|
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:53:35 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a miserable failure, and STILL don't see it. Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president? Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd, he would have had a great economy going for him. John H Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us. What country would you have had him 'punish'? John H The country which you think cannot be attacked because you've been told they're our ally, and you actually believe that nonsense. You're reading my mind now? Which country would you have had him punish? -- ** Good Day! ** John H |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
"John H" wrote in message
... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:53:35 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message m... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a miserable failure, and STILL don't see it. Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president? Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd, he would have had a great economy going for him. John H Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us. What country would you have had him 'punish'? John H The country which you think cannot be attacked because you've been told they're our ally, and you actually believe that nonsense. You're reading my mind now? Which country would you have had him punish? John H With every passing day, I have less patience with people who do not read. The information you need to participate in this discussion has been available in your public library for at least 5 years, as well as in news sources which target sentient adults. If you don't have this information by now, it's because you do not want to have this information. It would be best if you'd not participate in this discussion, since you do not have the necessary information to do so. If I see a thread about diagnosing a problem with a diesel engine, I might read it, but I would not contribute to it because I know absolutely nothing about diagnosing diesel engine problems. You should do the same in this discussion. |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
wrote:
On Dec 31 2008, 3:52 pm, Boater wrote: Don White wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ There's just way too many people in the world today. We have to come up with a way to 'thin the herd' over the next few generations or we'll all be over run. I agree completely, and I think it inappropriate for families to have more than one or two kids. Or cats or dogs. Animal shelters are over run by cats and dogs that are unwanted. Really.. Up here we are getting very disturbing commercials from the ASPCA which leave my kid in tears. She knows it is bull too as ASPCA is about as good at saving animals as "Planned Parenthood" is at saving babies.. Please folks, if you are going to help animals, support your local shelter.. Off my soap box... Happy new year. ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:08:41 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:53:35 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message om... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a miserable failure, and STILL don't see it. Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president? Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd, he would have had a great economy going for him. John H Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us. What country would you have had him 'punish'? John H The country which you think cannot be attacked because you've been told they're our ally, and you actually believe that nonsense. You're reading my mind now? Which country would you have had him punish? John H With every passing day, I have less patience with people who do not read. The information you need to participate in this discussion has been available in your public library for at least 5 years, as well as in news sources which target sentient adults. If you don't have this information by now, it's because you do not want to have this information. It would be best if you'd not participate in this discussion, since you do not have the necessary information to do so. If I see a thread about diagnosing a problem with a diesel engine, I might read it, but I would not contribute to it because I know absolutely nothing about diagnosing diesel engine problems. You should do the same in this discussion. Again, which country, in your opinion, should Bush have 'punished'? Try to just respond without all the smart-assed stuff. -- ** Good Day! ** John H |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
"John H" wrote in message
... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:08:41 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:53:35 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message m... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message news:6inpl4dqaql6ds684kgn0ug14i91eieqs4@4ax. com... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a miserable failure, and STILL don't see it. Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president? Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd, he would have had a great economy going for him. John H Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us. What country would you have had him 'punish'? John H The country which you think cannot be attacked because you've been told they're our ally, and you actually believe that nonsense. You're reading my mind now? Which country would you have had him punish? John H With every passing day, I have less patience with people who do not read. The information you need to participate in this discussion has been available in your public library for at least 5 years, as well as in news sources which target sentient adults. If you don't have this information by now, it's because you do not want to have this information. It would be best if you'd not participate in this discussion, since you do not have the necessary information to do so. If I see a thread about diagnosing a problem with a diesel engine, I might read it, but I would not contribute to it because I know absolutely nothing about diagnosing diesel engine problems. You should do the same in this discussion. Again, which country, in your opinion, should Bush have 'punished'? Try to just respond without all the smart-assed stuff. John H There are two possibilities at the moment: 1) You know the name of the country, but you're not revealing it. I won't play that game. 2) You do NOT know the name of the country, in which case, see above, "people who do not read". There's only one way out of this, John. Tell me the name of the country. If you don't know the name, we're all done here. |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
"John H" wrote in message
... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:25:06 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:08:41 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message m... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:53:35 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message news:msppl49men4h7me41cpjvuid9dpcgol8v6@4ax. com... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message news:6inpl4dqaql6ds684kgn0ug14i91eieqs4@4a x.com... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a miserable failure, and STILL don't see it. Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president? Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd, he would have had a great economy going for him. John H Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us. What country would you have had him 'punish'? John H The country which you think cannot be attacked because you've been told they're our ally, and you actually believe that nonsense. You're reading my mind now? Which country would you have had him punish? John H With every passing day, I have less patience with people who do not read. The information you need to participate in this discussion has been available in your public library for at least 5 years, as well as in news sources which target sentient adults. If you don't have this information by now, it's because you do not want to have this information. It would be best if you'd not participate in this discussion, since you do not have the necessary information to do so. If I see a thread about diagnosing a problem with a diesel engine, I might read it, but I would not contribute to it because I know absolutely nothing about diagnosing diesel engine problems. You should do the same in this discussion. Again, which country, in your opinion, should Bush have 'punished'? Try to just respond without all the smart-assed stuff. John H There are two possibilities at the moment: 1) You know the name of the country, but you're not revealing it. I won't play that game. 2) You do NOT know the name of the country, in which case, see above, "people who do not read". There's only one way out of this, John. Tell me the name of the country. If you don't know the name, we're all done here. If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess we're done. John H How is it possible that you don't know where most of the 9/11 attackers came from? How is it possible that you don't know which country sent more foreign fighters than any other into Iraq to kill our soldiers? How is it possible that you don't know which country has repeatedly resisted our efforts to get its ruling family to stop funding schools which train lunatics to attack us? How is it possible that you don't know which country's ruling family has contributed to every presidential library in recent memory, in return for special treatment? Seriously. How? Have you been sleeping for the past 8 years? |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:25:06 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:08:41 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:53:35 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message om... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message news:6inpl4dqaql6ds684kgn0ug14i91eieqs4@4ax .com... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a miserable failure, and STILL don't see it. Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president? Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd, he would have had a great economy going for him. John H Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us. What country would you have had him 'punish'? John H The country which you think cannot be attacked because you've been told they're our ally, and you actually believe that nonsense. You're reading my mind now? Which country would you have had him punish? John H With every passing day, I have less patience with people who do not read. The information you need to participate in this discussion has been available in your public library for at least 5 years, as well as in news sources which target sentient adults. If you don't have this information by now, it's because you do not want to have this information. It would be best if you'd not participate in this discussion, since you do not have the necessary information to do so. If I see a thread about diagnosing a problem with a diesel engine, I might read it, but I would not contribute to it because I know absolutely nothing about diagnosing diesel engine problems. You should do the same in this discussion. Again, which country, in your opinion, should Bush have 'punished'? Try to just respond without all the smart-assed stuff. John H There are two possibilities at the moment: 1) You know the name of the country, but you're not revealing it. I won't play that game. 2) You do NOT know the name of the country, in which case, see above, "people who do not read". There's only one way out of this, John. Tell me the name of the country. If you don't know the name, we're all done here. If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess we're done. -- ** Good Day! ** John H |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
How is it possible that you don't know where most of the 9/11 attackers came from? New Jersey, or at least that's what their driver's license said. Besides all the other troubles they wrought, getting a license in this state has now become a real PITA. |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "BAR" wrote in message ... Boater wrote: Don White wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ There's just way too many people in the world today. We have to come up with a way to 'thin the herd' over the next few generations or we'll all be over run. I agree completely, and I think it inappropriate for families to have more than one or two kids. Why don't you start preaching that to Africa, Middle East and Asia. Does that mean we shouldn't improve certain practices until everyone else does? Yes. If it is good for us it is good for everyone. So, you think we should freeze technology until Africa catches up with the program. That's nonsense, of course, but you're not here to say things which make sense. Try again tomorrow if and when you're sober. You are the one proposing that we freeze technology to wait for the rest of the world to catch up to us. If limiting children to one per couple is good for the developed world why isn't it good for the undeveloped world? If limiting CO2 emissions in the developed world is good then why not limit CO2 emissions in the undeveloped world? |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... How is it possible that you don't know where most of the 9/11 attackers came from? How is it possible that you don't know which country sent more foreign fighters than any other into Iraq to kill our soldiers? How is it possible that you don't know which country has repeatedly resisted our efforts to get its ruling family to stop funding schools which train lunatics to attack us? How is it possible that you don't know which country's ruling family has contributed to every presidential library in recent memory, in return for special treatment? Seriously. How? Have you been sleeping for the past 8 years? There are none so blind, as those who will not see. That about sums up our JohnnyPrepH. |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess we're done. What part of that is difficult to understand? -- ** Good Day! ** John H |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
