HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...

Tommy's "efforts" are really pretty funny. For eight years, he was
completely accepting of the presidency of Bush, quite possibly the
worst president in the history of this country, with an
administration that got wrong just about everything it touched. *Now*
we have a smart president who is trying to clean up the messes Bush
left behind *and* jumpstart the economy Bush's malfeasance,
misfeasance, and nonfeasance crashed, and Tommy thinks he is giving
us payback.



And you are a complete ass for calling him "Tommy" because he doesn't
buy your political persuasions.
You are doing it on purpose, for effect, you know the issue, but
you're willing to do anything to be an ass.

**** you, Harry.

Eisboch


Actually, I don't know "the issue" regarding "Tommy." I have no idea why
Tommy objects to the very common nickname for the name Thomas.

Not only did you read the post, but you acknowledged and responded to
the post, and stated you would not call him Tommy.

Once you decided someone is on your ****-list, you will use any and all
personal knowledge to try to touch a sensitive nerve. It has nothing to
do with politics, I can remember when Chuck went on your ****-list and
you treated him the same as those you consider right wing trash.
--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

HK wrote:
D.Duck wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
m...
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Tommy's "efforts" are really pretty funny. For eight years, he was
completely accepting of the presidency of Bush, quite possibly the
worst president in the history of this country, with an
administration that got wrong just about everything it touched.
*Now* we have a smart president who is trying to clean up the
messes Bush left behind *and* jumpstart the economy Bush's
malfeasance, misfeasance, and nonfeasance crashed, and Tommy thinks
he is giving us payback.


And you are a complete ass for calling him "Tommy" because he
doesn't buy your political persuasions.
You are doing it on purpose, for effect, you know the issue, but
you're willing to do anything to be an ass.

**** you, Harry.

Eisboch

Actually, I don't know "the issue" regarding "Tommy." I have no idea
why Tommy objects to the very common nickname for the name Thomas.

I don't expect him to "buy" my politics, but I don't recall him
objecting much if at all to the idiocies of the Bush Administration.
He bought into every lie Cheney put in Bush's mouth.

Tom explained it very clearly here in this group. You remember
everything else.

Eisboch was right on with your motives.


Sorry, never saw the explanation. Your amateur analysis is just
quackers. There are lots of posts in here I don't read for one reason
or another.

Fricken liar. You saw it. You apologized. Dirtbag.

jps wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2009 06:32:10 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

"WASHINGTON (AP) — Counties suffering the most from job losses stand
to receive the least help from President Barack Obama's plan to spend
billions of stimulus dollars on roads and bridges, an Associated Press
analysis has found.

Although the intent of the money is to put people back to work, AP's
review of more than 5,500 planned transportation projects nationwide
reveals that states are planning to spend the stimulus in communities
where jobless rates are already lower.

You're blaming Obama for the choices of individual states?

You are a laugh a minute. Did you read where Obama was going to rescind
stimulus money from California because they were reducing the pay of
some state workers?

Maybe first read what you post?

Maybe you should get a brain.

BAR wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2009 06:32:10 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

"WASHINGTON (AP) — Counties suffering the most from job losses stand
to receive the least help from President Barack Obama's plan to spend
billions of stimulus dollars on roads and bridges, an Associated Press
analysis has found.

Although the intent of the money is to put people back to work, AP's
review of more than 5,500 planned transportation projects nationwide
reveals that states are planning to spend the stimulus in communities
where jobless rates are already lower.

You're blaming Obama for the choices of individual states?

You are a laugh a minute. Did you read where Obama was going to rescind
stimulus money from California because they were reducing the pay of
some state workers?

Maybe first read what you post?

Maybe you should get a brain.


This is rich...you telling someone else they should get a brain.
Why didn't you get get one?