Trawler, anyone?
 

The new Grand Banks 41 with Skyhook, looks awesome. Beautiful Salon,
apparently lots of room from the photos , and fast, too.
23 knots for a 41 foot Trawler is fast. Great range, as well.
Another beauty that would be nice to own.

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:53:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:

The new Grand Banks 41 with Skyhook, looks awesome. Beautiful Salon,
apparently lots of room from the photos , and fast, too.
23 knots for a 41 foot Trawler is fast. Great range, as well.
Another beauty that would be nice to own.

To be called a trawler a boat needs to have a decent fuel range, close
to 1,000 nautical miles give or take. It is highly unlikely that a
23 knot boat will be anything close to that. Grand Banks seems to
have forgotten their roots.

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Jan 15, 6:51*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:53:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:
The new Grand Banks 41 with Skyhook, looks awesome. Beautiful Salon,
apparently lots of room from the photos , and fast, too.
23 knots for a 41 foot Trawler is fast. Great range, as well.
Another beauty that would be nice to own.

To be called a trawler a boat needs to have a decent fuel range, close
to 1,000 nautical miles give or take. * It is highly unlikely that a
23 knot boat will be anything close to that. * Grand Banks seems to
have forgotten their roots.

I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up, my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of 500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

Trawler, anyone?
 

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:

To be called a trawler a boat needs to have a decent fuel range, close
to 1,000 nautical miles give or take. * It is highly unlikely that a
23 knot boat will be anything close to that. * Grand Banks seems to
have forgotten their roots.

I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up, my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of 500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

Go do the math: approx 550 mi range. When a thousand is the minimum.

Casady`

Trawler, anyone?
 

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:

I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up, my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of 500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

8.8 kt / 7.9 gph is approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile for a maximum
range of about 550 NM. Unfortunately there are major reliability
issues with high performance diesels run at slow speed for extended
periods of time.

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Jan 15, 7:53*pm, (Richard Casady)
wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:
To be called a trawler a boat needs to have a decent fuel range, close
to 1,000 nautical miles give or take. It is highly unlikely that a
23 knot boat will be anything close to that. Grand Banks seems to
have forgotten their roots.

I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up, my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of 500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

Go do the math: approx 550 mi range. When a thousand is the minimum.

Casady`

I'm ONLY posting that Power Boating Magazine called it a Trawler...go
argue with them.

Trawler, anyone?
 

Unfortunately there are major reliability
issues with high performance diesels run at slow speed for extended
periods of time.

This from Cummins Diesel, with Mercruiser-Zeus Pods...dont remember
reading that in the article...who's your Pro stating that?
I dont think these are high-performance Diesels, either.

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Jan 15, 8:17*pm, D K wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 15, 6:51 pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:53:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:
The new Grand Banks 41 with Skyhook, looks awesome. Beautiful Salon,
apparently lots of room from the photos , and fast, too.
23 knots for a 41 foot Trawler is fast. Great range, as well.
Another beauty that would be nice to own.
To be called a trawler a boat needs to have a decent fuel range, close
to 1,000 nautical miles give or take. * It is highly unlikely that a
23 knot boat will be anything close to that. * Grand Banks seems to
have forgotten their roots.

I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up, my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of 500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

I get 620 miles but that's slow as hell - over 63 hours.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hence the term " Cruising "...doh!

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:52:06 -0800 (PST), wrote:

Unfortunately there are major reliability
issues with high performance diesels run at slow speed for extended
periods of time.

This from Cummins Diesel, with Mercruiser-Zeus Pods...dont remember
reading that in the article...who's your Pro stating that?
I dont think these are high-performance Diesels, either.

They just about have to be high performance just to push a 41 ft boat
at more than 20 kts. The problem is with the turbo chargers. They
carbon up when used at low speed which causes very expensive
maintenance issues.

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:48:56 -0800 (PST), wrote:

I'm ONLY posting that Power Boating Magazine called it a Trawler...go
argue with them.

