| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Speaking of The Waffle House
Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up
more pudding. I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy back into the coffin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4 |
Speaking of The Waffle House
wrote:
Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up more pudding. I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy back into the coffin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4 Fun to watch them dancing over hot coals. It's amazing how so many liars thieves and crazys have slithered into high government positions. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
jps wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2009 22:11:33 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up more pudding. I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy back into the coffin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4 Unfortunately, the CIA seems to be making up the record as it goes along. Pelosi is a red herring. Bush & Cheney need to answer for their traitorous, illegal activities. This is going to get uglier before it's over. What's done is done. Focus on the illegal criminal acts being committed right under your nose as we speak. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
"jim7856" wrote in message ... wrote: Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up more pudding. I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy back into the coffin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4 Fun to watch them dancing over hot coals. It's amazing how so many liars thieves and crazys have slithered into high government positions.\\ A couple of things stand out in my mind as I watch and listen to this now famous Pelosi news conference. In her statement, she talks about a signed oath she took not to divulge information she may received during classified briefings. She states that she has always honored that obligation. Then, she goes on to discuss information provided during the subject briefing in an attempt to cover her ass. The second stand-out. She states several times that her job was to elect a new president who did not subscribe to policies under the Bush administration. She seems to gloat and be very proud of her accomplishment in doing so. She seems to ignore the fact that a new president was going to be elected with or without her involvement or position in Congress. Bush's time was over. Both candidates .... Obama and McCain were and are on record has opposing torture. She really doesn't serve the Democratic Party very well. She serves herself. Eisboch |
Speaking of The Waffle House
Eisboch wrote:
"jim7856" wrote in message ... wrote: Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up more pudding. I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy back into the coffin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4 Fun to watch them dancing over hot coals. It's amazing how so many liars thieves and crazys have slithered into high government positions.\\ A couple of things stand out in my mind as I watch and listen to this now famous Pelosi news conference. In her statement, she talks about a signed oath she took not to divulge information she may received during classified briefings. She states that she has always honored that obligation. Then, she goes on to discuss information provided during the subject briefing in an attempt to cover her ass. The second stand-out. She states several times that her job was to elect a new president who did not subscribe to policies under the Bush administration. She seems to gloat and be very proud of her accomplishment in doing so. She seems to ignore the fact that a new president was going to be elected with or without her involvement or position in Congress. Bush's time was over. Both candidates .... Obama and McCain were and are on record has opposing torture. She really doesn't serve the Democratic Party very well. She serves herself. Eisboch Just another pretty (gag) face. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
On Fri, 15 May 2009 06:41:51 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote: "jim7856" wrote in message ... wrote: Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up more pudding. I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy back into the coffin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4 Fun to watch them dancing over hot coals. It's amazing how so many liars thieves and crazys have slithered into high government positions.\\ A couple of things stand out in my mind as I watch and listen to this now famous Pelosi news conference. In her statement, she talks about a signed oath she took not to divulge information she may received during classified briefings. She states that she has always honored that obligation. Then, she goes on to discuss information provided during the subject briefing in an attempt to cover her ass. The second stand-out. She states several times that her job was to elect a new president who did not subscribe to policies under the Bush administration. She seems to gloat and be very proud of her accomplishment in doing so. She seems to ignore the fact that a new president was going to be elected with or without her involvement or position in Congress. Bush's time was over. Both candidates .... Obama and McCain were and are on record has opposing torture. She really doesn't serve the Democratic Party very well. She serves herself. It's a classic case of hubris run amok. She's used threats, intimidation, supported corrupt members like Jefferson and Murtha, stifled ethics investigations (PMA) - she thinks she can get away with anything including lying about what she knew and when she knew it. Unfortunately for her, she's ****ed off so many of her own members, that they are gladly going to stand by and let her hang herself. It's bit her in her silicone filled ass and she doesn't know what to do because she can't admit that she is wro...wwrrrooo...wwrrrrooonnng. What's funny is that Obama, as usual, threw her under the bus by backing off on the memos. He opened the proverbial five pounds of crap in a one pound bag and now he can't stuff it back in - somebody has to be sacrificed and it's her. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
"Wizard of Woodstock" wrote in message ... On Fri, 15 May 2009 06:41:51 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "jim7856" wrote in message ... wrote: Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up more pudding. I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy back into the coffin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4 Fun to watch them dancing over hot coals. It's amazing how so many liars thieves and crazys have slithered into high government positions.\\ A couple of things stand out in my mind as I watch and listen to this now famous Pelosi news conference. In her statement, she talks about a signed oath she took not to divulge information she may received during classified briefings. She states that she has always honored that obligation. Then, she goes on to discuss information provided during the subject briefing in an attempt to cover her ass. The second stand-out. She states several times that her job was to elect a new president who did not subscribe to policies under the Bush administration. She seems to gloat and be very proud of her accomplishment in doing so. She seems to ignore the fact that a new president was going to be elected with or without her involvement or position in Congress. Bush's time was over. Both candidates .... Obama and McCain were and are on record has opposing torture. She really doesn't serve the Democratic Party very well. She serves herself. It's a classic case of hubris run amok. She's used threats, intimidation, supported corrupt members like Jefferson and Murtha, stifled ethics investigations (PMA) - she thinks she can get away with anything including lying about what she knew and when she knew it. Unfortunately for her, she's ****ed off so many of her own members, that they are gladly going to stand by and let her hang herself. It's bit her in her silicone filled ass and she doesn't know what to do because she can't admit that she is wro...wwrrrooo...wwrrrrooonnng. What's funny is that Obama, as usual, threw her under the bus by backing off on the memos. He opened the proverbial five pounds of crap in a one pound bag and now he can't stuff it back in - somebody has to be sacrificed and it's her. The "Morning Joe" show was just interviewing Senator Chris Bond who is familiar with intelligence briefings. Willie asked him if he "bought" Pelosi's story that the CIA informed her that water boarding had not been used, as she claims. His answer? "I've attended many classified intelligence briefings. They are not conducted to inform you of what is *not* being done." Eisboch |
Speaking of The Waffle House
Eisboch wrote:
"Wizard of Woodstock" wrote in message ... On Fri, 15 May 2009 06:41:51 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "jim7856" wrote in message ... wrote: Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up more pudding. I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy back into the coffin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4 Fun to watch them dancing over hot coals. It's amazing how so many liars thieves and crazys have slithered into high government positions.\\ A couple of things stand out in my mind as I watch and listen to this now famous Pelosi news conference. In her statement, she talks about a signed oath she took not to divulge information she may received during classified briefings. She states that she has always honored that obligation. Then, she goes on to discuss information provided during the subject briefing in an attempt to cover her ass. The second stand-out. She states several times that her job was to elect a new president who did not subscribe to policies under the Bush administration. She seems to gloat and be very proud of her accomplishment in doing so. She seems to ignore the fact that a new president was going to be elected with or without her involvement or position in Congress. Bush's time was over. Both candidates .... Obama and McCain were and are on record has opposing torture. She really doesn't serve the Democratic Party very well. She serves herself. It's a classic case of hubris run amok. She's used threats, intimidation, supported corrupt members like Jefferson and Murtha, stifled ethics investigations (PMA) - she thinks she can get away with anything including lying about what she knew and when she knew it. Unfortunately for her, she's ****ed off so many of her own members, that they are gladly going to stand by and let her hang herself. It's bit her in her silicone filled ass and she doesn't know what to do because she can't admit that she is wro...wwrrrooo...wwrrrrooonnng. What's funny is that Obama, as usual, threw her under the bus by backing off on the memos. He opened the proverbial five pounds of crap in a one pound bag and now he can't stuff it back in - somebody has to be sacrificed and it's her. The "Morning Joe" show was just interviewing Senator Chris Bond who is familiar with intelligence briefings. Willie asked him if he "bought" Pelosi's story that the CIA informed her that water boarding had not been used, as she claims. His answer? "I've attended many classified intelligence briefings. They are not conducted to inform you of what is *not* being done." Eisboch Bond is a Republican. The Repugs are circling the wagon and, in fact, Bond gave a circuitious answer. You bit. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 06:41:51 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "jim7856" wrote in message ... wrote: Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up more pudding. I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy back into the coffin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4 Fun to watch them dancing over hot coals. It's amazing how so many liars thieves and crazys have slithered into high government positions.