Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Apr 14, 1:33 am, "maynard" wrote: I was reading some comments on people who have auxiliary small trolling motors. One commented that a two cylinder was much better than a one, as the singles had a lot more problems. It seems to me that a twin with more parts would have more problems. I have seen a lot of really old singles, so it would seem that they last a pretty long time. As long as it pushes the boat it is mounted on at the proper speed, wouldn't a single be just as good as a twin, and even better for a light boat? Maynard I really wouldn't say there is a difference in reliability of a single over a twin. However, the twin is usually quieter, and produces less vibration. --- I would pick 2. While 2 has more parts, not really that many more parts. A pistion, connecting stuff, 2 more valves and that is it for more moving parts. For the added parts, it does not vibrate as much. That vibration hammers the housing, losens screws etc. I remember a Muncie 1 cyl., great motor but if you didn't routinely torque the bottom end the screws would work loose. Never seen that on a 2 cyl or more. |