Speaking of music...
 

wrote:
On Jan 17, 1:34 pm, John H wrote:
...we need a United States Sailors' Dance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wouNQ...eature=related

(One of my favorites.)

Well, if Pelosi and Obama get their way, this will be the new U.S.
Army fight song..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO43p2Wqc08

This really sucks...

There are plenty of gays in the military already, dumbo.

Speaking of music...
 

On Jan 17, 2:38*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message

...





On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:22:49 -0500, John H wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:52:10 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Jan 17, 1:34 pm, John H wrote:
...we need a United States Sailors' Dance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wouNQ...eature=related

(One of my favorites.)

Well, if Pelosi and Obama get their way, this will be the new U.S.
Army fight song..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO43p2Wqc08

This really sucks...

Well, maybe they just want the Army back in San Francisco.

Plus, I've got a feeling that allowing some open gays into the Army,
Marines, etc, is going to result in a lot of openly gay guys getting the
**** stomped out of them. Not judging right or wrong, but I'll bet it
happens.

All depends. *If the gays interpret this as a free ticket to actively live
and promote their lifestyle, yep, they are going to pay the consequences.
If they continue to keep their persuasion private and among themselves, *no
problem.

Eisboch- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If they would be satisfied to serve and keep their persuasion private,
there would be no problem. They already have the protections in place
to do that. This is something the activists want so they can actively
live and promote their lifestyle... Even if all don't, it only takes
a few zealous activists to disrupt any organization. I know the haters
will say I am prejudice, sure, I have issues with homosexuals, but as
a conservative (well liberatarian) Christian I have decided to not be
their judge. I have a couple of great gay couples right here in my
neighborhood, both couples raising children. I have no problem with
that, I do however appreciate that neither couple is trying outwardly
to sway their children in any particular direction.

Speaking of music...
 

On Jan 17, 2:53*pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 17, 1:34 pm, John H wrote:
...we need a United States Sailors' Dance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wouNQ...eature=related

(One of my favorites.)

Well, if Pelosi and Obama get their way, this will be the new U.S.
Army fight song..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO43p2Wqc08

This really sucks...

There are plenty of gays in the military already, dumbo.

That's right, and they are well protected by the current laws, we
don't need to open the door to activism and insubordination (elitism)
in the ranks...

Speaking of music...
 

wrote:
On Jan 17, 2:38 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message

...





On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:22:49 -0500, John H wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:52:10 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 17, 1:34 pm, John H wrote:
...we need a United States Sailors' Dance.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wouNQ...eature=related
(One of my favorites.)
Well, if Pelosi and Obama get their way, this will be the new U.S.
Army fight song..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO43p2Wqc08
This really sucks...
Well, maybe they just want the Army back in San Francisco.
Plus, I've got a feeling that allowing some open gays into the Army,
Marines, etc, is going to result in a lot of openly gay guys getting the
**** stomped out of them. Not judging right or wrong, but I'll bet it
happens.
All depends. If the gays interpret this as a free ticket to actively live
and promote their lifestyle, yep, they are going to pay the consequences.
If they continue to keep their persuasion private and among themselves, no
problem.

Eisboch- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If they would be satisfied to serve and keep their persuasion private,
there would be no problem. They already have the protections in place
to do that. This is something the activists want so they can actively
live and promote their lifestyle... Even if all don't, it only takes
a few zealous activists to disrupt any organization. I know the haters
will say I am prejudice, sure, I have issues with homosexuals, but as
a conservative (well liberatarian) Christian I have decided to not be
their judge. I have a couple of great gay couples right here in my
neighborhood, both couples raising children. I have no problem with
that, I do however appreciate that neither couple is trying outwardly
to sway their children in any particular direction.


You say you are a christian, but your hehavior says no.

Speaking of music...
 

On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:38:38 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:22:49 -0500, John H wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:52:10 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Jan 17, 1:34 pm, John H wrote:
...we need a United States Sailors' Dance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wouNQ...eature=related

(One of my favorites.)