It would be more accurate to call it a "trawler style" boat, meaning
that it looks something like a trawler. Magazines tend to regurgitate
the marketing hype distributed by the boat builders because that's
where the advertising revenues are.

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Jan 15, 8:42*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:
I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up, my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of 500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

8.8 kt / 7.9 gph is approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile for a maximum
range of about 550 NM. * Unfortunately there are major reliability
issues with high performance diesels run at slow speed for extended
periods of time.

Oh, oh, Harry failed 4th grade math. Must not be a requirement for
Yale. Pfffftttt..

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Jan 15, 9:12*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:52:06 -0800 (PST), wrote:
Unfortunately there are major reliability
issues with high performance diesels run at slow speed for extended
periods of time.

This from Cummins Diesel, with *Mercruiser-Zeus Pods...dont remember
reading that in the article...who's your Pro stating that?
I dont think these are high-performance Diesels, either.

They just about have to be high performance just to push a 41 ft boat
at more than 20 kts. * *The problem is with the turbo chargers. *They
carbon up when used at low speed which causes very expensive
maintenance issues.

It must be that ****ty, American diesel fuel. My Truck never carbons
up, and it runs slow for hours at a time...

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Jan 15, 9:24*pm, wrote:
On Jan 15, 8:42*pm, Wayne.B wrote:

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:
I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up, my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of 500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

8.8 kt / 7.9 gph is approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile for a maximum
range of about 550 NM. * Unfortunately there are major reliability
issues with high performance diesels run at slow speed for extended
periods of time.

Oh, oh, Harry failed 4th grade math. Must not be a requirement for
Yale. Pfffftttt..

Look at stupid here, blaming Harry for Waynes statement... What a
turd...polluting this thread.... I think you owe an appology, Mr Head-
In-Ass.

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Jan 15, 7:52*pm, wrote:
On Jan 15, 8:17*pm, D K wrote:



wrote:
On Jan 15, 6:51 pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:53:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:
The new Grand Banks 41 with Skyhook, looks awesome. Beautiful Salon,
apparently lots of room from the photos , and fast, too.
23 knots for a 41 foot Trawler is fast. Great range, as well.
Another beauty that would be nice to own.
To be called a trawler a boat needs to have a decent fuel range, close
to 1,000 nautical miles give or take. * It is highly unlikely that a
23 knot boat will be anything close to that. * Grand Banks seems to
have forgotten their roots.

I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up, my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of 500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

I get 620 miles but that's slow as hell - over 63 hours.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hence the term " Cruising "...doh!

more like "coasting"

Trawler, anyone?
 

wrote in message
...
On Jan 15, 8:42 pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:
I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up, my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of 500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

8.8 kt / 7.9 gph is approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile for a maximum
range of about 550 NM. Unfortunately there are major reliability
issues with high performance diesels run at slow speed for extended
periods of time.

Oh, oh, Harry failed 4th grade math. Must not be a requirement for
Yale. Pfffftttt..
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wayne also failed 7th grade math, or had a brain pffft. 1.1 nautical mile
per gallon. Or about 556 nautical miles. Whats that about 640 standard
miles? Actually is Slammer that has no math ability.

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Jan 15, 11:37*pm, Tim wrote:
On Jan 15, 7:52*pm, wrote:





On Jan 15, 8:17*pm, D K wrote:

wrote:
On Jan 15, 6:51 pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:53:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:
The new Grand Banks 41 with Skyhook, looks awesome. Beautiful Salon,
apparently lots of room from the photos , and fast, too.
23 knots for a 41 foot Trawler is fast. Great range, as well.
Another beauty that would be nice to own.
To be called a trawler a boat needs to have a decent fuel range, close
to 1,000 nautical miles give or take. * It is highly unlikely that a
23 knot boat will be anything close to that. * Grand Banks seems to
have forgotten their roots.

I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up, my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of 500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

I get 620 miles but that's slow as hell - over 63 hours.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hence the term " Cruising "...doh!

more like "coasting"- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

8.8 knots isnt exactly coasting...close...

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Jan 16, 12:03*am, "Calif Bill" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 15, 8:42 pm, Wayne.B wrote:

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:
I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up, my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of 500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

8.8 kt / 7.9 gph is approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile for a maximum
range of about 550 NM. Unfortunately there are major reliability
issues with high performance diesels run at slow speed for extended
periods of time.

Oh, oh, Harry failed 4th grade math. Must not be a requirement for
Yale. Pfffftttt..
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wayne also failed 7th grade math, or had a brain pffft. *1.1 nautical mile
per gallon. Or about 556 nautical miles. *Whats that about 640 standard
miles? *Actually is Slammer that has no math ability.

You know what? I didnt know the formula for the calculation. I didnt
care, anyway. The thread progression clearly shows the turds floating
up to the surface of it, to pollute it. Another on-topic boating post
ruined by the Dwarf Army.
At least I can build a proper sentence.Take a look at your last one.
Too much California Smoke, Corporal of the Dwarf Army?

Trawler, anyone?
 

Trawler, anyone?
 

Tim wrote:
On Jan 15, 7:52 pm, wrote:
On Jan 15, 8:17 pm, D K wrote:



wrote:
On Jan 15, 6:51 pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:53:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:
The new Grand Banks 41 with Skyhook, looks awesome. Beautiful Salon,
apparently lots of room from the photos , and fast, too.
23 knots for a 41 foot Trawler is fast. Great range, as well.
Another beauty that would be nice to own.
To be called a trawler a boat needs to have a decent fuel range, close
to 1,000 nautical miles give or take. It is highly unlikely that a
23 knot boat will be anything close to that. Grand Banks seems to
have forgotten their roots.
I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up, my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of 500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.
I get 620 miles but that's slow as hell - over 63 hours.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Hence the term " Cruising "...doh!

more like "coasting"

Or...drifting.

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:03:42 -0800, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Jan 15, 8:42 pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:
I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up, my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of 500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

8.8 kt / 7.9 gph is approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile for a maximum
range of about 550 NM. Unfortunately there are major reliability
issues with high performance diesels run at slow speed for extended
periods of time.

Oh, oh, Harry failed 4th grade math. Must not be a requirement for
Yale. Pfffftttt..
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wayne also failed 7th grade math, or had a brain pffft. 1.1 nautical mile
per gallon. Or about 556 nautical miles. Whats that about 640 standard
miles? Actually is Slammer that has no math ability.


I don't see how Wayne 'failed 7th grade math'. If the tank holds 500
gallons and the boat gets 1.1 nautical mile/gallon, the product of the two
numbers is 550 nautical miles.

Slammer's math? Leaves a lot to be desired.

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Jan 15, 11:03*pm, wrote:
On Jan 15, 9:24*pm, wrote:





On Jan 15, 8:42*pm, Wayne.B wrote:

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:
I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up, my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of 500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll guess..
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

8.8 kt / 7.9 gph is approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile for a maximum
range of about 550 NM. * Unfortunately there are major reliability
issues with high performance diesels run at slow speed for extended
periods of time.

Oh, oh, Harry failed 4th grade math. Must not be a requirement for
Yale. Pfffftttt..

Look at stupid here, blaming Harry for Waynes statement... What a
turd...polluting this thread.... I think you owe an appology, Mr Head-
In-Ass.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Are you going to apologize for every thread that you've ruined with
your childish name calling and third grade vulgar insults?

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Jan 16, 9:49*am, wrote:
On Jan 15, 11:03*pm, wrote:





On Jan 15, 9:24*pm, wrote:

On Jan 15, 8:42*pm, Wayne.B wrote:

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:
I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up, my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of 500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

8.8 kt / 7.9 gph is approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile for a maximum
range of about 550 NM. * Unfortunately there are major reliability
issues with high performance diesels run at slow speed for extended
periods of time.

Oh, oh, Harry failed 4th grade math. Must not be a requirement for
Yale. Pfffftttt..

