Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:26:26 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"Wizard of Woodstock" wrote in message
.. .

On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:32:15 -0500, HK wrote:

Bush is an idiot. Worst president ever.

Your boy bush was the ultimate disaster, and it is going to take a
series of miracles for Obama or anyone else to haul this country's ashes
out of the fire.

Well for starters, Bush wasn't "my boy". He was my President just as
he was your President. I also view Obama as my President although I
don't particularly think he was the best choice - Hillary would have
made a better choice in my view even though I wouldn't have voted for
her if you paid me to.

And what are you concerned with? Obama's failure to be perfect in every
way, as he attempts to shovel through the mountains of Bushschitt.

I'm supposed to take your carping seriously?

You established the rules with your constant bull****, name calling,
Bush Derangement Syndrome and obvious poking of the ferret for the
past five years. Beating the drum as it were with the constant
posturing of the neo-liberal outrage about everything and anything
Bush.

Well, what goes around comes around. You made the rules - I'm just
playing by them.

And, if your constant non-sequitars, ad hominem snark and vacuous
repartee are any indication, we're getting under your skin in a big
way.

Can't take it huh Harry? Raising your blood pressure - maybe enough
to make your eyeballs bug out? Are your ears turining red - fingers
trembling in a frenzy of rage as you type out schitts, righties,
'wingers and other pet names for people you disagree with?

When, and if, you reply, do include some comment about my preferred
brand of outboard, my political orientation, add in a few schitts here
and there and make some vague and completely off subject reference to
Republican sex scandals.

Oh and please, by all means feel free to insult my efforts in the area
of photography - I really take your criticism to heart.

Well ok - you caught me on that last one - that wasn't true at all. I
would take it to heart if you knew what you were talking about. Which
you don't so I guess that's out.

Sorry - my bad.

Thanks. That was refreshing. True and funny.

I live to serve. :)

It's like watching a bad movie over and over and over and over and over
looking for some redeeming value.

Got that right.

--

"An idealist is one who, on noticing that
a rose smells better than a cabbage, concludes
that it will also make better soup."

H.L. Mencken

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

Wizard of Woodstock wrote:

On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:32:15 -0500, HK wrote:
Bush is an idiot. Worst president ever.
Your boy bush was the ultimate disaster, and it is going to take a
series of miracles for Obama or anyone else to haul this country's ashes
out of the fire.

Well for starters, Bush wasn't "my boy". He was my President just as
he was your President. I also view Obama as my President although I
don't particularly think he was the best choice - Hillary would have
made a better choice in my view even though I wouldn't have voted for
her if you paid me to.

And what are you concerned with? Obama's failure to be perfect in every
way, as he attempts to shovel through the mountains of Bushschitt.

I'm supposed to take your carping seriously?
You established the rules with your constant bull****, name calling,
Bush Derangement Syndrome and obvious poking of the ferret for the
past five years. Beating the drum as it were with the constant
posturing of the neo-liberal outrage about everything and anything
Bush.


This is hilarious. I don't give a damn what you think about Obama. He'll
do well in spite of the horrific problems your boy Bush and your party
left behind.



Can't take it huh Harry? Raising your blood pressure - maybe enough
to make your eyeballs bug out? Are your ears turining red - fingers
trembling in a frenzy of rage as you type out schitts, righties,
'wingers and other pet names for people you disagree with?


Please, Tom. I still play with the big boys downtown. This is just a
diversion for me.





When, and if, you reply, do include some comment about my preferred
brand of outboard, my political orientation, add in a few schitts here
and there and make some vague and completely off subject reference to
Republican sex scandals.


Someone has to buy those etecs. Glad it isn't me.



Oh and please, by all means feel free to insult my efforts in the area
of photography - I really take your criticism to heart.


I think you try too hard. I prefer Eisboch's photos.

