On Dec 27, 6:16*pm, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:00:29 -0500, Boater wrote:

Tim wrote:
On Dec 27, 1:40 pm, Boater wrote:
Brian wrote:
On Dec 27, 12:01 pm, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:21:33 -0500, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:28:10 -0500, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:59:07 -0800 (PST), wrote:
http://enormusjugs.blogspot.com/-HotBabes Full length videos
streaming video, pics, wallpapers and more.
More of your crossposting friends, Harry?
--
John
Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
More likely one of Loogy's.
You seem to have a real issue with crossposters.
I appreciate decent manners. You don't.
--
** Good Day! **
* * John H
Liar. If you appreciated good manners, you'd demonstrate them.
I am. When was the last time I called you a name, or crossposted to get
support from other groups?
--
** Good Day! **
* * John H
Crossposting really annoys you... * *:)
Well, i said I wouldn't bring Christian and various other religious
newsgroups in here, but now that you've said:
"Crossposting really annoys you... * *:)"
I might keep that as an option.
?;^ )
It matters not to me.
Harry, It's just a guess on my part, but if I got a lot of *Christians
to post in here about nothing but religion, I really doubt if you'd
like it.

And again, I'm not sure, but I would imagine you would jump all over
and belittle everyone who posted about Christianity or any other
religion.

Just what I'm thinking, but not sure.

You'd be wrong. This isn't a boating newsgroup. Hell, Herring has done
his best to turn it unto a pseudo-Christian non-boating newsgroup.
Perhaps we could discuss pedophila among the Christian clergy,

Nothing sick about that, right Harry! Hell, Salty has the same kind of
thoughts. Maybe there's something going around?

Note, there was nothing ill-mannered in this post.
--
** Good Day! **

* * John H

There's nothing sick about discussing the pedophila problem plaguing
christian clergy. What is sick is either pretending it doesn't exist or
engaging in it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Sick is pretending the facts are not what they are.. Numbers show no
more problem in clergy than any other portion of the population...
Sick is bein so intolerant that you will run with anything you hear
and never have any reguard for the facts, just to hurt someones
feelings or dismiss your own shortcomings...

wrote:
On Dec 27, 6:16 pm, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:00:29 -0500, Boater wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Dec 27, 1:40 pm, Boater wrote:
Brian wrote:
On Dec 27, 12:01 pm, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:21:33 -0500, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:28:10 -0500, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:59:07 -0800 (PST), wrote:
http://enormusjugs.blogspot.com/-HotBabes Full length videos
streaming video, pics, wallpapers and more.
More of your crossposting friends, Harry?
--
John
Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
More likely one of Loogy's.
You seem to have a real issue with crossposters.
I appreciate decent manners. You don't.
--
** Good Day! **
John H
Liar. If you appreciated good manners, you'd demonstrate them.
I am. When was the last time I called you a name, or crossposted to get
support from other groups?
--
** Good Day! **
John H
Crossposting really annoys you... :)
Well, i said I wouldn't bring Christian and various other religious
newsgroups in here, but now that you've said:
"Crossposting really annoys you... :)"
I might keep that as an option.
?;^ )
It matters not to me.
Harry, It's just a guess on my part, but if I got a lot of Christians
to post in here about nothing but religion, I really doubt if you'd
like it.
And again, I'm not sure, but I would imagine you would jump all over
and belittle everyone who posted about Christianity or any other
religion.
Just what I'm thinking, but not sure.
You'd be wrong. This isn't a boating newsgroup. Hell, Herring has done
his best to turn it unto a pseudo-Christian non-boating newsgroup.
Perhaps we could discuss pedophila among the Christian clergy,
Nothing sick about that, right Harry! Hell, Salty has the same kind of
thoughts. Maybe there's something going around?
Note, there was nothing ill-mannered in this post.
--
** Good Day! **
John H
There's nothing sick about discussing the pedophila problem plaguing
christian clergy. What is sick is either pretending it doesn't exist or
engaging in it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Sick is pretending the facts are not what they are.. Numbers show no
more problem in clergy than any other portion of the population...
Sick is bein so intolerant that you will run with anything you hear
and never have any reguard for the facts, just to hurt someones
feelings or dismiss your own shortcomings...