Boater wrote:
Don White wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ There's just way too many people in the world today. We have to come up with a way to 'thin the herd' over the next few generations or we'll all be over run. I agree completely, and I think it inappropriate for families to have more than one or two kids. Maybe we should make abortion mandatory for anyone who has more than 2 kids? Heck, we have too many people already, we should make having more than one kid illegal, with the death penalty as punishment. |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ There's just way too many people in the world today. We have to come up with a way to 'thin the herd' over the next few generations or we'll all be over run. I agree completely, and I think it inappropriate for families to have more than one or two kids. But think for a second Harry. The kid that was not conceived or the one that was aborted might have grown up .... Harry Krause. Eisboch3 As I said, we need mandatory abortion. ;) |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
BAR wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "BAR" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "BAR" wrote in message ... Boater wrote: Don White wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ There's just way too many people in the world today. We have to come up with a way to 'thin the herd' over the next few generations or we'll all be over run. I agree completely, and I think it inappropriate for families to have more than one or two kids. Why don't you start preaching that to Africa, Middle East and Asia. Does that mean we shouldn't improve certain practices until everyone else does? Yes. If it is good for us it is good for everyone. So, you think we should freeze technology until Africa catches up with the program. That's nonsense, of course, but you're not here to say things which make sense. Try again tomorrow if and when you're sober. You are the one proposing that we freeze technology to wait for the rest of the world to catch up to us. If limiting children to one per couple is good for the developed world why isn't it good for the undeveloped world? If limiting CO2 emissions in the developed world is good then why not limit CO2 emissions in the undeveloped world? Cause they don't have the money to get bilked into the Global Taxing hoax... We do, we are ripe for the picking for folks like Al Gore who's house uses 22 times the energy mind does and has made tons of money on the scam.... ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 11:57:36 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: Boater wrote: Don White wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ There's just way too many people in the world today. We have to come up with a way to 'thin the herd' over the next few generations or we'll all be over run. I agree completely, and I think it inappropriate for families to have more than one or two kids. Maybe we should make abortion mandatory for anyone who has more than 2 kids? Heck, we have too many people already, we should make having more than one kid illegal, with the death penalty as punishment. Thinning the herd normally refers to picking out the weak animals and sending them to the butchers. If I were in the shoes of those two, I wouldn't suggest and agree with that concept. -- ** Good Day! ** John H |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
On Jan 1, 11:54*am, John H wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: *If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess we're done. What part of that is difficult to understand? -- ** Good Day! ** * * John H John, these guys never have answers, only games and insults.. Just back out till you get your answer and you will find yourself not bothering with the likes of them...;) |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis(Boatside)
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:21:36 -0600, wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:22:29 -0800, Frogwatch wrote: I'd like to develop a system for homes far from sewage lines whereby feces are spun in a thing like a washing machine causing liquids to be spun out. The resulting mass would be scraped off and then dried with a solar dryer, compacted into bricks and later collected like garbage. This would eliminate the necessity to run expensive sewer lines to each home. However, what to do with the liquid waste? First you separate grey water from urine and leftover water from the feces. Then you use some sort of electrical ozone generator to sterilize it. Then the tough part comes, removing the nutrients............ Are you familiar with composting toilets? Except for the grey water, it's pretty much what you are describing, if I'm understanding you correctly. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composting_toilet If I get a sailboat, I'm buying one of these for it. http://www.airheadtoilet.com/ No stinking holding tank, stinking hoses, **** in the bilges, etc. **** will be "discreetly' disposed of in a large body of water. --Vic |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
wrote in message
t... On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: How is it possible that you don't know where most of the 9/11 attackers came from? New Jersey, or at least that's what their driver's license said. Besides all the other troubles they wrought, getting a license in this state has now become a real PITA. Damn those terrorists! :-) |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
"John H" wrote in message
... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess we're done. What part of that is difficult to understand? -- ** Good Day! ** John H Clue: The country in question is in the Middle East. Why can't you just say "I don't know the answer?" Or: "I'm playing a game and I want to see YOU type the name of the country." |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
wrote in message
... On Jan 1, 11:54 am, John H wrote: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess we're done. What part of that is difficult to understand? -- ** Good Day! ** John H John, these guys never have answers, only games and insults.. Just back out till you get your answer and you will find yourself not bothering with the likes of them...;) ========== Do you know the name of the country we're talking about? |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