\\ A couple of things stand out in my mind as I watch and listen to this now famous Pelosi news conference. In her statement, she talks about a signed oath she took not to divulge information she may received during classified briefings. She states that she has always honored that obligation. Then, she goes on to discuss information provided during the subject briefing in an attempt to cover her ass. The second stand-out. She states several times that her job was to elect a new president who did not subscribe to policies under the Bush administration. She seems to gloat and be very proud of her accomplishment in doing so. She seems to ignore the fact that a new president was going to be elected with or without her involvement or position in Congress. Bush's time was over. Both candidates .... Obama and McCain were and are on record has opposing torture. She really doesn't serve the Democratic Party very well. She serves herself. It's a classic case of hubris run amok. She's used threats, intimidation, supported corrupt members like Jefferson and Murtha, stifled ethics investigations (PMA) - she thinks she can get away with anything including lying about what she knew and when she knew it. Unfortunately for her, she's ****ed off so many of her own members, that they are gladly going to stand by and let her hang herself. It's bit her in her silicone filled ass and she doesn't know what to do because she can't admit that she is wro...wwrrrooo...wwrrrrooonnng. What's funny is that Obama, as usual, threw her under the bus by backing off on the memos. He opened the proverbial five pounds of crap in a one pound bag and now he can't stuff it back in - somebody has to be sacrificed and it's her. Such a *hopeful* Repug you are. Here's your symbol: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...posaur_xlg.gif |
Speaking of The Waffle House
jps wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2009 22:11:33 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up more pudding. I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy back into the coffin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4 Unfortunately, the CIA seems to be making up the record as it goes along. The CIA doesn't like to be ****ed with, by anyone. Pelosi is a red herring. Pelosi challenged the CIA and she will loose. Bush & Cheney need to answer for their traitorous, illegal activities. Bush and Cheney are gone, this is Pelosi's problem now. Looks like the only one who has a leg to stand on complaint wise is Harmon. Harmon is the only one who wrote a letter of protest to the CIA. This is going to get uglier before it's over. Dear Leader Obama whacked the hornets nest and the hornets didn't do what they were told. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 06:41:51 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "jim7856" wrote in message ... wrote: Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up more pudding. I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy back into the coffin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4 Fun to watch them dancing over hot coals. It's amazing how so many liars thieves and crazys have slithered into high government positions.\\ A couple of things stand out in my mind as I watch and listen to this now famous Pelosi news conference. In her statement, she talks about a signed oath she took not to divulge information she may received during classified briefings. She states that she has always honored that obligation. Then, she goes on to discuss information provided during the subject briefing in an attempt to cover her ass. The second stand-out. She states several times that her job was to elect a new president who did not subscribe to policies under the Bush administration. She seems to gloat and be very proud of her accomplishment in doing so. She seems to ignore the fact that a new president was going to be elected with or without her involvement or position in Congress. Bush's time was over. Both candidates .... Obama and McCain were and are on record has opposing torture. She really doesn't serve the Democratic Party very well. She serves herself. It's a classic case of hubris run amok. She's used threats, intimidation, supported corrupt members like Jefferson and Murtha, stifled ethics investigations (PMA) - she thinks she can get away with anything including lying about what she knew and when she knew it. Unfortunately for her, she's ****ed off so many of her own members, that they are gladly going to stand by and let her hang herself. It's bit her in her silicone filled ass and she doesn't know what to do because she can't admit that she is wro...wwrrrooo...wwrrrrooonnng. What's funny is that Obama, as usual, threw her under the bus by backing off on the memos. He opened the proverbial five pounds of crap in a one pound bag and now he can't stuff it back in - somebody has to be sacrificed and it's her. I have never heard anyone conduct a press conference who actually sounded like she was lying. I would give 10 to 1 odds, that a voice stress test would show that she was lying. -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects |
Speaking of The Waffle House