If there is one thing you can count upon regarding right-wing
"Christians in Name Only" (CINO), it is their unfailing desire to excuse
the horrific behavior of other CINOs.

Let me try to put this into terms even an amoeba might understand:
clergy are in the position of very high trust among the religious, and
when they misbehave sexually with minors, it is quite a bit more of a
problem than it would be with members of the general public behaving
that way, no matter what the "numbers" show.

Of course, in your peculiar set of beliefs, no matter what sins are
committed, so long as you believe Jesus is your saviour, all is
forgiven, right?

That must make it really easy to be your sort of Christian, eh?
That must be how Dick Cheney and the rest of the Bush thugs will get
into heaven. :)

On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:13:57 -0500, Boater wrote:

wrote:
On Dec 27, 6:16 pm, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:00:29 -0500, Boater wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Dec 27, 1:40 pm, Boater wrote:
Brian wrote:
On Dec 27, 12:01 pm, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:21:33 -0500, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:28:10 -0500, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:59:07 -0800 (PST), wrote:
http://enormusjugs.blogspot.com/-HotBabes Full length videos
streaming video, pics, wallpapers and more.
More of your crossposting friends, Harry?
--
John
Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
More likely one of Loogy's.
You seem to have a real issue with crossposters.
I appreciate decent manners. You don't.
--
** Good Day! **
John H
Liar. If you appreciated good manners, you'd demonstrate them.
I am. When was the last time I called you a name, or crossposted to get
support from other groups?
--
** Good Day! **
John H
Crossposting really annoys you... :)
Well, i said I wouldn't bring Christian and various other religious
newsgroups in here, but now that you've said:
"Crossposting really annoys you... :)"
I might keep that as an option.
?;^ )
It matters not to me.
Harry, It's just a guess on my part, but if I got a lot of Christians
to post in here about nothing but religion, I really doubt if you'd
like it.
And again, I'm not sure, but I would imagine you would jump all over
and belittle everyone who posted about Christianity or any other
religion.
Just what I'm thinking, but not sure.
You'd be wrong. This isn't a boating newsgroup. Hell, Herring has done
his best to turn it unto a pseudo-Christian non-boating newsgroup.
Perhaps we could discuss pedophila among the Christian clergy,
Nothing sick about that, right Harry! Hell, Salty has the same kind of
thoughts. Maybe there's something going around?
Note, there was nothing ill-mannered in this post.
--
** Good Day! **
John H
There's nothing sick about discussing the pedophila problem plaguing
christian clergy. What is sick is either pretending it doesn't exist or
engaging in it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Sick is pretending the facts are not what they are.. Numbers show no
more problem in clergy than any other portion of the population...
Sick is bein so intolerant that you will run with anything you hear
and never have any reguard for the facts, just to hurt someones
feelings or dismiss your own shortcomings...


If there is one thing you can count upon regarding right-wing
"Christians in Name Only" (CINO), it is their unfailing desire to excuse
the horrific behavior of other CINOs.

Let me try to put this into terms even an amoeba might understand:
clergy are in the position of very high trust among the religious, and
when they misbehave sexually with minors, it is quite a bit more of a
problem than it would be with members of the general public behaving
that way, no matter what the "numbers" show.

Of course, in your peculiar set of beliefs, no matter what sins are
committed, so long as you believe Jesus is your saviour, all is
forgiven, right?

That must make it really easy to be your sort of Christian, eh?
That must be how Dick Cheney and the rest of the Bush thugs will get
into heaven. :)

Harry, trust me. Someone, somewhere, cares about your opinion.

