Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:16:23 GMT, Wizard of Woodstock
wrote:

And I'm archiving all your replies to this post just to keep you
honest.

I still have all the posts I ever downloaded, in more than ten years.
Not on one hard drive, but could,theoretically retrieve the drives
from the retired boxes and consolidate it all into one copy of Agent.

Casady

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

On Feb 5, 10:01*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:22:06 -0500, HK wrote:
it is going to
take miracles of biblical proportions to save this country.

Maybe we should have elected Huckabee after all. He is the one with an
"in" with God.

Guess he just couldn't lie enough for the MSM like Barak... "Change"
no, "Bipartisan" no, "no lobbyist" no, "openness" no.. The list goes
on...

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

Richard Casady wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:16:23 GMT, Wizard of Woodstock
wrote:

And I'm archiving all your replies to this post just to keep you
honest.

I still have all the posts I ever downloaded, in more than ten years.
Not on one hard drive, but could,theoretically retrieve the drives
from the retired boxes and consolidate it all into one copy of Agent.

Casady


I thought that was Reggie's rice bowl.

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:57:09 -0500, Jim7495632085
wrote:

he's read the 900 page bailout proposal?

I went over to thomas.loc.gov and looked at HR.1

That is mind numbing to try to read. Even with the 900 pages, it still
doesn't really say what it is doing. There are pages of things like
"strike line 2 and add blah blah" to some other US code section that
you have to look up to see what the hell they are talking about.
The titles are pretty ambiguous. I can see why people say this is such
a cluster****.

Yup. Very few people who support the stimulus bill know or understand what
it is.
Scary when you think about committing a trillion (with a "T") dollars, and
probably
more when it is all said and done.

But hey, it's just money.

Eisboch

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

Eisboch wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:57:09 -0500, Jim7495632085
wrote:

he's read the 900 page bailout proposal?

I went over to thomas.loc.gov and looked at HR.1

That is mind numbing to try to read. Even with the 900 pages, it still
doesn't really say what it is doing. There are pages of things like
"strike line 2 and add blah blah" to some other US code section that
you have to look up to see what the hell they are talking about.
The titles are pretty ambiguous. I can see why people say this is such
a cluster****.

Yup. Very few people who support the stimulus bill know or understand
what it is.
Scary when you think about committing a trillion (with a "T") dollars,
and probably
more when it is all said and done.

But hey, it's just money.

Eisboch

Betcha even Obama doesn't have the foggiest idea what's in the bill. But
it's his job, as head mucky muck community organizer, to get the people
he's going to cook, to stoke the fire. I am in awe at how many stupid
Americans support this guy.

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

On Feb 5, 8:14*pm, wrote:
On Feb 5, 6:43*pm, HK wrote:





Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:32:15 -0500, HK wrote:
Bush is an idiot. Worst president ever.
Your boy bush was the ultimate disaster, and it is going to take a
series of miracles for Obama or anyone else to haul this country's ashes
out of the fire.
Well for starters, Bush wasn't "my boy". *He was my President just as
he was your President. I also view Obama as my President although I
don't particularly think he was the best choice - Hillary would have
made a better choice in my view even though I wouldn't have voted for
her if you paid me to.

And what are you concerned with? Obama's failure to be perfect in every
way, as he attempts to shovel through the mountains of Bushschitt.

I'm supposed to take your carping seriously?
You established the rules with your constant bull****, name calling,
Bush Derangement Syndrome and obvious poking of the ferret for the
past five years. Beating the drum as it were with the constant
posturing of the neo-liberal outrage about everything and anything
Bush.

This is hilarious. I don't give a damn what you think about Obama. He'll
do well in spite of the horrific problems your boy Bush and your party
left behind.

Can't take it huh Harry? *Raising your blood pressure - maybe enough
to make your eyeballs bug out? *Are your ears turining red - fingers
trembling in a frenzy of rage as you type out schitts, righties,
'wingers and other pet names for people you disagree with?

Please, Tom. I still play with the big boys downtown. This is just a
diversion for me.

LOL... *Sure you do. You don't do anything but sit in your basement
and try to be clever.. Epic failure to be sure...





When, and if, you reply, do include some comment about my preferred
brand of outboard, my political orientation, add in a few schitts here
and there and make some vague and completely off subject reference to
Republican sex scandals.

Someone has to buy those etecs. Glad it isn't me.

Oh and please, by all means feel free to insult my efforts in the area
of photography - I really take your criticism to heart.

