Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BAR wrote:
wrote: You don't need to work for the "BFI", whatever that is, to get info on a phone number very quickly and easily. You do have to have a clue, however. Ok smart guy who is it? I know who it is, too...and it only took me about 20 seconds to find out. Oh, and I don't know what the BFI is, either. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 7, 9:06*am, hk wrote:
BAR wrote: wrote: You don't need to work for the "BFI", whatever that is, to get info on a phone number very quickly and easily. You do have to have a clue, however. Ok smart guy who is it? I know who it is, too...and it only took me about 20 seconds to find out. Oh, and I don't know what the BFI is, either. No you don't... |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 7, 10:39*am, wrote:
On Jan 7, 9:06*am, hk wrote: BAR wrote: wrote: You don't need to work for the "BFI", whatever that is, to get info on a phone number very quickly and easily. You do have to have a clue, however. Ok smart guy who is it? I know who it is, too...and it only took me about 20 seconds to find out. Oh, and I don't know what the BFI is, either. No you don't... It's just another WAFA lie. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BAR wrote:
wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:42:49 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 6, 2:40 pm, John H wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:33:57 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 6, 1:30 pm, wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:14:31 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 6, 1:09 pm, wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:41:45 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 6, 12:34 pm, John H wrote: On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:59:03 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:31:46 -0800 (PST), wrote: Check your E-mail... and have at it ![]() Scotty... Did you find the perp, and did he turn out to be the most likely suspect ? It's being worked on. I don't have any close cop friends anymore, or it would have been done. We are just waiting for a confirmation, but I think we got it... Interesting indeed... Too funny. You nitwits have been handed the phone number of who you are looking for, and two days later you don't know who they are. When you wake up in the morning, how long does it take you to find your dick?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not long at all, I just look in your mouth... We have not given this a priority, the number ain't going anywhere, neither is the caller... We have lives beyond trolling the internet, do you? With a phone numbetr in hand, you can know who made it in less than a minute. You are incompetent.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - and you are a coward.. now back under your desk... I wonder why those who are 'in the know' don't just post the information? It's for damn sure someone who is pretty sick. It sure as hell wouldn't hurt for everyone to know who it is. I won't call the cops because I don't want to cause problems for the guy's family, assuming he has one. I know how my wife felt, just listening to the crap he left on the recorder and the phone ringing seventeen times.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Remember, it was salty and harry that said they knew already... you know where I a going with this ![]() with the bfi... snerk You don't need to work for the "BFI", whatever that is, to get info on a phone number very quickly and easily. You do have to have a clue, however. Ok smart guy who is it? It'll cost you $14.95 |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:10:13 -0500, Jim wrote:
Ok smart guy who is it? It'll cost you $14.95 ROTFL!!! |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BAR wrote:
wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:42:49 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 6, 2:40 pm, John H wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:33:57 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 6, 1:30 pm, wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:14:31 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 6, 1:09 pm, wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:41:45 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 6, 12:34 pm, John H wrote: On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:59:03 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:31:46 -0800 (PST), wrote: Check your E-mail... and have at it ![]() Scotty... Did you find the perp, and did he turn out to be the most likely suspect ? It's being worked on. I don't have any close cop friends anymore, or it would have been done. We are just waiting for a confirmation, but I think we got it... Interesting indeed... Too funny. You nitwits have been handed the phone number of who you are looking for, and two days later you don't know who they are. When you wake up in the morning, how long does it take you to find your dick?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not long at all, I just look in your mouth... We have not given this a priority, the number ain't going anywhere, neither is the caller... We have lives beyond trolling the internet, do you? With a phone numbetr in hand, you can know who made it in less than a minute. You are incompetent.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - and you are a coward.. now back under your desk... I wonder why those who are 'in the know' don't just post the information? It's for damn sure someone who is pretty sick. It sure as hell wouldn't hurt for everyone to know who it is. I won't call the cops because I don't want to cause problems for the guy's family, assuming he has one. I know how my wife felt, just listening to the crap he left on the recorder and the phone ringing seventeen times.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Remember, it was salty and harry that said they knew already... you know where I a going with this ![]() with the bfi... snerk You don't need to work for the "BFI", whatever that is, to get info on a phone number very quickly and easily. You do have to have a clue, however. Ok smart guy who is it? The first reverse look up of the phone number showing the general location provide all of the information I needed to know. I wonder if he ever shows his head around here again? |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BAR wrote:
BAR wrote: wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:42:49 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 6, 2:40 pm, John H wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:33:57 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 6, 1:30 pm, wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:14:31 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 6, 1:09 pm, wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:41:45 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 6, 12:34 pm, John H wrote: On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:59:03 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:31:46 -0800 (PST), wrote: Check your E-mail... and have at it ![]() Scotty... Did you find the perp, and did he turn out to be the most likely suspect ? It's being worked on. I don't have any close cop friends anymore, or it would have been done. We are just waiting for a confirmation, but I think we got it... Interesting indeed... Too funny. You nitwits have been handed the phone number of who you are looking for, and two days later you don't know who they are. When you wake up in the morning, how long does it take you to find your dick?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not long at all, I just look in your mouth... We have not given this a priority, the number ain't going anywhere, neither is the caller... We have lives beyond trolling the internet, do you? With a phone numbetr in hand, you can know who made it in less than a minute. You are incompetent.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - and you are a coward.. now back under your desk... I wonder why those who are 'in the know' don't just post the information? It's for damn sure someone who is pretty sick. It sure as hell wouldn't hurt for everyone to know who it is. I won't call the cops because I don't want to cause problems for the guy's family, assuming he has one. I know how my wife felt, just listening to the crap he left on the recorder and the phone ringing seventeen times.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Remember, it was salty and harry that said they knew already... you know where I a going with this ![]() with the bfi... snerk You don't need to work for the "BFI", whatever that is, to get info on a phone number very quickly and easily. You do have to have a clue, however. Ok smart guy who is it? The first reverse look up of the phone number showing the general location provide all of the information I needed to know. I wonder if he ever shows his head around here again? My guess is JimH, but that is only a guess. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hey John! | ASA | |||
(OT) Vietnam Veterans Against John Kerry (Sorry John H) | General | |||
(OT) Gift for John H, NOYB, John Gaguin and other right wingers | General |