On Jan 6, 2:40*pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:33:57 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Jan 6, 1:30*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:14:31 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Jan 6, 1:09*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:41:45 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Jan 6, 12:34*pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:59:03 -0500, Wayne.B

wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:31:46 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

Check your E-mail... and have at it

Scotty...

Did you find the perp, and did he turn out to be the most likely
suspect ?

It's being worked on. I don't have any close cop friends anymore, or it
would have been done.

We are just waiting for a confirmation, but I think we got it...
Interesting indeed...

Too funny. You nitwits have been handed the phone number of who you
are looking for, and two days later you don't know who they are. When
you wake up in the morning, how long does it take you to find your
dick?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not long at all, I just look in your mouth... * We have not given this
a priority, the number ain't going anywhere, neither is the caller...
We have lives beyond trolling the internet, do you?

With a phone numbetr in hand, you can know who made it in less than a
minute. You are incompetent.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

and you are a coward.. now back under your desk...

I wonder why those who are 'in the know' don't just post the information?
It's for damn sure someone who is pretty sick. It sure as hell wouldn't
hurt for everyone to know who it is.

I won't call the cops because I don't want to cause problems for the guy's
family, assuming he has one. I know how my wife felt, just listening to the
crap he left on the recorder and the phone ringing seventeen times.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Remember, it was salty and harry that said they knew already... you
know where I a going with this Harry went to Yale, and salty works
with the bfi... snerk