Look at stupid here, blaming Harry for Waynes statement... What a
turd...polluting this thread.... I think you owe an appology, Mr Head-
In-Ass.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Are you going to apologize for every thread that you've ruined with
your childish name calling and third grade vulgar insults?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Don't worry about the fruity five Loog, ever since the story of Donnie
and Salty with the pink panties, I don't pay much attention to them.
They all seem to have very weird sexual hangups, remember stumpy?

Trawler, anyone?
 

wrote in message
...
On Jan 16, 9:49 am, wrote:
On Jan 15, 11:03 pm, wrote:





On Jan 15, 9:24 pm, wrote:

On Jan 15, 8:42 pm, Wayne.B wrote:

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:04:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up,
my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of
500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll
guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

8.8 kt / 7.9 gph is approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile for a
maximum
range of about 550 NM. Unfortunately there are major reliability
issues with high performance diesels run at slow speed for extended
periods of time.

Oh, oh, Harry failed 4th grade math. Must not be a requirement for
Yale. Pfffftttt..

Look at stupid here, blaming Harry for Waynes statement... What a
turd...polluting this thread.... I think you owe an appology, Mr Head-
In-Ass.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Are you going to apologize for every thread that you've ruined with
your childish name calling and third grade vulgar insults?- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Don't worry about the fruity five Loog, ever since the story of Donnie
and Salty with the pink panties, I don't pay much attention to them.
They all seem to have very weird sexual hangups, remember stumpy?

************************************************** ******************

How long does it take to put a new discussion board up? I believe Chuck
did it in a couple of days.

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Jan 16, 9:57*am, wrote:
On Jan 16, 9:49*am, wrote:





On Jan 15, 11:03*pm, wrote:

On Jan 15, 9:24*pm, wrote:

On Jan 15, 8:42*pm, Wayne.B wrote:

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:
I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up, my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of 500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

8.8 kt / 7.9 gph is approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile for a maximum
range of about 550 NM. * Unfortunately there are major reliability
issues with high performance diesels run at slow speed for extended
periods of time.

Oh, oh, Harry failed 4th grade math. Must not be a requirement for
Yale. Pfffftttt..

Look at stupid here, blaming Harry for Waynes statement... What a
turd...polluting this thread.... I think you owe an appology, Mr Head-
In-Ass.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Are you going to apologize for every thread that you've ruined with
your childish name calling and third grade vulgar insults?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Don't worry about the fruity five Loog, ever since the story of Donnie
and Salty with the pink panties, I don't pay much attention to them.
They all seem to have very weird sexual hangups, remember stumpy?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I think Don even has more sexual hangups than Harry. He's over in the
Hybrid Car thread talking about strap-ons now! I wonder if he and
Harry and slammer are planning a little get together........

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Jan 16, 10:12*am, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 16, 9:49 am, wrote:





On Jan 15, 11:03 pm, wrote:

On Jan 15, 9:24 pm, wrote:

On Jan 15, 8:42 pm, Wayne.B wrote:

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:04:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up,
my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of
500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll
guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

8.8 kt / 7.9 gph is approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile for a
maximum
range of about 550 NM. Unfortunately there are major reliability
issues with high performance diesels run at slow speed for extended
periods of time.

Oh, oh, Harry failed 4th grade math. Must not be a requirement for
Yale. Pfffftttt..

Look at stupid here, blaming Harry for Waynes statement... What a
turd...polluting this thread.... I think you owe an appology, Mr Head-
In-Ass.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Are you going to apologize for every thread that you've ruined with
your childish name calling and third grade vulgar insults?- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Don't worry about the fruity five Loog, ever since the story of Donnie
and Salty with the pink panties, I don't pay much attention to them.
They all seem to have very weird sexual hangups, remember stumpy?

************************************************** ******************

How long does it take to put a new discussion board up? * I believe Chuck
did it in a couple of days.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Don, I know you don't realize or understand this, what with you and
your kid laying around the house all day, but there are people in the
world that have different things that they need to do, or they want to
do. Sometimes these tasks take precedent over other tasks.

