| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Political posts suck.
They sucked when you all were bitching about Harry doing it.
BUT, they still suck even when you on the right are doing it. If you all want to be like Harry, go ahead. Personally, I wouldn't want that weight on my shoulders. |
Political posts suck.
wrote in message ... They sucked when you all were bitching about Harry doing it. BUT, they still suck even when you on the right are doing it. If you all want to be like Harry, go ahead. Personally, I wouldn't want that weight on my shoulders. You are right. It's much more interesting reading about who you, slammer and others are going to beat up next. Eisboch |
Political posts suck.
On Feb 13, 8:31*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message ... They sucked when you all were bitching about Harry doing it. BUT, they still suck even when you on the right are doing it. If you all want to be like Harry, go ahead. Personally, I wouldn't want that weight on my shoulders. You are right. *It's much more interesting reading about who you, slammer and others are going to beat up next. Eisboch Well, carry on then. Do what you want, Richard. It sure is ironic though that those who did the most whining are now doing the most posting. |
Political posts suck.
wrote in message ... On Feb 13, 8:31 am, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... They sucked when you all were bitching about Harry doing it. BUT, they still suck even when you on the right are doing it. If you all want to be like Harry, go ahead. Personally, I wouldn't want that weight on my shoulders. You are right. It's much more interesting reading about who you, slammer and others are going to beat up next. Eisboch Well, carry on then. Do what you want, Richard. It sure is ironic though that those who did the most whining are now doing the most posting. -------------------------------------- Some of us are far more concerned about what is happening to this country in a time of crisis than reading a bunch of juvenile, chest pounding exchanges of threats. But, it's still a free country. Suit yourself. I'll do the same. Eisboch |
Political posts suck.
On Feb 13, 8:42*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Feb 13, 8:31 am, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message .... They sucked when you all were bitching about Harry doing it. BUT, they still suck even when you on the right are doing it. If you all want to be like Harry, go ahead. Personally, I wouldn't want that weight on my shoulders. You are right. It's much more interesting reading about who you, slammer and others are going to beat up next. Eisboch Well, carry on then. Do what you want, Richard. It sure is ironic though that those who did the most whining are now doing the most posting. -------------------------------------- Some of us are far more concerned about what is happening to this country in a time of crisis than reading a bunch of juvenile, chest pounding exchanges of threats. But, it's still a free country. * *Suit yourself. *I'll do the same.. Eisboch No, you're just concerned about the new president and that everything he does, before it even has a chance to work, gets negated. It seems as if, when Harry was pushing political post after politcal post down our collective throats that none of you on that side of the fence was concerned about what was happening to this country. |
Political posts suck.
On Feb 13, 9:04*am, wrote:
On Feb 13, 8:42*am, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message .... On Feb 13, 8:31 am, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message .... They sucked when you all were bitching about Harry doing it. BUT, they still suck even when you on the right are doing it. If you all want to be like Harry, go ahead. Personally, I wouldn't want that weight on my shoulders. You are right. It's much more interesting reading about who you, slammer and others are going to beat up next. Eisboch Well, carry on then. Do what you want, Richard. It sure is ironic though that those who did the most whining are now doing the most posting. -------------------------------------- Some of us are far more concerned about what is happening to this country in a time of crisis than reading a bunch of juvenile, chest pounding exchanges of threats. But, it's still a free country. * *Suit yourself. *I'll do the same. Eisboch No, you're just concerned about the new president and that everything he does, before it even has a chance to work, gets negated. It seems as if, when Harry was pushing political post after politcal post down our collective throats that none of you on that side of the fence was concerned about what was happening to this country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - If you read carefully you will see that we were concerened with what happened with our country. Several of us including me and Richard also noted problems with Bush and his crew, we tried to be truthful when we came to the table and were genuinly concerened with the country. The problem with Harry's posts is they were dishonest and he only cares about himself so he did **** a lot of people off. As bad as you think Bush was, he let the dems have a say, and most of them voted with him on most of his agenda as it was truly bipartisan, Obama's crew has locked the door and refuses to let the repubs or the American people be involved in the process, despite the vows of openness and co- operation. That is scarey and should be of concern to anybody paying attention.. |
Political posts suck.
Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message ... They sucked when you all were bitching about Harry doing it. BUT, they still suck even when you on the right are doing it. If you all want to be like Harry, go ahead. Personally, I wouldn't want that weight on my shoulders. You are right. It's much more interesting reading about who you, slammer and others are going to beat up next. Eisboch There's nothing that loogy posts that is worth reading. |
Political posts suck.
|
Political posts suck.
On Feb 13, 9:12*am, wrote:
On Feb 13, 9:04*am, wrote: On Feb 13, 8:42*am, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message .... On Feb 13, 8:31 am, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... They sucked when you all were bitching about Harry doing it. BUT, they still suck even when you on the right are doing it. If you all want to be like Harry, go ahead. Personally, I wouldn't want that weight on my shoulders. You are right. It's much more interesting reading about who you, slammer and others are going to beat up next. Eisboch Well, carry on then. Do what you want, Richard. It sure is ironic though that those who did the most whining are now doing the most posting. -------------------------------------- Some of us are far more concerned about what is happening to this country in a time of crisis than reading a bunch of juvenile, chest pounding exchanges of threats. But, it's still a free country. * *Suit yourself. *I'll do the same. Eisboch No, you're just concerned about the new president and that everything he does, before it even has a chance to work, gets negated. It seems as if, when Harry was pushing political post after politcal post down our collective throats that none of you on that side of the fence was concerned about what was happening to this country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - If you read carefully you will see that we were concerened with what happened with our country. Several of us including me and Richard also noted problems with Bush and his crew, we tried to be truthful when we came to the table and were genuinly concerened with the country. The problem with Harry's posts is they were dishonest and he only cares about himself so he did **** a lot of people off. As bad as you think Bush was, he let the dems have a say, and most of them voted with him on most of his agenda as it was truly bipartisan, Obama's crew has locked the door and refuses to let the repubs or the American people be involved in the process, despite the vows of openness and co- operation. That is scarey and should be of concern to anybody paying attention..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Okay, so to what end does the 100% negative posts here serve? |
Political posts suck.
On Feb 13, 9:26*am, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: wrote in message .... They sucked when you all were bitching about Harry doing it. BUT, they still suck even when you on the right are doing it. If you all want to be like Harry, go ahead. Personally, I wouldn't want that weight on my shoulders. You are right. *It's much more interesting reading about who you, slammer and others are going to beat up next. Eisboch There's nothing that loogy posts that is worth reading. True, everyone is sick of your constant lies that I like to point out. |
Political posts suck.
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:31:20 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote: wrote in message ... They sucked when you all were bitching about Harry doing it. BUT, they still suck even when you on the right are doing it. If you all want to be like Harry, go ahead. Personally, I wouldn't want that weight on my shoulders. You are right. It's much more interesting reading about who you, slammer and others are going to beat up next. No comment. Except this public service boating safety link. http://www.boattest.com/Resources/vi...px?NewsID=3146 --Vic |
Political posts suck.
On Feb 13, 8:12*am, wrote:
They sucked when you all were bitching about Harry doing it. BUT, they still suck even when you on the right are doing it. If you all want to be like Harry, go ahead. Personally, I wouldn't want that weight on my shoulders. LIAR !!!! |
Political posts suck.
Vic Smith wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:31:20 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... They sucked when you all were bitching about Harry doing it. BUT, they still suck even when you on the right are doing it. If you all want to be like Harry, go ahead. Personally, I wouldn't want that weight on my shoulders. You are right. It's much more interesting reading about who you, slammer and others are going to beat up next. No comment. Except this public service boating safety link. http://www.boattest.com/Resources/vi...px?NewsID=3146 --Vic What could be funnier in rec.boats than the turd known as loogy complaining about a general category of posts? |
Political posts suck.
On Feb 13, 9:04*am, wrote:
On Feb 13, 8:42*am, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message .... On Feb 13, 8:31 am, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message .... They sucked when you all were bitching about Harry doing it. BUT, they still suck even when you on the right are doing it. If you all want to be like Harry, go ahead. Personally, I wouldn't want that weight on my shoulders. You are right. It's much more interesting reading about who you, slammer and others are going to beat up next. Eisboch Well, carry on then. Do what you want, Richard. It sure is ironic though that those who did the most whining are now doing the most posting. -------------------------------------- Some of us are far more concerned about what is happening to this country in a time of crisis than reading a bunch of juvenile, chest pounding exchanges of threats. But, it's still a free country. * *Suit yourself. *I'll do the same. Eisboch No, you're just concerned about the new president and that everything he does, before it even has a chance to work, gets negated. It seems as if, when Harry was pushing political post after politcal post down our collective throats that none of you on that side of the fence was concerned about what was happening to this country. LIAR !!!! |
Political posts suck.
"Vic Smith" wrote in message ... On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:31:20 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... They sucked when you all were bitching about Harry doing it. BUT, they still suck even when you on the right are doing it. If you all want to be like Harry, go ahead. Personally, I wouldn't want that weight on my shoulders. You are right. It's much more interesting reading about who you, slammer and others are going to beat up next. No comment. Except this public service boating safety link. http://www.boattest.com/Resources/vi...px?NewsID=3146 --Vic These guys trying to take that boat out in those conditions makes about as much sense as New Yawk city folk going alligator wrestling or grizzly bear hunting on their own. I'm originally from AZ (saw the ocean 32 years ago and couldn't live anywhere else since) and understand thier not grasping what they were getting into. Thanks for the boating related post Vic. |
Political posts suck.
wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:34:28 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Feb 13, 8:31 am, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... They sucked when you all were bitching about Harry doing it. BUT, they still suck even when you on the right are doing it. If you all want to be like Harry, go ahead. Personally, I wouldn't want that weight on my shoulders. You are right. It's much more interesting reading about who you, slammer and others are going to beat up next. Eisboch Well, carry on then. Do what you want, Richard. It sure is ironic though that those who did the most whining are now doing the most posting. LIAR! The biggest whiners in rec.boats are Loogy, JustHate and Herring. |
Political posts suck.
On Feb 13, 9:28*am, HK wrote:
wrote: If you read carefully you will see that we were concerened with what happened with our country. Several of us including me and Richard also noted problems with Bush and his crew, we tried to be truthful when we came to the table and were genuinly concerened with the country. The problem with Harry's posts is they were dishonest and he only cares about himself so he did **** a lot of people off. As bad as you think Bush was, he let the dems have a say, and most of them voted with him on most of his agenda as it was truly bipartisan, Obama's crew has locked the door and refuses to let the repubs or the American people be involved in the process, despite the vows of openness and co- operation. That is scarey and should be of concern to anybody paying attention.. More delusional crap from justhate. Ok, what's delusional? Obama said "no Lobbyists in his cabinet", he lied, he said most ethical cabinet ever, he lied, he said 48 hours to look over bills, he lied, he said he would work across the isle, he lied, he said most open administration ever, he lied, he said no earmarks or pork in stimulous, he really lied... Please cite which one of these is not true??? |
Political posts suck.
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:05:41 -0500, "mmc" wrote:
These guys trying to take that boat out in those conditions makes about as much sense as New Yawk city folk going alligator wrestling or grizzly bear hunting on their own. I'm originally from AZ (saw the ocean 32 years ago and couldn't live anywhere else since) and understand thier not grasping what they were getting into. Thanks for the boating related post Vic. There's actually a prop thread going on. Here's where I go when I want to see some fishing action on the internets. http://www.carolinaskiffowner.com/fo...aysprune=&f=42 This is the "Florida fishing" section, my favorite. Lots of pics too. Carolina Skiff owners do more fishing than any other 10 boat brands combined. But that's just a guess. --Vic |
Political posts suck.
|
Political posts suck.