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 06:41:51 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "jim7856" wrote in message ... wrote: Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up more pudding. I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy back into the coffin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4 Fun to watch them dancing over hot coals. It's amazing how so many liars thieves and crazys have slithered into high government positions.\\ A couple of things stand out in my mind as I watch and listen to this now famous Pelosi news conference. In her statement, she talks about a signed oath she took not to divulge information she may received during classified briefings. She states that she has always honored that obligation. Then, she goes on to discuss information provided during the subject briefing in an attempt to cover her ass. The second stand-out. She states several times that her job was to elect a new president who did not subscribe to policies under the Bush administration. She seems to gloat and be very proud of her accomplishment in doing so. She seems to ignore the fact that a new president was going to be elected with or without her involvement or position in Congress. Bush's time was over. Both candidates .... Obama and McCain were and are on record has opposing torture. She really doesn't serve the Democratic Party very well. She serves herself. It's a classic case of hubris run amok. She's used threats, intimidation, supported corrupt members like Jefferson and Murtha, stifled ethics investigations (PMA) - she thinks she can get away with anything including lying about what she knew and when she knew it. Unfortunately for her, she's ****ed off so many of her own members, that they are gladly going to stand by and let her hang herself. It's bit her in her silicone filled ass and she doesn't know what to do because she can't admit that she is wro...wwrrrooo...wwrrrrooonnng. What's funny is that Obama, as usual, threw her under the bus by backing off on the memos. He opened the proverbial five pounds of crap in a one pound bag and now he can't stuff it back in - somebody has to be sacrificed and it's her. There's one good move the chief made. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
BAR wrote:
jps wrote: On Thu, 14 May 2009 22:11:33 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up more pudding. I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy back into the coffin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4 Unfortunately, the CIA seems to be making up the record as it goes along. The CIA doesn't like to be ****ed with, by anyone. Too bad. The CIA is just another failed federal agency, just like the FBI. The CIA is too damned political and has not been a reliable gatherer/source of intel for years. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:22:50 -0400, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
What's funny is that Obama, as usual, threw her under the bus by backing off on the memos. He opened the proverbial five pounds of crap in a one pound bag and now he can't stuff it back in - somebody has to be sacrificed and it's her. Pelosi is a light weight, and I wouldn't mind seeing her gone, but it will take considerably more than this furor to down a House Speaker. Still, if it isn't this one, it might be the next one, and there will be a next one. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
On May 15, 6:43*am, HK wrote:
BAR wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 14 May 2009 22:11:33 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up more pudding. I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy back into the coffin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4 Unfortunately, the CIA seems to be making up the record as it goes along. * The CIA doesn't like to be ****ed with, by anyone. Too bad. The CIA is just another failed federal agency, just like the FBI. The CIA is too damned political and has not been a reliable gatherer/source of intel for years. Herr Krause. You should really change your job title to Pharaoh. You're the "King of Denial" |
Speaking of The Waffle House
"HK" wrote in message m... Bond is a Republican. The Repugs are circling the wagon and, in fact, Bond gave a circuitious answer. You bit. I didn't "bite" at anything. I can think for myself and believe what I want, thank you. You truly are amazing. You are so committed to *your* beliefs and are so arrogant in your confidence in yourself that you are totally blind to any other valid viewpoints. I can't deal with people like that. Sorry. Eisboch |
Speaking of The Waffle House
"HK" wrote in message m... Too bad. The CIA is just another failed federal agency, just like the FBI. The CIA is too damned political and has not been a reliable gatherer/source of intel for years. Now you are an expert on the inner workings of the CIA? Wow. Eisboch |
Speaking of The Waffle House
On May 15, 6:38*am, HK wrote:
Wizard of Woodstock wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2009 06:41:51 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "jim7856" wrote in message ... wrote: Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up more pudding. I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy back into the coffin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4 Fun to watch them dancing over hot coals. It's amazing how so many liars thieves and crazys *have slithered into high government positions.\\ A couple of things stand out in my mind as I watch and listen to this now famous Pelosi news conference. In her statement, she talks about a signed oath she took not to divulge information she may received during classified briefings. *She states that she has always honored that obligation. Then, she goes on to discuss information provided during the subject briefing in an attempt to cover her ass. The second stand-out. * She states several times that her job was to elect a new president who did not subscribe to policies under the Bush administration. * She seems to gloat and be very proud of her accomplishment in doing so. She seems to ignore the fact that a new president was going to be elected with or without her involvement or position in Congress. *Bush's time was over. * *Both candidates .... Obama *and McCain *were and are on record has opposing torture. She really doesn't serve the Democratic Party very well. * She serves herself. It's a classic case of hubris run amok. She's used threats, intimidation, supported corrupt members like Jefferson and Murtha, stifled ethics investigations (PMA) - she thinks she can get away with anything including lying about what she knew and when she knew it. Unfortunately for her, she's ****ed off so many of her own members, that they are gladly going to stand by and let her hang herself. It's bit her in her silicone filled ass and she doesn't know what to do because she can't admit that she is wro...wwrrrooo...wwrrrrooonnng. What's funny is that Obama, as usual, threw her under the bus by backing off on the memos. *He opened the proverbial five pounds of crap in a one pound bag and now he can't stuff it back in - somebody has to be sacrificed and it's her. Such a *hopeful* Repug you are. Here's your symbol: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...neous/Goposaur... Herr Krause. Please stop whimpering. It's bad form. You sound like you are trapped in a corner, and have no recourse of defence. Which is for the most, so. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