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Jan 16, 3:34*pm, wrote:
On Jan 16, 10:12*am, "Don White" wrote:





wrote in message

....
On Jan 16, 9:49 am, wrote:

On Jan 15, 11:03 pm, wrote:

On Jan 15, 9:24 pm, wrote:

On Jan 15, 8:42 pm, Wayne.B wrote:

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:04:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up,
my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of
500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll
guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

8.8 kt / 7.9 gph is approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile for a
maximum
range of about 550 NM. Unfortunately there are major reliability
issues with high performance diesels run at slow speed for extended
periods of time.

Oh, oh, Harry failed 4th grade math. Must not be a requirement for
Yale. Pfffftttt..

Look at stupid here, blaming Harry for Waynes statement... What a
turd...polluting this thread.... I think you owe an appology, Mr Head-
In-Ass.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Are you going to apologize for every thread that you've ruined with
your childish name calling and third grade vulgar insults?- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Don't worry about the fruity five Loog, ever since the story of Donnie
and Salty with the pink panties, I don't pay much attention to them.
They all seem to have very weird sexual hangups, remember stumpy?

************************************************** ******************

How long does it take to put a new discussion board up? * I believe Chuck
did it in a couple of days.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Don, I know you don't realize or understand this, what with you and
your kid laying around the house all day, but there are people in the
world that have different things that they need to do, or they want to
do. Sometimes these tasks take precedent over other tasks.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yeah, but the Fruity Five only are successful as trolls, it's their
job...

Trawler, anyone?
 

wrote in message
...
On Jan 16, 10:12 am, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 16, 9:49 am, wrote:





On Jan 15, 11:03 pm, wrote:

On Jan 15, 9:24 pm, wrote:

On Jan 15, 8:42 pm, Wayne.B wrote:

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:04:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up,
my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of
500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll
guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

8.8 kt / 7.9 gph is approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile for a
maximum
range of about 550 NM. Unfortunately there are major reliability
issues with high performance diesels run at slow speed for
extended
periods of time.

Oh, oh, Harry failed 4th grade math. Must not be a requirement for
Yale. Pfffftttt..

Look at stupid here, blaming Harry for Waynes statement... What a
turd...polluting this thread.... I think you owe an appology, Mr Head-
In-Ass.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Are you going to apologize for every thread that you've ruined with
your childish name calling and third grade vulgar insults?- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Don't worry about the fruity five Loog, ever since the story of Donnie
and Salty with the pink panties, I don't pay much attention to them.
They all seem to have very weird sexual hangups, remember stumpy?

************************************************** ******************

How long does it take to put a new discussion board up? I believe Chuck
did it in a couple of days.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Don, I know you don't realize or understand this, what with you and
your kid laying around the house all day, but there are people in the
world that have different things that they need to do, or they want to
do. Sometimes these tasks take precedent over other tasks.

************************************************** ***********

Has he moved the motorcycle off the kitchen table yet?

Trawler, anyone?
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:03:42 -0800, "Calif Bill"

wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Jan 15, 8:42 pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:
I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up, my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of 500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

8.8 kt / 7.9 gph is approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile for a maximum
range of about 550 NM. Unfortunately there are major reliability
issues with high performance diesels run at slow speed for extended
periods of time.

Oh, oh, Harry failed 4th grade math. Must not be a requirement for
Yale. Pfffftttt..
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wayne also failed 7th grade math, or had a brain pffft. 1.1 nautical mile
per gallon. Or about 556 nautical miles. Whats that about 640 standard
miles? Actually is Slammer that has no math ability.


I don't see how Wayne 'failed 7th grade math'. If the tank holds 500
gallons and the boat gets 1.1 nautical mile/gallon, the product of the two
numbers is 550 nautical miles.

Slammer's math? Leaves a lot to be desired.

