Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming pile
:

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:03:56 -0600, §ñühw€£f wrote:

Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming
pile
:

On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:52:17 -0500, hk wrote:

Kali wrote:
In article ,
says...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlS4JzDVlNA

Ha! That's great.

Did you catch Olberman last night? Good review of the Bush years.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#28699663



Eight years of bush in eight minutes...sad but funny.

Infuriating.

Support Conyers drive for holding the criminals accountable?

Been doing that. And demanding the same of every elected
"representative." A letter to Eric Holder is in progress.

Looks like my dreams are gonna be answered:
http://www.commondreams.org/print/36643

^_^

--
http://www.bds-palestine.net/?q=node/9
___ ___ ___ ___
/\__\ /\ \ /\ \ /\ \
/:/ _/_ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
/:/ /\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
/:/ /::\ \ _____\:\ \ ___ \:\ \ ___ /::\ \
/:/_/:/\:\__\ /::::::::\__\ /\ \ \:\__\ /\ /:/\:\__\
\:\/:/ /:/ / \:\~~\~~\/__/ \:\ \ /:/ / \:\/:/ \/__/
\::/ /:/ / \:\ \ \:\ /:/ / \::/__/
\/_/:/ / \:\ \ \:\/:/ / \:\ \
/:/ / \:\__\ \::/ / \:\__\

§ñühw¤£f wrote:
Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming pile
:

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:03:56 -0600, §ñühw€£f wrote:

Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming
pile
:

On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:52:17 -0500, hk wrote:

Kali wrote:
In article ,
says...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlS4JzDVlNA
Ha! That's great.

Did you catch Olberman last night? Good review of the Bush years.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#28699663



Eight years of bush in eight minutes...sad but funny.
Infuriating.

Support Conyers drive for holding the criminals accountable?
Been doing that. And demanding the same of every elected
"representative." A letter to Eric Holder is in progress.

Looks like my dreams are gonna be answered:
http://www.commondreams.org/print/36643

^_^


I wouldn't mind seeing certain members of the Bush mis-administration
prosecuted on criminal charges. Bush himself, no. Cheney, Gonzo...a few
others, you betcha.

Kali wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:33:08 -0500, hk wrote:

§ñühw¤£f wrote:
Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming pile
:

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:03:56 -0600, §ñühw€£f wrote:

Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming
pile
:

On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:52:17 -0500, hk wrote:

Kali wrote:
In article ,
says...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlS4JzDVlNA
Ha! That's great.

Did you catch Olberman last night? Good review of the Bush years.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#28699663



Eight years of bush in eight minutes...sad but funny.
Infuriating.

Support Conyers drive for holding the criminals accountable?
Been doing that. And demanding the same of every elected
"representative." A letter to Eric Holder is in progress.

Looks like my dreams are gonna be answered:
http://www.commondreams.org/print/36643

^_^

I wouldn't mind seeing certain members of the Bush mis-administration
prosecuted on criminal charges. Bush himself, no. Cheney, Gonzo...a few
others, you betcha.
And your calls for prosecution of those in the Clinton administration
can be found where again?

Gunner

Prosecution for what?

Your boys didn't have anything to go with, so they made a circus out
of a blow job and a blue dress, remember? LOL Gunner.


It's going to be a very rough eight years for Gummy.

On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:33:08 -0500, hk wrote:

§ñühw¤£f wrote:
Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming pile
:

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:03:56 -0600, §ñühw€£f wrote:

Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming
pile
:

On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:52:17 -0500, hk wrote:

Kali wrote:
In article ,
says...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlS4JzDVlNA
Ha! That's great.

Did you catch Olberman last night? Good review of the Bush years.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#28699663



Eight years of bush in eight minutes...sad but funny.
Infuriating.

Support Conyers drive for holding the criminals accountable?
Been doing that. And demanding the same of every elected
"representative." A letter to Eric Holder is in progress.

Looks like my dreams are gonna be answered:
http://www.commondreams.org/print/36643

^_^


I wouldn't mind seeing certain members of the Bush mis-administration
prosecuted on criminal charges. Bush himself, no. Cheney, Gonzo...a few
others, you betcha.

And your calls for prosecution of those in the Clinton administration
can be found where again?