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
HK wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Feb 5, 11:32 am, HK wrote:
HK wrote:
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:31:26 -0500, HK
wrote:
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:34:36 -0500, HK
wrote:
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 06:11:03 -0600, thunder

wrote:
Personally, I don't understand the resistance to Obama's 16
month
withdrawal. The Status of Forces agreement has us out of the
cities by June, and out of Iraq in 36 months. Al-Maliki states
an earlier withdrawal if OK by him. The Sunnis seemed concerned
by our leaving, but there seems to be an effort to address their
issues. I mean, Iraq is looking relatively stable, though
fragile, and we can use the manpower in Afghanistan, where
things
look to be going downhill.
Afghanistan will be President Obama's Vietnam.
Gad, i love these pronouncements from Mt. Olympus. You're
beginning
to sound like BAR. I thought you were a lot brighter.
Consider that in your memory, one of the mightiest militaries in
the
world, couldn't keep Afghanistan under it's control
We're all aware of Afghanistan's history. Too bad Bush shot and
wasted our wad in Iraq, eh? Well, stupid is as stupid does.
Ah yes - the famous Harry Krause logic - just call everybody stupid.
--
Happy Holidays and Merry Whatever It Is That ****es Liberals Off.
Well, if the foo schitts...
Bush is an idiot. Worst president ever.
Your boy bush was the ultimate disaster, and it is going to take a
series of miracles for Obama or anyone else to haul this country's
ashes
out of the fire.

And what are you concerned with? Obama's failure to be perfect in every
way, as he attempts to shovel through the mountains of Bushschitt.

I'm supposed to take your carping seriously?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"going to take a series of miracles?"

Obama.

The Messiah.


That's right. Bush ****ed up so badly in so many areas, it is going to
take miracles of biblical proportions to save this country.

It is funny to watch Harry tap after just a few weeks.
Hank the Hack. Living in the past and beating a dead horse. Ask him if
he's read the 900 page bailout proposal?

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 07:54:01 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

I heard yesterday that Russia has offered us help in Afghanistan.

Amazing the difference a few years makes.

Maybe they are having problems with the poppy. I believe most heroin
comes from there.

Casady

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

"HK" wrote in message
...


Please, Tom. I still play with the big boys downtown. This is just a
diversion for me.



The "big" boys?

Eisboch

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

On Feb 5, 5:43*am, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
om...
Tim wrote:
On Feb 4, 10:45 am, wrote:
On Feb 4, 11:19 am, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:

On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:48:11 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
US-IRAQ:
Generals Seek to Reverse Obama Withdrawal Decision
Gareth Porter*
Shades of Lyndon Johnson. *He didn't want to listen to his military
commanders either.
"I will not seek, nor will I accept my party's nomination ...."
Heh...
The more I see of Obama, the more I see a "community organizer" than
an executive.
Well, we'll see - time will tell.
--
"I am free of all prejudices. I hate every one equally."
W.C. Fields
Remember, the "community organizing" consisted of training voter
cheats for ACORN... When dems say "community organizer" they are
thinking more Al Capone than Martin L King... He has surrounded
himself with criminals, what do you expect?

When I think *of community organizers i automatically think of:

http://fbuch.com/images/korda_che.jpg

Or these guys:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...b4/Che-mao.jpg

You need to broaden your thinking. You don't seem to understand the
concept of organizing.

The operative word isn't "organizing". * It's "community".

Eisboch

You have a problem with "community"? When there is a blood drive in your
area, do you think it is something other than "the community" that is
targeted?

Not necessarily. In this case "organizer" will do.

http://cmsimg.detnews.com/apps/pbcsi...4180370&Ref=H3

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 19:28:52 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
...


Please, Tom. I still play with the big boys downtown. This is just a
diversion for me.

The "big" boys?

You gotta love the "diversion" bit.

On average, he posts one every fifteen minutes (that's over a month's
time too).

Diversion my ass.

--

"Far better it is to dare mighty things,
to win glorious triumphs even though
checkered by failure, than to rank with
those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor
suffer much because they live in the gray
twilight that knows neither victory nor
defeat."

Theodore Roosevelt

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

On Feb 5, 6:43*pm, HK wrote:
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:32:15 -0500, HK wrote:
Bush is an idiot. Worst president ever.
Your boy bush was the ultimate disaster, and it is going to take a
series of miracles for Obama or anyone else to haul this country's ashes
out of the fire.
Well for starters, Bush wasn't "my boy". *He was my President just as
he was your President. I also view Obama as my President although I
don't particularly think he was the best choice - Hillary would have
made a better choice in my view even though I wouldn't have voted for
her if you paid me to.

And what are you concerned with? Obama's failure to be perfect in every
way, as he attempts to shovel through the mountains of Bushschitt.