The 7th grade error was confusing the units.
Wayne "approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile " not approximately 1.1 nautical
mile/gal.

Trawler, anyone?
 

Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Jan 16, 9:49 am, wrote:
On Jan 15, 11:03 pm, wrote:





On Jan 15, 9:24 pm, wrote:
On Jan 15, 8:42 pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:04:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up,
my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of
500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll
guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.
8.8 kt / 7.9 gph is approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile for a
maximum
range of about 550 NM. Unfortunately there are major reliability
issues with high performance diesels run at slow speed for extended
periods of time.
Oh, oh, Harry failed 4th grade math. Must not be a requirement for
Yale. Pfffftttt..
Look at stupid here, blaming Harry for Waynes statement... What a
turd...polluting this thread.... I think you owe an appology, Mr Head-
In-Ass.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Are you going to apologize for every thread that you've ruined with
your childish name calling and third grade vulgar insults?- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Don't worry about the fruity five Loog, ever since the story of Donnie
and Salty with the pink panties, I don't pay much attention to them.
They all seem to have very weird sexual hangups, remember stumpy?

************************************************** ******************

How long does it take to put a new discussion board up? I believe Chuck
did it in a couple of days.



Less than an hour, dummy.

Trawler, anyone?
 

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:06:26 -0800, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

The 7th grade error was confusing the units.
Wayne "approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile " not approximately 1.1 nautical
mile/gal.

Typographical error. :-)

My mind had it right, the keyboard got it wrong...

That's my story and I'm sticking to it. How else would the range
calculation have come out correctly?

Trawler, anyone?
 

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:06:26 -0800, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

The 7th grade error was confusing the units.
Wayne "approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile " not approximately 1.1
nautical
mile/gal.

Typographical error. :-)

My mind had it right, the keyboard got it wrong...

That's my story and I'm sticking to it. How else would the range
calculation have come out correctly?

I am an engineer. I figured out where the error was. But the math teacher
could not. Still not a thousand mile range.

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Jan 16, 11:34*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message

...

On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:06:26 -0800, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

The 7th grade error was confusing the units.
Wayne "approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile " *not approximately 1.1
nautical
mile/gal.

Typographical error. * :-)

My mind had it right, the keyboard got it wrong...

That's my story and I'm sticking to it. *How else would the range
calculation have come out correctly?

I am an engineer. *I figured out where the error was. *But the math teacher
could not. *Still not a thousand mile range.

Well, in a response, I said I " guessed " the range would be
greater... I NEVER stated it would be.I also stated I did NOT know the
formula for calculation.
That doesnt compute in the brains of the Dwarf Army, and their efforts
to ruin a on-topic post.
Wayne B blames, and insults the wrong person for a math
calculation, but theres no mention of that, is there?
Just like the Dwarf General Herring has stated...dont answer my
posts...lol. Simple really, but not for the Dwarf Army ; they're too
stupid to resist.

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:06:26 -0800, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:03:42 -0800, "Calif Bill"

wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Jan 15, 8:42 pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:
I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up, my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of 500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

8.8 kt / 7.9 gph is approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile for a maximum
range of about 550 NM. Unfortunately there are major reliability
issues with high performance diesels run at slow speed for extended
periods of time.

Oh, oh, Harry failed 4th grade math. Must not be a requirement for
Yale. Pfffftttt..
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wayne also failed 7th grade math, or had a brain pffft. 1.1 nautical mile
per gallon. Or about 556 nautical miles. Whats that about 640 standard
miles? Actually is Slammer that has no math ability.


I don't see how Wayne 'failed 7th grade math'. If the tank holds 500
gallons and the boat gets 1.1 nautical mile/gallon, the product of the two
numbers is 550 nautical miles.

Slammer's math? Leaves a lot to be desired.

The 7th grade error was confusing the units.
Wayne "approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile " not approximately 1.1 nautical
mile/gal.


