinese would not want the USA's massive debt-spend problems. It would drag
them down.

Because while GM & Chrysler debtors are being dealt with, and home owners
over their heads are being cleaned up, the biggest default debtors in the
land is going unscathed, the governments.

This isn't a trade war, it is a about paying the bills, debtor versus
creditor. So far the debtors are winning, and while they will the economy
will seek the bottom of the sewer. But while the debtors are winning, the
USA credit rating is sub-zero.

Right now the USD is riding on hot air and facing a cliff in it's valuation.

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

Canuck57 wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
"Wizard of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
And just think - the "adults" are in charge.

I think I'd rather have the kids.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051404241.html

When the histories are written, the Obama Administration will be known
as "The Unintended Consequences Admininstration".

And none of those consequences are going to be good.
Typical...the real enemy in the trade deficit is in Asia, but we'll end up
fighting among ourselves.
Maybe things will calm down when the Chinese take us over.

Chinese would not want the USA's massive debt-spend problems. It would drag
them down.

Because while GM & Chrysler debtors are being dealt with, and home owners
over their heads are being cleaned up, the biggest default debtors in the
land is going unscathed, the governments.

This isn't a trade war, it is a about paying the bills, debtor versus
creditor. So far the debtors are winning, and while they will the economy
will seek the bottom of the sewer. But while the debtors are winning, the
USA credit rating is sub-zero.

Right now the USD is riding on hot air and facing a cliff in it's valuation.


Why do you suppose Donny thinks Aisa, specifically China, is our enemy?
Last time I looked, we were in charge of our own "LIBERAL"trade policy.
China is merely doing smart business.

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

Canuck57 wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
"Wizard of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
And just think - the "adults" are in charge.

I think I'd rather have the kids.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051404241.html

When the histories are written, the Obama Administration will be known
as "The Unintended Consequences Admininstration".

And none of those consequences are going to be good.
Typical...the real enemy in the trade deficit is in Asia, but we'll end up
fighting among ourselves.
Maybe things will calm down when the Chinese take us over.

Chinese would not want the USA's massive debt-spend problems. It would drag
them down.

Because while GM & Chrysler debtors are being dealt with, and home owners
over their heads are being cleaned up, the biggest default debtors in the
land is going unscathed, the governments.

This isn't a trade war, it is a about paying the bills, debtor versus
creditor. So far the debtors are winning, and while they will the economy
will seek the bottom of the sewer. But while the debtors are winning, the
USA credit rating is sub-zero.

Right now the USD is riding on hot air and facing a cliff in it's valuation.

Why have the Chinese bought so much US debt?

Why do the Chinese still hold so much US debt?

You can't fly an F-18 without aviation fuel it doesn't matter that your
nuclear powered carrier can go any where.

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

"jim7856" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
"Wizard of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
And just think - the "adults" are in charge.

I think I'd rather have the kids.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051404241.html

When the histories are written, the Obama Administration will be known
as "The Unintended Consequences Admininstration".

And none of those consequences are going to be good.
Typical...the real enemy in the trade deficit is in Asia, but we'll end
up fighting among ourselves.
Maybe things will calm down when the Chinese take us over.

Chinese would not want the USA's massive debt-spend problems. It would
drag them down.

Because while GM & Chrysler debtors are being dealt with, and home owners
over their heads are being cleaned up, the biggest default debtors in the
land is going unscathed, the governments.

This isn't a trade war, it is a about paying the bills, debtor versus
creditor. So far the debtors are winning, and while they will the
economy will seek the bottom of the sewer. But while the debtors are
winning, the USA credit rating is sub-zero.

Right now the USD is riding on hot air and facing a cliff in it's
valuation.
Why do you suppose Donny thinks Aisa, specifically China, is our enemy?
Last time I looked, we were in charge of our own "LIBERAL"trade policy.
China is merely doing smart business.

So...if you're "in charge of our own "LIBERAL"trade policy", why did you
give the store away to China?

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

Don White wrote:
"jim7856" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
"Wizard of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
And just think - the "adults" are in charge.

I think I'd rather have the kids.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051404241.html

When the histories are written, the Obama Administration will be known
as "The Unintended Consequences Admininstration".

And none of those consequences are going to be good.
Typical...the real enemy in the trade deficit is in Asia, but we'll end
up fighting among ourselves.
Maybe things will calm down when the Chinese take us over.
Chinese would not want the USA's massive debt-spend problems. It would
drag them down.

Because while GM & Chrysler debtors are being dealt with, and home owners
over their heads are being cleaned up, the biggest default debtors in the
land is going unscathed, the governments.

This isn't a trade war, it is a about paying the bills, debtor versus
creditor. So far the debtors are winning, and while they will the
economy will seek the bottom of the sewer. But while the debtors are
winning, the USA credit rating is sub-zero.

Right now the USD is riding on hot air and facing a cliff in it's
valuation.
Why do you suppose Donny thinks Aisa, specifically China, is our enemy?
Last time I looked, we were in charge of our own "LIBERAL"trade policy.
China is merely doing smart business.

So...if you're "in charge of our own "LIBERAL"trade policy", why did you
give the store away to China?



Excellent question. As you may have guessed already, I am not a
"LIBERAL". I have no idea why. Ask a "LIBERAL".

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

On Sat, 16 May 2009 08:03:13 -0400, Johnson
wrote:

jps wrote:

Republicans will now live with the taste of **** in their mouths for
the next 8 years, probably more.


True statement. What is happening is crap. You apparently like the taste.

Johnson

It's not crap to me, foreigner. Baked Alaska is more like it. An
adult in office capable of making adult decisions based on real need,
not the fantasies of a simple mind.

Did you throw flowers at George Bush when he came to visit your neck
of the woods?

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

jps wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 08:03:13 -0400, Johnson
wrote:

jps wrote:

Republicans will now live with the taste of **** in their mouths for
the next 8 years, probably more.

True statement. What is happening is crap. You apparently like the taste.

Johnson

It's not crap to me, foreigner. Baked Alaska is more like it. An
adult in office capable of making adult decisions based on real need,
not the fantasies of a simple mind.

Did you throw flowers at George Bush when he came to visit your neck
of the woods?

How does this vapid and void of any content monologue have anything to
do concerning the topic of trade wars with Canada?

It seems as if most of your post can be summed up by your statement ...
" You don't understand the concept. You add nothing to the dialogue.
You don't field arguments about anything. Vapid, void, empty. You
pursue a hobby of buttsniffing."

I would assume after you spend some time in rec.boats you need to wash
your face and shoulders with Lava (heavy duty hand cleaner). I would
also recommend you try their new Lava Liquid, it has moisturizers to
keep your nose from drying out. I am sure the other participants in
rec.boats would appreciate it.
--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

"jim7856" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
"Wizard of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
And just think - the "adults" are in charge.

I think I'd rather have the kids.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051404241.html

When the histories are written, the Obama Administration will be known
as "The Unintended Consequences Admininstration".

And none of those consequences are going to be good.
Typical...the real enemy in the trade deficit is in Asia, but we'll end
up fighting among ourselves.
Maybe things will calm down when the Chinese take us over.

Chinese would not want the USA's massive debt-spend problems. It would
drag them down.

Because while GM & Chrysler debtors are being dealt with, and home owners
over their heads are being cleaned up, the biggest default debtors in the
land is going unscathed, the governments.

This isn't a trade war, it is a about paying the bills, debtor versus
creditor. So far the debtors are winning, and while they will the
economy will seek the bottom of the sewer. But while the debtors are
winning, the USA credit rating is sub-zero.

Right now the USD is riding on hot air and facing a cliff in it's
valuation.
Why do you suppose Donny thinks Aisa, specifically China, is our enemy?
Last time I looked, we were in charge of our own "LIBERAL"trade policy.
China is merely doing smart business.

People like to blame others for their own paths in life. Politicians use it
to stear blame, teach them to hate others and they will hate you less.
Canadian and American politicians play this game all the time. Teach people
to hate say China and it allows people to ignore their own failures,
including government.

That being said, the title says trade war with Canada. I wonder if the
average American gets it straight from the politicians. Canadian resources,
oil, coal, power, mining, forrestry, people, industry, food etc. have been
an ally of the US for centuries. Leduc Alberta pumped oil for the US
carriers in the pacific...while Canadian resources left Thunder Bay fof
Wisconsin and Illinois. NY to this day gets a lot of electricity from
Quebec. Much of what we have in Canada is US made.