I'm supposed to take your carping seriously?
You established the rules with your constant bull****, name calling,
Bush Derangement Syndrome and obvious poking of the ferret for the
past five years. Beating the drum as it were with the constant
posturing of the neo-liberal outrage about everything and anything
Bush.

This is hilarious. I don't give a damn what you think about Obama. He'll
do well in spite of the horrific problems your boy Bush and your party
left behind.



Can't take it huh Harry? *Raising your blood pressure - maybe enough
to make your eyeballs bug out? *Are your ears turining red - fingers
trembling in a frenzy of rage as you type out schitts, righties,
'wingers and other pet names for people you disagree with?

Please, Tom. I still play with the big boys downtown. This is just a
diversion for me.

LOL... Sure you do. You don't do anything but sit in your basement
and try to be clever.. Epic failure to be sure...




When, and if, you reply, do include some comment about my preferred
brand of outboard, my political orientation, add in a few schitts here
and there and make some vague and completely off subject reference to
Republican sex scandals.

Someone has to buy those etecs. Glad it isn't me.

Oh and please, by all means feel free to insult my efforts in the area
of photography - I really take your criticism to heart.

I think you try too hard. I prefer Eisboch's photos.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

On Feb 5, 7:01*pm, Jim7495632085 wrote:
thunder wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:22:17 -0500, Eisboch wrote:

Obama is fair game for praise or criticism, just like Bush was. *

Of course he is, but after only two weeks in office ... *

Well he seems to have made quite a few bad decisions in only 2 weeks?

It's more like he has been caught in a bunch of lies in the last two
weeks.. Chris Matthews must be crushed...

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

On Feb 5, 6:28*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...



Please, Tom. I still play with the big boys downtown. This is just a
diversion for me.

The "big" boys?

Eisboch

The BIG boys.

tap...tap...tap,tap...tap...

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:16:23 GMT, Wizard of Woodstock
wrote:

And I'm archiving all your replies to this post just to keep you
honest.

I still have all the posts I ever downloaded, in more than ten years.
Not on one hard drive, but could,theoretically retrieve the drives
from the retired boxes and consolidate it all into one copy of Agent.

Casady

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

On Feb 5, 10:01*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:22:06 -0500, HK wrote:
it is going to
take miracles of biblical proportions to save this country.

Maybe we should have elected Huckabee after all. He is the one with an
"in" with God.

Guess he just couldn't lie enough for the MSM like Barak... "Change"
no, "Bipartisan" no, "no lobbyist" no, "openness" no.. The list goes
on...

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

Richard Casady wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:16:23 GMT, Wizard of Woodstock
wrote:

And I'm archiving all your replies to this post just to keep you
honest.

I still have all the posts I ever downloaded, in more than ten years.
Not on one hard drive, but could,theoretically retrieve the drives
from the retired boxes and consolidate it all into one copy of Agent.

Casady


I thought that was Reggie's rice bowl.

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:57:09 -0500, Jim7495632085
wrote:

he's read the 900 page bailout proposal?

I went over to thomas.loc.gov and looked at HR.1

That is mind numbing to try to read. Even with the 900 pages, it still
doesn't really say what it is doing. There are pages of things like
"strike line 2 and add blah blah" to some other US code section that
you have to look up to see what the hell they are talking about.
The titles are pretty ambiguous. I can see why people say this is such
a cluster****.

Yup. Very few people who support the stimulus bill know or understand what
it is.
Scary when you think about committing a trillion (with a "T") dollars, and
probably
more when it is all said and done.

But hey, it's just money.

Eisboch

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

Eisboch wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:57:09 -0500, Jim7495632085
wrote:

he's read the 900 page bailout proposal?

I went over to thomas.loc.gov and looked at HR.1

That is mind numbing to try to read. Even with the 900 pages, it still
doesn't really say what it is doing. There are pages of things like
"strike line 2 and add blah blah" to some other US code section that
you have to look up to see what the hell they are talking about.
The titles are pretty ambiguous. I can see why people say this is such
a cluster****.

Yup. Very few people who support the stimulus bill know or understand
what it is.
Scary when you think about committing a trillion (with a "T") dollars,
and probably
more when it is all said and done.

But hey, it's just money.

Eisboch

Betcha even Obama doesn't have the foggiest idea what's in the bill. But
it's his job, as head mucky muck community organizer, to get the people
he's going to cook, to stoke the fire. I am in awe at how many stupid
Americans support this guy.

