On May 4, 9:54*am, HK wrote:
wrote in
Yeah but those boats have a design that makes them easier to skull.
Long and narrow with a trailing end transom, vee bottom etc. I would
think the motor transom of those skiffs might make them harder to
skull, especially in any current or wind..

*skull* * Hehehehe.

What a frippin' idiot.

If you had something in your skull besides gas, you'd know the
difference between scull and skull.

*SKULL* * Sheeesh.

Most of the more educated folks here knew what I meant.. Of course if
you had anything but gas in your head you would have noticed your pink
army regular spelled dilemma wrong in the title of his troll thread...
But we know you are more interested in trolling than talking boats
anyway.

On May 4, 9:54*am, HK wrote:
wrote in
Yeah but those boats have a design that makes them easier to skull.
Long and narrow with a trailing end transom, vee bottom etc. I would
think the motor transom of those skiffs might make them harder to
skull, especially in any current or wind..

*skull* * Hehehehe.

What a frippin' idiot.

If you had something in your skull besides gas, you'd know the
difference between scull and skull.

*SKULL* * Sheeesh.

Harry, you missed one. Your lover Don's title of his troll has
"delemma" in it.

On May 4, 10:32*am, wrote:
On May 4, 9:54*am, HK wrote:

wrote in
Yeah but those boats have a design that makes them easier to skull.
Long and narrow with a trailing end transom, vee bottom etc. I would
think the motor transom of those skiffs might make them harder to
skull, especially in any current or wind..

*skull* * Hehehehe.

What a frippin' idiot.

If you had something in your skull besides gas, you'd know the
difference between scull and skull.

*SKULL* * Sheeesh.

Harry, you missed one. Your lover Don's title of his troll has
"delemma" in it.

He didn't miss it, he is a hypocrite and won't go after his Pink Army
regulars....

On May 4, 6:44*am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On May 4, 9:54 am, HK wrote:
wrote in
Yeah but those boats have a design that makes them easier to skull.
Long and narrow with a trailing end transom, vee bottom etc. I would
think the motor transom of those skiffs might make them harder to
skull, especially in any current or wind..
*skull* * Hehehehe.

What a frippin' idiot.

If you had something in your skull besides gas, you'd know the
difference between scull and skull.

*SKULL* * Sheeesh.

Most of the more educated folks here knew what I meant.. Of course if
you had anything but gas in your head you would have noticed your pink
army regular spelled dilemma wrong in the title of his troll thread...
But we know you are more interested in trolling than talking boats
anyway.

You claim to have been a builder of rowboats, ****-for-brains. Any real
builder of rowboats would be familiar with the word "scull." Anyone
familiar with rowboats knows the word "scull" and knows that "skull" and
"scull" are not the same word.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You claim to have been the writer of technical papers dealing with
structural building issues. Care to have a discussion right here on
those seismic and wind forces that you wrote about?

On May 4, 10:23*am, wrote:
On May 4, 9:54*am, HK wrote:

wrote in
Yeah but those boats have a design that makes them easier to skull.
Long and narrow with a trailing end transom, vee bottom etc. I would
think the motor transom of those skiffs might make them harder to
skull, especially in any current or wind..

*skull* * Hehehehe.

What a frippin' idiot.

If you had something in your skull besides gas, you'd know the
difference between scull and skull.

*SKULL* * Sheeesh.

Most of the more educated folks here knew what I meant.. Of course if
you had anything but gas in your head you would have noticed your pink
army regular spelled dilemma wrong in the title of his troll thread...
But we know you are more interested in trolling than talking boats
anyway.

Harry claimed to have wrote some tech papers on structural seismic and
wind forces on buildings. I'm really trying to get him to discuss
this. I may learn something from someone as knowledgable on the
subject as he is snerk

On May 4, 11:16*am, wrote:
On May 4, 10:23*am, wrote:





On May 4, 9:54*am, HK wrote:

wrote in
Yeah but those boats have a design that makes them easier to skull..
Long and narrow with a trailing end transom, vee bottom etc. I would
think the motor transom of those skiffs might make them harder to
skull, especially in any current or wind..

*skull* * Hehehehe.

What a frippin' idiot.

If you had something in your skull besides gas, you'd know the
difference between scull and skull.

*SKULL* * Sheeesh.

Most of the more educated folks here knew what I meant.. Of course if
you had anything but gas in your head you would have noticed your pink
army regular spelled dilemma wrong in the title of his troll thread...
But we know you are more interested in trolling than talking boats
anyway.