On May 15, 6:36*am, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "Wizard of Woodstock" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 15 May 2009 06:41:51 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "jim7856" wrote in message ... wrote: Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up more pudding. I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy back into the coffin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4 Fun to watch them dancing over hot coals. It's amazing how so many liars thieves and crazys *have slithered into high government positions.\\ A couple of things stand out in my mind as I watch and listen to this now famous Pelosi news conference. In her statement, she talks about a signed oath she took not to divulge information she may received during classified briefings. *She states that she has always honored that obligation. Then, she goes on to discuss information provided during the subject briefing in an attempt to cover her ass. The second stand-out. * She states several times that her job was to elect a new president who did not subscribe to policies under the Bush administration. * She seems to gloat and be very proud of her accomplishment in doing so. She seems to ignore the fact that a new president was going to be elected with or without her involvement or position in Congress. *Bush's time was over. * *Both candidates .... Obama *and McCain *were and are on record has opposing torture. She really doesn't serve the Democratic Party very well. * She serves herself. It's a classic case of hubris run amok. She's used threats, intimidation, supported corrupt members like Jefferson and Murtha, stifled ethics investigations (PMA) - she thinks she can get away with anything including lying about what she knew and when she knew it. Unfortunately for her, she's ****ed off so many of her own members, that they are gladly going to stand by and let her hang herself. It's bit her in her silicone filled ass and she doesn't know what to do because she can't admit that she is wro...wwrrrooo...wwrrrrooonnng. What's funny is that Obama, as usual, threw her under the bus by backing off on the memos. *He opened the proverbial five pounds of crap in a one pound bag and now he can't stuff it back in - somebody has to be sacrificed and it's her. The "Morning Joe" show was just interviewing Senator Chris Bond who is familiar with intelligence briefings. Willie asked him if he "bought" Pelosi's story that the CIA informed her that water boarding had not been used, as she claims. His answer? * "I've attended many classified intelligence briefings. * They are not conducted to inform you of what is *not* being done." Eisboch Bond is a Republican. The Repugs are circling the wagon and, in fact, Bond gave a circuitious answer. You bit. Poor Krause. So desperate. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
On Fri, 15 May 2009 08:07:50 -0400, Eisboch wrote:
Now you are an expert on the inner workings of the CIA? They have missed on some rather important work. Failing to predict the fall of the Soviet Union, and WMDs come to mind. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
thunder wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 08:07:50 -0400, Eisboch wrote: Now you are an expert on the inner workings of the CIA? They have missed on some rather important work. Failing to predict the fall of the Soviet Union, and WMDs come to mind. The CIA is a "Bureaucracy" and it will be extremely difficult to discipline and replace them and they know it. When they screw up they will claim it was due to a lack of funding. Whose to argue, their inner workings are classified and you can't debate them in public. It's a no win situation. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message m... Bond is a Republican. The Repugs are circling the wagon and, in fact, Bond gave a circuitious answer. You bit. I didn't "bite" at anything. I can think for myself and believe what I want, thank you. You truly are amazing. You are so committed to *your* beliefs and are so arrogant in your confidence in yourself that you are totally blind to any other valid viewpoints. I can't deal with people like that. Sorry. Eisboch *The* issue is over a Republican Administration, a Republican justice department, a Republican CIA and a Republican senate and house inflicting torture on captives. The GOP is working mightily to divert attention away from that any way it can. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message m... Too bad. The CIA is just another failed federal agency, just like the FBI. The CIA is too damned political and has not been a reliable gatherer/source of intel for years. Now you are an expert on the inner workings of the CIA? Wow. Eisboch There's been serious criticism aplenty in the CIA for those very reasons. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:03:59 -0500, thunder
wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:22:50 -0400, Wizard of Woodstock wrote: What's funny is that Obama, as usual, threw her under the bus by backing off on the memos. He opened the proverbial five pounds of crap in a one pound bag and now he can't stuff it back in - somebody has to be sacrificed and it's her. Pelosi is a light weight, and I wouldn't mind seeing her gone, but it will take considerably more than this furor to down a House Speaker. Still, if it isn't this one, it might be the next one, and there will be a next one. Perhaps, but I think you made the point - she is a light weight - she even makes Hastert look good and he was the Republican's very own version of Harry Reid. Light weights don't survive this kind of lying and obstruction of the truth. I originally thought this would be swept under the rug, but I'm begining to think that this may be a pivotal point in the Obama Administration - he's made a huge mistake, he knows it and doesn't know what to do about it. Plus he's not exactly endearing himself to the power brokers in the economy - there's a lot of buyers remorse begining to fester and the more he looks like he's interfering rather than assisting the economy the worse it's going to be. He needs a distraction and Pelosi is going to be that distraction. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:16:12 -0500, thunder
wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2009 08:07:50 -0400, Eisboch wrote: Now you are an expert on the inner workings of the CIA? They have missed on some rather important work. Failing to predict the fall of the Soviet Union, and WMDs come to mind. I am not an apologist for the Caught In Act people, but it is the nature of the business that successes tend to stay secret, while the failures are often famous. Their true batting average is a bit difficult to discern. Casady |
Speaking of The Waffle House
Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:16:12 -0500, thunder wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2009 08:07:50 -0400, Eisboch wrote: Now you are an expert on the inner workings of the CIA? They have missed on some rather important work. Failing to predict the fall of the Soviet Union, and WMDs come to mind. I am not an apologist for the Caught In Act people, but it is the nature of the business that successes tend to stay secret, while the failures are often famous. Their true batting average is a bit difficult to discern. Casady Indeed, and isn't that a wonderful way to hide the massive number of intel failures. Let's see... Downfall of Batista Bay of Pigs Shah of Iran Vietnam Contras Chile PLO and its offshots WMDs (well, who really knows) And about a zillion more. We'd be better served by 100 chimpanzees sitting in a room with shortwave radios and typewriters. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
On Fri, 15 May 2009 06:41:51 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote: "jim7856" wrote in message ... wrote: Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up more pudding. I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy back into the coffin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4 Fun to watch them dancing over hot coals. It's amazing how so many liars thieves and crazys have slithered into high government positions.\\ A couple of things stand out in my mind as I watch and listen to this now famous Pelosi news conference. In her statement, she talks about a signed oath she took not to divulge information she may received during classified briefings. She states that she has always honored that obligation. Then, she goes on to discuss information provided during the subject briefing in an attempt to cover her ass. She was not free to divulge. Now that information has made it to public light otherwise, she's no longer bound to hold secret what's in the public domain. You must have dealt with this 100 times in the tech industry. It's called a NDA. When the information is publicly available, you're no longer bound. The second stand-out. She states several times that her job was to elect a new president who did not subscribe to policies under the Bush administration. She seems to gloat and be very proud of her accomplishment in doing so. They attempted to clarify Bush's torture policy as illegal and he vetoed the bill. It could not be overridden since Republicans supported the torture policies of the Bush Administration. The only way out is to elect a new president with a different view of torture. As an American, I'm glad she did what she could. She seems to ignore the fact that a new president was going to be elected with or without her involvement or position in Congress. Bush's time was over. Both candidates .... Obama and McCain were and are on record has opposing torture. That's a good point. She really doesn't serve the Democratic Party very well. She serves herself. Who can you cite within the Republican party that serves the party well? |
Speaking of The Waffle House
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:32:08 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote: His answer? "I've attended many classified intelligence briefings. They are not conducted to inform you of what is *not* being done." That's a bull**** answer. As Pelosi has maintained since her first interview with Rachael Maddow in February, they briefed the members on what they had established as legal and did not suggest that they were using such techniques, only that they had been determined by the Bush Admin as legal. As we now know, they were using the techniques before they developed their legal theories. Pelosi is a red herring and you know it. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
On Fri, 15 May 2009 05:16:08 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