You damn English majors! :)

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:34:45 -0800, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Wayne.B" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:06:26 -0800, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

The 7th grade error was confusing the units.
Wayne "approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile " not approximately 1.1
nautical
mile/gal.

Typographical error. :-)

My mind had it right, the keyboard got it wrong...

That's my story and I'm sticking to it. How else would the range
calculation have come out correctly?

I am an engineer. I figured out where the error was. But the math teacher
could not. Still not a thousand mile range.


What can I say? You're just much smarter than I am!

Trawler, anyone?
 

What can I say? You're just much smarter than I am!-

The Master has spoken to his bitches, justwaitahate, and loogy.


....and the two bitches reply... " Yes, Master "


The Master has spoken to his bitches, justwaitahate, and loogy.


....and the two bitches reply... " Yes, Master "


The Master has spoken to his bitches, justwaitahate, and loogy.


....and the two bitches reply... " Yes, Master "


The Master has spoken to his bitches, justwaitahate, and loogy.


....and the two bitches reply... " Yes, Master "


The Master has spoken to his bitches, justwaitahate, and loogy.


....and the two bitches reply... " Yes, Master "


The Master has spoken to his bitches, justwaitahate, and loogy.


....and the two bitches reply... " Yes, Master "


The Master has spoken to his bitches, justwaitahate, and loogy.


....and the two bitches reply... " Yes, Master "


The Master has spoken to his bitches, justwaitahate, and loogy.


....and the two bitches reply... " Yes, Master "

Trawler, anyone?
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:06:26 -0800, "Calif Bill"

wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:03:42 -0800, "Calif Bill"

wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Jan 15, 8:42 pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:
I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up, my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of 500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

8.8 kt / 7.9 gph is approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile for a maximum
range of about 550 NM. Unfortunately there are major reliability
issues with high performance diesels run at slow speed for extended
periods of time.

Oh, oh, Harry failed 4th grade math. Must not be a requirement for
Yale. Pfffftttt..
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wayne also failed 7th grade math, or had a brain pffft. 1.1 nautical
mile
per gallon. Or about 556 nautical miles. Whats that about 640 standard
miles? Actually is Slammer that has no math ability.


I don't see how Wayne 'failed 7th grade math'. If the tank holds 500
gallons and the boat gets 1.1 nautical mile/gallon, the product of the
two
numbers is 550 nautical miles.

Slammer's math? Leaves a lot to be desired.

The 7th grade error was confusing the units.
Wayne "approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile " not approximately 1.1
nautical
mile/gal.


You damn English majors! :)

Engineering major.

Trawler, anyone?
 

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:45:57 -0800, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:06:26 -0800, "Calif Bill"

wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:03:42 -0800, "Calif Bill"

wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Jan 15, 8:42 pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:
I forgot to mention ( and you obviously havent read the write-up, my
bad ) but at 8.8 knots, using 7.9 gal per hour.... with a load of 500
gallons....thats a lot of NM. More than your cutoff line, I'll guess.
Twin Diesels. Zeus Pods.
Go read the write-up.

8.8 kt / 7.9 gph is approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile for a maximum
range of about 550 NM. Unfortunately there are major reliability
issues with high performance diesels run at slow speed for extended
periods of time.

Oh, oh, Harry failed 4th grade math. Must not be a requirement for
Yale. Pfffftttt..
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wayne also failed 7th grade math, or had a brain pffft. 1.1 nautical
mile
per gallon. Or about 556 nautical miles. Whats that about 640 standard
miles? Actually is Slammer that has no math ability.


I don't see how Wayne 'failed 7th grade math'. If the tank holds 500
gallons and the boat gets 1.1 nautical mile/gallon, the product of the
two
numbers is 550 nautical miles.

Slammer's math? Leaves a lot to be desired.

The 7th grade error was confusing the units.
Wayne "approximately 1.1 gal/nautical mile " not approximately 1.1
nautical
mile/gal.


You damn English majors! :)

Engineering major.


Good on ya!
--
* I Have a Degree in Liberal Arts; Do You Want Fries With That? *

John H