On Feb 13, 11:47*am, HK wrote:
wrote: On Feb 13, 9:28 am, HK wrote: wrote: If you read carefully you will see that we were concerened with what happened with our country. Several of us including me and Richard also noted problems with Bush and his crew, we tried to be truthful when we came to the table and were genuinly concerened with the country. The problem with Harry's posts is they were dishonest and he only cares about himself so he did **** a lot of people off. As bad as you think Bush was, he let the dems have a say, and most of them voted with him on most of his agenda as it was truly bipartisan, Obama's crew has locked the door and refuses to let the repubs or the American people be involved in the process, despite the vows of openness and co- operation. That is scarey and should be of concern to anybody paying attention.. More delusional crap from justhate. Ok, what's delusional? For starters, your beliefs, as stated above, about Bush. Gee, I notice you snipped the meat of the post, don't have an answer as I suspected. Let's try again... Ok, what's delusional? Obama said "no Lobbyists in his cabinet", he lied, he said most ethical cabinet ever, he lied, he said 48 hours to look over bills, he lied, he said he would work across the isle, he lied, he said most open administration ever, he lied, he said no earmarks or pork in stimulous, he really lied... Please cite which one of these is not true??? See if your 7th grade education will allow you to address the questions above.. If you have to deflect again we can just stipulate they are true from here on in, of course that would make things easier anyway. |
Political posts suck.
|
Political posts suck.
On Feb 13, 12:02*pm, HK wrote:
wrote: On Feb 13, 11:47 am, HK wrote: wrote: On Feb 13, 9:28 am, HK wrote: wrote: If you read carefully you will see that we were concerened with what happened with our country. Several of us including me and Richard also noted problems with Bush and his crew, we tried to be truthful when we came to the table and were genuinly concerened with the country. The problem with Harry's posts is they were dishonest and he only cares about himself so he did **** a lot of people off. As bad as you think Bush was, he let the dems have a say, and most of them voted with him on most of his agenda as it was truly bipartisan, Obama's crew has locked the door and refuses to let the repubs or the American people be involved in the process, despite the vows of openness and co- operation. That is scarey and should be of concern to anybody paying attention.. More delusional crap from justhate. Ok, what's delusional? For starters, your beliefs, as stated above, about Bush. Gee, I notice you snipped the meat of the post, don't have an answer as I suspected. Let's try again... Ok, what's delusional? As I stated, for starters, your beliefs about Bush. Since you are delusional about Bush, there is no reason to take seriously any of your other "political" posts. Or are you asking what delusional *is*? Your beliefs about Bush indicate you have a rigid system of beliefs that are logically absurd and lacking in supporting evidence. There's nothing to be gained by engaging you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ok, so it's agreed there is no problem with the following observation: Obama said "no Lobbyists in his cabinet", he lied, he said most ethical cabinet ever, he lied, he said 48 hours to look over bills, he lied, he said he would work across the isle, he lied, he said most open administration ever, he lied, he said no earmarks or pork in stimulus, he really lied... Thank you for the clarification |
Political posts suck.
|
Political posts suck.
"Vic Smith" wrote in message ... I see myself as the old guy with the wine. --Vic Speaking of old guys .... I just came home to a surprise. Mrs.E. somehow got me a bottle of Samuel Adams Utopia for Valentine's day. Apparently it took quite a while to get. Only 12000 bottles were produced. I have bottle number 3061. Feel kinda cheap because I had just come back from CVS picking up a card and a stupid red Teddy Bear holding a lollipop or something for her. Now, to plan the special occasion to try the beer. You drink it as if it is cognac, according to the directions. I don't want to open it until there are enough people here to enjoy it. Eisboch |
Political posts suck.
