Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:13:57 -0500, Boater wrote:
wrote: On Dec 27, 6:16 pm, Boater wrote: John H wrote: On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:00:29 -0500, Boater wrote: Tim wrote: On Dec 27, 1:40 pm, Boater wrote: Brian wrote: On Dec 27, 12:01 pm, Boater wrote: John H wrote: On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:21:33 -0500, Boater wrote: John H wrote: On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:28:10 -0500, Boater wrote: John H wrote: On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:59:07 -0800 (PST), wrote: http://enormusjugs.blogspot.com/-HotBabes Full length videos streaming video, pics, wallpapers and more. More of your crossposting friends, Harry? -- John Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! More likely one of Loogy's. You seem to have a real issue with crossposters. I appreciate decent manners. You don't. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Liar. If you appreciated good manners, you'd demonstrate them. I am. When was the last time I called you a name, or crossposted to get support from other groups? -- ** Good Day! ** John H Crossposting really annoys you... :) Well, i said I wouldn't bring Christian and various other religious newsgroups in here, but now that you've said: "Crossposting really annoys you... :)" I might keep that as an option. ?;^ ) It matters not to me. Harry, It's just a guess on my part, but if I got a lot of Christians to post in here about nothing but religion, I really doubt if you'd like it. And again, I'm not sure, but I would imagine you would jump all over and belittle everyone who posted about Christianity or any other religion. Just what I'm thinking, but not sure. You'd be wrong. This isn't a boating newsgroup. Hell, Herring has done his best to turn it unto a pseudo-Christian non-boating newsgroup. Perhaps we could discuss pedophila among the Christian clergy, Nothing sick about that, right Harry! Hell, Salty has the same kind of thoughts. Maybe there's something going around? Note, there was nothing ill-mannered in this post. -- ** Good Day! ** John H There's nothing sick about discussing the pedophila problem plaguing christian clergy. What is sick is either pretending it doesn't exist or engaging in it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sick is pretending the facts are not what they are.. Numbers show no more problem in clergy than any other portion of the population... Sick is bein so intolerant that you will run with anything you hear and never have any reguard for the facts, just to hurt someones feelings or dismiss your own shortcomings... If there is one thing you can count upon regarding right-wing "Christians in Name Only" (CINO), it is their unfailing desire to excuse the horrific behavior of other CINOs. Let me try to put this into terms even an amoeba might understand: clergy are in the position of very high trust among the religious, and when they misbehave sexually with minors, it is quite a bit more of a problem than it would be with members of the general public behaving that way, no matter what the "numbers" show. Of course, in your peculiar set of beliefs, no matter what sins are committed, so long as you believe Jesus is your saviour, all is forgiven, right? That must make it really easy to be your sort of Christian, eh? That must be how Dick Cheney and the rest of the Bush thugs will get into heaven. :) Harry, trust me. Someone, somewhere, cares about your opinion. Note, nothing said herein was ill-mannered. -- ** Good Day! ** John H |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John H wrote:
That must make it really easy to be your sort of Christian, eh? That must be how Dick Cheney and the rest of the Bush thugs will get into heaven. :) Harry, trust me. Someone, somewhere, cares about your opinion. Note, nothing said herein was ill-mannered. -- ** Good Day! ** John H You must...you follow me around here like Pavlov's dog. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John H" wrote in message ... On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:13:57 -0500, Boater wrote: wrote: On Dec 27, 6:16 pm, Boater wrote: John H wrote: On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:00:29 -0500, Boater wrote: Tim wrote: On Dec 27, 1:40 pm, Boater wrote: Brian wrote: On Dec 27, 12:01 pm, Boater wrote: John H wrote: On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:21:33 -0500, Boater wrote: John H wrote: On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:28:10 -0500, Boater wrote: John H wrote: On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:59:07 -0800 (PST), wrote: http://enormusjugs.blogspot.com/-HotBabes Full length videos streaming video, pics, wallpapers and more. More of your crossposting friends, Harry? -- John Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! More likely one of Loogy's. You seem to have a real issue with crossposters. I appreciate decent manners. You don't. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Liar. If you appreciated good manners, you'd demonstrate them. I am. When was the last time I called you a name, or crossposted to get support from other groups? -- ** Good Day! ** John H Crossposting really annoys you... :) Well, i said I wouldn't bring Christian and various other religious newsgroups in here, but now that you've said: "Crossposting really annoys you... :)" I might keep that as an option. ?;^ ) It matters not to me. Harry, It's just a guess on my part, but if I got a lot of Christians to post in here about nothing but religion, I really doubt if you'd like it. And again, I'm not sure, but I would imagine you would jump all over and belittle everyone who posted about Christianity or any other religion. Just what I'm thinking, but not sure. You'd be wrong. This isn't a boating newsgroup. Hell, Herring has done his best to turn it unto a pseudo-Christian non-boating newsgroup. Perhaps we could discuss pedophila among the Christian clergy, Nothing sick about that, right Harry! Hell, Salty has the same kind of thoughts. Maybe there's something going around? Note, there was nothing ill-mannered in this post. -- ** Good Day! ** John H There's nothing sick about discussing the pedophila problem plaguing christian clergy. What is sick is either pretending it doesn't exist or engaging in it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sick is pretending the facts are not what they are.. Numbers show no more problem in clergy than any other portion of the population... Sick is bein so intolerant that you will run with anything you hear and never have any reguard for the facts, just to hurt someones feelings or dismiss your own shortcomings... If there is one thing you can count upon regarding right-wing "Christians in Name Only" (CINO), it is their unfailing desire to excuse the horrific behavior of other CINOs. Let me try to put this into terms even an amoeba might understand: clergy are in the position of very high trust among the religious, and when they misbehave sexually with minors, it is quite a bit more of a problem than it would be with members of the general public behaving that way, no matter what the "numbers" show. Of course, in your peculiar set of beliefs, no matter what sins are committed, so long as you believe Jesus is your saviour, all is forgiven, right? That must make it really easy to be your sort of Christian, eh? That must be how Dick Cheney and the rest of the Bush thugs will get into heaven. :) Harry, trust me. Someone, somewhere, cares about your opinion. Note, nothing said herein was ill-mannered. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Jezzum pete John, why do you even respond to the moron... grow a set, and don't let him bother you. You're doing EXACTLY what he wants. If EVERYONE ignores him, he will eventually go away. Since we know he's a slow (or non) learner, it might take a few years, but it WILL work. Trust me, I've seen it before. This harry sandbox is out of friggin-control! He owns this group and you all let him! That's exactly what he wants. --Mike |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:54:57 -0800, "Mike" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:13:57 -0500, Boater wrote: wrote: On Dec 27, 6:16 pm, Boater wrote: John H wrote: On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:00:29 -0500, Boater wrote: Tim wrote: On Dec 27, 1:40 pm, Boater wrote: Brian wrote: On Dec 27, 12:01 pm, Boater wrote: John H wrote: On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:21:33 -0500, Boater wrote: John H wrote: On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:28:10 -0500, Boater wrote: John H wrote: On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:59:07 -0800 (PST), wrote: http://enormusjugs.blogspot.com/-HotBabes Full length videos streaming video, pics, wallpapers and more. More of your crossposting friends, Harry? -- John Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! More likely one of Loogy's. You seem to have a real issue with crossposters. I appreciate decent manners. You don't. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Liar. If you appreciated good manners, you'd demonstrate them. I am. When was the last time I called you a name, or crossposted to get support from other groups? -- ** Good Day! ** John H Crossposting really annoys you... :) Well, i said I wouldn't bring Christian and various other religious newsgroups in here, but now that you've said: "Crossposting really annoys you... :)" I might keep that as an option. ?;^ ) It matters not to me. Harry, It's just a guess on my part, but if I got a lot of Christians to post in here about nothing but religion, I really doubt if you'd like it. And again, I'm not sure, but I would imagine you would jump all over and belittle everyone who posted about Christianity or any other religion. Just what I'm thinking, but not sure. You'd be wrong. This isn't a boating newsgroup. Hell, Herring has done his best to turn it unto a pseudo-Christian non-boating newsgroup. Perhaps we could discuss pedophila among the Christian clergy, Nothing sick about that, right Harry! Hell, Salty has the same kind of thoughts. Maybe there's something going around? Note, there was nothing ill-mannered in this post. -- ** Good Day! ** John H There's nothing sick about discussing the pedophila problem plaguing christian clergy. What is sick is either pretending it doesn't exist or engaging in it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sick is pretending the facts are not what they are.. Numbers show no more problem in clergy than any other portion of the population... Sick is bein so intolerant that you will run with anything you hear and never have any reguard for the facts, just to hurt someones feelings or dismiss your own shortcomings... If there is one thing you can count upon regarding right-wing "Christians in Name Only" (CINO), it is their unfailing desire to excuse the horrific behavior of other CINOs. Let me try to put this into terms even an amoeba might understand: clergy are in the position of very high trust among the religious, and when they misbehave sexually with minors, it is quite a bit more of a problem than it would be with members of the general public behaving that way, no matter what the "numbers" show. Of course, in your peculiar set of beliefs, no matter what sins are committed, so long as you believe Jesus is your saviour, all is forgiven, right? That must make it really easy to be your sort of Christian, eh? That must be how Dick Cheney and the rest of the Bush thugs will get into heaven. :) Harry, trust me. Someone, somewhere, cares about your opinion. Note, nothing said herein was ill-mannered. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Jezzum pete John, why do you even respond to the moron... grow a set, and don't let him bother you. You're doing EXACTLY what he wants. If EVERYONE ignores him, he will eventually go away. Since we know he's a slow (or non) learner, it might take a few years, but it WILL work. Trust me, I've seen it before. This harry sandbox is out of friggin-control! He owns this group and you all let him! That's exactly what he wants. --Mike Harry doesn't own squat. You see a lot of people playing Harry like a banjo because it's fun. But, you're right in that WE are doing what he wants. He needs the attention, and will say anything to get it, even to the point of accusing me of killing women and children, or underhandedly slamming another with his 'pedophilia among the Christian clergy' comment. A few months ago, many of us were ignoring the poor guy. In order to drum up some business, Harry began his cross-posting to other groups. Then this place became full of a bunch of folks just like him. Surely you remember that? Perhaps a New Year's Resolution to ignore Harry is in order. Drum up some business, and I'll sign on with everyone else. chuckles. (...double deep secret indeed!) -- ** Good Day! ** John H |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 07:05:08 -0500, John H wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:54:57 -0800, "Mike" wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:13:57 -0500, Boater wrote: wrote: On Dec 27, 6:16 pm, Boater wrote: John H wrote: On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:00:29 -0500, Boater wrote: Tim wrote: On Dec 27, 1:40 pm, Boater wrote: Brian wrote: On Dec 27, 12:01 pm, Boater wrote: John H wrote: On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:21:33 -0500, Boater wrote: John H wrote: On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:28:10 -0500, Boater wrote: John H wrote: On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:59:07 -0800 (PST), wrote: http://enormusjugs.blogspot.com/-HotBabes Full length videos streaming video, pics, wallpapers and more. More of your crossposting friends, Harry? -- John Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! More likely one of Loogy's. You seem to have a real issue with crossposters. I appreciate decent manners. You don't. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Liar. If you appreciated good manners, you'd demonstrate them. I am. When was the last time I called you a name, or crossposted to get support from other groups? -- ** Good Day! ** John H Crossposting really annoys you... :) Well, i said I wouldn't bring Christian and various other religious newsgroups in here, but now that you've said: "Crossposting really annoys you... :)" I might keep that as an option. ?;^ ) It matters not to me. Harry, It's just a guess on my part, but if I got a lot of Christians to post in here about nothing but religion, I really doubt if you'd like it. And again, I'm not sure, but I would imagine you would jump all over and belittle everyone who posted about Christianity or any other religion. Just what I'm thinking, but not sure. You'd be wrong. This isn't a boating newsgroup. Hell, Herring has done his best to turn it unto a pseudo-Christian non-boating newsgroup. Perhaps we could discuss pedophila among the Christian clergy, Nothing sick about that, right Harry! Hell, Salty has the same kind of thoughts. Maybe there's something going around? Note, there was nothing ill-mannered in this post. -- ** Good Day! ** John H There's nothing sick about discussing the pedophila problem plaguing christian clergy. What is sick is either pretending it doesn't exist or engaging in it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sick is pretending the facts are not what they are.. Numbers show no more problem in clergy than any other portion of the population... Sick is bein so intolerant that you will run with anything you hear and never have any reguard for the facts, just to hurt someones feelings or dismiss your own shortcomings... If there is one thing you can count upon regarding right-wing "Christians in Name Only" (CINO), it is their unfailing desire to excuse the horrific behavior of other CINOs. Let me try to put this into terms even an amoeba might understand: clergy are in the position of very high trust among the religious, and when they misbehave sexually with minors, it is quite a bit more of a problem than it would be with members of the general public behaving that way, no matter what the "numbers" show. Of course, in your peculiar set of beliefs, no matter what sins are committed, so long as you believe Jesus is your saviour, all is forgiven, right? That must make it really easy to be your sort of Christian, eh? That must be how Dick Cheney and the rest of the Bush thugs will get into heaven. :) Harry, trust me. Someone, somewhere, cares about your opinion. Note, nothing said herein was ill-mannered. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Jezzum pete John, why do you even respond to the moron... grow a set, and don't let him bother you. You're doing EXACTLY what he wants. If EVERYONE ignores him, he will eventually go away. Since we know he's a slow (or non) learner, it might take a few years, but it WILL work. Trust me, I've seen it before. This harry sandbox is out of friggin-control! He owns this group and you all let him! That's exactly what he wants. --Mike Harry doesn't own squat. You see a lot of people playing Harry like a banjo because it's fun. But, you're right in that WE are doing what he wants. He needs the attention, and will say anything to get it, even to the point of accusing me of killing women and children, or underhandedly slamming another with his 'pedophilia among the Christian clergy' comment. A few months ago, many of us were ignoring the poor guy. In order to drum up some business, Harry began his cross-posting to other groups. Then this place became full of a bunch of folks just like him. Surely you remember that? Perhaps a New Year's Resolution to ignore Harry is in order. Drum up some business, and I'll sign on with everyone else. chuckles. (...double deep secret indeed!) Besides, Mike, wasn't that you who was so thrilled that you'd 'made the cut'? Hell, why should you get all the fun? :) -- ** Good Day! ** John H |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Besides, Mike, wasn't that you who was so thrilled that you'd 'made the
cut'? Hell, why should you get all the fun? :) OK, I'll give you that one. ;-) The reverse is true as well, if *everyone* made the cut, he'd have no one to respond to. Happy New Year! --Mike "John H" wrote in message ... On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 07:05:08 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:54:57 -0800, "Mike" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:13:57 -0500, Boater wrote: wrote: On Dec 27, 6:16 pm, Boater wrote: John H wrote: On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:00:29 -0500, Boater wrote: Tim wrote: On Dec 27, 1:40 pm, Boater wrote: Brian wrote: On Dec 27, 12:01 pm, Boater wrote: John H wrote: On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:21:33 -0500, Boater wrote: John H wrote: On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:28:10 -0500, Boater wrote: John H wrote: On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:59:07 -0800 (PST), wrote: http://enormusjugs.blogspot.com/-HotBabes Full length videos streaming video, pics, wallpapers and more. More of your crossposting friends, Harry? -- John Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! More likely one of Loogy's. You seem to have a real issue with crossposters. I appreciate decent manners. You don't. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Liar. If you appreciated good manners, you'd demonstrate them. I am. When was the last time I called you a name, or crossposted to get support from other groups? -- ** Good Day! ** John H Crossposting really annoys you... :) Well, i said I wouldn't bring Christian and various other religious newsgroups in here, but now that you've said: "Crossposting really annoys you... :)" I might keep that as an option. ?;^ ) It matters not to me. Harry, It's just a guess on my part, but if I got a lot of Christians to post in here about nothing but religion, I really doubt if you'd like it. And again, I'm not sure, but I would imagine you would jump all over and belittle everyone who posted about Christianity or any other religion. Just what I'm thinking, but not sure. You'd be wrong. This isn't a boating newsgroup. Hell, Herring has done his best to turn it unto a pseudo-Christian non-boating newsgroup. Perhaps we could discuss pedophila among the Christian clergy, Nothing sick about that, right Harry! Hell, Salty has the same kind of thoughts. Maybe there's something going around? Note, there was nothing ill-mannered in this post. -- ** Good Day! ** John H There's nothing sick about discussing the pedophila problem plaguing christian clergy. What is sick is either pretending it doesn't exist or engaging in it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sick is pretending the facts are not what they are.. Numbers show no more problem in clergy than any other portion of the population... Sick is bein so intolerant that you will run with anything you hear and never have any reguard for the facts, just to hurt someones feelings or dismiss your own shortcomings... If there is one thing you can count upon regarding right-wing "Christians in Name Only" (CINO), it is their unfailing desire to excuse the horrific behavior of other CINOs. Let me try to put this into terms even an amoeba might understand: clergy are in the position of very high trust among the religious, and when they misbehave sexually with minors, it is quite a bit more of a problem than it would be with members of the general public behaving that way, no matter what the "numbers" show. Of course, in your peculiar set of beliefs, no matter what sins are committed, so long as you believe Jesus is your saviour, all is forgiven, right? That must make it really easy to be your sort of Christian, eh? That must be how Dick Cheney and the rest of the Bush thugs will get into heaven. :) Harry, trust me. Someone, somewhere, cares about your opinion. Note, nothing said herein was ill-mannered. -- ** Good Day! ** John H Jezzum pete John, why do you even respond to the moron... grow a set, and don't let him bother you. You're doing EXACTLY what he wants. If EVERYONE ignores him, he will eventually go away. Since we know he's a slow (or non) learner, it might take a few years, but it WILL work. Trust me, I've seen it before. This harry sandbox is out of friggin-control! He owns this group and you all let him! That's exactly what he wants. --Mike Harry doesn't own squat. You see a lot of people playing Harry like a banjo because it's fun. But, you're right in that WE are doing what he wants. He needs the attention, and will say anything to get it, even to the point of accusing me of killing women and children, or underhandedly slamming another with his 'pedophilia among the Christian clergy' comment. A few months ago, many of us were ignoring the poor guy. In order to drum up some business, Harry began his cross-posting to other groups. Then this place became full of a bunch of folks just like him. Surely you remember that? Perhaps a New Year's Resolution to ignore Harry is in order. Drum up some business, and I'll sign on with everyone else. chuckles. (...double deep secret indeed!) Besides, Mike, wasn't that you who was so thrilled that you'd 'made the cut'? Hell, why should you get all the fun? :) -- ** Good Day! ** John H |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
other young rude pickles will walk amazingly below doses | ASA | |||
i am amazingly proud, so I seek you | ASA | |||
i am amazingly sour, so I look you | ASA | |||
i am amazingly sticky, so I converse you | ASA | |||
why doesn't Hector expect amazingly | ASA |