"BAR" wrote in message
... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "BAR" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "BAR" wrote in message ... Boater wrote: Don White wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ There's just way too many people in the world today. We have to come up with a way to 'thin the herd' over the next few generations or we'll all be over run. I agree completely, and I think it inappropriate for families to have more than one or two kids. Why don't you start preaching that to Africa, Middle East and Asia. Does that mean we shouldn't improve certain practices until everyone else does? Yes. If it is good for us it is good for everyone. So, you think we should freeze technology until Africa catches up with the program. That's nonsense, of course, but you're not here to say things which make sense. Try again tomorrow if and when you're sober. You are the one proposing that we freeze technology to wait for the rest of the world to catch up to us. If limiting children to one per couple is good for the developed world why isn't it good for the undeveloped world? If limiting CO2 emissions in the developed world is good then why not limit CO2 emissions in the undeveloped world? Uh...no. Above, I asked you this: "Does that mean we shouldn't improve certain practices until everyone else does?" Your response was: "Yes." Therefore, YOU are suggesting that we improve nothing until Africa catches up with us. Since Africa will probably NEVER catch up with us, your answer is absurd. |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
... On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:56:26 -0500, John H penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a miserable failure, and STILL don't see it. Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president? Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd, he would have had a great economy going for him. John H Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us. What country would you have had him 'punish'? 15 of the 19 9/11 terrorists were from one country. That country, to this day, broadcasts strong anti-American sentiment on their government owned radio. That same government, having close ties to the Bush administration, walked away from the mess, entirely unchallenged by the US government for their role in the death of 3,000 Americans. Their hands are just as dirty as Afghanistan's. In addition, although this country has claimed to arrest Al Qaeda operatives within their borders, I don't think any have been charged (or accused) of having terrorist targets *outside* of that country's borders. Afghanistan makes sense, but why punish Iraq and then let this country go free..... Doubters will attempt to trash the source of this information. That will be funny to watch, as the doubters try and rain disrespect all over OUR SOLDIERS, who uncovered the information about our so-called "allies", who provided the majority of foreign fighters who came to kill our soldiers. "The data come largely from a trove of documents and computers discovered in September, when American forces raided a tent camp in the desert near Sinjar, close to the Syrian border. The raid's target was an insurgent cell believed to be responsible for smuggling the vast majority of foreign fighters into Iraq. The most significant discovery was a collection of biographical sketches that listed hometowns and other details for more than 700 fighters brought into Iraq since August 2006." |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message
... Boater wrote: Don White wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ There's just way too many people in the world today. We have to come up with a way to 'thin the herd' over the next few generations or we'll all be over run. I agree completely, and I think it inappropriate for families to have more than one or two kids. Maybe we should make abortion mandatory for anyone who has more than 2 kids? Heck, we have too many people already, we should make having more than one kid illegal, with the death penalty as punishment. Why? Most of us already do things differently than we did 40 years ago, just because it's a good idea. What's with the kneejerk reaction about making something into a law? |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
On Jan 1, 12:41*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 11:54 am, John H wrote: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess we're done. What part of that is difficult to understand? -- ** Good Day! ** John H John, these guys never have answers, only games and insults.. Just back out till you get your answer and you will find yourself not bothering with the likes of them...;) ========== Do you know the name of the country we're talking about? Saudi Arabia. Duh, now next time I ask a question you owe a straight answer... pfffftttt... |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
wrote in message
... On Jan 1, 12:41 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 11:54 am, John H wrote: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess we're done. What part of that is difficult to understand? -- ** Good Day! ** John H John, these guys never have answers, only games and insults.. Just back out till you get your answer and you will find yourself not bothering with the likes of them...;) ========== Do you know the name of the country we're talking about? Saudi Arabia. Duh, now next time I ask a question you owe a straight answer... pfffftttt... =============== Why do you suppose John either: 1) Doesn't know the name of the country or 2) Is afraid or unwilling to reveal his answer |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
On Jan 1, 12:52*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 12:41 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 11:54 am, John H wrote: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess we're done. What part of that is difficult to understand? -- ** Good Day! ** John H John, these guys never have answers, only games and insults.. Just back out till you get your answer and you will find yourself not bothering with the likes of them...;) ========== Do you know the name of the country we're talking about? Saudi Arabia. Duh, now next time I ask a question you owe a straight answer... pfffftttt... =============== Why do you suppose John either: 1) Doesn't know the name of the country or 2) Is afraid or unwilling to reveal his answer- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Probably like me remembers how much of an idiot you are and doesn't want to play your schoolboy games.... Not to mention, sometimes your drunken logic is hard to follow.. bye bye.. plonk... |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
wrote in message
