Pelosi Caught Lying
 

On Fri, 8 May 2009 03:03:14 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 07 May 2009 22:17:03 -0400, BAR wrote:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/cap...riefed_on.html

This was in the news many weeks ago. Her take was that they were
briefed on the methods but were never told the methods were being
used.

I don't know if she asked specifically or those who were briefing her
assumed that she'd make the connection.

I assume she's being purposefully dense in order to keep that teflon
coating intact. Like a tobacco CEO who doesn't dare acknowledge the
concept of using his products and cancer.



Have you watched the recent interviews on TV of Pelosi regarding this
subject?
She doesn't lie very well. Tongue tied and evasive.
She is a piece of work, that's for sure.

Eisboch

Allow me two words -- Tom DeLay.

Pelosi Caught Lying
 

On Fri, 08 May 2009 12:23:24 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 8 May 2009 03:03:14 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 07 May 2009 22:17:03 -0400, BAR wrote:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/cap...riefed_on.html

This was in the news many weeks ago. Her take was that they were
briefed on the methods but were never told the methods were being
used.

I don't know if she asked specifically or those who were briefing her
assumed that she'd make the connection.

I assume she's being purposefully dense in order to keep that teflon
coating intact. Like a tobacco CEO who doesn't dare acknowledge the
concept of using his products and cancer.



Have you watched the recent interviews on TV of Pelosi regarding this
subject?
She doesn't lie very well. Tongue tied and evasive.
She is a piece of work, that's for sure.

Eisboch

Allow me two words -- Tom DeLay.

What the hell do your utterances about the past have to do with the
lieing Pelosi, Reid, Obama, et al?

Is that your position - any action previously performed is OK for
repition? Is that really the best you can come up with?

Pretty flaky.
--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

Pelosi Caught Lying
 

jps wrote:
On Thu, 7 May 2009 23:55:40 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On May 7, 10:29 pm, jps wrote:
On Thu, 07 May 2009 22:17:03 -0400, BAR wrote:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/cap...05/cia_says_pe...
This was in the news many weeks ago. Her take was that they were
briefed on the methods but were never told the methods were being
used.

I don't know if she asked specifically or those who were briefing her
assumed that she'd make the connection.

I assume she's being purposefully dense in order to keep that teflon
coating intact. Like a tobacco CEO who doesn't dare acknowledge the
concept of using his products and cancer.
Dude, shes a DEM for gods sake, you maybe expected truth?

If her lips are moving, she's lying.

If your fingers are typing, you're saying something stupid.

You are a child. The "sticks and stones" thing can't be too far away.

Pelosi Caught Lying
 

On Sat, 09 May 2009 22:02:38 -0400, DK wrote:

jps wrote:
On Thu, 7 May 2009 23:55:40 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On May 7, 10:29 pm, jps wrote:
On Thu, 07 May 2009 22:17:03 -0400, BAR wrote:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/cap...05/cia_says_pe...
This was in the news many weeks ago. Her take was that they were
briefed on the methods but were never told the methods were being
used.

I don't know if she asked specifically or those who were briefing her
assumed that she'd make the connection.

I assume she's being purposefully dense in order to keep that teflon
coating intact. Like a tobacco CEO who doesn't dare acknowledge the
concept of using his products and cancer.
Dude, shes a DEM for gods sake, you maybe expected truth?

If her lips are moving, she's lying.

If your fingers are typing, you're saying something stupid.

You are a child. The "sticks and stones" thing can't be too far away.

That means even a child can outwit a dillweed.

Pelosi Caught Lying
 

On Thu, 07 May 2009 19:29:01 -0700, jps wrote:

I assume she's being purposefully dense in order to keep that teflon
coating intact. Like a tobacco CEO who doesn't dare acknowledge the
concept of using his products and cancer.

How about a conscious decision, when taking the job, to just stonewall
the cancer issue. Dare? They never even consider it. What kind of
person do you think takes that job?

Casady