http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzyT9-9lUyE

I know it's old, but.....

?;^Q

On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:46:07 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzyT9-9lUyE

I know it's old, but.....

?;^Q

Another reason Sarah should be President.

BTW, I keep thinking this [ ?;^Q ] is just a typo. But, it keeps popping up
in your posts. Is it something Google is adding? Or, is there some code
there I'm just too stupid to pick up on?

On Jan 17, 2:13*pm, John H wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:46:07 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzyT9-9lUyE

I know it's old, but.....

?;^Q

Another reason Sarah should be President.

BTW, I keep thinking this [ ?;^Q ] is just a typo. But, it keeps popping up
in your posts. Is it something Google is adding? Or, is there some code
there I'm just too stupid to pick up on?

John, that's me gagging and sticking my tongue out. See my Blago
hairjob?

?:^ )

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 17, 2:13 pm, John H wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:46:07 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzyT9-9lUyE

I know it's old, but.....

?;^Q

Another reason Sarah should be President.

BTW, I keep thinking this [ ?;^Q ] is just a typo. But, it keeps popping
up
in your posts. Is it something Google is adding? Or, is there some code
there I'm just too stupid to pick up on?

John, that's me gagging and sticking my tongue out. See my Blago
hairjob?

?:^ )

===================================

I see that Blago's attorneys refuse to represent him during his impeachment
trial. They don't like the Illinois Senates rules.

On Jan 17, 2:36*pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 17, 2:13 pm, John H wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:46:07 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzyT9-9lUyE

I know it's old, but.....

?;^Q

Another reason Sarah should be President.

BTW, I keep thinking this [ ?;^Q ] is just a typo. But, it keeps popping
up
in your posts. Is it something Google is adding? Or, is there some code
there I'm just too stupid to pick up on?

John, that's me gagging and sticking my tongue out. See my Blago
hairjob?

?:^ )

===================================

I see that Blago's attorneys refuse to represent him during his impeachment
trial. *They don't like the Illinois Senates rules.

Right now, I really don't think very many people want to stand too
close to him.

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 17, 2:36 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 17, 2:13 pm, John H wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:46:07 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzyT9-9lUyE

I know it's old, but.....

?;^Q

Another reason Sarah should be President.

BTW, I keep thinking this [ ?;^Q ] is just a typo. But, it keeps popping
up
in your posts. Is it something Google is adding? Or, is there some code
there I'm just too stupid to pick up on?

John, that's me gagging and sticking my tongue out. See my Blago
hairjob?

?:^ )

===================================

I see that Blago's attorneys refuse to represent him during his
impeachment
trial. They don't like the Illinois Senates rules.

Right now, I really don't think very many people want to stand too
close to him.

======================================

How are Blago and his FIL getting along now? I wonder how Christmas dinner
was. I bet Mell hates the day he got his daughter involved with the Elvis
wanna be.

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:46:07 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzyT9-9lUyE

I know it's old, but.....

?;^Q

Another reason Sarah should be President.

BTW, I keep thinking this [ ?;^Q ] is just a typo. But, it keeps popping
up
in your posts. Is it something Google is adding? Or, is there some code
there I'm just too stupid to pick up on?

Here's my guess: a furrowed brow (?) two eyes ( a nose (^) and a mouth
with the tongue to the side Q)