Gunner

"Kali" wrote in message
...

Prosecution for what?

Your boys didn't have anything to go with, so they made a circus out
of a blow job and a blue dress, remember? LOL Gunner.


Self-imposed ignorance through repetition. Huh, Kali?

Odd how you liberals ignore the real issue which is not the blue dress and
cum stain. The real issue was suborning perjury and lying under oath with
the adverse effects this could have on national security via blackmail, etc.
Clinton did not get disbarred because he got blow jobs in the oval office.

Get a clue. Conservatives know the real issues.

--
Gregory Hall

"Kali" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"Kali" wrote in message
...

Prosecution for what?

Your boys didn't have anything to go with, so they made a circus out
of a blow job and a blue dress, remember? LOL Gunner.


Self-imposed ignorance through repetition. Huh, Kali?

Odd how you liberals ignore the real issue which is not the blue dress
and
cum stain. The real issue was suborning perjury and lying under oath

Yes, that was the unfortunate part of the blow job circus brought to
us by the family values hypocrites.

"I did not have sex with that woman..." Horror of horrors. Perjury!
A man lied about having extramarital sex!


More self-imposed liberal ignorance. More attempts to re-write history. The
lying under oath charge and conviction was about the suborning perjury and
not about not having sex with "that woman, Monica Lewinski."


That's far worse than ignoring intelligence and deceiving a country
into a war costing thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

A crime is a crime and a POTUS should know better. Going to war with Iraq is
not a crime as it was santioned by an almost unanimous vote of Congress. A
vote, BTW, Democrats insisted upon having.


Liberalism = stupid, ignorant people who put hate above fact.

--
Gregory Hall

On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:36:12 -0500, Kali wrote:

In article ,
says...

"Kali" wrote in message
...

Prosecution for what?

Your boys didn't have anything to go with, so they made a circus out
of a blow job and a blue dress, remember? LOL Gunner.


Self-imposed ignorance through repetition. Huh, Kali?

Odd how you liberals ignore the real issue which is not the blue dress and
cum stain. The real issue was suborning perjury and lying under oath

Yes, that was the unfortunate part of the blow job circus brought to
us by the family values hypocrites.

"I did not have sex with that woman..." Horror of horrors. Perjury!
A man lied about having extramarital sex!

That's far worse than ignoring intelligence and deceiving a country
into a war costing thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

with
the adverse effects this could have on national security via blackmail, etc.
Clinton did not get disbarred because he got blow jobs in the oval office.

Get a clue. Conservatives know the real issues.

And Clinton should be prosecuted for what?

Were you invited by Harry Krause to express your boating opinions?
--
* I Have a Degree in Liberal Arts; Do You Want Fries With That? *

John H

On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:51:15 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:

And your calls for prosecution of those in the Clinton administration
can be found where again?

Prosecution for what?
Wingers already spent about 100 million US taxpayer
dollars trying to investigate & impeach based *on their own lies*.
All you got was poor little Monica which was none of your
business anyway as well as being entrapment & illegal
phone tapeing, etc.

Did you spend one thin dime on neocons?
Nope.
And THEY have confessed/bragged in public.
--
Cliff

On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:48:59 -0500, hk wrote:

It's going to be a very rough eight years for Gummy.

He may even get "free" psychiatric care.
--
Cliff

On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:57:58 -0500, "Gregory Hall" wrote:


"Kali" wrote in message
.. .

Prosecution for what?

Your boys didn't have anything to go with, so they made a circus out
of a blow job and a blue dress, remember? LOL Gunner.


Self-imposed ignorance through repetition. Huh, Kali?

Odd how you liberals ignore the real issue which is not the blue dress and
cum stain. The real issue was suborning perjury and lying under oath with
the adverse effects this could have on national security via blackmail, etc.
Clinton did not get disbarred because he got blow jobs in the oval office.

Get a clue. Conservatives know the real issues.

They lie a lot.
"blow job and a blue dress".
100 milion spent investigating.
WHAT "suborning perjury and lying under oath"?

Found those "WMDs" yet?

BTW, The NIE presented to congress by the neocons
was *blatently edited* by them.
The *original* said "Saddam & Iraq are no threat
to the US or anybody".
--
Cliff