On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 26, 1:36*pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 25, 4:22*pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 24, 7:47*pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,... ****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU? *Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. *Just subsequent to asking me about my
cussing, he said STFU.

If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word ****.

Get it?

Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for your safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.

Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. *Or better yet, consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.

nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.

IMHO? it sux to be you....

There you go. *Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU pushed him
over the edge.

Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken away.

"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of arms is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."

-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698

Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?

A real renaissance man you are.

Do I need to?

You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.

Doesn't make it right or even relevant.

No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.

I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. It doesn't make them
right or relevant.

On Apr 26, 8:32*pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36*pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 25, 4:22*pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 24, 7:47*pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,... ****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU? *Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. *Just subsequent to asking me about my
cussing, he said STFU.

If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word ****.

Get it?

Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for your safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.

Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. *Or better yet, consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.

nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.

IMHO? it sux to be you....

There you go. *Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU pushed him
over the edge.

Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken away.

"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of arms is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."

-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698

Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?

A real renaissance man you are.

Do I need to?

You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.

Doesn't make it right or even relevant.

No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.

I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. *The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. *It doesn't make them
right or relevant.

Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 26, 8:32*pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36*pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 25, 4:22*pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 24, 7:47*pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,... ****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU? *Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. *Just subsequent to asking me about my
cussing, he said STFU.

If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word ****.

Get it?

Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for your safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.

Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. *Or better yet, consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.

nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.

IMHO? it sux to be you....

There you go. *Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU pushed him
over the edge.

Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken away.

"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of arms is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."

-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698

Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?

A real renaissance man you are.

Do I need to?

You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.

Doesn't make it right or even relevant.

No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.

I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. *The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. *It doesn't make them
right or relevant.

Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.

230 years ago.

Anything changed since then? Yes, in the 1950's we decided to keep
standing armies to protect America.

We don't need no stinking militias anymore.

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 26, 8:32 pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36 pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 25, 4:22 pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:

On Apr 24, 7:47 pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:

On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,...
****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU?
Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. Just subsequent to asking me
about my
cussing, he said STFU.

If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word
****.

Get it?

Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and
yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for your
safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could
be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So
yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.

Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. Or better yet,
consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.

nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.

IMHO? it sux to be you....

There you go. Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU
pushed him
over the edge.

Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here
snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken
away.

"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of arms
is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."

-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698

Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?

A real renaissance man you are.

Do I need to?

You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.

Doesn't make it right or even relevant.

No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.

I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. It doesn't make them
right or relevant.

Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.

230 years ago.

Anything changed since then? Yes, in the 1950's we decided to keep
standing armies to protect America.

We don't need no stinking militias anymore.

Standing armies are a reason to keep militias, an armed populace.

CalifBill wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 26, 8:32 pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36 pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Apr 25, 4:22 pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:
On Apr 24, 7:47 pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:
On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,...
****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU?
Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. Just subsequent to asking me
about my
cussing, he said STFU.
If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word
****.
Get it?
Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and
yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for your
safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could
be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So
yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.
Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. Or better yet,
consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.
nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.
IMHO? it sux to be you....
There you go. Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU
pushed him
over the edge.
Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here
snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken
away.
"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of arms
is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."
-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698
Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?
A real renaissance man you are.
Do I need to?
You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.
Doesn't make it right or even relevant.
No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.
I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. It doesn't make them
right or relevant.
Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.
230 years ago.

Anything changed since then? Yes, in the 1950's we decided to keep
standing armies to protect America.

We don't need no stinking militias anymore.

Standing armies are a reason to keep militias, an armed populace.

JPS is a poster child for literacy, civics and US history.

On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:30:54 -0400, BAR wrote:

CalifBill wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 26, 8:32 pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36 pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Apr 25, 4:22 pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:
On Apr 24, 7:47 pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:
On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,...
****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU?
Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. Just subsequent to asking me
about my
cussing, he said STFU.
If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word
****.
Get it?
Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and
yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for your
safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could
be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So
yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.
Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. Or better yet,
consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.
nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.
IMHO? it sux to be you....
There you go. Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU
pushed him
over the edge.
Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here
snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken
away.
"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of arms
is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."
-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698
Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?
A real renaissance man you are.
Do I need to?
You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.
Doesn't make it right or even relevant.
No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.
I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. It doesn't make them
right or relevant.
Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.
230 years ago.

Anything changed since then? Yes, in the 1950's we decided to keep
standing armies to protect America.

We don't need no stinking militias anymore.

Standing armies are a reason to keep militias, an armed populace.

JPS is a poster child for literacy, civics and US history.

BAR is a poster child for vapid arguments.

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:51:04 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 26, 8:32 pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36 pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 25, 4:22 pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:

On Apr 24, 7:47 pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:

On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,...
****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU?
Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. Just subsequent to asking me
about my
cussing, he said STFU.

If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word
****.

Get it?

Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and
yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for your
safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could
be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So
yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.

Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. Or better yet,
consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.

nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.

IMHO? it sux to be you....

There you go. Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU
pushed him
over the edge.

Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here
snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken
away.

"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of arms
is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."

-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698

Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?

A real renaissance man you are.

Do I need to?

You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.

Doesn't make it right or even relevant.

No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.

I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. It doesn't make them
right or relevant.

Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.

230 years ago.

Anything changed since then? Yes, in the 1950's we decided to keep
standing armies to protect America.

We don't need no stinking militias anymore.

Standing armies are a reason to keep militias, an armed populace.

Oh, was that the genesis for the idea of militias?

Allow me to point out the folly. The standing army we were supposed
to be protecting against was the enemy's, not our own.

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:51:04 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 26, 8:32 pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36 pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 25, 4:22 pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:

On Apr 24, 7:47 pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:

On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,...
****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU?
Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. Just subsequent to asking
me
about my
cussing, he said STFU.

If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the
word
****.

Get it?

Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and
yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for
your
safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could
be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So
yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.

Just let me know when your little brain needs some
remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. Or better
yet,
consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.

nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.

IMHO? it sux to be you....

There you go. Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU
pushed him
over the edge.

Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here
snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote
that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken
away.

"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of
arms
is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."

-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698

Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?

A real renaissance man you are.

Do I need to?

You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.

Doesn't make it right or even relevant.

No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.

I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. It doesn't make them
right or relevant.

Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.

230 years ago.

Anything changed since then? Yes, in the 1950's we decided to keep
standing armies to protect America.

We don't need no stinking militias anymore.

Standing armies are a reason to keep militias, an armed populace.

Oh, was that the genesis for the idea of militias?

Allow me to point out the folly. The standing army we were supposed
to be protecting against was the enemy's, not our own.

The standing army was of a despotic ruler.

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:23:23 -0700, jps wrote:

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 26, 8:32*pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36*pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 25, 4:22*pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 24, 7:47*pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,... ****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU? *Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. *Just subsequent to asking me about my
cussing, he said STFU.

If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word ****.

Get it?

Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for your safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.

Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. *Or better yet, consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.

nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.

IMHO? it sux to be you....

There you go. *Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU pushed him
over the edge.

Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken away.

"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of arms is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."

-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698

Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?

A real renaissance man you are.

Do I need to?

You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.

Doesn't make it right or even relevant.

No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.

I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. *The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. *It doesn't make them
right or relevant.

Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.

230 years ago.

Anything changed since then?

Yeah..., you, Pelosi, and Reid came along. Reason enough to keep and
bear arms. Harry exhibits a lot of sense in this one area. He
maintains his proficiency in the use of firearms. He even publishes
photographs of his targets - or someone's targets!
--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm