Daschle Withdraws
 

Good.

--Vic

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Feb 3, 12:50*pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good. *

--Vic

I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 3, 12:50Â*pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good. Â*

--Vic

I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.

Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.

Daschle Withdraws
 

Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.

--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.

Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.




After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.

--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.

Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.

After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.

We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. As proof, I cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.

Daschle Withdraws
 

Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.
--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.
Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.
After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.

We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. As proof, I cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.


Got any contracts paid for directly or indirectly by federal dollars? Be
delighted to help make sure you get no more. :)

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Feb 3, 2:46 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.
--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.
Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.
After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.

We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. As proof, I cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.

Got any contracts paid for directly or indirectly by federal dollars? Be
delighted to help make sure you get no more. :)

Threats from HK, Ewww, I am terrified. Is that the best you can do
when people disagree with you HK, make threats? Sorry Harry, we are
strictly commercial right now.

However, "ethics" requires intelligence, a quality lacking among Dems
as experience this week shows.

Daschle Withdraws
 

HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:



Got any contracts paid for directly or indirectly by federal dollars? Be
delighted to help make sure you get no more. :)

You must be delusional if you think anyone believes you have any
influence on anyone in power.
--

Looking to for a good time?

click here to make yourself feel good.

http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Feb 3, 2:52 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:46 pm, HK wrote:



Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.
--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.
Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.
After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.

We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. As proof, I cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.

Got any contracts paid for directly or indirectly by federal dollars? Be
delighted to help make sure you get no more. :)

Threats from HK, Ewww, I am terrified. Is that the best you can do
when people disagree with you HK, make threats? Sorry Harry, we are
strictly commercial right now.

However, "ethics" requires intelligence, a quality lacking among Dems
as experience this week shows.

HK has just given us all a demonstration of ethics among Dems, when he
cannot win with logic, he attempts to threaten.
HK, anything I would write would have numbers and lots of those
squiggly greek letter thingies, sure to baffle a Dem.

Daschle Withdraws
 

Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:46 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.
--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.
Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.
After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.
We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. As proof, I cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.
Got any contracts paid for directly or indirectly by federal dollars? Be
delighted to help make sure you get no more. :)

Threats from HK, Ewww, I am terrified. Is that the best you can do
when people disagree with you HK, make threats? Sorry Harry, we are
strictly commercial right now.

However, "ethics" requires intelligence, a quality lacking among Dems
as experience this week shows.


No threat...you obviously want to control federal spending. Just wait to
help. Your commercial clients, are they using taxpayer dollars to buy
from you? Do they sell services or products to the feds?

Daschle Withdraws
 

Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:52 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:46 pm, HK wrote:



Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.
--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.
Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.
After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.
We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. As proof, I cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.
Got any contracts paid for directly or indirectly by federal dollars? Be
delighted to help make sure you get no more. :)
Threats from HK, Ewww, I am terrified. Is that the best you can do
when people disagree with you HK, make threats? Sorry Harry, we are
strictly commercial right now.

However, "ethics" requires intelligence, a quality lacking among Dems
as experience this week shows.

HK has just given us all a demonstration of ethics among Dems, when he
cannot win with logic, he attempts to threaten.
HK, anything I would write would have numbers and lots of those
squiggly greek letter thingies, sure to baffle a Dem.


Just offering to help. You want to control federal spending, I want to
help you.

Daschle Withdraws
 

"HK" wrote in message
...


Just offering to help. You want to control federal spending, I want to
help you.



Budgeted federal spending that benefits small business is fine and healthy
to the economy.
A rewritten stimulus program that encourages more of it would go a long way
towards increased employment.
Increased employment would go a long way towards a recovery.
A recovery would go a long way towards Obama's chances for an eight year
term.

Eisboch

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Feb 3, 3:02 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:52 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:46 pm, HK wrote:

Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.
--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.
Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.
After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.
We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. As proof, I cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.
Got any contracts paid for directly or indirectly by federal dollars? Be
delighted to help make sure you get no more. :)
Threats from HK, Ewww, I am terrified. Is that the best you can do
when people disagree with you HK, make threats? Sorry Harry, we are
strictly commercial right now.

However, "ethics" requires intelligence, a quality lacking among Dems
as experience this week shows.

HK has just given us all a demonstration of ethics among Dems, when he
cannot win with logic, he attempts to threaten.
HK, anything I would write would have numbers and lots of those
squiggly greek letter thingies, sure to baffle a Dem.

Just offering to help. You want to control federal spending, I want to
help you.

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".

Daschle Withdraws
 

"HK" wrote in message
...
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.
--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.

Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.




After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.


This cracks me up.

We are not talking about forgetting to report income.
We are talking about tax evasion, pure and simple. Us mortals would go to
jail for it.

Furthermore, he apparently knew this when he accepted Obama's offer for the
position, but didn't bother telling anyone until after the nomination was
made public.

What a guy.

"Oooops. I forgot"

Eisboch

Daschle Withdraws
 

Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 3:02 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:52 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:46 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.
--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.
Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.
After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.
We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. As proof, I cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.
Got any contracts paid for directly or indirectly by federal dollars? Be
delighted to help make sure you get no more. :)
Threats from HK, Ewww, I am terrified. Is that the best you can do
when people disagree with you HK, make threats? Sorry Harry, we are
strictly commercial right now.
However, "ethics" requires intelligence, a quality lacking among Dems
as experience this week shows.
HK has just given us all a demonstration of ethics among Dems, when he
cannot win with logic, he attempts to threaten.
HK, anything I would write would have numbers and lots of those
squiggly greek letter thingies, sure to baffle a Dem.
Just offering to help. You want to control federal spending, I want to
help you.

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".


So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?

Daschle Withdraws
 

"HK" wrote in message
...

Frogwatch wrote:

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".


So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?



Jesus, Harry. He didn't say "eliminate". He said "controlling".
According to your illogic, we would also eliminate Social Security,
Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps and any other "Federal Spending".

Daschle Withdraws
 

Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...

Frogwatch wrote:

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".


So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?



Jesus, Harry. He didn't say "eliminate". He said "controlling".
According to your illogic, we would also eliminate Social Security,
Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps and any other "Federal Spending".


Oh, I know what the righties mean by "controlling." Their sort of
controlling means plenty of money for military misadventures, for
defense contractors, et cetera. Plenty of taxbreaks for the rich and for
corporations. But tight tight control for anything that helps the
working stiff.

Daschle Withdraws
 

HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...

Frogwatch wrote:

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".


So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?



Jesus, Harry. He didn't say "eliminate". He said "controlling".
According to your illogic, we would also eliminate Social Security,
Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps and any other "Federal Spending".


Oh, I know what the righties mean by "controlling." Their sort of
controlling means plenty of money for military misadventures, for
defense contractors, et cetera. Plenty of taxbreaks for the rich and for
corporations. But tight tight control for anything that helps the
working stiff.

Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?

A month?

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Feb 3, 6:39 pm, Keith Nuttle wrote:
HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...

Frogwatch wrote:

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".

So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?

Jesus, Harry. He didn't say "eliminate". He said "controlling".
According to your illogic, we would also eliminate Social Security,
Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps and any other "Federal Spending".

Oh, I know what the righties mean by "controlling." Their sort of
controlling means plenty of money for military misadventures, for
defense contractors, et cetera. Plenty of taxbreaks for the rich and for
corporations. But tight tight control for anything that helps the
working stiff.

Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?

A month?

Nobody seriously expects people like HK to make sense. He belongs to
the Cult of The One and reason is therefore not expected

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Feb 3, 7:05 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 6:39 pm, Keith Nuttle wrote:



HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...

Frogwatch wrote:

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".

So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?

Jesus, Harry. He didn't say "eliminate". He said "controlling".
According to your illogic, we would also eliminate Social Security,
Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps and any other "Federal Spending".

Oh, I know what the righties mean by "controlling." Their sort of
controlling means plenty of money for military misadventures, for
defense contractors, et cetera. Plenty of taxbreaks for the rich and for
corporations. But tight tight control for anything that helps the
working stiff.

Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?

A month?

Nobody seriously expects people like HK to make sense. He belongs to
the Cult of The One and reason is therefore not expected

Harry has probably never known a "working stiff".

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Feb 3, 7:06*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 7:05 pm, Frogwatch wrote:





On Feb 3, 6:39 pm, Keith Nuttle wrote:

HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...

Frogwatch wrote:

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".

So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?

Jesus, Harry. *He didn't say "eliminate". * He said "controlling".
According to your illogic, we would also eliminate Social Security,
Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps and any other "Federal Spending".

Oh, I know what the righties mean by "controlling." Their sort of
controlling means plenty of money for military misadventures, for
defense contractors, et cetera. Plenty of taxbreaks for the rich and for
corporations. But tight tight control for anything that helps the
working stiff.

Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?

A month?

Nobody seriously expects people like HK to make sense. *He belongs to
the Cult of The One and reason is therefore not expected

Harry has probably never known a "working stiff".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, he sure had fun with "Stumpy" before he stole a picture of a
piece of wood to defray the jokes;)

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Feb 3, 7:09 pm, wrote:
On Feb 3, 7:06 pm, Frogwatch wrote:



On Feb 3, 7:05 pm, Frogwatch wrote:

On Feb 3, 6:39 pm, Keith Nuttle wrote:

HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...

Frogwatch wrote:

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".

So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?

Jesus, Harry. He didn't say "eliminate". He said "controlling".
According to your illogic, we would also eliminate Social Security,
Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps and any other "Federal Spending".

Oh, I know what the righties mean by "controlling." Their sort of
controlling means plenty of money for military misadventures, for
defense contractors, et cetera. Plenty of taxbreaks for the rich and for
corporations. But tight tight control for anything that helps the
working stiff.

Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?

A month?

Nobody seriously expects people like HK to make sense. He belongs to
the Cult of The One and reason is therefore not expected

Harry has probably never known a "working stiff".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, he sure had fun with "Stumpy" before he stole a picture of a
piece of wood to defray the jokes;)

I resisted the urge to point out what "working stiff" he is most
familiar with.

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:39:36 -0500, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?

Over/under?

Two weeks.

--

"Every normal man must be tempted at times
to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag,
and begin to slit throats."

H. L. Mencken

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Feb 3, 2:41*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:

Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.

--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.

Me either. *I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.

After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.

We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. *As proof, I cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.

Daschle and the Dems are practicing the "Screw everyone else, I got
mine" principle.

Daschle Withdraws
 

HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 3:02 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:52 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:46 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith
wrote:
Good.
--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.
Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be
withdrawn.
After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors,
Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.
We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder
if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. As proof, I
cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.
Got any contracts paid for directly or indirectly by federal
dollars? Be
delighted to help make sure you get no more. :)
Threats from HK, Ewww, I am terrified. Is that the best you can do
when people disagree with you HK, make threats? Sorry Harry, we are
strictly commercial right now.
However, "ethics" requires intelligence, a quality lacking among Dems
as experience this week shows.
HK has just given us all a demonstration of ethics among Dems, when he
cannot win with logic, he attempts to threaten.
HK, anything I would write would have numbers and lots of those
squiggly greek letter thingies, sure to baffle a Dem.
Just offering to help. You want to control federal spending, I want to
help you.

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".


So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?


WAFA's way out there...

Daschle Withdraws
 

HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 3:02 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:52 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:46 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith
wrote:
Good.
--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.
Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be
withdrawn.
After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors,
Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.
We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder
if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. As proof, I
cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.
Got any contracts paid for directly or indirectly by federal
dollars? Be
delighted to help make sure you get no more. :)
Threats from HK, Ewww, I am terrified. Is that the best you can do
when people disagree with you HK, make threats? Sorry Harry, we are
strictly commercial right now.
However, "ethics" requires intelligence, a quality lacking among Dems
as experience this week shows.
HK has just given us all a demonstration of ethics among Dems, when he
cannot win with logic, he attempts to threaten.
HK, anything I would write would have numbers and lots of those
squiggly greek letter thingies, sure to baffle a Dem.
Just offering to help. You want to control federal spending, I want to
help you.

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".


So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?


Go ahead and follow through on your threat. Or, is this another one of
your lies.

Daschle Withdraws
 

BAR wrote:
HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 3:02 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:52 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:46 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith
wrote:
Good.
--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.
Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be
withdrawn.
After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors,
Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.
We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder
if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math
challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. As proof,
I cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than
bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.
Got any contracts paid for directly or indirectly by federal
dollars? Be
delighted to help make sure you get no more. :)
Threats from HK, Ewww, I am terrified. Is that the best you can do
when people disagree with you HK, make threats? Sorry Harry, we are
strictly commercial right now.
However, "ethics" requires intelligence, a quality lacking among Dems
as experience this week shows.
HK has just given us all a demonstration of ethics among Dems, when he
cannot win with logic, he attempts to threaten.
HK, anything I would write would have numbers and lots of those
squiggly greek letter thingies, sure to baffle a Dem.
Just offering to help. You want to control federal spending, I want to
help you.

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".


So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?


Go ahead and follow through on your threat. Or, is this another one of
your lies.



What threat, ****-for-brains?

You know, if you stayed in school, someone might have taught you to read.

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Feb 3, 11:50*am, Vic Smith wrote:
Good. *

--Vic

NEXT!

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:39:36 -0500, Keith Nuttle wrote:


Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?

A month?

My guess is that he is done. You overlook the fact that Dashle would
have been approved by the Senate. He withdrew because he was a
distraction. He's a distraction now, and he would be a distraction a
month from now.

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:02:17 +0000, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:

On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:39:36 -0500, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?

Over/under?

Two weeks.

