Sheriff says concealed carry law is helping
 

On Apr 26, 8:30*pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:13 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36*pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 25, 4:22*pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 24, 7:47*pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,... ****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU? *Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. *Just subsequent to asking me about my
cussing, he said STFU.

If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word ****.

Get it?

Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for your safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.

Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. *Or better yet, consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.

nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.

IMHO? it sux to be you....

There you go. *Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU pushed him
over the edge.

Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken away.

"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of arms is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."

-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698

Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?

A real renaissance man you are.

Do I need to?

You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.

Doesn't make it right or even relevant.

What does the Bible have to do with gun control quotes?

Why is any quote by any yahoo relevant to the disease which guns
represent in this country?

The CDC likens gun violence to the most virulent of diseases. *But
they're just another socialist organization that *just happens to be
spearheading the effort to address the current swine flu epidemic.

jps

ok

Sheriff says concealed carry law is helping
 

On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:15:59 -0400, D K
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:41:05 -0400, D K
wrote:

wrote:
On Apr 23, 8:09 pm, D K wrote:
jps wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:35:33 -0400, D K
wrote:
jps wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:34:03 -0400, D K
wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:58:35 -0400, D K
wrote:
jps wrote:
Did you complete elementary, secondary and high school?
Yes, asshole. My education afforded me the opportunity to advance in
business to the point where I have my own. My income allows me to buy
whatever guns I want. I'm currently looking for a clean Colt AR-15.
Know of any for sale?
You could have a 3rd grade education and own a business, buy any gun
you wanted, even if mentally imbalanced as is apparently the case.
$6.5 million in sales last year, asshole. We're not stuffing envelopes.
Carry on...
Oooooo, that's so much! Sales don't equal profits.
What are you stuffing, sheep entrails?
No, bozo, I'm stuffing cash into my pockets.
At 4.9% EBITA (after payroll - including mine) it's not much, I guess.
If the economy was better we might be able to put $500K on the bottom
line (read about sub chapter S corps, dumbass) for a more respectable
profit.
I know all about subchapter s corps. They're excellent for passing
losses through to the shareholders of corporations that don't make
profits.
The other reason to have a subchapter S is to avoid paying corporate
tax rates. If that's your reason then you're an as unamerican of a
lout as I suspected who doesn't think paying taxes is patriotic.
Pseudo conservatives think the world should be handed to them.
You really don't get it. I don't pay corporate tax rates (and *double*
taxation) because I don't have a corporation. I have a LLC. I didn't
invent the LLC, or subchapter S, so go write your congressman and STFU.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
He doesn't really understand what a LLC is or a subchapter S.. Didn't
you see his post the other day. JPS just makes it up as he goes along,
and when he gets lazy he turns to Jon Stewart and Michael Moore. It is
a symptom of being intellectually lazy..
True.

The Freak is now a JD, CPA and smarter than Jon Stewart and Michael
Moore. Truth is he'd have a hard time matching wits with Deputy Dog.

Sub S and LLC's are used to manipulate for favorable tax rates and
limit liability.

Personal responsibility doesn't apply when it comes to business.

Conservatives think roads, schools and the power grid should be
supplied for free.

You have NO idea what you are talking about. Read up on it before you
embarrass yourself even more.

I have direct knowledge of whence I speak. Lower taxes, trickle down,
deficit spending, etc. None are truly conservative.

The deficit has historically been closer to or balanced during Dem
administrations. During Republican we all eat **** and go further in
debt.

Go look at the historical federal budget and tell me otherwise.

Sheriff says concealed carry law is helping
 

Sheriff says concealed carry law is helping
 

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:54:55 -0400, Johnson
wrote:

wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:06 pm, Johnson wrote:
jps wrote:
You stupid ****
****in' cocksuckers like you,
****in' tax cheat.
An angry little impotent man you are.

Small wonder you fear the gun.

Johnson

Amazing! Must make you feel like a real man when toting your phallic
symbol of a gun, huh? Any man with any lick of sense would "fear the
gun". They are lethal. Doesn't matter how big or bad you think you
are, you can be killed by a .22.

Hmmmmm. Weird reaction.

I don't fear guns. JPS does, and you also. I can imagine you all
trembling when in the presence of a gun toting policeman.

If any fear on my part it would be of the person wielding (not toting) a
gun.

And keep your licking to yourself. Gross.

Johnson.

I don't fear firearms. I fear the people who own them who either
don't know how to handle them properly, when they should be used,
proper storage and those that are mentally fragile or imbalanced.

Although maybe a mistake, I hold the police in esteem. Whenever I've
had occasion to work with or require their assistance, I find they're
usually very professional, efficient and willing to help.

I trust them with firearms, even the Republican ones.

Sheriff says concealed carry law is helping
 

On Apr 26, 8:32*pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36*pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 25, 4:22*pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 24, 7:47*pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,... ****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU? *Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. *Just subsequent to asking me about my
cussing, he said STFU.

If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word ****.

Get it?

Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for your safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.

Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. *Or better yet, consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.

nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.

IMHO? it sux to be you....

There you go. *Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU pushed him
over the edge.

Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken away.

"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of arms is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."

-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698

Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?

A real renaissance man you are.

Do I need to?

You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.

Doesn't make it right or even relevant.

No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.

I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. *The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. *It doesn't make them
right or relevant.

Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.

Sheriff says concealed carry law is helping
 

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 26, 8:32*pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36*pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 25, 4:22*pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 24, 7:47*pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,... ****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU? *Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. *Just subsequent to asking me about my
cussing, he said STFU.

If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word ****.

Get it?

Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for your safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.

Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. *Or better yet, consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.

nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.

IMHO? it sux to be you....

There you go. *Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU pushed him
over the edge.

Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken away.

"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of arms is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."

-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698

Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?

A real renaissance man you are.

Do I need to?

You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.

Doesn't make it right or even relevant.

No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.

I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. *The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. *It doesn't make them
right or relevant.

Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.

230 years ago.

Anything changed since then? Yes, in the 1950's we decided to keep
standing armies to protect America.

We don't need no stinking militias anymore.

Sheriff says concealed carry law is helping
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 26, 8:32 pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36 pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 25, 4:22 pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:

On Apr 24, 7:47 pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:

On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,...
****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU?
Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. Just subsequent to asking me
about my
cussing, he said STFU.

If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word
****.

Get it?

Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and
yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for your
safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could
be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So
yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.

Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. Or better yet,
consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.

nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.

IMHO? it sux to be you....

There you go. Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU
pushed him
over the edge.

Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here
snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken
away.

"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of arms
is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."

-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698

Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?

A real renaissance man you are.

Do I need to?

You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.

Doesn't make it right or even relevant.

No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.

I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. It doesn't make them
right or relevant.

Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.

230 years ago.

Anything changed since then? Yes, in the 1950's we decided to keep
standing armies to protect America.

We don't need no stinking militias anymore.

Standing armies are a reason to keep militias, an armed populace.

Sheriff says concealed carry law is helping
 

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:23:23 -0700, jps wrote:

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 26, 8:32*pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36*pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 25, 4:22*pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 24, 7:47*pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,... ****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU? *Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. *Just subsequent to asking me about my
cussing, he said STFU.

If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word ****.

Get it?

Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for your safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.

Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. *Or better yet, consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.

nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.

IMHO? it sux to be you....

There you go. *Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU pushed him
over the edge.

Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken away.

"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of arms is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."

-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698

Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?

A real renaissance man you are.

Do I need to?

You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.

Doesn't make it right or even relevant.

No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.

I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. *The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. *It doesn't make them
right or relevant.

Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.

230 years ago.

Anything changed since then?

Yeah..., you, Pelosi, and Reid came along. Reason enough to keep and
bear arms. Harry exhibits a lot of sense in this one area. He
maintains his proficiency in the use of firearms. He even publishes
photographs of his targets - or someone's targets!
--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

Sheriff says concealed carry law is helping
 

http://www.boat-ed.com/ wrote:
John H wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:23:23 -0700, jps wrote:

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 26, 8:32 pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36 pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Apr 25, 4:22 pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:
On Apr 24, 7:47 pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:
On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,...
****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU?
Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. Just subsequent to asking
me about my
cussing, he said STFU.
If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word
****.
Get it?
Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and
yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for
your safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could
be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So
yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.
Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. Or better
yet, consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.
nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.
IMHO? it sux to be you....
There you go. Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU
pushed him
over the edge.
Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here
snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken
away.
"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of
arms is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."
-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698
Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?
A real renaissance man you are.
Do I need to?
You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.
Doesn't make it right or even relevant.
No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.
I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. It doesn't make them
right or relevant.
Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.
230 years ago.

Anything changed since then?

Yeah..., you, Pelosi, and Reid came along. Reason enough to keep and
bear arms. Harry exhibits a lot of sense in this one area. He
maintains his proficiency in the use of firearms. He even publishes
photographs of his targets - or someone's targets!
--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

I have no problems if someone wants to own a firearm, as long as the
person is not a lunatic. Anyone who publishes photographs of his
targets, sounds like he should not own a firearm.


Being proud of your shooting abilities is not lunacy.

However, Krause is a lunatic.

Sheriff says concealed carry law is helping
 

CalifBill wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 26, 8:32 pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36 pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Apr 25, 4:22 pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:
On Apr 24, 7:47 pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:
On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,...
****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU?
Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. Just subsequent to asking me
about my
cussing, he said STFU.
If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word
****.
Get it?
Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and
yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for your
safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could
be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So
yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.
Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. Or better yet,
consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.
nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.
IMHO? it sux to be you....
There you go. Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU
pushed him
over the edge.
Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here
snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken
away.
"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of arms
is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."
-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698
Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?
A real renaissance man you are.
Do I need to?
You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.
Doesn't make it right or even relevant.
No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.
I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. It doesn't make them
right or relevant.
Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.
230 years ago.

Anything changed since then? Yes, in the 1950's we decided to keep
standing armies to protect America.

We don't need no stinking militias anymore.

Standing armies are a reason to keep militias, an armed populace.

JPS is a poster child for literacy, civics and US history.