It is irrational not to recognize that our two countries are not irrevokably
intertwinded for mutual benefit. And politicial infighting on either side
is just a waco dysfunctional politicial weasel trying for 5 minutes of glory
at a cost to both of us.

If the US was in a serious tiff with Canada, just pass our green cards to
any law abiding Canadian for the asking and drain our workers. In a decade
or two Canada would be a 3rd world country and destabilize your entire
longest unprotected border. And not a shot need be fired. Who knows, to
pay the bills Ottawa will sell NWT to the Russians much the same like the US
got Alaska.

Lets hope the USA finds it's mojo before too much damage is done.

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

On Sun, 17 May 2009 07:18:13 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 08:03:13 -0400, Johnson
wrote:

jps wrote:

Republicans will now live with the taste of **** in their mouths for
the next 8 years, probably more.

True statement. What is happening is crap. You apparently like the taste.

Johnson

It's not crap to me, foreigner. Baked Alaska is more like it. An
adult in office capable of making adult decisions based on real need,
not the fantasies of a simple mind.

Did you throw flowers at George Bush when he came to visit your neck
of the woods?

How does this vapid and void of any content monologue have anything to
do concerning the topic of trade wars with Canada?

Did you send the same message to "Johnson?" Did you find his message
enlightening?

Buttsniff to heart's content.

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

jps wrote:

It's not crap to me, foreigner. Baked Alaska is more like it. An
adult in office capable of making adult decisions based on real need,
not the fantasies of a simple mind.

It's almost incredulous that persons like yourself actually believe that
spending trillions of borrowed or printed dollars can be described as
"An adult ... making adult decisions based on real need".

It demonstrates how far removed from reality and common sense you are.

Johnson

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

On Mon, 18 May 2009 09:15:31 -0400, Johnson
wrote:

jps wrote:

It's not crap to me, foreigner. Baked Alaska is more like it. An
adult in office capable of making adult decisions based on real need,
not the fantasies of a simple mind.

It's almost incredulous that persons like yourself actually believe that
spending trillions of borrowed or printed dollars can be described as
"An adult ... making adult decisions based on real need".

It demonstrates how far removed from reality and common sense you are.

And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?

I didn't think so.

Is English your second language?

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

jps wrote:

And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?

We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.

Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.

Johnson

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

On Mon, 18 May 2009 15:45:24 -0400, Johnson
wrote:

jps wrote:

And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?

We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.

Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.

I have no intention of discussing Obama's spending with you if you
weren't balanced enough to recognize the falicy of Bush's economic
stupidity.

Did you endorse his two debt financed tax cuts?

Were you okay with him keeping war funding off the budget?

Prove to me that you have a shred of balance and I'll discuss
whatever.

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 15:45:24 -0400, Johnson
wrote:

jps wrote:

And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?
We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.

Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.

I have no intention of discussing Obama's spending with you if you
weren't balanced enough to recognize the falicy of Bush's economic
stupidity.

You've just labeled yourself an economic idiot with the above statement.

Did you endorse his two debt financed tax cuts?

Let's talk about the debt financed $787 billion "stimulus" bill and the
near $500 billion supplemental spending bill. Which both occured prior
to submission of and above and beyond the FY10 budgets.

Were you okay with him keeping war funding off the budget?

Sure, the war is not going to last forever. Obama's giveaway to the lazy
SOB's who refuse to work is going to bankrupt the US.

Prove to me that you have a shred of balance and I'll discuss
whatever.

Define balance and prove that you have an understanding of the word
yourself.

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

On Mon, 18 May 2009 19:53:28 -0400, BAR wrote:

jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 15:45:24 -0400, Johnson
wrote:

jps wrote:

And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?
We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.

Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.

I have no intention of discussing Obama's spending with you if you
weren't balanced enough to recognize the falicy of Bush's economic
stupidity.

You've just labeled yourself an economic idiot with the above statement.

Did you endorse his two debt financed tax cuts?

Let's talk about the debt financed $787 billion "stimulus" bill and the
near $500 billion supplemental spending bill. Which both occured prior
to submission of and above and beyond the FY10 budgets.

Were you okay with him keeping war funding off the budget?

Sure, the war is not going to last forever. Obama's giveaway to the lazy
SOB's who refuse to work is going to bankrupt the US.