Daschle is done, but it does make an opening for Howard Dean.

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 04:32:37 -0600, thunder
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:02:17 +0000, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:

On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:39:36 -0500, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?

Over/under?

Two weeks.

Daschle is done, but it does make an opening for Howard Dean.

Dean really should have been first choice for that position. I
understand why Obama chose Daschle, but it was a bad move from the
start. I wouldn't blameDean if he was not interested in being "sloppy
seconds", but I have a feeling that if asked, his sense of duty to
country would override his personal feelings.

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:29:46 -0500, HK wrote:

Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.

--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.

Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.

After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.

Agreed, but the GOP never claimed they had any ethical standards.
Well, except no BJ's in the WH. But nothing restricting f**king the
American economy and people by giving Wall Street a BJ.
That was perfectly okay.
The Dems are claiming things have changed.
Putting lobbyist/taxcheat Daschle in the cabinet violates the claim.
Last thing this country needs is more limousine liberals.
I'm very happy the current administration has set a high bar for
ethics. It was refreshing to see Obama admit "I screwed up."
Per my usual rant, the problem the Dems have is being saddled with the
same globalist views they and the Reps have had for a couple decades
now.
Last year's trade deficit almost equals the proposed "stimulus" in $.
All the economists who supported the equity/housing bubbles and loss
of jobs are disgraced, but they are still influencing economic policy.
You can figure it out from there.
But temporary jobs created with more debt will *not* revive a moribund
economy which is guided by the same old globalist thinking.

--Vic

Daschle Withdraws
 

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 04:32:37 -0600, thunder
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:02:17 +0000, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:

On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:39:36 -0500, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?

Over/under?

Two weeks.

Daschle is done, but it does make an opening for Howard Dean.

I would be very surprised if Dean became Health Czar and HHH
Secretary.

--

"I am free of all prejudices. I hate every one equally."

W.C. Fields

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:02:07 -0600, thunder
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:39:36 -0500, Keith Nuttle wrote:


Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?

A month?

My guess is that he is done. You overlook the fact that Dashle would
have been approved by the Senate. He withdrew because he was a
distraction. He's a distraction now, and he would be a distraction a
month from now.

According to Politico and The Hill, Dashle backed out because his
support in the Senate collapsed.
--

Happy Holidays and Merry Whatever It Is
That ****es Liberals Off.

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 06:41:43 -0500, BAR wrote:


Dean is a screamer and has been hidden from view for the past two years.
The Democrats won the White House in spite of him not because of him.

Dean's "50 State Strategy" not withstanding.

Daschle Withdraws
 

"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:02:17 +0000, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:

On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:39:36 -0500, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?

Over/under?

Two weeks.

Daschle is done, but it does make an opening for Howard Dean.


YYAAAAAHHHHHHAAAAAA!!!!!

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Feb 4, 6:41*am, BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 04:32:37 -0600, thunder
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:02:17 +0000, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:

On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:39:36 -0500, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?
Over/under?

Two weeks.
Daschle is done, but it does make an opening for Howard Dean.

Dean really should have been first choice for that position. I
understand why Obama chose Daschle, but it was a bad move from the
start. I wouldn't blameDean if he was not interested in being "sloppy
seconds", but I have a feeling that if asked, his sense of duty to
country would override his personal feelings.

Dean is a screamer and has been hidden from view for the past two years.
The Democrats won the White House in spite of him not because of him.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That's a stretch! One little yelp of happiness and he's been branded a
"screamer"........jeez....

Daschle Withdraws
 

On Feb 4, 7:29*am, wrote:
On Feb 4, 6:41*am, BAR wrote:



wrote:
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 04:32:37 -0600, thunder
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:02:17 +0000, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:

On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:39:36 -0500, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?
Over/under?

Two weeks.
Daschle is done, but it does make an opening for Howard Dean.

Dean really should have been first choice for that position. I
understand why Obama chose Daschle, but it was a bad move from the
start. I wouldn't blameDean if he was not interested in being "sloppy
seconds", but I have a feeling that if asked, his sense of duty to
country would override his personal feelings.

Dean is a screamer and has been hidden from view for the past two years..
The Democrats won the White House in spite of him not because of him.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That's a stretch! One little yelp of happiness and he's been branded a
"screamer"........jeez....

LOL!

change the "he" to a "she" and that described my first wife.
HAHAHAHA!

Daschle Withdraws
 

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:02:17 +0000, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:

On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:39:36 -0500, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?

Over/under?

Two weeks.

Daschle is done, but it does make an opening for Howard Dean.


YYAAAAAHHHHHHAAAAAA!!!!!


So that's how you spell it.