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:13:05 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Feb 13, 9:12*am, wrote: On Feb 13, 9:04*am, wrote: On Feb 13, 8:42*am, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... On Feb 13, 8:31 am, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... They sucked when you all were bitching about Harry doing it. BUT, they still suck even when you on the right are doing it. If you all want to be like Harry, go ahead. Personally, I wouldn't want that weight on my shoulders. You are right. It's much more interesting reading about who you, slammer and others are going to beat up next. Eisboch Well, carry on then. Do what you want, Richard. It sure is ironic though that those who did the most whining are now doing the most posting. -------------------------------------- Some of us are far more concerned about what is happening to this country in a time of crisis than reading a bunch of juvenile, chest pounding exchanges of threats. But, it's still a free country. * *Suit yourself. *I'll do the same. Eisboch No, you're just concerned about the new president and that everything he does, before it even has a chance to work, gets negated. It seems as if, when Harry was pushing political post after politcal post down our collective throats that none of you on that side of the fence was concerned about what was happening to this country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - If you read carefully you will see that we were concerened with what happened with our country. Several of us including me and Richard also noted problems with Bush and his crew, we tried to be truthful when we came to the table and were genuinly concerened with the country. The problem with Harry's posts is they were dishonest and he only cares about himself so he did **** a lot of people off. As bad as you think Bush was, he let the dems have a say, and most of them voted with him on most of his agenda as it was truly bipartisan, Obama's crew has locked the door and refuses to let the repubs or the American people be involved in the process, despite the vows of openness and co- operation. That is scarey and should be of concern to anybody paying attention..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Okay, so to what end does the 100% negative posts here serve? Loogy, I think your position is understandable. You are a Democrat, you voted for BO, and you see the things he is doing now to dick up the country. You see a bill with $2billion for ACORN, to buy votes, a few million for Pelosi's mice, a lot of money to illegal aliens because the 'E-Verify' provisions were taken out http://tinyurl.com/cq3pes , the lie about the Caterpillar CEO, the failure of so many ranking Democrats to pay taxes, and you are most likely very friggin' embarrassed. I don't blame you. But, you have to admit that the political posting (except Harry's, which is just name-calling) is a lot more 'adult' than the juvenile 'I'm going to beat you up with my karate hands' bull**** that several of you persist in displaying. Wouldn't you agree? |
Political posts suck.
On Feb 13, 12:37*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Vic Smith" wrote in message ... I see myself as the old guy with the wine. --Vic Speaking of old guys .... I just came home to a surprise. Mrs.E. somehow got me a bottle of Samuel Adams Utopia for Valentine's day.. Apparently it took quite a while to get. Only 12000 bottles were produced. *I have bottle number 3061. Feel kinda cheap because I had just come back from CVS picking up a card and a stupid red Teddy Bear holding a lollipop or something for her. Now, to plan the special occasion to try the beer. *You drink it as if it is cognac, according to the directions. *I don't want to open it until there are enough people here to enjoy it. Eisboch Yeah, I got one for my daughter and son in law last year for Christmas,, Don't know if they ever opened it yet or not. Really nice bottle last year, it looked like a brewer kettle with a little sliding door on the side. Let us know how it is, I never tried it. I may join the brew club again after I get off the med I am on, which won't let me drink... |
Political posts suck.
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:37:19 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote: "Vic Smith" wrote in message .. . I see myself as the old guy with the wine. --Vic Speaking of old guys .... I just came home to a surprise. Mrs.E. somehow got me a bottle of Samuel Adams Utopia for Valentine's day. Apparently it took quite a while to get. Only 12000 bottles were produced. I have bottle number 3061. Feel kinda cheap because I had just come back from CVS picking up a card and a stupid red Teddy Bear holding a lollipop or something for her. Now, to plan the special occasion to try the beer. You drink it as if it is cognac, according to the directions. I don't want to open it until there are enough people here to enjoy it. Eisboch So what? I'm going to take my wife to Costco for hot dogs. Beat that! |
Political posts suck.