Prove to me that you have a shred of balance and I'll discuss
whatever.

Define balance and prove that you have an understanding of the word
yourself.

Is your name now Johnson? So soon after stepping for DK the Prick?

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

Johnson wrote:
jps wrote:

And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?

We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.

Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.

Johnson

He is not worth the effort to try to discuss anything. ADD is the
least of his problems.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

On Mon, 18 May 2009 23:11:38 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Johnson wrote:
jps wrote:

And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?

We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.

Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.

Johnson

He is not worth the effort to try to discuss anything. ADD is the
least of his problems.

That you're both "conservatives" is the least of your problems.

Those that want to bitch about Obama's rampant spending need to bring
credentials proving they were also alarmed by Bush handing out
trillions in tax breaks to millionaires -- financed by debt to the
Chinese.

Without that credibility, the complaint is purely partisan and
bull****.

End of story.

Got any credibility? Don't think so.

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 23:11:38 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Johnson wrote:
jps wrote:

And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?
We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.

Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.

Johnson
He is not worth the effort to try to discuss anything. ADD is the
least of his problems.

That you're both "conservatives" is the least of your problems.

Those that want to bitch about Obama's rampant spending need to bring
credentials proving they were also alarmed by Bush handing out
trillions in tax breaks to millionaires -- financed by debt to the
Chinese.

Without that credibility, the complaint is purely partisan and
bull****.

End of story.

Got any credibility? Don't think so.

This is not a discussion, just a basis of fact.

You have NEVER heard me bitch about any of Obama's policies, even if I
don't agree with all of them. I DID and still do bitch about Bush's
deficient spending, extremely poor choice of cabinet members, and an
administration that entered into a war, without any real objectives, and
no exit strategy. As far as their fiscal policies, the Bush
Administration behaved like a drunken sailor on shore leave. I have and
will continue to complain about the rampant growth of our national debt,
under ANY administration. I absolutely would NEVER be described as a
conservative, at least not as the word conservative is used today, and I
probably wouldn't even be described as a conservative in Goldwater's
era. I did vote for Obama, even though like most voters, I do not
agree, with all of his programs and long term goals. I thought the
Republicans seemed to be floundering around, being pulled and tugged at
by special interest groups, even more than the Democrats.

So my complaint about you having ADD and coming into rec.boats behaving
like a psychotic street corner preacher, yelling at all of the
pedestrians as they walk by, have NOTHING to do with partisan
"bull****". It is just an accurate description of your behavior.



--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

Trade War!! With Canada?
 

On May 19, 6:47*am, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 23:11:38 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Johnson wrote:
jps wrote:

And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?
We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.

Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.

Johnson
He is not worth the effort to try to discuss anything. * ADD is the
least of his problems.

That you're both "conservatives" is the least of your problems.

Those that want to bitch about Obama's rampant spending need to bring
credentials proving they were also alarmed by Bush handing out
trillions in tax breaks to millionaires -- financed by debt to the
Chinese.

Without that credibility, the complaint is purely partisan and
bull****.

End of story.

Got any credibility? *Don't think so.

This is not a discussion, just a basis of fact.

You have NEVER heard me bitch about any of Obama's policies, even if I
don't agree with all of them. *I DID and still do bitch about Bush's
deficient spending, extremely poor choice of cabinet members, and an
administration that entered into a war, without any real objectives, and
no exit strategy. As far as their fiscal policies, the Bush
Administration behaved like a drunken sailor on shore leave. I have and
will continue to complain about the rampant growth of our national debt,
under ANY administration. *I absolutely would NEVER be described as a
conservative, at least not as the word conservative is used today, and I
probably wouldn't even be described as a conservative in Goldwater's
era. * I did vote for Obama, even though like most voters, I do not
agree, with all of his programs and long term goals. *I thought the
Republicans seemed to be floundering around, being pulled and tugged at
by special interest groups, even more than the Democrats.

So my complaint about you having ADD and coming into rec.boats behaving
like a psychotic street corner preacher, yelling at all of the
pedestrians as they walk by, have NOTHING to do with partisan
"bull****". * It is just an accurate description of your behavior.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pffftttt... JPS talking about credibility..LOL! Next, he will be
quoting Harry!!