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

On Feb 5, 8:14*pm, wrote:
On Feb 5, 6:43*pm, HK wrote:





Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:32:15 -0500, HK wrote:
Bush is an idiot. Worst president ever.
Your boy bush was the ultimate disaster, and it is going to take a
series of miracles for Obama or anyone else to haul this country's ashes
out of the fire.
Well for starters, Bush wasn't "my boy". *He was my President just as
he was your President. I also view Obama as my President although I
don't particularly think he was the best choice - Hillary would have
made a better choice in my view even though I wouldn't have voted for
her if you paid me to.

And what are you concerned with? Obama's failure to be perfect in every
way, as he attempts to shovel through the mountains of Bushschitt.

I'm supposed to take your carping seriously?
You established the rules with your constant bull****, name calling,
Bush Derangement Syndrome and obvious poking of the ferret for the
past five years. Beating the drum as it were with the constant
posturing of the neo-liberal outrage about everything and anything
Bush.

This is hilarious. I don't give a damn what you think about Obama. He'll
do well in spite of the horrific problems your boy Bush and your party
left behind.

Can't take it huh Harry? *Raising your blood pressure - maybe enough
to make your eyeballs bug out? *Are your ears turining red - fingers
trembling in a frenzy of rage as you type out schitts, righties,
'wingers and other pet names for people you disagree with?

Please, Tom. I still play with the big boys downtown. This is just a
diversion for me.

LOL... *Sure you do. You don't do anything but sit in your basement
and try to be clever.. Epic failure to be sure...





When, and if, you reply, do include some comment about my preferred
brand of outboard, my political orientation, add in a few schitts here
and there and make some vague and completely off subject reference to
Republican sex scandals.

Someone has to buy those etecs. Glad it isn't me.

Oh and please, by all means feel free to insult my efforts in the area
of photography - I really take your criticism to heart.

I think you try too hard. I prefer Eisboch's photos.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Some reading:

There are many people that just can't stop lying. In order to avoid
the truth this path is chosen. A lie that is said for someone's
benefit is to cheat another. However there are some people that always
lie, meaning that they are looked upon as liars for everything and
anything that they might say. Anyone who has the habit of lying
continuously is called as compulsive liar. It is a condition where a
person is just unable to speak the truth, even if he tries to put it
in a simple and truthful way there happens to be a point at which he
will be unable to continue with the harsh truths and in order to avoid
this he will start it all again with lying.

Compulsive lying is also like an addiction just like sex, drugs,
smoking and so on. Just as a person requires help under all these
conditions, the situation is the same even with compulsive lying. Any
person can be a compulsive liar; your daughters, sons, husbands,
wife's, girlfriends, boyfriends etc. Instead of avoiding your
compulsive liar (friend or spouse) you can help them deal with this
disease just like you would do in case of a more evident addiction.

For this you don't have to directly approach them and tell them that
they are lying as this could hurt their feelings or make them
defensive. Instead opt for a way that would help them. Try showing
them that you know about the lies, but try and take it easy by telling
them that you knew it was meant as a joke. Let the victim realize that
there is a problem and help them. You can take the victim to
psychiatrist and expect a change in him/her.

Sound like anybody here to you, Scotty?

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:16:23 GMT, Wizard of Woodstock
wrote:

And I'm archiving all your replies to this post just to keep you
honest.

I still have all the posts I ever downloaded, in more than ten years.
Not on one hard drive, but could,theoretically retrieve the drives
from the retired boxes and consolidate it all into one copy of Agent.

Casady


I thought that was Reggie's rice bowl.

Yes, I keep them all saved away on Google Groups.

--

Looking to for a good time?

click here to make yourself feel good.

http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

On Feb 6, 8:21*am, Jim7495632085 wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:57:09 -0500, Jim7495632085
wrote:

he's read the 900 page bailout proposal?

I went over to thomas.loc.gov and looked at HR.1

That is mind numbing to try to read. Even with the 900 pages, it still
doesn't really say what it is doing. There are pages of things like
"strike line 2 and add blah blah" to some other US code section that
you have to look up to see what the hell they are talking about.
The titles are pretty ambiguous. I can see why people say this is such
a cluster****.

Yup. *Very few people who support the stimulus bill know or understand
what it is.
Scary when you think about committing a trillion *(with a "T") *dollars,
and probably
more when it is all said and done.