Note, nothing said herein was ill-mannered.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

John H wrote:


That must make it really easy to be your sort of Christian, eh?
That must be how Dick Cheney and the rest of the Bush thugs will get
into heaven. :)

Harry, trust me. Someone, somewhere, cares about your opinion.

Note, nothing said herein was ill-mannered.
--
** Good Day! **

John H


You must...you follow me around here like Pavlov's dog.

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:13:57 -0500, Boater wrote:

wrote:
On Dec 27, 6:16 pm, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:00:29 -0500, Boater
wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Dec 27, 1:40 pm, Boater wrote:
Brian wrote:
On Dec 27, 12:01 pm, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:21:33 -0500, Boater
wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:28:10 -0500, Boater
wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:59:07 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
http://enormusjugs.blogspot.com/-HotBabes Full length
videos
streaming video, pics, wallpapers and more.
More of your crossposting friends, Harry?
--
John
Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
More likely one of Loogy's.
You seem to have a real issue with crossposters.
I appreciate decent manners. You don't.
--
** Good Day! **
John H
Liar. If you appreciated good manners, you'd demonstrate them.
I am. When was the last time I called you a name, or crossposted
to get
support from other groups?
--
** Good Day! **
John H
Crossposting really annoys you... :)
Well, i said I wouldn't bring Christian and various other
religious
newsgroups in here, but now that you've said:
"Crossposting really annoys you... :)"
I might keep that as an option.
?;^ )
It matters not to me.
Harry, It's just a guess on my part, but if I got a lot of
Christians
to post in here about nothing but religion, I really doubt if you'd
like it.
And again, I'm not sure, but I would imagine you would jump all over
and belittle everyone who posted about Christianity or any other
religion.
Just what I'm thinking, but not sure.
You'd be wrong. This isn't a boating newsgroup. Hell, Herring has
done
his best to turn it unto a pseudo-Christian non-boating newsgroup.
Perhaps we could discuss pedophila among the Christian clergy,
Nothing sick about that, right Harry! Hell, Salty has the same kind of
thoughts. Maybe there's something going around?
Note, there was nothing ill-mannered in this post.
--
** Good Day! **
John H
There's nothing sick about discussing the pedophila problem plaguing
christian clergy. What is sick is either pretending it doesn't exist or
engaging in it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Sick is pretending the facts are not what they are.. Numbers show no
more problem in clergy than any other portion of the population...
Sick is bein so intolerant that you will run with anything you hear
and never have any reguard for the facts, just to hurt someones
feelings or dismiss your own shortcomings...


If there is one thing you can count upon regarding right-wing
"Christians in Name Only" (CINO), it is their unfailing desire to excuse
the horrific behavior of other CINOs.

Let me try to put this into terms even an amoeba might understand:
clergy are in the position of very high trust among the religious, and
when they misbehave sexually with minors, it is quite a bit more of a
problem than it would be with members of the general public behaving
that way, no matter what the "numbers" show.

Of course, in your peculiar set of beliefs, no matter what sins are
committed, so long as you believe Jesus is your saviour, all is
forgiven, right?

That must make it really easy to be your sort of Christian, eh?
That must be how Dick Cheney and the rest of the Bush thugs will get
into heaven. :)

Harry, trust me. Someone, somewhere, cares about your opinion.

Note, nothing said herein was ill-mannered.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Jezzum pete John, why do you even respond to the moron... grow a set, and
don't let him bother you. You're doing EXACTLY what he wants. If EVERYONE
ignores him, he will eventually go away. Since we know he's a slow (or non)
learner, it might take a few years, but it WILL work. Trust me, I've seen it
before.

This harry sandbox is out of friggin-control! He owns this group and you all
let him! That's exactly what he wants.

--Mike

On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:54:57 -0800, "Mike" wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:13:57 -0500, Boater wrote:

wrote:
On Dec 27, 6:16 pm, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:00:29 -0500, Boater
wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Dec 27, 1:40 pm, Boater wrote:
Brian wrote:
On Dec 27, 12:01 pm, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:21:33 -0500, Boater
wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:28:10 -0500, Boater
wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:59:07 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
http://enormusjugs.blogspot.com/-HotBabes Full length
videos
streaming video, pics, wallpapers and more.
More of your crossposting friends, Harry?
--
John
Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
More likely one of Loogy's.
You seem to have a real issue with crossposters.
I appreciate decent manners. You don't.
--
** Good Day! **
John H
Liar. If you appreciated good manners, you'd demonstrate them.
I am. When was the last time I called you a name, or crossposted
to get
support from other groups?
--
** Good Day! **
John H
Crossposting really annoys you... :)
Well, i said I wouldn't bring Christian and various other
religious
newsgroups in here, but now that you've said:
"Crossposting really annoys you... :)"
I might keep that as an option.
?;^ )
It matters not to me.
Harry, It's just a guess on my part, but if I got a lot of
Christians
to post in here about nothing but religion, I really doubt if you'd
like it.
And again, I'm not sure, but I would imagine you would jump all over
and belittle everyone who posted about Christianity or any other
religion.
Just what I'm thinking, but not sure.
You'd be wrong. This isn't a boating newsgroup. Hell, Herring has
done
his best to turn it unto a pseudo-Christian non-boating newsgroup.
Perhaps we could discuss pedophila among the Christian clergy,
Nothing sick about that, right Harry! Hell, Salty has the same kind of
thoughts. Maybe there's something going around?
Note, there was nothing ill-mannered in this post.
--
** Good Day! **
John H
There's nothing sick about discussing the pedophila problem plaguing
christian clergy. What is sick is either pretending it doesn't exist or
engaging in it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Sick is pretending the facts are not what they are.. Numbers show no
more problem in clergy than any other portion of the population...
Sick is bein so intolerant that you will run with anything you hear
and never have any reguard for the facts, just to hurt someones
feelings or dismiss your own shortcomings...


If there is one thing you can count upon regarding right-wing
"Christians in Name Only" (CINO), it is their unfailing desire to excuse
the horrific behavior of other CINOs.

Let me try to put this into terms even an amoeba might understand:
clergy are in the position of very high trust among the religious, and
when they misbehave sexually with minors, it is quite a bit more of a
problem than it would be with members of the general public behaving
that way, no matter what the "numbers" show.

Of course, in your peculiar set of beliefs, no matter what sins are
committed, so long as you believe Jesus is your saviour, all is
forgiven, right?

That must make it really easy to be your sort of Christian, eh?
That must be how Dick Cheney and the rest of the Bush thugs will get
into heaven. :)

Harry, trust me. Someone, somewhere, cares about your opinion.

Note, nothing said herein was ill-mannered.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Jezzum pete John, why do you even respond to the moron... grow a set, and
don't let him bother you. You're doing EXACTLY what he wants. If EVERYONE
ignores him, he will eventually go away. Since we know he's a slow (or non)
learner, it might take a few years, but it WILL work. Trust me, I've seen it
before.

This harry sandbox is out of friggin-control! He owns this group and you all
let him! That's exactly what he wants.

--Mike



Harry doesn't own squat. You see a lot of people playing Harry like a banjo
because it's fun.

But, you're right in that WE are doing what he wants. He needs the
attention, and will say anything to get it, even to the point of accusing
me of killing women and children, or underhandedly slamming another with
his 'pedophilia among the Christian clergy' comment.

A few months ago, many of us were ignoring the poor guy. In order to drum
up some business, Harry began his cross-posting to other groups. Then this
place became full of a bunch of folks just like him. Surely you remember
that?

Perhaps a New Year's Resolution to ignore Harry is in order. Drum up some
business, and I'll sign on with everyone else.
chuckles. (...double deep secret indeed!)


--
** Good Day! **

John H

On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 07:05:08 -0500, John H wrote:

On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:54:57 -0800, "Mike" wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:13:57 -0500, Boater wrote:

wrote:
On Dec 27, 6:16 pm, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:00:29 -0500, Boater
wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Dec 27, 1:40 pm, Boater wrote:
Brian wrote:
On Dec 27, 12:01 pm, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:21:33 -0500, Boater
wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:28:10 -0500, Boater
wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:59:07 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
http://enormusjugs.blogspot.com/-HotBabes Full length
videos
streaming video, pics, wallpapers and more.
More of your crossposting friends, Harry?
--
John
Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
More likely one of Loogy's.
You seem to have a real issue with crossposters.
I appreciate decent manners. You don't.
--
** Good Day! **
John H
Liar. If you appreciated good manners, you'd demonstrate them.
I am. When was the last time I called you a name, or crossposted
to get
support from other groups?
--
** Good Day! **
John H
Crossposting really annoys you... :)
Well, i said I wouldn't bring Christian and various other
religious
newsgroups in here, but now that you've said:
"Crossposting really annoys you... :)"
I might keep that as an option.
?;^ )
It matters not to me.
Harry, It's just a guess on my part, but if I got a lot of
Christians
to post in here about nothing but religion, I really doubt if you'd
like it.
And again, I'm not sure, but I would imagine you would jump all over
and belittle everyone who posted about Christianity or any other
religion.
Just what I'm thinking, but not sure.
You'd be wrong. This isn't a boating newsgroup. Hell, Herring has
done
his best to turn it unto a pseudo-Christian non-boating newsgroup.
Perhaps we could discuss pedophila among the Christian clergy,
Nothing sick about that, right Harry! Hell, Salty has the same kind of
thoughts. Maybe there's something going around?
Note, there was nothing ill-mannered in this post.
--
** Good Day! **
John H
There's nothing sick about discussing the pedophila problem plaguing
christian clergy. What is sick is either pretending it doesn't exist or
engaging in it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Sick is pretending the facts are not what they are.. Numbers show no
more problem in clergy than any other portion of the population...
Sick is bein so intolerant that you will run with anything you hear
and never have any reguard for the facts, just to hurt someones
feelings or dismiss your own shortcomings...


If there is one thing you can count upon regarding right-wing
"Christians in Name Only" (CINO), it is their unfailing desire to excuse
the horrific behavior of other CINOs.

Let me try to put this into terms even an amoeba might understand:
clergy are in the position of very high trust among the religious, and
when they misbehave sexually with minors, it is quite a bit more of a
problem than it would be with members of the general public behaving
that way, no matter what the "numbers" show.

Of course, in your peculiar set of beliefs, no matter what sins are
committed, so long as you believe Jesus is your saviour, all is
forgiven, right?

That must make it really easy to be your sort of Christian, eh?
That must be how Dick Cheney and the rest of the Bush thugs will get
into heaven. :)

Harry, trust me. Someone, somewhere, cares about your opinion.

Note, nothing said herein was ill-mannered.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Jezzum pete John, why do you even respond to the moron... grow a set, and
don't let him bother you. You're doing EXACTLY what he wants. If EVERYONE
ignores him, he will eventually go away. Since we know he's a slow (or non)
learner, it might take a few years, but it WILL work. Trust me, I've seen it
before.

This harry sandbox is out of friggin-control! He owns this group and you all
let him! That's exactly what he wants.

--Mike



Harry doesn't own squat. You see a lot of people playing Harry like a banjo
because it's fun.

But, you're right in that WE are doing what he wants. He needs the
attention, and will say anything to get it, even to the point of accusing
me of killing women and children, or underhandedly slamming another with
his 'pedophilia among the Christian clergy' comment.

A few months ago, many of us were ignoring the poor guy. In order to drum
up some business, Harry began his cross-posting to other groups. Then this
place became full of a bunch of folks just like him. Surely you remember
that?

Perhaps a New Year's Resolution to ignore Harry is in order. Drum up some
business, and I'll sign on with everyone else.
chuckles. (...double deep secret indeed!)

