Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
And it's coming our way...
Eisboch wrote:
"John H" wrote in message ... Obama could have stopped paying for Iraq in two weeks. Any future costs are his baby. -- You have to realize that those who like to claim a 2 trillion dollar cost for the war in Iraq are using creative accounting techniques so suit their agendas. So far it has cost about 640-650 billion. (not that that's exactly chump change). The 2 trillion is a "projected cost" of maintaining the military in combat operations through 2019, a date that both Bush and Obama rejected. If Obama exits Iraq in accordance with his new time table, it will be generally in agreement with the timetable that Bush established during the last four months of his administration. Some things don't change. Eisboch It's actually higher than $2 trillion when you factor in such things as service-related injuries and illnesses resulting from Bush's Folly. |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
And it's coming our way...
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 19:37:08 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . Obama could have stopped paying for Iraq in two weeks. Any future costs are his baby. -- You have to realize that those who like to claim a 2 trillion dollar cost for the war in Iraq are using creative accounting techniques so suit their agendas. So far it has cost about 640-650 billion. (not that that's exactly chump change). The 2 trillion is a "projected cost" of maintaining the military in combat operations through 2019, a date that both Bush and Obama rejected. What happens when you factor in the costs of medical care for returning vets, and keeping their families afloat? Tack on another Trillion, easily - not to mention the loss of a lot of thousands of productive lives, who will now be using resources rather than creating them. Maybe tack on 2 trillion. |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
And it's coming our way...
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 19:37:08 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . Obama could have stopped paying for Iraq in two weeks. Any future costs are his baby. -- You have to realize that those who like to claim a 2 trillion dollar cost for the war in Iraq are using creative accounting techniques so suit their agendas. So far it has cost about 640-650 billion. (not that that's exactly chump change). The 2 trillion is a "projected cost" of maintaining the military in combat operations through 2019, a date that both Bush and Obama rejected. If Obama exits Iraq in accordance with his new time table, it will be generally in agreement with the timetable that Bush established during the last four months of his administration. Some things don't change. Eisboch Which is why it's such a shame to see one with your intellect and understanding wasting his time with the likes of Krause. Krause isn't interested in another's honest opinion. When presented with a decent argument his response is name-calling or personal insults, both of which you've recieved. He will not engage in a head-to-head discussion, because his positions (anti-Bush, anti-corp, anti-everything) are untenable. Just as the liberals are deflecting the focus off the economy, by using Rush, Harry deflects *any* argument getting close to home with his hate-Bush or hate-corporation rhetoric. Some things don't change. -- John H "The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." Thomas Jefferson |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
And it's coming our way...
"Jim" wrote in message m... John H wrote: http://tinyurl.com/br3c3a -- John H "The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." Thomas Jefferson Don't remember you complaining about Bush giving Wall Street bags of money with no accountability. Which is probably worse than socialism. Or maybe is what socialism actually is. I call it corrupt-socialism. The rouse is socialism to make it look like it benefits the people, but lines the pockets of the corporate welfare greed lines. Sort of like taxation endentured slavery of the masses getting milked for the elite and aristocracy. |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
And it's coming our way...
Canuck57 wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message m... John H wrote: http://tinyurl.com/br3c3a -- John H "The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." Thomas Jefferson Don't remember you complaining about Bush giving Wall Street bags of money with no accountability. Which is probably worse than socialism. Or maybe is what socialism actually is. I call it corrupt-socialism. The rouse is socialism to make it look like it benefits the people, but lines the pockets of the corporate welfare greed lines. Sort of like taxation endentured slavery of the masses getting milked for the elite and aristocracy. But it's so much fun accusing Democrats of being Socialists. You have to be smart enough to know what some of the above words and concepts mean. Not as fun and easy as yelling "Socialist!" |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
And it's coming our way...
Jim wrote:
Canuck57 wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... John H wrote: http://tinyurl.com/br3c3a -- John H "The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." Thomas Jefferson Don't remember you complaining about Bush giving Wall Street bags of money with no accountability. Which is probably worse than socialism. Or maybe is what socialism actually is. I call it corrupt-socialism. The rouse is socialism to make it look like it benefits the people, but lines the pockets of the corporate welfare greed lines. Sort of like taxation endentured slavery of the masses getting milked for the elite and aristocracy. But it's so much fun accusing Democrats of being Socialists. You have to be smart enough to know what some of the above words and concepts mean. Not as fun and easy as yelling "Socialist!" Survey sez 97.4% of righties have no idea what socialism is. |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
And it's coming our way...
HK wrote:
Jim wrote: Canuck57 wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... John H wrote: http://tinyurl.com/br3c3a -- John H "The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." Thomas Jefferson Don't remember you complaining about Bush giving Wall Street bags of money with no accountability. Which is probably worse than socialism. Or maybe is what socialism actually is. I call it corrupt-socialism. The rouse is socialism to make it look like it benefits the people, but lines the pockets of the corporate welfare greed lines. Sort of like taxation endentured slavery of the masses getting milked for the elite and aristocracy. But it's so much fun accusing Democrats of being Socialists. You have to be smart enough to know what some of the above words and concepts mean. Not as fun and easy as yelling "Socialist!" Survey sez 97.4% of righties have no idea what socialism is. Educate us. What is your definition of socialism? |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
And it's coming our way...
On Mar 7, 1:52*pm, HK wrote:
Jim wrote: Canuck57 wrote: "Jim" wrote in message news:E6mdnR9XZt0CJS_UnZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@earthlink. com... John H wrote: http://tinyurl.com/br3c3a -- John H "The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." *Thomas Jefferson Don't remember you complaining about Bush giving Wall Street bags of money with no accountability. Which is probably worse than socialism. *Or maybe is what socialism actually is. I call it corrupt-socialism. *The rouse is socialism to make it look like it benefits the people, but lines the pockets of the corporate welfare greed lines. *Sort of like taxation endentured slavery of the masses getting milked for the elite and aristocracy. But it's so much fun accusing Democrats of being Socialists. *You have to be smart enough to know what some of the above words and concepts mean. Not as fun and easy as yelling "Socialist!" Survey sez 97.4% of righties have no idea what socialism is. What's the survey on lefties say, Harry? |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
And it's coming our way...
"HK" wrote in message m... Jim wrote: Canuck57 wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... John H wrote: http://tinyurl.com/br3c3a -- John H "The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." Thomas Jefferson Don't remember you complaining about Bush giving Wall Street bags of money with no accountability. Which is probably worse than socialism. Or maybe is what socialism actually is. I call it corrupt-socialism. The rouse is socialism to make it look like it benefits the people, but lines the pockets of the corporate welfare greed lines. Sort of like taxation endentured slavery of the masses getting milked for the elite and aristocracy. But it's so much fun accusing Democrats of being Socialists. You have to be smart enough to know what some of the above words and concepts mean. Not as fun and easy as yelling "Socialist!" Survey sez 97.4% of righties have no idea what socialism is. Neither do socialists. There is not one single successful true socialist society ever! Even meak attempts fail outright, usually for two important reasons. Corruption, you still have a aristocracy enslaving others by the guise of socialism and persuit of power over others. Second is economic, no one has figured out how to pay for it in a sustainable way. Even lefties are hypocrits here. |
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
And it's coming our way...
"Jim" wrote in message m... Canuck57 wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... John H wrote: http://tinyurl.com/br3c3a -- John H "The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." Thomas Jefferson Don't remember you complaining about Bush giving Wall Street bags of money with no accountability. Which is probably worse than socialism. Or maybe is what socialism actually is. I call it corrupt-socialism. The rouse is socialism to make it look like it benefits the people, but lines the pockets of the corporate welfare greed lines. Sort of like taxation endentured slavery of the masses getting milked for the elite and aristocracy. But it's so much fun accusing Democrats of being Socialists. You have to be smart enough to know what some of the above words and concepts mean. Not as fun and easy as yelling "Socialist!" Agreed, I used it liberally in a broad scope. But none the less socialism such as wealth-bailout distribution is a socialist concept. Take from those that have done things right to provide to those who did not is socialism. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
I'm coming out! | General | |||
Coming soon . . . | ASA | |||
Coming Very Soon!!! | ASA | |||
Coming Soon!!! | ASA | |||
Coming Soon!!! | ASA |