"jps" wrote in message
...

On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:06:14 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


Probably having guns available causes a lot less deaths to happen annually
than without guns. When there were a lot less people, and the kings and
feudal rulers were about, there lots of deaths by hacking and hewing.
Percentage wise a lot more than we now have via guns.



If you want to drift back to the middle ages I can see your point. It
was an ugly period and life wasn't worth a whole lot if you were in
someone's way.



I would hope you agree the human race has progressed some since then.

I don't think we've progressed as much as you would like to think.
The underlining causes leading to violence remain. Our prisons are full of
people that have demonstrated that. The means of delivering it is what has
progressed.

I never had any interest in guns or firearms. Still don't really. Raising
three young kids in the house further influenced my choice not to have guns
around. But life's experiences, observations and frankly getting older has
changed my mind. As a young man I always fancied that I had the physical
capability to protect my home and it's occupants without the use of
firearms. Now, as I get older, think back to an experience I had as a
young man, read the daily accounts of robberies that include violence and
having had the experience of a break-in ourselves, my feelings have changed.
I now keep a firearm in the house now that the kids are all grown and on
their own. I don't use it as a hobby. I don't display it. In fact I
rarely even look at it. It's sole purpose is for protection of my wife and
I should the reason to use it ever present itself.

Eisboch