I think you try too hard. I prefer Eisboch's photos.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Some reading:

There are many people that just can't stop lying. In order to avoid
the truth this path is chosen. A lie that is said for someone's
benefit is to cheat another. However there are some people that always
lie, meaning that they are looked upon as liars for everything and
anything that they might say. Anyone who has the habit of lying
continuously is called as compulsive liar. It is a condition where a
person is just unable to speak the truth, even if he tries to put it
in a simple and truthful way there happens to be a point at which he
will be unable to continue with the harsh truths and in order to avoid
this he will start it all again with lying.

Compulsive lying is also like an addiction just like sex, drugs,
smoking and so on. Just as a person requires help under all these
conditions, the situation is the same even with compulsive lying. Any
person can be a compulsive liar; your daughters, sons, husbands,
wife's, girlfriends, boyfriends etc. Instead of avoiding your
compulsive liar (friend or spouse) you can help them deal with this
disease just like you would do in case of a more evident addiction.

For this you don't have to directly approach them and tell them that
they are lying as this could hurt their feelings or make them
defensive. Instead opt for a way that would help them. Try showing
them that you know about the lies, but try and take it easy by telling
them that you knew it was meant as a joke. Let the victim realize that
there is a problem and help them. You can take the victim to
psychiatrist and expect a change in him/her.

Sound like anybody here to you, Scotty?

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:16:23 GMT, Wizard of Woodstock
wrote:

And I'm archiving all your replies to this post just to keep you
honest.

I still have all the posts I ever downloaded, in more than ten years.
Not on one hard drive, but could,theoretically retrieve the drives
from the retired boxes and consolidate it all into one copy of Agent.

Casady


I thought that was Reggie's rice bowl.

Yes, I keep them all saved away on Google Groups.

--

Looking to for a good time?

click here to make yourself feel good.

http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

On Feb 6, 8:21*am, Jim7495632085 wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:57:09 -0500, Jim7495632085
wrote:

he's read the 900 page bailout proposal?

I went over to thomas.loc.gov and looked at HR.1

That is mind numbing to try to read. Even with the 900 pages, it still
doesn't really say what it is doing. There are pages of things like
"strike line 2 and add blah blah" to some other US code section that
you have to look up to see what the hell they are talking about.
The titles are pretty ambiguous. I can see why people say this is such
a cluster****.

Yup. *Very few people who support the stimulus bill know or understand
what it is.
Scary when you think about committing a trillion *(with a "T") *dollars,
and probably
more when it is all said and done.

But hey, it's just money.

Eisboch

Betcha even Obama doesn't have the foggiest idea what's in the bill. But
it's his job, as head mucky muck community organizer, to get the people
he's going to cook, to stoke the fire. I am in awe at how many stupid
Americans support this guy.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It's not too hard to figure out what it's all about. It's about paying
off the folks and organizations who elected Obama and Pelosi. They are
trying to buy out democracy and turn us into a one party country like
Russia or Iran. Look how many attacks we have seen on compromise, free
speech, free elections, etc... This is unAmerican.

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

thunder wrote:
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:27:02 -0500, BAR wrote:


http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=45640
You don't get to be a 4 star general officer without knowing a little
bit about politics and making friends on Capital Hill and the various
states with large military bases and defense contractors.

And you don't get to stay a 4 Star by undermining your CIC. ;-)

Personally, I don't understand the resistance to Obama's 16 month
withdrawal. The Status of Forces agreement has us out of the cities by
June, and out of Iraq in 36 months. Al-Maliki states an earlier
withdrawal if OK by him. The Sunnis seemed concerned by our leaving, but
there seems to be an effort to address their issues. I mean, Iraq is
looking relatively stable, though fragile, and we can use the manpower in
Afghanistan, where things look to be going downhill.

If we leave before the Iraqi forces are fully capable of defending the
entire country it will be extremely difficult for us to get back in.
But, it will be easy for Iran to come across the border and "assist" the
brothers in the south in order to protect them from being oppressed by
those in the north.

What's the rush to get out of Iraq?

Will it be called...,'ECOMCON'?
 

HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...

You need to broaden your thinking. You don't seem to understand the
concept of organizing.


The operative word isn't "organizing". It's "community".

Eisboch



You have a problem with "community"? When there is a blood drive in
your area, do you think it is something other than "the community"
that is targeted?

Good grief.

Eisboch


When Paul Revere took his ride to warn the brits were coming, do you
think those who took arms did so individually, or as part of a
community, organized by a community organizer?

So you are equating modern day community organizers with Paul Revere?

I'll trump your with Attila the Hun as a better community organizer.