Well, if Pelosi and Obama get their way, this will be the new U.S.
Army fight song..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO43p2Wqc08

This really sucks...

Well, maybe they just want the Army back in San Francisco.

Plus, I've got a feeling that allowing some open gays into the Army,
Marines, etc, is going to result in a lot of openly gay guys getting the
**** stomped out of them. Not judging right or wrong, but I'll bet it
happens.


All depends. If the gays interpret this as a free ticket to actively live
and promote their lifestyle, yep, they are going to pay the consequences.
If they continue to keep their persuasion private and among themselves, no
problem.

Eisboch

I wonder what the earring and hair-length rules will be. Just how much
eye-shadow should be allowed at the 6 AM inspection?

Speaking of music...
 

wrote in message
...


Ok. That's enough about gays. Let's get back to the original, off-topic
subject that we were discussing.

I just finished moving the Hammond "Porta-B" and it's Leslie speaker up from
the horse garage to my "apartment".

Whoever decided this thing is portable took a lot of liberties, especially
when you are doing it yourself. The upper section still weighs 249 lbs and
the Leslie isn't exactly a lightweight either. I got my energy up, grabbed
a dolly and got it done. Out of the garage, up that ice packed driveway,
into the house (with Mrs.E. freaking out), up two flights of stairs and ....
whew.... done.

Now I need to get some beer to nurse my aching back. I also am thinking
that thank God my B3 rental business really hasn't taken off. The Porta-B
is 249 lbs. The B3 is 500.

Sounds good though.

Eisboch

Speaking of music...
 

On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:34:11 -0500, John H
wrote:

...we need a United States Sailors' Dance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wouNQ...eature=related

(One of my favorites.)

Pfffht...

Now this is good...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0vZwONKshU

Who said Russians don't have a sense of humor? :)

--

"Never fight an inanimate object."

P.J. O'Rourke

Speaking of music...
 

On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:19:49 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:


wrote in message
...


Ok. That's enough about gays. Let's get back to the original, off-topic
subject that we were discussing.

I just finished moving the Hammond "Porta-B" and it's Leslie speaker up from
the horse garage to my "apartment".

Whoever decided this thing is portable took a lot of liberties, especially
when you are doing it yourself. The upper section still weighs 249 lbs and
the Leslie isn't exactly a lightweight either. I got my energy up, grabbed
a dolly and got it done. Out of the garage, up that ice packed driveway,
into the house (with Mrs.E. freaking out), up two flights of stairs and ....
whew.... done.

Now I need to get some beer to nurse my aching back. I also am thinking
that thank God my B3 rental business really hasn't taken off. The Porta-B
is 249 lbs. The B3 is 500.

Sounds good though.

I'll being the MRI scans of my back and spine over sometime and we'll
compare.

Damned spine looks like a pretzel. :)

--

When I want your opinion, I'll beat it out of you

Speaking of music...
 

On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:52:29 GMT, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:34:11 -0500, John H
wrote:

...we need a United States Sailors' Dance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wouNQ...eature=related

(One of my favorites.)

Pfffht...

Now this is good...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0vZwONKshU

Who said Russians don't have a sense of humor? :)

Wow. Costumes by Elton John.

Speaking of music...
 

On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:31:26 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:22:49 -0500, John H wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:52:10 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Jan 17, 1:34*pm, John H wrote:
...we need a United States Sailors' Dance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wouNQ...eature=related

(One of my favorites.)

Well, if Pelosi and Obama get their way, this will be the new U.S.
Army fight song..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO43p2Wqc08

This really sucks...

Well, maybe they just want the Army back in San Francisco.

Plus, I've got a feeling that allowing some open gays into the Army,
Marines, etc, is going to result in a lot of openly gay guys getting the
**** stomped out of them. Not judging right or wrong, but I'll bet it
happens.

Despite what you see on television, many gays are not even slightly
wimpy. Lots of them are bodybuilders, bikers, and martial arts
enthusiasts among other things.

If a gay guy joins the armed forces, he's likely not one of the lispy,
swishy ones. He might be the one who does the most stomping.