Besides, Mike, wasn't that you who was so thrilled that you'd 'made the
cut'? Hell, why should you get all the fun? :)
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Besides, Mike, wasn't that you who was so thrilled that you'd 'made the
cut'? Hell, why should you get all the fun? :)

OK, I'll give you that one. ;-) The reverse is true as well, if *everyone*
made the cut, he'd have no one to respond to.

Happy New Year!

--Mike

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 07:05:08 -0500, John H wrote:

On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:54:57 -0800, "Mike" wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:13:57 -0500, Boater
wrote:

wrote:
On Dec 27, 6:16 pm, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:00:29 -0500, Boater
wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Dec 27, 1:40 pm, Boater wrote:
Brian wrote:
On Dec 27, 12:01 pm, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:21:33 -0500, Boater
wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:28:10 -0500, Boater
wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:59:07 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
http://enormusjugs.blogspot.com/-HotBabes Full length
videos
streaming video, pics, wallpapers and more.
More of your crossposting friends, Harry?
--
John
Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
More likely one of Loogy's.
You seem to have a real issue with crossposters.
I appreciate decent manners. You don't.
--
** Good Day! **
John H
Liar. If you appreciated good manners, you'd demonstrate
them.
I am. When was the last time I called you a name, or
crossposted
to get
support from other groups?
--
** Good Day! **
John H
Crossposting really annoys you... :)
Well, i said I wouldn't bring Christian and various other
religious
newsgroups in here, but now that you've said:
"Crossposting really annoys you... :)"
I might keep that as an option.
?;^ )
It matters not to me.
Harry, It's just a guess on my part, but if I got a lot of
Christians
to post in here about nothing but religion, I really doubt if
you'd
like it.
And again, I'm not sure, but I would imagine you would jump all
over
and belittle everyone who posted about Christianity or any other
religion.
Just what I'm thinking, but not sure.
You'd be wrong. This isn't a boating newsgroup. Hell, Herring has
done
his best to turn it unto a pseudo-Christian non-boating newsgroup.
Perhaps we could discuss pedophila among the Christian clergy,
Nothing sick about that, right Harry! Hell, Salty has the same kind
of
thoughts. Maybe there's something going around?
Note, there was nothing ill-mannered in this post.
--
** Good Day! **
John H
There's nothing sick about discussing the pedophila problem plaguing
christian clergy. What is sick is either pretending it doesn't exist
or
engaging in it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Sick is pretending the facts are not what they are.. Numbers show no
more problem in clergy than any other portion of the population...
Sick is bein so intolerant that you will run with anything you hear
and never have any reguard for the facts, just to hurt someones
feelings or dismiss your own shortcomings...


If there is one thing you can count upon regarding right-wing
"Christians in Name Only" (CINO), it is their unfailing desire to
excuse
the horrific behavior of other CINOs.

Let me try to put this into terms even an amoeba might understand:
clergy are in the position of very high trust among the religious, and
when they misbehave sexually with minors, it is quite a bit more of a
problem than it would be with members of the general public behaving
that way, no matter what the "numbers" show.

Of course, in your peculiar set of beliefs, no matter what sins are
committed, so long as you believe Jesus is your saviour, all is
forgiven, right?

That must make it really easy to be your sort of Christian, eh?
That must be how Dick Cheney and the rest of the Bush thugs will get
into heaven. :)

Harry, trust me. Someone, somewhere, cares about your opinion.

Note, nothing said herein was ill-mannered.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Jezzum pete John, why do you even respond to the moron... grow a set, and
don't let him bother you. You're doing EXACTLY what he wants. If EVERYONE
ignores him, he will eventually go away. Since we know he's a slow (or
non)
learner, it might take a few years, but it WILL work. Trust me, I've seen
it
before.

This harry sandbox is out of friggin-control! He owns this group and you
all
let him! That's exactly what he wants.

--Mike



Harry doesn't own squat. You see a lot of people playing Harry like a
banjo
because it's fun.