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:37:19 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote: Feel kinda cheap because I had just come back from CVS picking up a card and a stupid red Teddy Bear holding a lollipop or something for her. I talked mine out of some ring she was hinting at, but it wasn't worth it, as she got in a little snit about it. I quickly gave in, but I think she likes the snit more than the ring. She refuses to tell me which ring it was. So I picked up a pound of Fannie Mae chocolate orange peels for her, the only candy she really likes. 22 bucks a pound. Still cheaper than the ring by far. We'll see if it mollifies her. She'll bring up the ring again soon enough. Too many damn "holidays" the merchants have hyped up. Geez, I thought Valentines Day was for kids in school learning to write names and young guys adding to their chance of getting some nookie. Now, to plan the special occasion to try the beer. You drink it as if it is cognac, according to the directions. I don't want to open it until there are enough people here to enjoy it. I like any ritual that involves good beer. Well, so far anyway. Cheers! for when you quaff it. --Vic |
Political posts suck.
On Feb 13, 1:15*pm, John H wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:37:19 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "Vic Smith" wrote in message .. . I see myself as the old guy with the wine. --Vic Speaking of old guys .... I just came home to a surprise. Mrs.E. somehow got me a bottle of Samuel Adams Utopia for Valentine's day. Apparently it took quite a while to get. Only 12000 bottles were produced. *I have bottle number 3061. Feel kinda cheap because I had just come back from CVS picking up a card and a stupid red Teddy Bear holding a lollipop or something for her. Now, to plan the special occasion to try the beer. *You drink it as if it is cognac, according to the directions. *I don't want to open it until there are enough people here to enjoy it. Eisboch So what? I'm going to take my wife to Costco for hot dogs. Beat that!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I get a double hit, my wife's birthday is Monday and I don't think the whole "this is for both" would work with her;) Actually, all she wants is a good Pizza so we are taking a ride to her favorite shop, about 60 miles from here,,, |
Political posts suck.
"John H" wrote in message ... So what? I'm going to take my wife to Costco for hot dogs. Beat that! That poor long suffering woman......... |
Political posts suck.
Don White wrote:
"John H" wrote in message ... So what? I'm going to take my wife to Costco for hot dogs. Beat that! That poor long suffering woman......... She probably prepays his golf fees so she can get him out of the house. |
Political posts suck.
On Feb 13, 1:15*pm, John H wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:37:19 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "Vic Smith" wrote in message .. . I see myself as the old guy with the wine. --Vic Speaking of old guys .... I just came home to a surprise. Mrs.E. somehow got me a bottle of Samuel Adams Utopia for Valentine's day. Apparently it took quite a while to get. Only 12000 bottles were produced. *I have bottle number 3061. Feel kinda cheap because I had just come back from CVS picking up a card and a stupid red Teddy Bear holding a lollipop or something for her. Now, to plan the special occasion to try the beer. *You drink it as if it is cognac, according to the directions. *I don't want to open it until there are enough people here to enjoy it. Eisboch So what? I'm going to take my wife to Costco for hot dogs. Beat that!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - John, you're just a hopeless romantic, aren't you?! |
Political posts suck.