Poor Krause. So desperate. Yes, his party is so out of power and his political agenda is laying fallow in a ditch. Oh, no. That's your party. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:40:52 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: I have never heard anyone conduct a press conference who actually sounded like she was lying. I would give 10 to 1 odds, that a voice stress test would show that she was lying. I'd take you up on that if it were possible. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:32:08 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: His answer? "I've attended many classified intelligence briefings. They are not conducted to inform you of what is *not* being done." That's a bull**** answer. As Pelosi has maintained since her first interview with Rachael Maddow in February, they briefed the members on what they had established as legal and did not suggest that they were using such techniques, only that they had been determined by the Bush Admin as legal. As we now know, they were using the techniques before they developed their legal theories. Pelosi is a red herring and you know it. Well, you don't expect the GOP'ers to openly discuss in a critical manner any of the horrors they inflicted on this country and the rest of the world, do you? That's why they are so busy here, trying to deflect. It's sooooo obvious, it's really funny. Of course, none of what the GOP did matches up to Bill Clinton boning an of age gal who was happy for the presidential attention. :) |
Speaking of The Waffle House
On May 15, 12:56*pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 05:16:08 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Poor Krause. So desperate. Yes, his party is so out of power and his political agenda is laying fallow in a ditch. Oh, no. *That's your party. I believe you are mistaken, Maestro. I'm not a citizen of your country, therefore I have none of your nations *party* affiliations. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
|
Speaking of The Waffle House
On May 15, 7:45*am, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message om... Too bad. The CIA is just another failed federal agency, just like the FBI. The CIA is too damned political and has not been a reliable gatherer/source of intel for years. Now you are an expert on the inner workings of the CIA? Wow. Eisboch There's been serious criticism aplenty in the CIA for those very reasons. Herr Krause. There's been serious criticism aplenty concerning your mental status in this and other forums for a considerable amount of time. But nothing has changed. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 06:41:51 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "jim7856" wrote in message ... wrote: Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up more pudding. I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy back into the coffin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4 Fun to watch them dancing over hot coals. It's amazing how so many liars thieves and crazys have slithered into high government positions.\\ A couple of things stand out in my mind as I watch and listen to this now famous Pelosi news conference. In her statement, she talks about a signed oath she took not to divulge information she may received during classified briefings. She states that she has always honored that obligation. Then, she goes on to discuss information provided during the subject briefing in an attempt to cover her ass. She was not free to divulge. Now that information has made it to public light otherwise, she's no longer bound to hold secret what's in the public domain. You must have dealt with this 100 times in the tech industry. It's called a NDA. When the information is publicly available, you're no longer bound. My briefings on variously classified material and subjects while working for the government and serving in the military did not have a clause that stated I could talk about what I was told during the briefings if the material was also disclosed in the public domain. The second stand-out. She states several times that her job was to elect a new president who did not subscribe to policies under the Bush administration. She seems to gloat and be very proud of her accomplishment in doing so. They attempted to clarify Bush's torture policy as illegal and he vetoed the bill. It could not be overridden since Republicans supported the torture policies of the Bush Administration. The framers came up with a system of government that worked. Smart guys. The only way out is to elect a new president with a different view of torture. As an American, I'm glad she did what she could. The framers came up with a system of government that worked. Smart guys. She seems to ignore the fact that a new president was going to be elected with or without her involvement or position in Congress. Bush's time was over. Both candidates .... Obama and McCain were and are on record has opposing torture. That's a good point. Its a very good point that is completely lost on the fourth estate. She really doesn't serve the Democratic Party very well. She serves herself. Who can you cite within the Republican party that serves the party well? Palin. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
On Sat, 16 May 2009 09:23:58 -0400, BAR wrote:
She seems to ignore the fact that a new president was going to be elected with or without her involvement or position in Congress. Bush's time was over. Both candidates .... Obama and McCain were and are on record has opposing torture. That's a good point. Its a very good point that is completely lost on the fourth estate. Except think timeline, the briefing meeting was back in 2003. Any work to get Kerry elected failed, and, for the next 4 years, no one knew who the 2008 candidates were going to be. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
On Sat, 16 May 2009 09:23:58 -0400, BAR wrote:
jps wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2009 06:41:51 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "jim7856" wrote in message ... wrote: Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up more pudding. I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy back into the coffin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4 Fun to watch them dancing over hot coals. It's amazing how so many liars thieves and crazys have slithered into high government positions.\\ A couple of things stand out in my mind as I watch and listen to this now famous Pelosi news conference. In her statement, she talks about a signed oath she took not to divulge information she may received during classified briefings. She states that she has always honored that obligation. Then, she goes on to discuss information provided during the subject briefing in an attempt to cover her ass. She was not free to divulge. Now that information has made it to public light otherwise, she's no longer bound to hold secret what's in the public domain. You must have dealt with this 100 times in the tech industry. It's called a NDA. When the information is publicly available, you're no longer bound. My briefings on variously classified material and subjects while working for the government and serving in the military did not have a clause that stated I could talk about what I was told during the briefings if the material was also disclosed in the public domain. The second stand-out. She states several times that her job was to elect a new president who did not subscribe to policies under the Bush administration. She seems to gloat and be very proud of her accomplishment in doing so. They attempted to clarify Bush's torture policy as illegal and he vetoed the bill. It could not be overridden since Republicans supported the torture policies of the Bush Administration. The framers came up with a system of government that worked. Smart guys. The only way out is to elect a new president with a different view of torture. As an American, I'm glad she did what she could. The framers came up with a system of government that worked. Smart guys. She seems to ignore the fact that a new president was going to be elected with or without her involvement or position in Congress. Bush's time was over. Both candidates .... Obama and McCain were and are on record has opposing torture. That's a good point. Its a very good point that is completely lost on the fourth estate. She really doesn't serve the Democratic Party very well. She serves herself. Who can you cite within the Republican party that serves the party well? Palin. Lame answers. You weren't a US Senator hearing legal arguments surrounding torture. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
thunder wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 09:23:58 -0400, BAR wrote: She seems to ignore the fact that a new president was going to be elected with or without her involvement or position in Congress. Bush's time was over. Both candidates .... Obama and McCain were and are on record has opposing torture. That's a good point. Its a very good point that is completely lost on the fourth estate. Except think timeline, the briefing meeting was back in 2003. Any work to get Kerry elected failed, and, for the next 4 years, no one knew who the 2008 candidates were going to be. Except that Pelosi's comments today cannot be verified to have occurred in 2003. Pelosi is trying to rewrite history but, she fails to understand that the events she is attempting to rewrite never occurred. Pelosi is now backtracking on her accusation that the CIA lied to her and congress. I guess she didn't listen when she told her children that honesty was the best policy. Or, she may not have told her children that honesty was the best policy. |
Speaking of The Waffle House
jps wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 09:23:58 -0400, BAR wrote: jps wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2009 06:41:51 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "jim7856" wrote in message ... wrote: Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up more pudding. I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy back into the coffin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4 Fun to watch them dancing over hot coals. It's amazing how so many liars thieves and crazys have slithered into high government positions.\\ A couple of things stand out in my mind as I watch and listen to this now famous Pelosi news conference. In her statement, she talks about a signed oath she took not to divulge information she may received during classified briefings. She states that she has always honored that obligation. Then, she goes on to discuss information provided during the subject briefing in an attempt to cover her ass. She was not free to divulge. Now that information has made it to public light otherwise, she's no longer bound to hold secret what's in the public domain. You must have dealt with this 100 times in the tech industry. It's called a NDA. When the information is publicly available, you're no longer bound. My briefings on variously classified material and subjects while working for the government and serving in the military did not have a clause that stated I could talk about what I was told during the briefings if the material was also disclosed in the public domain. The second stand-out. She states several times that her job was to elect a new president who did not subscribe to policies under the Bush administration. She seems to gloat and be very proud of her accomplishment in doing so. They attempted to clarify Bush's torture policy as illegal and he vetoed the bill. It could not be overridden since Republicans supported the torture policies of the Bush Administration. The framers came up with a system of government that worked. Smart guys. The only way out is to elect a new president with a different view of torture. As an American, I'm glad she did what she could. The framers came up with a system of government that worked. Smart guys. She seems to ignore the fact that a new president was going to be elected with or without her involvement or position in Congress. Bush's time was over. Both candidates .... Obama and McCain were and are on record has opposing torture. That's a good point. Its a very good point that is completely lost on the fourth estate. She really doesn't serve the Democratic Party very well. She serves herself. Who can you cite within the Republican party that serves the party well? Palin. Lame answers. You weren't a US Senator hearing legal arguments surrounding torture. No, I was hearing about our military capabilities vs. the Soviets and ChiComs. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:06 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com