... On Jan 1, 12:52 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 12:41 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 11:54 am, John H wrote: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess we're done. What part of that is difficult to understand? -- ** Good Day! ** John H John, these guys never have answers, only games and insults.. Just back out till you get your answer and you will find yourself not bothering with the likes of them...;) ========== Do you know the name of the country we're talking about? Saudi Arabia. Duh, now next time I ask a question you owe a straight answer... pfffftttt... =============== Why do you suppose John either: 1) Doesn't know the name of the country or 2) Is afraid or unwilling to reveal his answer- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Probably like me remembers how much of an idiot you are and doesn't want to play your schoolboy games.... Not to mention, sometimes your drunken logic is hard to follow.. bye bye.. plonk... =========== Oh no. I've been plonked. There goes my day. |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 12:52 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 12:41 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 11:54 am, John H wrote: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess we're done. What part of that is difficult to understand? -- ** Good Day! ** John H John, these guys never have answers, only games and insults.. Just back out till you get your answer and you will find yourself not bothering with the likes of them...;) ========== Do you know the name of the country we're talking about? Saudi Arabia. Duh, now next time I ask a question you owe a straight answer... pfffftttt... =============== Why do you suppose John either: 1) Doesn't know the name of the country or 2) Is afraid or unwilling to reveal his answer- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Probably like me remembers how much of an idiot you are and doesn't want to play your schoolboy games.... Not to mention, sometimes your drunken logic is hard to follow.. bye bye.. plonk... =========== Oh no. I've been plonked. There goes my day. Justwait has the intellectual capabilities of a slug. In case you did not know. |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:41:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess we're done. What part of that is difficult to understand? -- ** Good Day! ** John H Clue: The country in question is in the Middle East. Why can't you just say "I don't know the answer?" Or: "I'm playing a game and I want to see YOU type the name of the country." Doug, you started the game playing. You made a comment, I asked a question. You refuse to answer. End of game. I don't play your silly games. -- ** Good Day! ** John H |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:49:12 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "Gene Kearns" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:56:26 -0500, John H penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message m... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a miserable failure, and STILL don't see it. Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president? Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd, he would have had a great economy going for him. John H Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us. What country would you have had him 'punish'? 15 of the 19 9/11 terrorists were from one country. That country, to this day, broadcasts strong anti-American sentiment on their government owned radio. That same government, having close ties to the Bush administration, walked away from the mess, entirely unchallenged by the US government for their role in the death of 3,000 Americans. Their hands are just as dirty as Afghanistan's. In addition, although this country has claimed to arrest Al Qaeda operatives within their borders, I don't think any have been charged (or accused) of having terrorist targets *outside* of that country's borders. Afghanistan makes sense, but why punish Iraq and then let this country go free..... Doubters will attempt to trash the source of this information. That will be funny to watch, as the doubters try and rain disrespect all over OUR SOLDIERS, who uncovered the information about our so-called "allies", who provided the majority of foreign fighters who came to kill our soldiers. "The data come largely from a trove of documents and computers discovered in September, when American forces raided a tent camp in the desert near Sinjar, close to the Syrian border. The raid's target was an insurgent cell believed to be responsible for smuggling the vast majority of foreign fighters into Iraq. The most significant discovery was a collection of biographical sketches that listed hometowns and other details for more than 700 fighters brought into Iraq since August 2006." I suppose, using your logic, we should wreak havoc on Mexico from whence have come a whole passel of murderers, rapists, and other assorted felons. -- ** Good Day! ** John H |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
"John H" wrote in message
... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:49:12 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Gene Kearns" wrote in message . .. On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:56:26 -0500, John H penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message om... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a miserable failure, and STILL don't see it. Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president? Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd, he would have had a great economy going for him. John H Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us. What country would you have had him 'punish'? 15 of the 19 9/11 terrorists were from one country. That country, to this day, broadcasts strong anti-American sentiment on their government owned radio. That same government, having close ties to the Bush administration, walked away from the mess, entirely unchallenged by the US government for their role in the death of 3,000 Americans. Their hands are just as dirty as Afghanistan's. In addition, although this country has claimed to arrest Al Qaeda operatives within their borders, I don't think any have been charged (or accused) of having terrorist targets *outside* of that country's borders. Afghanistan makes sense, but why punish Iraq and then let this country go free..... Doubters will attempt to trash the source of this information. That will be funny to watch, as the doubters try and rain disrespect all over OUR SOLDIERS, who uncovered the information about our so-called "allies", who provided the majority of foreign fighters who came to kill our soldiers. "The data come largely from a trove of documents and computers discovered in September, when American forces raided a tent camp in the desert near Sinjar, close to the Syrian border. The raid's target was an insurgent cell believed to be responsible for smuggling the vast majority of foreign fighters into Iraq. The most significant discovery was a collection of biographical sketches that listed hometowns and other details for more than 700 fighters brought into Iraq since August 2006." I suppose, using your logic, we should wreak havoc on Mexico from whence have come a whole passel of murderers, rapists, and other assorted felons. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Based on YOUR logic, we should've attacked Peru in retaliation for Pearl Harbor. |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 17:10:03 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:49:12 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:56:26 -0500, John H penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message news:6inpl4dqaql6ds684kgn0ug14i91eieqs4@4ax. com... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a miserable failure, and STILL don't see it. Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president? Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd, he would have had a great economy going for him. John H Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us. What country would you have had him 'punish'? 15 of the 19 9/11 terrorists were from one country. That country, to this day, broadcasts strong anti-American sentiment on their government owned radio. That same government, having close ties to the Bush administration, walked away from the mess, entirely unchallenged by the US government for their role in the death of 3,000 Americans. Their hands are just as dirty as Afghanistan's. In addition, although this country has claimed to arrest Al Qaeda operatives within their borders, I don't think any have been charged (or accused) of having terrorist targets *outside* of that country's borders. Afghanistan makes sense, but why punish Iraq and then let this country go free..... Doubters will attempt to trash the source of this information. That will be funny to watch, as the doubters try and rain disrespect all over OUR SOLDIERS, who uncovered the information about our so-called "allies", who provided the majority of foreign fighters who came to kill our soldiers. "The data come largely from a trove of documents and computers discovered in September, when American forces raided a tent camp in the desert near Sinjar, close to the Syrian border. The raid's target was an insurgent cell believed to be responsible for smuggling the vast majority of foreign fighters into Iraq. The most significant discovery was a collection of biographical sketches that listed hometowns and other details for more than 700 fighters brought into Iraq since August 2006." I suppose, using your logic, we should wreak havoc on Mexico from whence have come a whole passel of murderers, rapists, and other assorted felons. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Based on YOUR logic, we should've attacked Peru in retaliation for Pearl Harbor. Enuff. Bye. |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
"John H" wrote in message
... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 17:10:03 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:49:12 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Gene Kearns" wrote in message m... On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:56:26 -0500, John H penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message news:6inpl4dqaql6ds684kgn0ug14i91eieqs4@4ax .com... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a miserable failure, and STILL don't see it. Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president? Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd, he would have had a great economy going for him. John H Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us. What country would you have had him 'punish'? 15 of the 19 9/11 terrorists were from one country. That country, to this day, broadcasts strong anti-American sentiment on their government owned radio. That same government, having close ties to the Bush administration, walked away from the mess, entirely unchallenged by the US government for their role in the death of 3,000 Americans. Their hands are just as dirty as Afghanistan's. In addition, although this country has claimed to arrest Al Qaeda operatives within their borders, I don't think any have been charged (or accused) of having terrorist targets *outside* of that country's borders. Afghanistan makes sense, but why punish Iraq and then let this country go free..... Doubters will attempt to trash the source of this information. That will be funny to watch, as the doubters try and rain disrespect all over OUR SOLDIERS, who uncovered the information about our so-called "allies", who provided the majority of foreign fighters who came to kill our soldiers. "The data come largely from a trove of documents and computers discovered in September, when American forces raided a tent camp in the desert near Sinjar, close to the Syrian border. The raid's target was an insurgent cell believed to be responsible for smuggling the vast majority of foreign fighters into Iraq. The most significant discovery was a collection of biographical sketches that listed hometowns and other details for more than 700 fighters brought into Iraq since August 2006." I suppose, using your logic, we should wreak havoc on Mexico from whence have come a whole passel of murderers, rapists, and other assorted felons. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Based on YOUR logic, we should've attacked Peru in retaliation for Pearl Harbor. Enuff. Bye. It's fun to scare you away like this. You can't face your own "logic", if you can call it logic. |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 19:03:29 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 17:10:03 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:49:12 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Gene Kearns" wrote in message om... On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:56:26 -0500, John H penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message news:6inpl4dqaql6ds684kgn0ug14i91eieqs4@4a x.com... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a miserable failure, and STILL don't see it. Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president? Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd, he would have had a great economy going for him. John H Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us. What country would you have had him 'punish'? 