On Feb 13, 1:11*pm, John H wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:13:05 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Feb 13, 9:12*am, wrote: On Feb 13, 9:04*am, wrote: On Feb 13, 8:42*am, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... On Feb 13, 8:31 am, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... They sucked when you all were bitching about Harry doing it. BUT, they still suck even when you on the right are doing it. If you all want to be like Harry, go ahead. Personally, I wouldn't want that weight on my shoulders. You are right. It's much more interesting reading about who you, slammer and others are going to beat up next. Eisboch Well, carry on then. Do what you want, Richard. It sure is ironic though that those who did the most whining are now doing the most posting. -------------------------------------- Some of us are far more concerned about what is happening to this country in a time of crisis than reading a bunch of juvenile, chest pounding exchanges of threats. But, it's still a free country. * *Suit yourself. *I'll do the same. Eisboch No, you're just concerned about the new president and that everything he does, before it even has a chance to work, gets negated. It seems as if, when Harry was pushing political post after politcal post down our collective throats that none of you on that side of the fence was concerned about what was happening to this country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - If you read carefully you will see that we were concerened with what happened with our country. Several of us including me and Richard also noted problems with Bush and his crew, we tried to be truthful when we came to the table and were genuinly concerened with the country. The problem with Harry's posts is they were dishonest and he only cares about himself so he did **** a lot of people off. As bad as you think Bush was, he let the dems have a say, and most of them voted with him on most of his agenda as it was truly bipartisan, Obama's crew has locked the door and refuses to let the repubs or the American people be involved in the process, despite the vows of openness and co- operation. That is scarey and should be of concern to anybody paying attention..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Okay, so to what end does the 100% negative posts here serve? Loogy, I think your position is understandable. You are a Democrat, you voted for BO, and you see the things he is doing now to dick up the country. You see a bill with $2billion for ACORN, to buy votes, a few million for Pelosi's mice, a lot of money to illegal aliens because the 'E-Verify' provisions were taken out http://tinyurl.com/cq3pes, the lie about the Caterpillar CEO, the failure of so many ranking Democrats to pay taxes, and you are most likely very friggin' embarrassed. I don't blame you. But, you have to admit that the political posting (except Harry's, which is just name-calling) is a lot more 'adult' than the juvenile 'I'm going to beat you up with my karate hands' bull**** that several of you persist in displaying. Wouldn't you agree?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No. And how do you purport to know who I voted for? |
Political posts suck.
On Feb 13, 12:37*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Vic Smith" wrote in message ... I see myself as the old guy with the wine. --Vic Speaking of old guys .... I just came home to a surprise. Mrs.E. somehow got me a bottle of Samuel Adams Utopia for Valentine's day.. Apparently it took quite a while to get. Only 12000 bottles were produced. *I have bottle number 3061. Feel kinda cheap because I had just come back from CVS picking up a card and a stupid red Teddy Bear holding a lollipop or something for her. Now, to plan the special occasion to try the beer. *You drink it as if it is cognac, according to the directions. *I don't want to open it until there are enough people here to enjoy it. Eisboch Man, that's a big beer, meaning, it's high gravity, meaning it's HIGH alcohol by volume! Here's a write-up in Beer Advocate: http://beeradvocate.com/news/1039677 |
Political posts suck.
wrote in message ... On Feb 13, 12:37 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "Vic Smith" wrote in message ... I see myself as the old guy with the wine. --Vic Speaking of old guys .... I just came home to a surprise. Mrs.E. somehow got me a bottle of Samuel Adams Utopia for Valentine's day. Apparently it took quite a while to get. Only 12000 bottles were produced. I have bottle number 3061. Feel kinda cheap because I had just come back from CVS picking up a card and a stupid red Teddy Bear holding a lollipop or something for her. Now, to plan the special occasion to try the beer. You drink it as if it is cognac, according to the directions. I don't want to open it until there are enough people here to enjoy it. Eisboch Man, that's a big beer, meaning, it's high gravity, meaning it's HIGH alcohol by volume! Here's a write-up in Beer Advocate: http://beeradvocate.com/news/1039677 Those that have tried it say it is a unique experience. We'll see. The bottle I have is from the 2007 batch. They are planning to have another release this year (2009). Here's a pic Mrs.E. took today when she picked it up. The guy on the left is the local Sam Adams distributor's representative. The guy on the right is the owner of the little "ma and pa" shop store who she bought it from. It was a big deal for him. http://www.eisboch.com/Utopia.jpg Eisboch Those that have tried it say it is a unique experience. We'll see. |
Political posts suck.