Harry claimed to have wrote some tech papers on structural seismic and
wind forces on buildings. I'm really trying to get him to discuss
this. I may learn something from someone as knowledgable on the
subject as he is snerk- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I saw the pics of the last design project you did, it was pretty cool,
and huge.. Harry has never designed of built anything, he made his
living off of the backs of hard working blue collar workers, like the
rest of the pink army, no talent so they make stuff up...

wrote:
On May 4, 11:16 am, wrote:
On May 4, 10:23 am, wrote:





On May 4, 9:54 am, HK wrote:
wrote in
Yeah but those boats have a design that makes them easier to skull.
Long and narrow with a trailing end transom, vee bottom etc. I would
think the motor transom of those skiffs might make them harder to
skull, especially in any current or wind..
*skull* Hehehehe.
What a frippin' idiot.
If you had something in your skull besides gas, you'd know the
difference between scull and skull.
*SKULL* Sheeesh.
Most of the more educated folks here knew what I meant.. Of course if
you had anything but gas in your head you would have noticed your pink
army regular spelled dilemma wrong in the title of his troll thread...
But we know you are more interested in trolling than talking boats
anyway.
Harry claimed to have wrote some tech papers on structural seismic and
wind forces on buildings. I'm really trying to get him to discuss
this. I may learn something from someone as knowledgable on the
subject as he is snerk- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I saw the pics of the last design project you did, it was pretty cool,
and huge.. Harry has never designed of built anything, he made his
living off of the backs of hard working blue collar workers, like the
rest of the pink army, no talent so they make stuff up...

Gee, how huge can a one-hole outhouse built out of cheap pine be?

On May 4, 11:36*am, wrote:
On May 4, 11:16*am, wrote:





On May 4, 10:23*am, wrote:

On May 4, 9:54*am, HK wrote:

wrote in
Yeah but those boats have a design that makes them easier to skull.
Long and narrow with a trailing end transom, vee bottom etc. I would
think the motor transom of those skiffs might make them harder to
skull, especially in any current or wind..

*skull* * Hehehehe.

What a frippin' idiot.

If you had something in your skull besides gas, you'd know the
difference between scull and skull.

*SKULL* * Sheeesh.

Most of the more educated folks here knew what I meant.. Of course if
you had anything but gas in your head you would have noticed your pink
army regular spelled dilemma wrong in the title of his troll thread....
But we know you are more interested in trolling than talking boats
anyway.

Harry claimed to have wrote some tech papers on structural seismic and
wind forces on buildings. I'm really trying to get him to discuss
this. I may learn something from someone as knowledgable on the
subject as he is snerk- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I saw the pics of the last design project you did, it was pretty cool,
and huge.. Harry has never designed of built anything, he made his
living off of the backs of hard working blue collar workers, like the
rest of the pink army, no talent so they make stuff up...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Thanks! Notice, if you will, that Harry has read where I've asked to
have a discussion about his technical papers dealing with structures
that he's alleged to have written. He's deflecting like usual when
he's lied. Also, being in that area of expertise, I've had to read a
lot of things, and I just don't recall ever seeing anything dealing
with structural engineering that Harry has written. Odd huh? Not
really, just another lobster boating!

On Mon, 04 May 2009 09:54:05 -0400, HK wrote:

wrote in

Yeah but those boats have a design that makes them easier to skull.
Long and narrow with a trailing end transom, vee bottom etc. I would
think the motor transom of those skiffs might make them harder to
skull, especially in any current or wind..


*skull* Hehehehe.

What a frippin' idiot.

If you had something in your skull besides gas, you'd know the
difference between scull and skull.


*SKULL* Sheeesh.

By their lame spelling flames you shall know them.

Casady

Richard Casady wrote:
On Mon, 04 May 2009 09:54:05 -0400, HK wrote:

wrote in
Yeah but those boats have a design that makes them easier to skull.
Long and narrow with a trailing end transom, vee bottom etc. I would
think the motor transom of those skiffs might make them harder to
skull, especially in any current or wind..

*skull* Hehehehe.

What a frippin' idiot.

If you had something in your skull besides gas, you'd know the
difference between scull and skull.


*SKULL* Sheeesh.

By their lame spelling flames you shall know them.

Casady


Nothing lame about it. As a self-proclaimed builder of rowboats, even an
intellectual cipher like JustHate should have known the word he wanted
was "scull," not "scull." I'm not expecting a high level of language
"dexterity" on usenet, but someone in "the boatbuilding biz" should be
familiar with its common terms.

*SKULL for SCULL*

Idiot.