But hey, it's just money.

Eisboch

Betcha even Obama doesn't have the foggiest idea what's in the bill. But
it's his job, as head mucky muck community organizer, to get the people
he's going to cook, to stoke the fire. I am in awe at how many stupid
Americans support this guy.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It's not too hard to figure out what it's all about. It's about paying
off the folks and organizations who elected Obama and Pelosi. They are
trying to buy out democracy and turn us into a one party country like
Russia or Iran. Look how many attacks we have seen on compromise, free
speech, free elections, etc... This is unAmerican.

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

thunder wrote:
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:27:02 -0500, BAR wrote:


http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=45640
You don't get to be a 4 star general officer without knowing a little
bit about politics and making friends on Capital Hill and the various
states with large military bases and defense contractors.

And you don't get to stay a 4 Star by undermining your CIC. ;-)

Personally, I don't understand the resistance to Obama's 16 month
withdrawal. The Status of Forces agreement has us out of the cities by
June, and out of Iraq in 36 months. Al-Maliki states an earlier
withdrawal if OK by him. The Sunnis seemed concerned by our leaving, but
there seems to be an effort to address their issues. I mean, Iraq is
looking relatively stable, though fragile, and we can use the manpower in
Afghanistan, where things look to be going downhill.

If we leave before the Iraqi forces are fully capable of defending the
entire country it will be extremely difficult for us to get back in.
But, it will be easy for Iran to come across the border and "assist" the
brothers in the south in order to protect them from being oppressed by
those in the north.

What's the rush to get out of Iraq?

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...

You need to broaden your thinking. You don't seem to understand the
concept of organizing.


The operative word isn't "organizing". It's "community".

Eisboch



You have a problem with "community"? When there is a blood drive in
your area, do you think it is something other than "the community"
that is targeted?

Good grief.

Eisboch


When Paul Revere took his ride to warn the brits were coming, do you
think those who took arms did so individually, or as part of a
community, organized by a community organizer?

So you are equating modern day community organizers with Paul Revere?

I'll trump your with Attila the Hun as a better community organizer.

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

BAR wrote:
HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...

You need to broaden your thinking. You don't seem to understand
the concept of organizing.


The operative word isn't "organizing". It's "community".

Eisboch



You have a problem with "community"? When there is a blood drive in
your area, do you think it is something other than "the community"
that is targeted?

Good grief.

Eisboch


When Paul Revere took his ride to warn the brits were coming, do you
think those who took arms did so individually, or as part of a
community, organized by a community organizer?

So you are equating modern day community organizers with Paul Revere?

I'll trump your with Attila the Hun as a better community organizer.


No, dummy...the colonists in the communities who recruited for and
helped establish the militias...they were the organizers. Revere was the
harbinger. Maybe in your next life, you'll stay in school a bit longer
and pay attention to the lessons in reading comprehension.

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:02:57 -0500, BAR wrote:


What's the rush to get out of Iraq?

I'm not sure I'd call 16 months rushing, but we are going to need the
manpower in Afghanistan. The last I heard, the Taliban has an active
presence in over 70% of the country. I'm not exactly sure what that
means, but it doesn't sound good. ;-)

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

On Sat, 07 Feb 2009 05:29:35 -0600, thunder
wrote:

On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:02:57 -0500, BAR wrote:


What's the rush to get out of Iraq?

I'm not sure I'd call 16 months rushing, but we are going to need the
manpower in Afghanistan. The last I heard, the Taliban has an active
presence in over 70% of the country. I'm not exactly sure what that
means, but it doesn't sound good. ;-)

Thunder, in all honesty, don't you think we should stay in Iraq at
least long enough to get some of that oil which was Bush's reason for
invading in the first place?

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

thunder wrote:
On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:02:57 -0500, BAR wrote:


What's the rush to get out of Iraq?

I'm not sure I'd call 16 months rushing, but we are going to need the
manpower in Afghanistan. The last I heard, the Taliban has an active
presence in over 70% of the country. I'm not exactly sure what that
means, but it doesn't sound good. ;-)

Why do we need the manpower in Afghanistan? Nobody is ever going to
control Afghanistan. If why destroy a farmers poppy crop you make him a
Taliban just like killing his water buffalo in Vietnam made him a VC.

We should leave Afghanistan first it is of no strategic value.