On Feb 13, 3:01*pm, wrote:
On Feb 13, 12:37*pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "Vic Smith" wrote in message .. . I see myself as the old guy with the wine. --Vic Speaking of old guys .... I just came home to a surprise. Mrs.E. somehow got me a bottle of Samuel Adams Utopia for Valentine's day. Apparently it took quite a while to get. Only 12000 bottles were produced. *I have bottle number 3061. Feel kinda cheap because I had just come back from CVS picking up a card and a stupid red Teddy Bear holding a lollipop or something for her. Now, to plan the special occasion to try the beer. *You drink it as if it is cognac, according to the directions. *I don't want to open it until there are enough people here to enjoy it. Eisboch Man, that's a big beer, meaning, it's high gravity, meaning it's HIGH alcohol by volume! Here's a write-up in Beer Advocate: http://beeradvocate.com/news/1039677- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey Loogie, you know you sound just like Tim, with a little more southern fried in the dialect? ;) |
Political posts suck.
Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message ... On Feb 13, 12:37 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "Vic Smith" wrote in message ... I see myself as the old guy with the wine. --Vic Speaking of old guys .... I just came home to a surprise. Mrs.E. somehow got me a bottle of Samuel Adams Utopia for Valentine's day. Apparently it took quite a while to get. Only 12000 bottles were produced. I have bottle number 3061. Feel kinda cheap because I had just come back from CVS picking up a card and a stupid red Teddy Bear holding a lollipop or something for her. Now, to plan the special occasion to try the beer. You drink it as if it is cognac, according to the directions. I don't want to open it until there are enough people here to enjoy it. Eisboch Man, that's a big beer, meaning, it's high gravity, meaning it's HIGH alcohol by volume! Here's a write-up in Beer Advocate: http://beeradvocate.com/news/1039677 Those that have tried it say it is a unique experience. We'll see. The bottle I have is from the 2007 batch. They are planning to have another release this year (2009). Here's a pic Mrs.E. took today when she picked it up. The guy on the left is the local Sam Adams distributor's representative. The guy on the right is the owner of the little "ma and pa" shop store who she bought it from. It was a big deal for him. http://www.eisboch.com/Utopia.jpg Eisboch Those that have tried it say it is a unique experience. We'll see. If you want a nice, not expensive, wine to share with Mrs. E...try: http://www.rexgoliath.com/rexgoliath...=1007&cat_id=1 My wife discovered this at dinner during one of her business trips, and bought a bottle for us upon her return. I'm about as far removed from a wine expert as one can be, but I have to agree...the Rex Goliath merlot is mighty fine wine. Nice label on the bottle, too. |
Political posts suck.
"HK" wrote in message m... If you want a nice, not expensive, wine to share with Mrs. E...try: http://www.rexgoliath.com/rexgoliath...=1007&cat_id=1 My wife discovered this at dinner during one of her business trips, and bought a bottle for us upon her return. I'm about as far removed from a wine expert as one can be, but I have to agree...the Rex Goliath merlot is mighty fine wine. Nice label on the bottle, too. I'll look for it. Mrs.E. rarely drinks but when she does, she likes good wine. Must be the Italian in her. Me? I am just not that sophisticated to appreciate fine wines. I am a beer guy, always was, always will be. Just can't do it like I used to unfortunately. Eisboch |
Political posts suck.
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message m... If you want a nice, not expensive, wine to share with Mrs. E...try: http://www.rexgoliath.com/rexgoliath...=1007&cat_id=1 My wife discovered this at dinner during one of her business trips, and bought a bottle for us upon her return. I'm about as far removed from a wine expert as one can be, but I have to agree...the Rex Goliath merlot is mighty fine wine. Nice label on the bottle, too. I'll look for it. Mrs.E. rarely drinks but when she does, she likes good wine. Must be the Italian in her. Me? I am just not that sophisticated to appreciate fine wines. I am a beer guy, always was, always will be. Just can't do it like I used to unfortunately. Eisboch I only drink beer on really hot summer days, and then not much of it. I do prefer Mexican beers, though. Dunno why. I drink less wine than I do beer. But I liked the Rex Goliath merlot. It's only about $7 a bottle at a wine store. My father in law loves a beer now and then, and he collects beer bottles from the countries where he's enjoyed a national or local brew. Last time I was at his house, he had about 100 empty beer bottles from different countries. My favorite alcoholic bev is a well-made margarita. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:36 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com