"Tim" wrote in message
...
On May 2, 11:24 am, Tim wrote:
still crude arms but uping the ante' for violence.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...EDuCwwY9ncDOtP...

hmmm, maybe the brits will take a bigger hand in getting rid of the
scum now that they've lost a ship to the Somalians.

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/05/...5811241280128/

One thing that gets me, though. Is why did they go to the trouble of
blowing up the pirates explosives etc, when they could have simply
thrown them (the dynomite and guns, not the pirates) into the drink?

-------------------------------------------------------------


Conflicting reports. The first link said the pirates that had the
dynamite, etc. were released.
The second link says they were taken into custody.

Eisboch

On May 2, 11:51*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On May 2, 11:24 am, Tim wrote:

still crude arms but uping the ante' for violence.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...EDuCwwY9ncDOtP...

hmmm, maybe the brits will take a bigger hand in getting rid of the
scum now that they've lost a ship to the Somalians.

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/05/...eize-British-s...

One thing that gets me, though. Is why did they go to the trouble of
blowing up the pirates explosives etc, when they could have simply
thrown them (the dynomite and guns, not the pirates) into the drink?

-------------------------------------------------------------

Conflicting reports. * The first link said the pirates that had the
dynamite, etc. were released.
The second link says they were taken into custody.

Eisboch

huh? I didn't notice that. thanks for pointing that out, Richard.