But, you're right in that WE are doing what he wants. He needs the
attention, and will say anything to get it, even to the point of accusing
me of killing women and children, or underhandedly slamming another with
his 'pedophilia among the Christian clergy' comment.

A few months ago, many of us were ignoring the poor guy. In order to drum
up some business, Harry began his cross-posting to other groups. Then this
place became full of a bunch of folks just like him. Surely you remember
that?

Perhaps a New Year's Resolution to ignore Harry is in order. Drum up some
business, and I'll sign on with everyone else.
chuckles. (...double deep secret indeed!)

Besides, Mike, wasn't that you who was so thrilled that you'd 'made the
cut'? Hell, why should you get all the fun? :)
--
** Good Day! **

John H

On Dec 27, 5:43*pm, wrote:
On Dec 27, 6:16*pm, Boater wrote:



John H wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:00:29 -0500, Boater wrote:

Tim wrote:
On Dec 27, 1:40 pm, Boater wrote:
Brian wrote:
On Dec 27, 12:01 pm, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:21:33 -0500, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:28:10 -0500, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:59:07 -0800 (PST), wrote:
http://enormusjugs.blogspot.com/-HotBabesFull length videos
streaming video, pics, wallpapers and more.
More of your crossposting friends, Harry?
--
John
Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
More likely one of Loogy's.
You seem to have a real issue with crossposters.
I appreciate decent manners. You don't.
--
** Good Day! **
* * John H
Liar. If you appreciated good manners, you'd demonstrate them.
I am. When was the last time I called you a name, or crossposted to get
support from other groups?
--
** Good Day! **
* * John H
Crossposting really annoys you... * *:)
Well, i said I wouldn't bring Christian and various other religious
newsgroups in here, but now that you've said:
"Crossposting really annoys you... * *:)"
I might keep that as an option.
?;^ )
It matters not to me.
Harry, It's just a guess on my part, but if I got a lot of *Christians
to post in here about nothing but religion, I really doubt if you'd
like it.

And again, I'm not sure, but I would imagine you would jump all over
and belittle everyone who posted about Christianity or any other
religion.

Just what I'm thinking, but not sure.

You'd be wrong. This isn't a boating newsgroup. Hell, Herring has done
his best to turn it unto a pseudo-Christian non-boating newsgroup.
Perhaps we could discuss pedophila among the Christian clergy,

Nothing sick about that, right Harry! Hell, Salty has the same kind of
thoughts. Maybe there's something going around?

Note, there was nothing ill-mannered in this post.
--
** Good Day! **

* * John H

There's nothing sick about discussing the pedophila problem plaguing
christian clergy. What is sick is either pretending it doesn't exist or
engaging in it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

....
Sick is bein so intolerant that you will run with anything you hear
and never have any reguard for the facts, just to hurt someones
feelings or dismiss your own shortcomings...

You mean, like this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7FaS...eature=related

Tim wrote:
On Dec 27, 5:43 pm, wrote:
On Dec 27, 6:16 pm, Boater wrote:



John H wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:00:29 -0500, Boater wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Dec 27, 1:40 pm, Boater wrote:
Brian wrote:
On Dec 27, 12:01 pm, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:21:33 -0500, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:28:10 -0500, Boater wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:59:07 -0800 (PST), wrote:
http://enormusjugs.blogspot.com/-HotBabesFull length videos
streaming video, pics, wallpapers and more.
More of your crossposting friends, Harry?
--
John
Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
More likely one of Loogy's.
You seem to have a real issue with crossposters.
I appreciate decent manners. You don't.
--
** Good Day! **
John H
Liar. If you appreciated good manners, you'd demonstrate them.
I am. When was the last time I called you a name, or crossposted to get
support from other groups?
--
** Good Day! **
John H
Crossposting really annoys you... :)
Well, i said I wouldn't bring Christian and various other religious
newsgroups in here, but now that you've said:
"Crossposting really annoys you... :)"
I might keep that as an option.
?;^ )
It matters not to me.
Harry, It's just a guess on my part, but if I got a lot of Christians
to post in here about nothing but religion, I really doubt if you'd
like it.
And again, I'm not sure, but I would imagine you would jump all over
and belittle everyone who posted about Christianity or any other
religion.
Just what I'm thinking, but not sure.
You'd be wrong. This isn't a boating newsgroup. Hell, Herring has done
his best to turn it unto a pseudo-Christian non-boating newsgroup.
Perhaps we could discuss pedophila among the Christian clergy,
Nothing sick about that, right Harry! Hell, Salty has the same kind of
thoughts. Maybe there's something going around?
Note, there was nothing ill-mannered in this post.
--
** Good Day! **
John H
There's nothing sick about discussing the pedophila problem plaguing
christian clergy. What is sick is either pretending it doesn't exist or
engaging in it.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
...
Sick is bein so intolerant that you will run with anything you hear
and never have any reguard for the facts, just to hurt someones
feelings or dismiss your own shortcomings...

You mean, like this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7FaS...eature=related


And that has what, precisely, to do with pedophilia among the clergy?

Time ranks SBC rejection of sex-offender database as 'under-reported'
story Print
By Bob Allen
Wednesday, 17 December 2008

NEW YORK (ABP) -- Time Magazine ranked the Southern Baptist Convention's
refusal to establish a database of clergy sex offenders one of the most
under-reported news stories in 2008.

A ranking of under-reported stories in Time's "Top 10 Everything of
2008" special feature placed the story at No. 6, behind a mix-up that
accidentally sent U.S. nuclear-warhead fuses to Taiwan, the Congolese
civil war, violence in Sri Lanka, and new guidelines for insurance
coverage for mental health and regulation of food from animals that are
genetically altered.

****"Facing calls to curb child sex abuse within its churches, in June
the Southern Baptist Convention -- the largest U.S. religious body after
the Catholic Church -- urged local hiring committees to conduct federal
background checks but rejected a proposal to create a central database
of staff and clergy who have been either convicted of or indicted on
charges of molesting minors," the magazine noted.****

"The SBC decided against such a database in part because its principle
of local autonomy means it cannot compel individual churches to report
any information. And while the headlines regarding churches and
pedophilia remain largely focused on Catholic parishes, the lack of
hierarchical structure and systematized record-keeping in most
Protestant churches makes it harder not only for church leaders to
impose standards, but for interested parties to track allegations of abuse."

Christa Brown, Baptist outreach leader for the Survivors Network of
those Abused by Priests, agreed the story was under-reported.

"It's such an extremely important story," she said. "The largest
Protestant denomination in the land -- a denomination that claims 16.2
million members -- refused to even attempt to implement the sorts of
proactive measures for routing out predators that other major faith
groups have."

Brown, a survivor of clergy sex abuse, worked two years to draw
attention to the problem of unreported sexual abuse in Southern Baptist
churches before seeing denominational leaders recommend against her
suggestion of a national database.

Last month Brown and SNAP National Director David Clohessy wrote SBC
President Johnny Hunt asking for a meeting about establishing a system
to report abusive clergy.

"As president of the Southern Baptist Convention, you now have the
opportunity to show genuine leadership on the issue of clergy sex abuse
and cover-ups," the letter said. "This may be one of the greatest
leadership challenges in the history of Southern Baptists."

The SNAP leaders said Southern Baptists' local-church autonomy makes it
all-the-more imperative that congregations have enough information to
make responsible decisions about whom they call as ministers.

"The only way people in the pews will find out about clergy child
molesters is if victims feel safe in reporting them," they said. "And
victims are never going to feel safe if they have to report abuse by
going to the church of the accused minister."

"Telling clergy victims to 'go to the church' is like telling them to go
to the den of the wolf who savaged them," the letter said. "It is cruel
to the victim and unproductive toward the end of protecting others."

-30-


Nah...pedophilia among the clergy is just an isolated problem...