On Fri, 15 May 2009 21:04:33 -0700, "Mike" wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
om...
Eisboch wrote:

"jim7856" wrote in message
...
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
And just think - the "adults" are in charge.

I think I'd rather have the kids.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051404241.html

When the histories are written, the Obama Administration will be known
as "The Unintended Consequences Admininstration".

That is if the current administration doesn't issue a book burning
order.

And none of those consequences are going to be good.

Well! at least his heart is in the right place. Isn't it? I think he
should hire Mitt Romney to help him out with business and financial
matters.



Was just watching Congressman Ron Paul being interviewed on Morning Joe.

Scarborough read a document written by Paul back in 2003 in which he
accurately and precisely predicted the current economic condition,
including the housing bubble burst, the activities of government
sponsored mortgages for non-qualified buyers, the phony blaming of
capitalism as the "problem" and on and on. Again, this was in 2003.

He said he recognized the potential as far back as 1971 when we went
de-linked the dollar from gold. He blames big government, phony
"oversight" that supports pork barrel programs and winks and nods by
members of Congress.

But, disturbingly, he is now very concerned that the US dollar is going
to collapse due to debt and trade deficits.
He doesn't paint a very optimistic picture. He says that if we continue
on our current path, trying to spend our way out of this problem that the
dollar *will* collapse and the ramifications for all of us will make the
current economic problems look minor in comparison.

He advocates a complete and total dismantling of government, eliminating
all "Department of ......." whatever, other than those identified as
necessary in the US Constitution.

People thought he was a nut-case when he was running for President. They
aren't laughing now.


"He advocates a complete and total dismantling of government, eliminating
all "Department of ......." "whatever"


Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Ron Paul's a fascinating fella, but...he's a nut case.

We'll pull out of mess *Bush* put us into...despite the knuckle-dragging,
obstructionist Republicans.

Kewl... it took you less than an hour to blame something on Bush. Get over
it, you won, and things have gone from bad to worse. You can't blame it on
GWB forever.

Do you do anything other than post here. With the timestamps of yours posts,
I don't think so. Get a life... putz.

--Mike

Bad to worse?

We had to live through 8 years of a failed turd of an administration
going bad to worse. We now find that Cheney was trying to coerce
testimony out of prisoners to establish a link between Iraq and al
Qaeda using torture before they'd established the bogus legal basis
for torture.

The same torture technique used by Japanese our soldiers in WWII,
several of which we hanged post conviction.

This is why the convenient timing of the Pelosi red herring.

Republicans will now live with the taste of **** in their mouths for
the next 8 years, probably more.

It's gonna take a long time to get the taste of **** out of our mouths
from Bush/Cheney.

You may as well get used to it. We're gonna be blaming every ****ing
thing on idiot Bush the same way they blamed Clinton for everything.

Enjoy.

jps wrote:

Republicans will now live with the taste of **** in their mouths for
the next 8 years, probably more.


True statement. What is happening is crap. You apparently like the taste.

Johnson

On Sat, 16 May 2009 08:03:13 -0400, Johnson
wrote:

jps wrote:

Republicans will now live with the taste of **** in their mouths for
the next 8 years, probably more.


True statement. What is happening is crap. You apparently like the taste.

Johnson

It's not crap to me, foreigner. Baked Alaska is more like it. An
adult in office capable of making adult decisions based on real need,
not the fantasies of a simple mind.

Did you throw flowers at George Bush when he came to visit your neck
of the woods?

jps wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 08:03:13 -0400, Johnson
wrote:

jps wrote:

Republicans will now live with the taste of **** in their mouths for
the next 8 years, probably more.

True statement. What is happening is crap. You apparently like the taste.

Johnson

It's not crap to me, foreigner. Baked Alaska is more like it. An
adult in office capable of making adult decisions based on real need,
not the fantasies of a simple mind.

Did you throw flowers at George Bush when he came to visit your neck
of the woods?

How does this vapid and void of any content monologue have anything to
do concerning the topic of trade wars with Canada?

It seems as if most of your post can be summed up by your statement ...
" You don't understand the concept. You add nothing to the dialogue.
You don't field arguments about anything. Vapid, void, empty. You
pursue a hobby of buttsniffing."

I would assume after you spend some time in rec.boats you need to wash
your face and shoulders with Lava (heavy duty hand cleaner). I would
also recommend you try their new Lava Liquid, it has moisturizers to
keep your nose from drying out. I am sure the other participants in
rec.boats would appreciate it.
--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

On Sun, 17 May 2009 07:18:13 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 08:03:13 -0400, Johnson
wrote:

jps wrote:

Republicans will now live with the taste of **** in their mouths for
the next 8 years, probably more.

True statement. What is happening is crap. You apparently like the taste.

Johnson

It's not crap to me, foreigner. Baked Alaska is more like it. An
adult in office capable of making adult decisions based on real need,
not the fantasies of a simple mind.

Did you throw flowers at George Bush when he came to visit your neck
of the woods?

How does this vapid and void of any content monologue have anything to
do concerning the topic of trade wars with Canada?

Did you send the same message to "Johnson?" Did you find his message
enlightening?

Buttsniff to heart's content.

jps wrote:

It's not crap to me, foreigner. Baked Alaska is more like it. An
adult in office capable of making adult decisions based on real need,
not the fantasies of a simple mind.

It's almost incredulous that persons like yourself actually believe that
spending trillions of borrowed or printed dollars can be described as
"An adult ... making adult decisions based on real need".

It demonstrates how far removed from reality and common sense you are.

Johnson

On Mon, 18 May 2009 09:15:31 -0400, Johnson
wrote:

jps wrote:

It's not crap to me, foreigner. Baked Alaska is more like it. An
adult in office capable of making adult decisions based on real need,
not the fantasies of a simple mind.

It's almost incredulous that persons like yourself actually believe that
spending trillions of borrowed or printed dollars can be described as
"An adult ... making adult decisions based on real need".

It demonstrates how far removed from reality and common sense you are.

And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?

I didn't think so.

Is English your second language?

jps wrote:

And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?

We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.

Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.

Johnson

On Mon, 18 May 2009 15:45:24 -0400, Johnson
wrote:

jps wrote:

And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?

We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.

Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.

I have no intention of discussing Obama's spending with you if you
weren't balanced enough to recognize the falicy of Bush's economic
stupidity.

Did you endorse his two debt financed tax cuts?

Were you okay with him keeping war funding off the budget?

Prove to me that you have a shred of balance and I'll discuss
whatever.

Johnson wrote:
jps wrote:

And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?

We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.

Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.

Johnson

He is not worth the effort to try to discuss anything. ADD is the
least of his problems.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects