Canuck57 wrote:

I per say have no problems with unions, but they should be as easy to get
rid of as to get. They are like a flu you can't get rid of. And when times
are good, they want the profits in wages, when times are bad the sharehodler
have to eat it. A little too one sided. Lockout rules on out of contract
unions should be liberalised.

Those darn unions...but they have a lot to learn from wall street,
where, when profits are good, they keep them, and when there are losses,
the taxpayers make 'em good. So they can continue to pay multimillion
dollar bonuses.

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Canuck57 wrote:

I per say have no problems with unions, but they should be as easy to get
rid of as to get. They are like a flu you can't get rid of. And when
times are good, they want the profits in wages, when times are bad the
sharehodler have to eat it. A little too one sided. Lockout rules on
out of contract unions should be liberalised.

Those darn unions...but they have a lot to learn from wall street, where,
when profits are good, they keep them, and when there are losses, the
taxpayers make 'em good. So they can continue to pay multimillion dollar
bonuses.

Unions could start their own businesses. No kidding either.

Take GM/Chrysler and CAW/UAW. They could all take out a small $50,000 loan,
give it to these failing dogs to buy out all the debt and then run the
companies. No taxpayer rape and corruption spending needed. With the
claimed membership of CAW/UAW they wouldn't even need much more than $50K
per every CAW/UAW to pull it off.

There is a hint on why they will not, corruption spending is easier.