15 of the 19 9/11 terrorists were from one country. That country, to this day, broadcasts strong anti-American sentiment on their government owned radio. That same government, having close ties to the Bush administration, walked away from the mess, entirely unchallenged by the US government for their role in the death of 3,000 Americans. Their hands are just as dirty as Afghanistan's. In addition, although this country has claimed to arrest Al Qaeda operatives within their borders, I don't think any have been charged (or accused) of having terrorist targets *outside* of that country's borders. Afghanistan makes sense, but why punish Iraq and then let this country go free..... Doubters will attempt to trash the source of this information. That will be funny to watch, as the doubters try and rain disrespect all over OUR SOLDIERS, who uncovered the information about our so-called "allies", who provided the majority of foreign fighters who came to kill our soldiers. "The data come largely from a trove of documents and computers discovered in September, when American forces raided a tent camp in the desert near Sinjar, close to the Syrian border. The raid's target was an insurgent cell believed to be responsible for smuggling the vast majority of foreign fighters into Iraq. The most significant discovery was a collection of biographical sketches that listed hometowns and other details for more than 700 fighters brought into Iraq since August 2006." I suppose, using your logic, we should wreak havoc on Mexico from whence have come a whole passel of murderers, rapists, and other assorted felons. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Based on YOUR logic, we should've attacked Peru in retaliation for Pearl Harbor. Enuff. Bye. It's fun to scare you away like this. You can't face your own "logic", if you can call it logic. Doug. I've presented nothing. I've asked a question. You've still not answered it. |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
On Jan 1, 7:10*pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 19:03:29 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 17:10:03 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:49:12 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Gene Kearns" wrote in message om... On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:56:26 -0500, John H penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message news:6inpl4dqaql6ds684kgn0ug14i91eieqs4@4a x.com... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a miserable failure, and STILL don't see it. Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president? Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd, he would have had a great economy going for him. * *John H Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us. What country would you have had him 'punish'? 15 of the 19 * *9/11 terrorists were from one country. That country, to this day, broadcasts strong anti-American sentiment on their government owned radio. That same government, having close ties to the Bush administration, walked away from the mess, entirely unchallenged by the US government for their role in the death of 3,000 Americans. Their hands are just as dirty as Afghanistan's. In addition, although this country has claimed to arrest Al Qaeda operatives within their borders, I don't think any have been charged (or accused) of having terrorist targets *outside* of that country's borders. Afghanistan makes sense, but why punish Iraq and then let this country go free..... Doubters will attempt to trash the source of this information. That will be funny to watch, as the doubters try and rain disrespect all over OUR SOLDIERS, who uncovered the information about our so-called "allies", who provided the majority of foreign fighters who came to kill our soldiers. "The data come largely from a trove of documents and computers discovered in September, when American forces raided a tent camp in the desert near Sinjar, close to the Syrian border. The raid's target was an insurgent cell believed to be responsible for smuggling the vast majority of foreign fighters into Iraq. The most significant discovery was a collection of biographical sketches that listed hometowns and other details for more than 700 fighters brought into Iraq since August 2006." I suppose, using your logic, we should wreak havoc on Mexico from whence have come a whole passel of murderers, rapists, and other assorted felons. -- ** Good Day! ** * *John H Based on YOUR logic, we should've attacked Peru in retaliation for Pearl Harbor. Enuff. Bye. It's fun to scare you away like this. You can't face your own "logic", if you can call it logic. Doug. I've presented nothing. I've asked a question. You've still not answered it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - snerk |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
"John H" wrote in message
... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 19:03:29 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 17:10:03 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message m... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:49:12 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Gene Kearns" wrote in message news:9crpl49k4608ilg3qus7rtgtr7duhm7eo2@4ax. com... On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:56:26 -0500, John H penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message news:6inpl4dqaql6ds684kgn0ug14i91eieqs4@4 ax.com... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a miserable failure, and STILL don't see it. Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president? Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd, he would have had a great economy going for him. John H Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us. What country would you have had him 'punish'? 15 of the 19 9/11 terrorists were from one country. That country, to this day, broadcasts strong anti-American sentiment on their government owned radio. That same government, having close ties to the Bush administration, walked away from the mess, entirely unchallenged by the US government for their role in the death of 3,000 Americans. Their hands are just as dirty as Afghanistan's. In addition, although this country has claimed to arrest Al Qaeda operatives within their borders, I don't think any have been charged (or accused) of having terrorist targets *outside* of that country's borders. Afghanistan makes sense, but why punish Iraq and then let this country go free..... Doubters will attempt to trash the source of this information. That will be funny to watch, as the doubters try and rain disrespect all over OUR SOLDIERS, who uncovered the information about our so-called "allies", who provided the majority of foreign fighters who came to kill our soldiers. "The data come largely from a trove of documents and computers discovered in September, when American forces raided a tent camp in the desert near Sinjar, close to the Syrian border. The raid's target was an insurgent cell believed to be responsible for smuggling the vast majority of foreign fighters into Iraq. The most significant discovery was a collection of biographical sketches that listed hometowns and other details for more than 700 fighters brought into Iraq since August 2006." I suppose, using your logic, we should wreak havoc on Mexico from whence have come a whole passel of murderers, rapists, and other assorted felons. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Based on YOUR logic, we should've attacked Peru in retaliation for Pearl Harbor. Enuff. Bye. It's fun to scare you away like this. You can't face your own "logic", if you can call it logic. Doug. I've presented nothing. I've asked a question. You've still not answered it. It's been long enough since 9/11 for you to know who really attacked us. You really can't answer the question, can you? You don't know who attacked us. Suggestion: Move your TV set to the attic for a year. Football is rotting your brain, old soldier. |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 19:03:29 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 17:10:03 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:49:12 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:56:26 -0500, John H penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a miserable failure, and STILL don't see it. Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president? Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd, he would have had a great economy going for him. John H Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us. What country would you have had him 'punish'? 15 of the 19 9/11 terrorists were from one country. That country, to this day, broadcasts strong anti-American sentiment on their government owned radio. That same government, having close ties to the Bush administration, walked away from the mess, entirely unchallenged by the US government for their role in the death of 3,000 Americans. Their hands are just as dirty as Afghanistan's. In addition, although this country has claimed to arrest Al Qaeda operatives within their borders, I don't think any have been charged (or accused) of having terrorist targets *outside* of that country's borders. Afghanistan makes sense, but why punish Iraq and then let this country go free..... Doubters will attempt to trash the source of this information. That will be funny to watch, as the doubters try and rain disrespect all over OUR SOLDIERS, who uncovered the information about our so-called "allies", who provided the majority of foreign fighters who came to kill our soldiers. "The data come largely from a trove of documents and computers discovered in September, when American forces raided a tent camp in the desert near Sinjar, close to the Syrian border. The raid's target was an insurgent cell believed to be responsible for smuggling the vast majority of foreign fighters into Iraq. The most significant discovery was a collection of biographical sketches that listed hometowns and other details for more than 700 fighters brought into Iraq since August 2006." I suppose, using your logic, we should wreak havoc on Mexico from whence have come a whole passel of murderers, rapists, and other assorted felons. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Based on YOUR logic, we should've attacked Peru in retaliation for Pearl Harbor. Enuff. Bye. It's fun to scare you away like this. You can't face your own "logic", if you can call it logic. Doug. I've presented nothing. I've asked a question. You've still not answered it. It's been long enough since 9/11 for you to know who really attacked us. You really can't answer the question, can you? You don't know who attacked us. Suggestion: Move your TV set to the attic for a year. Football is rotting your brain, old soldier. You're destroying his right-wing underpinnings. |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
"Boater" wrote in message
... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 19:03:29 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 17:10:03 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:49:12 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:56:26 -0500, John H penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a miserable failure, and STILL don't see it. Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president? Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd, he would have had a great economy going for him. John H Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us. What country would you have had him 'punish'? 15 of the 19 9/11 terrorists were from one country. That country, to this day, broadcasts strong anti-American sentiment on their government owned radio. That same government, having close ties to the Bush administration, walked away from the mess, entirely unchallenged by the US government for their role in the death of 3,000 Americans. Their hands are just as dirty as Afghanistan's. In addition, although this country has claimed to arrest Al Qaeda operatives within their borders, I don't think any have been charged (or accused) of having terrorist targets *outside* of that country's borders. Afghanistan makes sense, but why punish Iraq and then let this country go free..... Doubters will attempt to trash the source of this information. That will be funny to watch, as the doubters try and rain disrespect all over OUR SOLDIERS, who uncovered the information about our so-called "allies", who provided the majority of foreign fighters who came to kill our soldiers. "The data come largely from a trove of documents and computers discovered in September, when American forces raided a tent camp in the desert near Sinjar, close to the Syrian border. The raid's target was an insurgent cell believed to be responsible for smuggling the vast majority of foreign fighters into Iraq. The most significant discovery was a collection of biographical sketches that listed hometowns and other details for more than 700 fighters brought into Iraq since August 2006." I suppose, using your logic, we should wreak havoc on Mexico from whence have come a whole passel of murderers, rapists, and other assorted felons. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Based on YOUR logic, we should've attacked Peru in retaliation for Pearl Harbor. Enuff. Bye. It's fun to scare you away like this. You can't face your own "logic", if you can call it logic. Doug. I've presented nothing. I've asked a question. You've still not answered it. It's been long enough since 9/11 for you to know who really attacked us. You really can't answer the question, can you? You don't know who attacked us. Suggestion: Move your TV set to the attic for a year. Football is rotting your brain, old soldier. You're destroying his right-wing underpinnings. I wish more could be done, but the death penalty for treason was eliminated in 1990. |
Completely On Topic: Sewage Crisis
Don White wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... (considering what hasn't changed here in this NG) http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/ There's just way too many people in the world today. We have to come up with a way to 'thin the herd' over the next few generations or we'll all be over run. Let's start with unemployed losers who are over 30 and live with their parents. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com